Mt.McKinley is no more

[WOTR]

Yeah, but in my case I was saying it just to see the impulsive-immature-queer-reaction you and your Nancy-friends would have, which you swallowed like the desperate attention-deprived emotionally stunted cum-drinker you are.

In your case, you're a psychotic dick-slurping queer shut-in, that pees himself.

I have no doubt that one day soon we will see your face on TV too - just like the black queer (Vester Lee Flanagan II) that killed his far more likeable, far more successful former colleagues, because the world was so unfair to him...

Are you black, Kanye-nitwit, or do you just wish you were some black dude's woman?

Sorry... You are a Christian, right?

[Quick Karl]

Sorry... You are a Christian, right?

No, I am not; I've said it a thousand times in this forum. I just believe that Christians and Christianity are more admirable, and have as much right to their beliefs, as well as expressing them wherever and whenever they want, as does the despotic pervert-infiltrated left!

[Yorkshire pud]

No, I am not; I've said it a thousand times in this forum. I just believe that Christians and Christianity are more admirable, and have as much right to their beliefs, as well as expressing them wherever and whenever they want, as does the despotic pervert-infiltrated left!

Jesus was a liberal. You stupid fuck.

[WOTR]

No, I am not; I've said it a thousand times in this forum. I just believe that Christians and Christianity are more admirable, and have as much right to their beliefs, as well as expressing them wherever and whenever they want, as does the despotic pervert-infiltrated left!

Fair enough.  I have to admit that my memory is not great and I seem to only visit the political forum every now and then.  I had just recalled something about Christians in a past post.

I suppose we agree that free speech for both those on the right and left are important.  I think we probably also agree that free speech does not mean speech that cannot be criticized- just that you can say what you want.

[Quick Karl]

Fair enough.  I have to admit that my memory is not great and I seem to only visit the political forum every now and then.  I had just recalled something about Christians in a past post.

I suppose we agree that free speech for both those on the right and left are important.  I think we probably also agree that free speech does not mean speech that cannot be criticized- just that you can say what you want.

If people want their dignity to be respected, they should respect the dignity of people with whom they disagree. When they don't is when I chime in. This entire hissy fit in this forum began when a few of the gay-mafia-gabbers got hysterical over Phil Robertson's beliefs and the fact that he would dare express them, and they thought they and the rest of the minority of gays in America were going to bully A&E into cancelling Duck Dynasty, which I have never watched a single episode of (though I do own a duck call to show my support for their cause).

It's the same as the incessant attacks on the Catholic Church -- labeling the entire institution as perverts because a handful of homosexual perverts PRETENDED to be Catholics in order to get fresh young boys to molest. The fact is - it IS homosexuals that were molesting the boys. Facts like those really send the girls into a whirlwind...

Finally, as I have said before, I don't care what any psychologically unbalanced person put in their mouth or anus in the privacy of their own home, but when they make their perversion a public issue, so will I.

Quack quack!

[Yorkshire pud]

If people want their dignity to be respected, they should respect the dignity of people with whom they disagree.
Quack quack!

Yeah, how is the unelected American Spring military coup on an elected government going?

[SredniVashtar]

It's the same as the incessant attacks on the Catholic Church -- labeling the entire institution as perverts because a handful of homosexual perverts PRETENDED to be Catholics in order to get fresh young boys to molest. The fact is - it IS homosexuals that were molesting the boys. Facts like those really send the girls into a whirlwind...

Darling, the entire institution was labelled as corrupt because they knew what was going on but chose to ignore it or cover it up. No-one is saying they are all perverts, but that they are all heartless bastards who valued the preservation of their institution more than the lives of abused children. If you want to be part of an organisation that compels virginity then it is hardly a surprise if some of those people find their suppressed urges bursting out in sinister directions. I know you understand icky urges better than most, don't you, girlfriend?

I know, in your case, you are a virgin because you are both impotent and sexually repellent, but other people actively choose it and it's a bad idea.

[RealCool Daddio]

Is this what passes for a psy-op with you? You're what, 14?

Sure, 14. :

And you are - 57 right?  Right?   

[Quick Karl]

You're 10-years off but nice try!

Nevertheless, I am happy to see you so consumed by all this!

When someone says something in a chat forum, and it hurts your feelings and makes you all angry and seething -- it is because you believe it is true!

