Started by GuerrillaUnReal, August 01, 2016, 02:49:39 PM
Quote from: theONE~EMPEROR on November 20, 2016, 03:25:43 AMand you are know pedhophiledon't fucking respond to my posts you ass kisser, ..don't try to get my approval or attention you pedo fucking creep
Quote from: Jackstar on November 10, 2016, 02:26:44 PMTHEON: You have until Friday to start posting updates from www.whatdoesitmean.com, or we will destroy you completely.
Quote from: Jackstar on December 01, 2016, 02:33:19 PMMEANWHILE
Quote from: Uncle Duke on December 05, 2016, 08:38:38 AMhttps://theaviationist.com/2016/12/05/russian-su-33-crashed-in-the-mediterranean-while-attempting-to-land-on-kuznetsov-aircraft-carrier/Naval Aviation for Amateurs, Part II.
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 05, 2016, 11:51:00 AMThey need to look at Eric Brown archive footage. Show em how its done. If he were still alive, he'd probably do it for them. Lol. Just because he could.
Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 09, 2016, 01:26:37 PMI'm coming a little late to the party with respect to this post but I need to say that no one should be surprised that the Russians are experiencing a seemingly high rate of losses through mishaps in the launching and recovery of aircraft onboard its aircraft carrier. For obvious reasons carrier flight operations are inherently more dangerous than land based flight operations. According to the U.S. Navy Safety Center statistics the average number of Class A Mishaps (damage resulting in costs of $2,000,000 or more and/or aircraft destroyed or a fatality or permanent total disability) has averaged 12 per year since the year 2001. The number of mishaps occurring during carrier flight operations and the number of fatalities is not specified but I know that at one time as it was thought that as rule of thumb at least 2-3 such mishaps would occur during a peacetime carrier deployment of six months. When you add to the equation the fact that the Russians are relatively inexperienced in carrier flight operations, the current rate of loss is nothing more than would be expected. I suspect, however, that only those incidents that are visible to outside observers are acknowledged and there are more that go unreported.
Quote from: Uncle Duke on December 09, 2016, 10:08:15 PMConcur. If you read the updated article below however, both a/c lost from the carrier in the Med were the result of arresting cable failures. Could as easily have been the result of poor quality control or metallurgical issues with the cable as deck crew incompetence. Meanwhile, the K-36 seats are getting a good operational test in an environment they were never designed or tested to perform.http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/179274/russian-carrier-loses-second-fighter-in-landing-accident.html
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 10, 2016, 03:44:08 PMYou probably know more on this, but after the near zero altitude ejection with the Russian fighter at an airshow, the K36 was considered for fitment in (I think) the F18. But further investigation showed it to be too heavy to be viable.
Quote from: brig on December 19, 2016, 08:45:39 AMIn a world of Globalization, one would think the Democrats would expect and welcome the influence of Foreign Governments opinions, based on what they know about us, in all our decisions, including our Elections. If the Democrats truly see us as a "Global Community", then wouldn't it be reasonable to expect "Global Participation" in everything we do? Maybe they feel that "Globalism" only applies to people who agree with them. Maybe the Democrats didn't realize, that in a global world, even those they disagree with, would have a strong voice as well. In a Global World, "Did Putin try to influence our election"? is an irrelevant question IMO.
Quote from: area51drone on December 19, 2016, 12:14:48 PMIt's time for Russia to fuck some shit up in Syria. Global Thermo Nuclear War anyone?
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 19, 2016, 09:04:27 AMYou do have foreign influence. It isn't just a right v left thing. The west has had it for decades. Centuries in some instances. The difference now is the USA has possibly had their political landscape gamed by another country, rather than the USA doing it to someone else. Karma?
Quote from: Dr. MD MD on December 19, 2016, 01:44:46 PMWE all know that the most insidious foreign influence we face has always been from Britain. It's why were in the shit we are right now but we should all really listen to you, pud. :
Quote from: Dr. MD MD on December 19, 2016, 02:06:37 PMThe Religion of Peace Strikes Again!
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 19, 2016, 02:13:35 PMWe? You speak for yourself, you self aggrandising little prick. You know diddly squat about anything. Go and play with your lego.
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 19, 2016, 02:15:45 PMGood you find it amusing. I'm sure his family will share your laughter.
Quote from: Dr. MD MD on December 19, 2016, 02:18:14 PMI find it ironic that despite evidence to the contrary simpering little tits like you will still defend this shit. :
Quote from: Yorkshire pud on December 19, 2016, 02:40:48 PMLink please where I defend it, prick.