Hillary Clinton

[chefist]

oy vey

Big difference between the Rothschild/Big Finance/Capo-Soros types and the Israeli Zionists...people need to understand the difference...and it is not antisemitic to search for facts...

[albrecht]

Don't want to go all Tin Foil hat, Alex Jones...but new data dump has the Rothschild's donating big to Hillary...

There have been a lot of Rothschild involvement.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/250 ("gal pals?")
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/22544 ("xoo")
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31963 (Ed Rothschild on the fundraising list)
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/opinion/campaign-stops/why-dont-boomer-women-like-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Hillary_Clinton_Flies_20_Miles_In_Private_Jet_To_Attend_Rothschild_Nantucket_Fundraiser/53615/0/38/38/Y/M.html

[bateman]

This is moving really fast.

[Humilia Lepus Foramen]

This is moving really fast.

Seriously.  So many rumors swirling on Twitter it's hard to know who to believe.

[WOTR]

Rally Topics Today:

Hillary: Hurt feelings from a criminal, Colombian beauty queen

Trump: Ending corruption in Washington, healthcare, jobs, military, vets, law enforcement


https://twitter.com/Darren32895836/status/793553925504835584

I just need to double check.  Are these the same pollsters and media who are corrupt and never to be trusted because they are rigging the election? If so, is it OK to start trusting them now that Donald is ahead?

[chefist]

I just need to double check.  Are these the same pollsters and media who are corrupt and never to be trusted because they are rigging the election? If so, is it OK to start trusting them now that Donald is ahead?

I don't trust anyone completely...just fun watching the shit show...

[bateman]

Don't want to go all Tin Foil hat, Alex Jones...but new data dump has the Rothschild's donating big to Hillary...

Hasn't been verified yet, but...

https://twitter.com/AnonymousGlobo/status/793602434337767428

[mikuthing01]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12zVlaZyX3Q

[WOTR]

I don't trust anyone completely...just fun watching the shit show...

I don't disagree.  It's just funny watching all of the people who bought Trumps line about it all being one big scheme and polling being skewed suddenly quoting this poll.  I'm just waiting for trump himself to start flaunting his lead.

Regardless of the outcome, I can see this election providing material for political studies classes and a new crop of PHD's for the next few decades.

[albrecht]

Hasn't been verified yet, but...

https://twitter.com/AnonymousGlobo/status/793602434337767428

Holy crap if true. Amazing stuff coming out hourly it seems. Time for a new Cox/Reece Committee etc?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_to_Investigate_Tax-Exempt_Foundations_and_Comparable_Organizations

[akwilly]

I just need to double check.  Are these the same pollsters and media who are corrupt and never to be trusted because they are rigging the election? If so, is it OK to start trusting them now that Donald is ahead?

haha it's like Hoagy and NASA!

[Dr. MD MD]

Don't want to go all Tin Foil hat, Alex Jones...but new data dump has the Rothschild's donating big to Hillary...

Perhaps it may be time to reassess if he really should be an object of ridicule. Sure, some of it is ridiculous or turns out to be wrong but a lot of the broad strokes, the larger vision has more often than not turned out to be true.

[bateman]

Holy crap if true. Amazing stuff coming out hourly it seems. Time for a new Cox/Reece Committee etc?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_to_Investigate_Tax-Exempt_Foundations_and_Comparable_Organizations

/pol/acks are about 3 mins away from getting in.

[albrecht]

/pol/acks are about 3 mins away from getting in.

Alas, I have no idea what a /pol/acks is but good if they are getting information out there on Clinton and associated parties and on the "work" that various Foundations do in our political system. I didn't have enough disk-space or bandwidth to d/l that file of the Bradley Foundation to peruse. Hopefully someone will make a searchable archive like wikileaks etc have done. Or at least bring out any incriminating documents.

[Jackstar]

This is moving really fast.

All of these biscuits have happened before. All of these biscuits will happen again.

[Dr. MD MD]

All of these biscuits have happened before. All of these biscuits will happen again.

eternal biscuit recurrence? 

[mikuthing01]

I tried to download it a few times and keep getting an out of memory error

[pate]

They were gifts that were donated to President Bill Clinton by foreign dignitaries that they weren't allowed to take.  They weren't stealing things bought by the taxpayers.  This is the same thing Nancy and President Reagan tried to do.

How many Hillary campaign signs do you have in your front yard up there in Canada?  I imagine a lot, it looks like people in my historically solid Democrat neighborhood are having trouble getting them.  I see more Johnson signs than Hillary ones, it is quite funny.

Maybe you should overnight some of them to some folks in the US, get that ground game up and running?  Just a thought.

[GravitySucks]

I tried to download it a few times and keep getting an out of memory error

Brave to download anything from Anonymous

[albrecht]

Brave to download anything from Anonymous

Yeah, although those are DNC talking points! People who have that much easy storage and are into politics/hacking/etc this much will likely have it secured download over TOR or VPN or off-shore seedbox first and then "sandboxed" virtual machined etc when they delve into it after downloading. I don't know. I hope someone put a searchable website version up sometime that is more easy (and maybe secure) for us not so tech oriented.
ps: are you getting so many political calls also? F@ck you, I'm watching a BB game (Cubs Win!) and don't want to participate in surveys or conference calls about various elections! Even from politicians I, hesitantly, voted for.