[SredniVashtar]

When someone says something in a chat forum, and it hurts your feelings and makes you all angry and seething -- it is because you believe it is true!

Does that include little bitch asses who go complaining to the moderator when their iddle biddle feelings get a boo boo?

You utter eunuch.

[Quick Karl]

Does anyone here know a Ben Imlay?

He's stalking me and he looks kinda gay - its weird...

[ACE of CLUBS]

He's stalking me and he looks kinda gay - its weird...

Were you molested?
Are you a molester?
Might explain your anger, hostility, homophobia, and childish rant issues ....
Get well soon ....

[RealCool Daddio]

I never knew that. What an absolute pussy. Fits right in with the gun-toting tough guy she presents herself as on here.

Yeah, he does that. Three times now.  Right, Karl?

[RealCool Daddio]

Does anyone here know a Ben Imlay?

He's stalking me and he looks kinda gay - its weird...

Probably another one of the dudes who's banging your "wife".

[Quick Karl]

Probably another one of the dudes who's banging your "wife".

Aww Ben, you seem all pissy now. You mad?

[RealCool Daddio]

Aww Ben, you seem all pissy now. You mad?

Not sure who Ben is.  Maybe you should bother MV about him, too. 

Karl.

Who lives near an HEB grocery store. 

In the Austin area.

[Quick Karl]

Not sure who Ben is.  Maybe you should bother MV about him, too. 

Karl.

Who lives near an HEB grocery store. 

In the Austin area.

Woow Ben, unnerving aint it?  You're really over-reacting, ya know?

You really read EVERY one of my posts and log the information!!!!  Kinda obsessive but hey whatever floats your boat!

You're crackin me up girl!

[RealCool Daddio]

Woow Ben, unnerving aint it?  You're really over-reacting, ya know?

You really read EVERY one of my posts and log the information!!!!  Kinda obsessive but hey whatever floats your boat!

You're crackin me up girl!

Hey, you fantasize about black cock in your ass, so why can't she, right?

What did you do while you lived back east, BTW? 

[SciFiAuthor]

Man, this is the new Falkie thread as far as trainwrecks go.

Karl? How you doing man?

Daddio ... lookin' good. Nice to see you.

Yorkie ... um, yeah.

Nowhere, pull your mouth off the Lenin statue's cock long enough to give me some advice. Should I go Trump, or continue grasping onto Rand Paul's hopeless candidacy? Kind of having a hard time with that one. You do actually have someone decent for once though; Bernie Sanders isn't a bad guy. Nice to see a non-crook in the Dem lineup for once. I'd probably vote Bernie over another Bush if it came down to that.

Anyway, just stirring the shit.

[RealCool Daddio]

...
Daddio ... lookin' good. Nice to see you.
...

You as well. 

I believe we had a wager?

[SciFiAuthor]

You as well. 

I believe we had a wager?

Yeah, we'll have to get back to that. I haven't forgotten. Just life and Ferguson intervened.

[NowhereInTime]

Nowhere, pull your mouth off the Lenin statue's cock long enough to give me some advice.

How. Dare. You.  What a man does with a consenting Communist's statue is between himself and... oh, you know...

Should I go Trump, or continue grasping onto Rand Paul's hopeless candidacy?

Trump.  Paul has alienated too many power brokers and conservative movements.

This may surprise you but I do think a Trump presidency would be productive; he cares not a whit for the GOP's agenda (only his own) and is the ultimate deal maker.  I don't like him allowing himself to be suckered in to signing Priebus' Pledge, but he seems fairly bullet proof.
He is an accomplished man who would be looking for legacy legislation; when he blows up Obamacare you better be redy to accept the High End version - TrumpCare.

You do actually have someone decent for once though; Bernie Sanders isn't a bad guy. Nice to see a non-crook in the Dem lineup for once. I'd probably vote Bernie over another Bush if it came down to that.

He is the breath of (old, stale) fresh air the Dems needed.  So much better than Hitlery and Joey Gaffes.  I like him because he is progressive but realistic; he knows that commerce and innovation drive this country but that we can't just see our population as cannon fodder.  "Socialist" in the respect that he understands that as a society we can do a decent job of caring for those who are not able to strive like some others can, but not in choking ideas and innovation (no centralized planning).

[SciFiAuthor]

Trump.  Paul has alienated too many power brokers and conservative movements.

This may surprise you but I do think a Trump presidency would be productive; he cares not a whit for the GOP's agenda (only his own) and is the ultimate deal maker.  I don't like him allowing himself to be suckered in to signing Priebus' Pledge, but he seems fairly bullet proof.
He is an accomplished man who would be looking for legacy legislation; when he blows up Obamacare you better be redy to accept the High End version - TrumpCare.

I'm not particularly beholden to the GOP's agenda either, so when he mentions things like single-payer systems as he did in the first debate, I don't really cringe. I'm interested in systems that work, and if he can make that work, then fine by me. It's just been hard for me to convince myself that Trump is really serious about this. I'm just about ready to go ahead and jump on the bandwagon though because the only other candidate I like on the right is Dr. Carson, but I like Trump better I think.   

He is the breath of (old, stale) fresh air the Dems needed.  So much better than Hitlery and Joey Gaffes.  I like him because he is progressive but realistic; he knows that commerce and innovation drive this country but that we can't just see our population as cannon fodder.  "Socialist" in the respect that he understands that as a society we can do a decent job of caring for those who are not able to strive like some others can, but not in choking ideas and innovation (no centralized planning).

Yeah, I've spent a lot of time looking at Bernie's positions and I don't think socialist is a good word for him. To me he's basically a transplanted European-style center-left politician. I think he's also an honest guy. Those things make him a known quantity, whereas a GOP establishment candidate like Bush is not.   

In any case at least things are being shaken up this time around. Both parties needed that.

[albrecht]

How. Dare. You.  What a man does with a consenting Communist's statue is between himself and... oh, you know...

Trump.  Paul has alienated too many power brokers and conservative movements.

This may surprise you but I do think a Trump presidency would be productive; he cares not a whit for the GOP's agenda (only his own) and is the ultimate deal maker.  I don't like him allowing himself to be suckered in to signing Priebus' Pledge, but he seems fairly bullet proof.
He is an accomplished man who would be looking for legacy legislation; when he blows up Obamacare you better be redy to accept the High End version - TrumpCare.

He is the breath of (old, stale) fresh air the Dems needed.  So much better than Hitlery and Joey Gaffes.  I like him because he is progressive but realistic; he knows that commerce and innovation drive this country but that we can't just see our population as cannon fodder.  "Socialist" in the respect that he understands that as a society we can do a decent job of caring for those who are not able to strive like some others can, but not in choking ideas and innovation (no centralized planning).

Unfortunately unless living nearby most people won't know much about Sanders except as "socialist" label (which is associated, at least in the past, with negativity) because the Democrats will not have any debates. While his rape musings are somewhat troubling those views/fantasies are more softcore than many of our immigrants' beliefs- and actions-, Muslim and Latino, flowing across the open border, or gaining fast-track refugee status, under the current immigration policies so I will put those off to "youthful indiscretions" and misunderstood satire. His stance on guns is good with me, though a little too liberal, but I'm all for some of us other issues about things actually, at least debating about them. (Financial issues, corporate and banking oversight, etc even.) Vermont is an interesting place and I agree with general sympathy of "let us alone," and he does agree, unlike the other Democrats, that we should have a national border even. For that alone he deserves at least the ability to debate the pre-selected Democratic candidate.

[136 or 142]

Yeah, I've spent a lot of time looking at Bernie's positions and I don't think socialist is a good word for him. To me he's basically a transplanted European-style center-left politician. I think he's also an honest guy. Those things make him a known quantity, whereas a GOP establishment candidate like Bush is not.   

In any case at least things are being shaken up this time around. Both parties needed that.

He's called a socialist because he himself says he's a socialist. I agree he isn't a socialist in terms of his policy positions.  Socialism is defined in economics as the nationalization of the 'commanding heights' of the economy - seven or so sectors encompassing things like transportation, communications, energy, banking and the like.  The only one I know of that he has a policy of nationalizing is health care.

I suspect he'd like to nationalize all the 'commanding heights' which is possibly why he refers to himself as a socialist, but in practice he knows that isn't going to happen, so it's not something he brings up, and he focuses instead on somewhat realistic ideas of making these things more affordable for poor people.