• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Hillary Clinton

Started by albrecht, June 21, 2014, 10:05:45 AM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cnn-donna-brazile-jeff-zucker_us_58189c8de4b064e1b4b4ba02

CNN Chief Jeff Zucker Rips Donna Brazile's 'Disgusting' Dealings With Clinton Campaign


If what Donna Brazile did was"disgusting", then what about Hillary Clinton receiving the question in the first place and not saying anything?

theONE

Quote from: chefist on November 01, 2016, 10:31:42 AM
UH OH! Barack and Michelle have scrubbed their Twitters and stopped following Hillary!

https://twitter.com/VetCapitalist/status/793489458318364672

hahahaha, just few days ago Michelle Obama was squiring all over the stage supporting crocked Hillry telling how great that evil woman is .LOL

mikuthing01

Since Hillary is so big on gender equality i wonder if she will take a stand against gender segregation in our federal prison system. Now that her prospects of becoming President are dashed she should become the first woman in a mens federal prison. #GirlPower #Feminism


Quote from: chefist on November 01, 2016, 10:20:27 AM
It's an amazing article...everyone, left and right, should read it...

Here is another "nugget" from Podesta dumps...

https://twitter.com/Rambobiggs/status/793481242909913088

Hillary is definitely a good goyim.  Memba da 6 gorillian!

theONE

Quote from: theONE on November 01, 2016, 10:38:25 AM
One more "gem" project by Clintons in Haiti...

"The Clinton Blood Money Scandal Exposed. Haiti Earthquake Helped To Enrich"
22 minute video with shocking facts


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nelt1UC2eog

"Haitian Man Exposes The Clinton's And The Money That Was Stolen From Haiti!"
11 minutes quite recent video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5Losa1zoMY

the Haiti videos you better save it because they might also be removed from youtube same as the
"Factor 8 - Clinton's Arkansas tinted blood" documentary was removed.
Interesting that that documentary was on youtube for many years and after it was posted here on BellGab couple of times it was removed
from youtube.

I have a very strong suspicion that the paid shill working here for Hillry known as  136 or 142 also know as a Bitchy Poofta Canadian turd
spy working for Clinton that he was responsible for that documantary to be removed from youtube, he snitched about it...
136Bitchy Poofta is a snitch be careful guys ... 136 is a paid snitch that's why he is so viciously active in promoting and protecting that
croock Hillry and he so viciously attacking everyone who supports Trump here.

136-Bitchy Poofta is a paid Hillry's snitch on this board

mikuthing01

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on November 01, 2016, 11:32:31 AM
Hillary is definitely a good goyim.  Memba da 6 gorillian!

[laughs in German]


Gyoza Girl

Quote from: brig on November 01, 2016, 08:12:34 AM
I have to disagree here. The Clintons in Arkansas, are the roots of The Clinton Foundation. The Clintons keep "their people* with them whenever possible. The Clinton Foundation is the evolution of The Clintons in Arkansas IMhumbleO.

Hi there. My understanding is that Hillary was still an active partner in that Rose law firm. I'm not sure how directly as Arkansas' First Lady she would have been involved in the sale of blood from the state's prison system -- let alone with the full knowledge that it wasn't adequately being screened for hepatitis and HIV. I simply don't believe Hillary would take an active role in any such scheme, knowing it would spread life-threatening illnesses around the world!

I would put the blame more on Bill and his cronies whose companies he picked to manage the blood sale program.



Gyoza Girl

Quote from: albrecht on November 01, 2016, 10:25:44 AM
It still effects people today and to be so cavalier to the suffering victims and the families of those people that died as a result? No surprise you are voting for a Clinton with attitudes towards victims like that.

Why hasn't their rich Foundation stepped in and helped out the victim's of their and their crony's scheme to make money by selling infected prisoners' blood to the UK, Canada, Japan, etc? Why hasn't their Foundation paid some money into the NHS*, Canadian healthcare system, etc that has to bear much of the burden for their profiteering? In other words, "socialist" single-payer healthcare systems, the kind Billary claims to like, had to pay for the profits made by Clinton connected companies and prisons by selling infected blood to patients.

http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/bloody-awful/Content?oid=863387 Overview of the scandal

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-32041715 Penrose Inquiry

http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/04/arkansas-bloodsuckers-the-clintons-prisoners-and-the-blood-trade/ Overview

*Lord Robert Winston has dubbed as "the worst treatment disaster in the history of the National Health Service"

I know people who received the blood are suffering, but I don't think it's cavalier not to blame Hillary, who probably didn't have that much to do with it. If there's any proof to the contrary (actual evidence -- not innuendo, insinuation and guilt by association), I'll adjust my opinion.

