• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Random Political Thoughts

Started by MV/Liberace!, February 08, 2012, 10:50:42 AM

Kidnostad3





albrecht

Quote from: GravitySucks on August 30, 2016, 06:09:38 PM
Hmmmm what could possibly go wrong.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592
Everything, literally, needs to be the formerly proverbial 'federal case.' Now they want to seize control of our elections? Gee I wonder how those will go? The ability of some government bureaucrat or political appointee will be able to determine who is the next President but even down to our sheriff or city offices?

And now the media is foreshadowing this type of event:
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-30/candidate-death-could-delay-or-eliminate-presidential-election




albrecht

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/08/28/83-year-old-georgia-woman-dies-after-being-beaten-set-on-fire/
This is why one should not hire Obama's BLM types even for odd job around the house. Finding some humor in an all too frequent type of crime one of the names of the 'youth' is a new one for me: Shanquavious Keontrell Cameron, Shanquavious Koentrell? Maybe this, in part, explains why instead of being in school or getting a job he tortures and kill elderly white women as a source of income? I'm sure Obama's DOJ is investigating it as a 'hate crime' and already pursuing Federal charges. Interesting, in keeping with policy, no mention is made of the race of the victim (and elderly white woman) or the perpetrators (but some news included mugshots and names like Shanqyavious are a clue.)

=Schlyder=

Quote from: GravitySucks on August 30, 2016, 06:09:38 PM
Hmmmm what could possibly go wrong.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592

You know they are all shitting their pants about Trump winning. LOL
  And Obama looks like a fool again.  "What is that?" when referring to voter fraud... but now HS is going to step in? LOL 


albrecht

The Marine discharged for sending classified emails over an unsecure server, sound familiar, but some key differences:
1) he was the one who informed his superiors that he sent the email in an unsecure manner (didn't wipe drives or 'lose emails' etc)
2) he was not trying to solicit funds in some pay-to-play bribe scheme or just to make money
3) he was not trying to undermine another candidate in his own party
4) he was trying to stop child rape (Hillary infamously laughs about getting a child rapist off)
5) the military and government big wigs had made the determination that we don't want to 'draw attention' to the problem of sex slavery and pedophilia by Islamists in Afghanistan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/09/01/navy-analysis-found-that-a-marines-case-would-draw-attention-to-afghan-sex-slaves/

ItsOver

Quote from: albrecht on September 01, 2016, 10:32:35 AM
The Marine discharged for sending classified emails over an unsecure server, sound familiar, but some key differences:
1) he was the one who informed his superiors that he sent the email in an unsecure manner (didn't wipe drives or 'lose emails' etc)
2) he was not trying to solicit funds in some pay-to-play bribe scheme or just to make money
3) he was not trying to undermine another candidate in his own party
4) he was trying to stop child rape (Hillary infamously laughs about getting a child rapist off)
5) the military and government big wigs had made the determination that we don't want to 'draw attention' to the problem of sex slavery and pedophilia by Islamists in Afghanistan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/09/01/navy-analysis-found-that-a-marines-case-would-draw-attention-to-afghan-sex-slaves/
It really is disillusioning to see the blatant inequality of justice in this country.  I won't dispute Trump has issues but just focusing on Hillary Clinton, in her role in the Federal government as The Secretary of State, it's difficult for me to accept she hasn't violated numerous Federal laws and regulations.  Refusing required Federal government ethics training, committing numerous conflict-of-interest violations, disregarding government IT security restrictions, lying to Congress, all pointing to a "I'm above the law" attitude, and, at least to this point, getting away with it.  Then when you see an ordinary American commit one small fraction of something similar getting punished, it truly is disillusioning.

TigerLily


US Court Upholds Ban on Gun Sales to Marijuana Card Holders

... The court also said Congress had reasonably concluded that marijuana and other drug use "raises the risk of irrational or unpredictable behavior with which gun use should not be associated." ...
"We live in a world where having a medical marijuana card is enough to say you don't get a gun, but if you're on the no fly list your constitutional right is still protected," he said.
-AP

And an alcoholic with a gun is perfectly ok. Twisted. Laid back drunks and mean stoners?

Jackstar

Quote from: TigerLily on September 01, 2016, 12:54:18 PM
And an alcoholic with a gun is perfectly ok. Twisted. Laid back drunks and mean stoners?

Drunks are easily surrounded. Stoners win revolutions.




Robert

Quote from: albrecht on August 30, 2016, 07:21:56 PMEverything, literally, needs to be the formerly proverbial 'federal case.' Now they want to seize control of our elections? Gee I wonder how those will go? The ability of some government bureaucrat or political appointee will be able to determine who is the next President but even down to our sheriff or city offices?

And now the media is foreshadowing this type of event:
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-30/candidate-death-could-delay-or-eliminate-presidential-election
When the incipient primary election in New York City was aborted & postponed on 9/11/2001, that apparently did lead to the result changing in who eventually got elected mayor, and he got in for 3 terms.  But at least that was done pursuant to a very reasonable administration of a quite explicit NY law regarding emergencies.  Homeland Security treating an election as "vital infrastructure"?!  A postponement of the election because of a candidate's death?!!  It frequently happens that a candidate on the ballot has died by the time of the election, and has anybody tried to postpone an election ad hoc on that basis?  There are already procedures, people!  You don't get to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Jackstar

I don't find promises of election protection by the 'tards who rubber-stamped Scalia's death to be compelling.



albrecht

Alert "Power Players Jeopardy!"this week. Always fun to see how uneducated pundits and reporters are, its a repeat but still funny.




Quote from: pate on September 01, 2016, 09:45:33 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-TtVBzDgQE

Canoe ?

Piper and Ventura had the coolest energy together. They were both the arguably coolest characters from the 80s. They rarely interacted with each other but I always popped when they'd randomly wind up together for interview segments.

chefist

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 12, 2016, 11:48:22 AM
Piper and Ventura had the coolest energy together. They were both the arguably coolest characters from the 80s. They rarely interacted with each other but I always popped when they'd randomly wind up together for interview segments.

OMG...lolz..."...he should just keep changing his name, over and over again."

Philosopher

Quote from: Jackstar on September 06, 2016, 01:42:21 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3JeVOzcIn0

Is this legit?


It is nearly impossible NOT to have a head-on collision in Russia.  It is par for the course.


Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod