Hillary Clinton

[Jackstar]

it could give rise to a viable third party option.

God, you're so cute. I just wanna sit on your knee and feed you raisins while you tell me all about how Roosevelt did everything he could to champion democracy.

[Dr. MD MD]

I thought that it would be a long time before another Rep was elected after Watergate too but then Jimmy Carter was elected and it was four and out.  Doubt that the Dems will go away completely but it could give rise to a viable third party option.

In hiring Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security advisor it connected him to the world of DC insiders too much. Brzezinski was both a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and joined the Bilderberg Group in the early 60s. That was Carter's downfall. I mean, my understanding is that plans to bring Reagan in as president were made even before the election, as evident from arms for hostages deal revealed in the Iran/Contra Scandal.

[Gyoza Girl]

what's you take on info that Clinton's took money that were donated to go to people in Haiti ,there is plenty of documentation on that
and youtube videos showing evidence of money being or stollen or spent on other irrelevant projects

If you're referring to the millions of dollars that were raised for a hospital, that story originated with a Trump surrogate who was deflecting allegations about Trump's donations to veterans groups. The story has been rated false (four "Pinocchios), just like the other anti-Hillary accusations that get bandied about.

I don't know about the other donations earmarked for Haiti. It does seem like the poor Haitians have had more than their fair share of disasters, yet the international relief efforts don't seem to dramatically change or improve things much.

[Kidnostad3]

God, you're so cute. I just wanna sit on your knee and feed you raisins while you tell me all about how Roosevelt did everything he could to champion democracy.

It's gotta be really scary inside your head.  It would help if you stayed on your meds and cut back on the sauce. 

[Gyoza Girl]

That's the story that was deliberately leaked, weeks ago--that's really not a reliable narrative.

It's equally likely, or more, that the demon machine known the Clinton Global Initiative Criminal Conspiracy was known to be doomed for months, and breadcrumbs were Astroturfed into place in an effort to keep the scion pure.

It's how these elitist Luciferian cunts work.

Why isn't it a reliable narrative? I thought it came from WikiLeaks, just like all the others. I doubt the Clintons knew John Podesta's emails were being hacked and sprinkled in some self-serving emails to make themselves look good, if that's what you're implying. If that were the case, I think they'd put in some better ones!

[Dr. MD MD]

I don't know about the other donations earmarked for Haiti. It does seem like the poor Haitians have had more than their fair share of disasters, yet the international relief efforts don't seem to dramatically change or improve things much.

Now you're trying to say that the Haitians must be evil geniuses who outsmarted the Clinton mafia and ripped them off? 

The lengths you'll go to to prop up a decrepit old gangster like her are getting pretty disgusting now.  :

[Jackstar]

Why isn't it a reliable narrative? I thought it came from WikiLeaks, just like all the others.

That data also isn't a reliable narrative, except insofar as that the narrative exists.

The sudden emergence of a few lines of text that vaguely seem to paint Chelsea Clinton in a mildly-less-than-criminal-light is hardly persusaive, but the best rebranding campaigns usually start with subtlety.

[Gyoza Girl]

Now you're trying to say that the Haitians must be evil geniuses who outsmarted the Clinton mafia and ripped them off? 

The lengths you'll go to to prop up a decrepit old gangster like her are getting pretty disgusting now.  :

Oh, I said no such thing! Anyway, charity watchdog groups give the Clinton Foundation an "A" rating. It disperses more than 88 percent of its revenues on programs such as global health, girls' education, wellness, economic development and so forth. Hardly things a gangster would do.

[Dr. MD MD]

Oh, I said no such thing! Anyway, charity watchdog groups give the Clinton Foundation an "A" rating. It disperses more than 88 percent of its revenues on programs such as global health, girls' education, wellness, economic development and so forth. Hardly things a gangster would do.

Nice spin but try again. Try 5.7%. Unless you're willing to include the Clintons themselves as charity. 

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

[Gyoza Girl]

That data also isn't a reliable narrative, except insofar as that the narrative exists.

The sudden emergence of a few lines of text that vaguely seem to paint Chelsea Clinton in a mildly-less-than-criminal-light is hardly persusaive, but the best rebranding campaigns usually start with subtlety.

Would the rebranding have started all the way back in December 2011, when Chelsea sent the email outlining her concerns?

[chefist]

I smell...

[Jackstar]

Anyway, charity watchdog groups give the Clinton Foundation an "A" rating.

Don't you find that remarkably suspicious?

It disperses more than 88 percent of its revenues on programs such as global health, girls' education, wellness, economic development and so forth.

Has that been proven to you? Can you prove that? To yourself? To anyone?

Hardly things a gangster would do.

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/al-capones-soup-kitchen-great-depression-chicago-1931/




You don't seem very bright for a girl. Usually boys are the ones that display this much gap-jawed, slack-drool ignorance. Are you at least, like, smokin' hot? I really do adore gyoza.

[Jackstar]

Would the rebranding have started all the way back in December 2011, when Chelsea sent the email outlining her concerns?

Historically, parents of single children display remarkable patterns of forethought and planning when it comes to building and ensuring their spawn's future success.

It seems odd that this is something you find to be unlikely. Tell us, tell us only the good things you remember, about your father.

[Kidnostad3]

In hiring Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security advisor it connected him to the world of DC insiders too much. Brzezinski was both a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and joined the Bilderberg Group in the early 60s. That was Carter's downfall. I mean, my understanding is that plans to bring Reagan in as president were made even before the election, as evident from arms for hostages deal revealed in the Iran/Contra Scandal.

Whoa, stand down trooper.  I wasn't taking a shot at Carter--just demonstrating how fickle the electorate can be.  Is Carter a relative of yours or something?

[Gyoza Girl]

Nice spin but try again. Try 5.7%. Unless you're willing to include the Clintons themselves as charity. 

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

I know a lot of conservative websites make this claim, but the Clinton Foundation isn't set up to pass through private donations to other charitable orgs, such as in the form of grants. From what I've read, it performs most of its charitable activities directly. Independent charity watchdogs consistently peg the percentage of revenue the foundation spends on programs as in the high 80s.

[chefist]

Drunk Hillary...

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/793198177226788864

[GravitySucks]

Here. Take your minds off the election for 7 seconds.

You can thank me later.

https://twitter.com/funnyvines/status/793195568424034305

[Gyoza Girl]

Has that been proven to you? Can you prove that? To yourself? To anyone?

I've read the Clinton Foundation's annual report, as well as the joint tax return of Bill and Hillary Clinton. They're available on the Internet. Speaking of tax returns, if you want to see something eye-opening, look up the amount the Clintons give to charity, versus the guesstimate for how much Donald Trump donates. (No one knows how much Donald actually donates, since he won't release his tax returns.) The difference is staggering!

[Dr. MD MD]

I know a lot of conservative websites make this claim, but the Clinton Foundation isn't set up to pass through private donations to other charitable orgs, such as in the form of grants. From what I've read, it performs most of its charitable activities directly. Independent charity watchdogs consistently peg the percentage of revenue the foundation spends on programs as in the high 80s.

Ask the people of Haiti how well served they feel by the Clinton Foundation? 

[Dr. MD MD]

Whoa, stand down trooper.  I wasn't taking a shot at Carter--just demonstrating how fickle the electorate can be.  Is Carter a relative of yours or something?

No. It's just my analysis of what happened. It was only a small paragraph so you can relax.  :

[GravitySucks]

I've read the Clinton Foundation's annual report, as well as the joint tax return of Bill and Hillary Clinton. They're available on the Internet. Speaking of tax returns, if you want to see something eye-opening, look up the amount the Clintons give to charity, versus the guesstimate for how much Donald Trump donates. (No one knows how much Donald actually donates, since he won't release his tax returns.) The difference is staggering!

The money the Clintons donated was given to their own foundation... which then pays her daughter's salary. Nothing illegal about that, they are just taking advantage of the tax code.

But they aren't funding other charities with their own dollars.

[Jackstar]

From what I've read, it performs most of its charitable activities directly. Independent charity watchdogs consistently peg the percentage of revenue the foundation spends on programs as in the high 80s.

From what I've read, most of their money comes from laundering illicit drug revenue and foreign dictatorships that abuse basic human rights. How do you know that everything you've read isn't a lie?

Asking for a friend.

[Jackstar]

look up the amount the Clintons give to charity

Is this your 'A' game, already? Too soon! Too soon!

[Jackstar]

(No one knows how much Donald actually donates, since he won't release his tax returns.)

1. Have you ever read Atlas Shrugged? I think you might really benefit from its depth.

2. Jane, income tax is unlawful, you ignorant slut.

[Kidnostad3]

I've read the Clinton Foundation's annual report, as well as the joint tax return of Bill and Hillary Clinton. They're available on the Internet. Speaking of tax returns, if you want to see something eye-opening, look up the amount the Clintons give to charity, versus the guesstimate for how much Donald Trump donates. (No one knows how much Donald actually donates, since he won't release his tax returns.) The difference is staggering!

Oh fuck!  We're  arguing with a piece of software!

[Jackstar]

Oh fuck!  We're  arguing with a piece of software!

Welcome to the next Level, Sailor.

[=Schlyder=]

http://clashdaily.com/2016/10/wikileaks-hillarys-aide-shes-acting-like-retard-smells-like-boiled-cabbage-urine-farts/

LOLOL

[136 or 142]

From what I've read, most of their money comes from laundering illicit drug revenue and foreign dictatorships that abuse basic human rights. How do you know that everything you've read isn't a lie?

Asking for a friend.

Would that 'friend' be Donald Trump?  I'm sure he'd love as many additional revenue streams as he can get his greedy, small hand on.

Of course, that's not the question you asked for a friend.  But, I'm sure Donald Trump would love to know if he can (continue) to claim that everything negative written or said about him is a lie.  That would be useful information for him as he taps into illegal drug revenue and payoffs from foreign dictatorships (assuming he hasn't tapped into those revenue sources already.)

[ItsOver]

Drunk Hillary...

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/793198177226788864

Ha!  Imagine Big Hill in a drunken melt-down.  "The Weiner!  The Big Weiner!  Wash thuh hell wash he thinking!  The Weiner can shuck my dick!"

[albrecht]

Oh, I said no such thing! Anyway, charity watchdog groups give the Clinton Foundation an "A" rating. It disperses more than 88 percent of its revenues on programs such as global health, girls' education, wellness, economic development and so forth. Hardly things a gangster would do.

Actually in many cases they do. Depending on the case sometimes the people really like organized crimes figures or mafia families because they "protect" the neighborhood, pay for parades, pay for children's sports, give to charity/church, will employ friends/family/neighborhood in their "businesses," even the legit ones used to launder money etc.