I agree it was a terrible scandal. This may be why Vince Foster committed suicide. If the Clintons never donated any money to help the victims, that is disgraceful and hard to understand.

theONE

Quote from: Gyoza Girl on November 01, 2016, 12:02:41 PM
I know people who received the blood are suffering, but I don't think it's cavalier not to blame Hillary, who probably didn't have that much to do with it. If there's any proof to the contrary (actual evidence -- not innuendo, insinuation and guilt by association), I'll adjust my opinion.

I agree it was a terrible scandal. This may be why Vince Foster committed suicide. If the Clintons never donated any money to help the victims, that is disgraceful and hard to understand.

very good points GG - NOTHING that is of evil nature is hard to understand when comes to Clintons

136 or 142

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on November 01, 2016, 11:04:41 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cnn-donna-brazile-jeff-zucker_us_58189c8de4b064e1b4b4ba02

CNN Chief Jeff Zucker Rips Donna Brazile's 'Disgusting' Dealings With Clinton Campaign


If what Donna Brazile did was"disgusting", then what about Hillary Clinton receiving the question in the first place and not saying anything?

Could be a valid point.

Ronald Reagan did pretty much the same thing in 1980.

bateman

https://twitter.com/halleybordercol/status/793499159701647361

@POTUS and @FLOTUS accounts also appear to have unfollowed and are scrubbing anything Hillary-related.

chefist

Quote from: bateman on November 01, 2016, 12:32:12 PM

@POTUS and @FLOTUS accounts also appear to have unfollowed and are scrubbing anything Hillary-related.



https://twitter.com/calebqwash/status/793516672078544897




albrecht

Quote from: Gyoza Girl on November 01, 2016, 12:02:41 PM
I know people who received the blood are suffering, but I don't think it's cavalier not to blame Hillary, who probably didn't have that much to do with it. If there's any proof to the contrary (actual evidence -- not innuendo, insinuation and guilt by association), I'll adjust my opinion.

I agree it was a terrible scandal. This may be why Vince Foster committed suicide. If the Clintons never donated any money to help the victims, that is disgraceful and hard to understand.
I'm just saying at some point where there is smoke there might be fire and you can judge a person but what company they keep. So many crooks, scandals, rape allegations, lies (to Congress, to each other, to the people,to reporters) extra-marital affairs, convicted pedofiles (and maybe soon to be another one,) convicted "bundlers," illegal email servers, questionable Foundation(s), corrupt land deals, mysterious gains in future markets, suicides, etc. (I'm sure I forgot some things.)

Quote from: albrecht on November 01, 2016, 12:52:32 PM
I'm just saying at some point where there is smoke there might be fire and you can judge a person but what company they keep. So many crooks, scandals, rape allegations, lies (to Congress, to each other, to the people,to reporters) extra-marital affairs, convicted pedofiles (and maybe soon to be another one,) convicted "bundlers," illegal email servers, questionable Foundation(s), corrupt land deals, mysterious gains in future markets, suicides, etc. (I'm sure I forgot some things.)

Exactly.  Why do so many scandals follow the Clintons?  Where there is smoke, there is probably a fire.

Gyoza Girl

Quote from: theONE on November 01, 2016, 12:06:56 PM
very good points GG - NOTHING that is of evil nature is hard to understand when comes to Clintons
Oh, I don't believe Hillary is evil. My feeling on Hillary is that the Right's animosity against her started even before she ever set foot in the White House as First Lady. Conservatives were scandalized that she kept her maiden name and continued to work as a lawyer while Bill was governor of Arkansas. Then, when she explained her choice to continue her legal practice by saying something like, "Well, I could have stayed home and baked cookies," the Republicans and other conservatives lost their minds!

Hillary didn't fit the mold of previous First Ladies; she didn't know "her place." She chose meatier projects such as health care reform, instead of traditional things like White House beautification and selecting new china for state dinners. She didn't want to select new china, she wanted to deal WITH China!

GravitySucks

Quote from: albrecht on November 01, 2016, 12:52:32 PM
I'm just saying at some point where there is smoke there might be fire and you can judge a person but what company they keep. So many crooks, scandals, rape allegations, lies (to Congress, to each other, to the people,to reporters) extra-marital affairs, convicted pedofiles (and maybe soon to be another one,) convicted "bundlers," illegal email servers, questionable Foundation(s), corrupt land deals, mysterious gains in future markets, suicides, etc. (I'm sure I forgot some things.)

Yep. What worrys me about the current FBI investigation is the ties the FBI assistant director has to Podesta. They were roomies in college and here is an email from Wikileaks.

The tangled web knows no bounds.

onan

Quote from: Gyoza Girl on November 01, 2016, 12:57:29 PM
Oh, I don't believe Hillary is evil. My feeling on Hillary is that the Right's animosity against her started even before she ever set foot in the White House as First Lady. Conservatives were scandalized that she kept her maiden name and continued to work as a lawyer while Bill was governor of Arkansas. Then, when she explained her choice to continue her legal practice by saying something like, "Well, I could have stayed home and baked cookies," the Republicans and other conservatives lost their minds!