[theONE]

"It’s This Bad=> NY Times Front Page Has Photo of Hillary Clinton Welcomed by Trump Signs in Florida"
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/bad-ny-times-front-page-photo-hillary-clinton-welcomed-trump-signs-florida/
Jim Hoft Oct 31st, 2016 3:43 pm

THE FINAL INSULTâ€"
The New York Times features a photo of Hillary Clinton being welcomed to an early voting site in Pompano Beach, Florida on Sunday…
Surrounded by screaming TRUMP supporters!

[albrecht]

"It’s This Bad=> NY Times Front Page Has Photo of Hillary Clinton Welcomed by Trump Signs in Florida"
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/bad-ny-times-front-page-photo-hillary-clinton-welcomed-trump-signs-florida/
Jim Hoft Oct 31st, 2016 3:43 pm

THE FINAL INSULTâ€"
The New York Times features a photo of Hillary Clinton being welcomed to an early voting site in Pompano Beach, Florida on Sunday…
Surrounded by screaming TRUMP supporters!

HILLarious. Though the other article points out one of my main concerns I've had since it began. The whole "early voting" rules that many States have. Not only does it make people who are too lazy or motivated to show up on a certain day vote, and if they are too lazy or motivated to vote they often might vote willy-nilly or vote for whoever promises them "free stuff" or just happens to be in the news but also that vote (unless they vote twice illegally) is cast before whatever event, revelation, debate, faux-pas, or news might break late. Why the DNC candidates often encourage their voters to "vote early and often." But, honestly, the RNC ones also encourage early-voting but, mainly, because now it is the law so take advantage of that lest something "comes out" about them.

[GravitySucks]

Yeah, although those are DNC talking points! People who have that much easy storage and are into politics/hacking/etc this much will likely have it secured download over TOR or VPN or off-shore seedbox first and then "sandboxed" virtual machined etc when they delve into it after downloading. I don't know. I hope someone put a searchable website version up sometime that is more easy (and maybe secure) for us not so tech oriented.
ps: are you getting so many political calls also? F@ck you, I'm watching a BB game (Cubs Win!) and don't want to participate in surveys or conference calls about various elections! Even from politicians I, hesitantly, voted for.

LOL - blah, blah, blah, Cubs won, blah blah

Yes. I think I have been getting robocalls but I don't answer calls that aren't on my contact list and then I google them. If they are robocalls I just block the number.

[21st Century Man]

HILLarious. Though the other article points out one of my main concerns I've had since it began. The whole "early voting" rules that many States have. Not only does it make people who are too lazy or motivated to show up on a certain day vote, and if they are too lazy or motivated to vote they often might vote willy-nilly or vote for whoever promises them "free stuff" or just happens to be in the news but also that vote (unless they vote twice illegally) is cast before whatever event, revelation, debate, faux-pas, or news might break late. Why the DNC candidates often encourage their voters to "vote early and often." But, honestly, the RNC ones also encourage early-voting but, mainly, because now it is the law so take advantage of that lest something "comes out" about them.

Make Election Day a holiday and get rid of early voting.  Add more precincts if lines are too long.  Early voting has got to go.  It makes voter fraud much easier.

[albrecht]

Make Election Day a holiday and get rid of early voting.  Add more precincts if lines are too long.  Early voting has got to go.  It makes voter fraud much easier.

Yeah. Make it PC and make it on MLK Jr Day. So nobody can complain. (I think the change might/could be legal via the same way early voting is if each State makes their local voting laws stipulating it. If not than simply make the "Tuesday immediately after the first Monday in November" a holiday (or move MLK Jr day to then also.) No more early voting and no more "motor voter" since now illegals can get driver's licenses in some States.

[mikuthing01]

I have never voted early... i know it would be illegal but you can vote early then show up at the polls on the 8th and vote twice?

[onan]

I have never voted early... i know it would be illegal but you can vote early then show up at the polls on the 8th and vote twice?

Please, go try that. Lemme know what happens.

[albrecht]

Please, go try that. Lemme know what happens.

I think 5 years in the few places that prosecuted the relatively, at least in terms of prosecution, rare crime (like Ohio.)

[mikuthing01]

Please, go try that. Lemme know what happens.

I'm not a democrat, just wondering if that actually happens. The people who run my polling station run a tight ship they look your name up in a binder and mark you off. I just assumed it was like that everywhere. But i live in a rural area where everyone knows each other and don't even have to ask for your name.

[theONE]

HILLarious. Though the other article points out one of my main concerns I've had since it began. The whole "early voting" rules that many States have. Not only does it make people who are too lazy or motivated to show up on a certain day vote, and if they are too lazy or motivated to vote they often might vote willy-nilly or vote for whoever promises them "free stuff" or just happens to be in the news but also that vote (unless they vote twice illegally) is cast before whatever event, revelation, debate, faux-pas, or news might break late. Why the DNC candidates often encourage their voters to "vote early and often." But, honestly, the RNC ones also encourage early-voting but, mainly, because now it is the law so take advantage of that lest something "comes out" about them.

The only reasonable reasoning for early voting would be if people have colliding work/business/medical scheduling -but otherwise I agree
with you it should be done on designated day