Hillary didn't fit the mold of previous First Ladies; she didn't know "her place." She chose meatier projects such as health care reform, instead of traditional things like White House beautification and selecting new china for state dinners. She didn't want to select new china, she wanted to deal WITH China!


albrecht

Quote from: 21st Century Man on November 01, 2016, 12:54:29 PM
Exactly.  Why do so many scandals follow the Clintons/  Where there is smoke, there is probably a fire.
Don't get me wrong I'm not convicting anyone simply by 'guilt by association.' Indeed it is likely hard to live 'inside the beltway' or be involved with Arkansas and than national and New York politics for decades and not meet, or maybe be friends with, some unsavory characters. But the length and breadth of the Clinton's lives and always there is some shady business or investment deal, political scandal, sexual scandal, charity scam, or crime going on around them and/or by them.

In the very BEST light in an attempt to excuse the Clintons, for the sake of argument, they never knowingly committed any crimes: is that they are a poor judge of character, cannot control their sexual desires or emotions- especially anger, and are very incompetent/uneducated and have health/drinking problems. So even excusing them shows how she is not qualified to be President.

Quote from: albrecht on November 01, 2016, 01:01:19 PM
Don't get me wrong I'm not convicting anyone simply by 'guilt by association.' Indeed it is likely hard to live 'inside the beltway' or be involved with Arkansas and than national and New York politics for decades and not meet, or maybe be friends with, some unsavory characters. But the length and breadth of the Clinton's lives and always there is some shady business or investment deal, political scandal, sexual scandal, charity scam, or crime going on around them and/or by them.

In the very BEST light in an attempt to excuse the Clintons, for the sake of argument, they never knowingly committed any crimes: is that they are a poor judge of character, cannot control their sexual desires or emotions- especially anger, and are very incompetent/uneducated and have health/drinking problems. So even excusing them shows how she is not qualified to be President.

I wouldn't convict them either based on guilt by association but I certainly would never support them them for office especially the Presidency.

GravitySucks

Quote from: Gyoza Girl on November 01, 2016, 12:57:29 PM
Oh, I don't believe Hillary is evil. My feeling on Hillary is that the Right's animosity against her started even before she ever set foot in the White House as First Lady. Conservatives were scandalized that she kept her maiden name and continued to work as a lawyer while Bill was governor of Arkansas. Then, when she explained her choice to continue her legal practice by saying something like, "Well, I could have stayed home and baked cookies," the Republicans and other conservatives lost their minds!

Hillary didn't fit the mold of previous First Ladies; she didn't know "her place." She chose meatier projects such as health care reform, instead of traditional things like White House beautification and selecting new china for state dinners. She didn't want to select new china, she wanted to deal WITH China!

Not in my eyes. But, you must admit her arrogance in announcing that we were getting "2 for 1" back in 92/93  was a bit off putting. She wasn't elected. She blasted on the scene with TravelGate and left with the White House china. Half of the scandals in the 90's were attributable to her. Hiding billing records, IRS files, sanitizing Vince Foster's office; damn, she even assaulted a sitting president (he did deserve it).

chefist

The Clinton's stole $200,000 worth of furniture and other items from the White House when they left in 2000...they later had to return and refund all of it...

She is quite familiar with "china".

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 01, 2016, 01:04:28 PM
Not in my eyes. But, you must admit her arrogance in announcing that we were getting "2 for 1" back in 92/93  was a bit off putting. She wasn't elected. She blasted on the scene with TravelGate and left with the White House china. Half of the scandals in the 90's were attributable to her. Hiding billing records, IRS files, sanitizing Vince Foster's office; damn, she even assaulted a sitting president (he did deserve it).

Right. The only scandals emanating from Bill were sex scandals.  All of the other crap emanated from Hillary.

136 or 142

Quote from: chefist on November 01, 2016, 01:04:36 PM
The Clinton's stole $200,000 worth of furniture and other items from the White House when they left in 2000...they later had to return and refund all of it...

She is quite familiar with "china".

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856

They were gifts that were donated to President Bill Clinton by foreign dignitaries that they weren't allowed to take.  They weren't stealing things bought by the taxpayers.  This is the same thing Nancy and President Reagan tried to do.

chefist

Quote from: 136 or 142 on November 01, 2016, 01:12:05 PM
They were gifts that were donated to President Bill Clinton by foreign dignitaries, that they weren't allowed to take.  They weren't stealing things bought by the taxpayers, unlike Nancy Reagan.

They had to give them back, and pay back on the other items...you are blatantly lying now (CTR)...you have no credibility...

136 or 142

Quote from: chefist on November 01, 2016, 01:14:51 PM
They had to give them back, and pay back on the other items...you are blatantly lying now (CTR)...you have no credibility...

I corrected on Nancy Reagan.  Nothing else I wrote was wrong, Falsify the Record liar.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod