Why I am Voting GOP on 11/4

[Ruteger]

Make no mistake. My vote is a vote AGAINST the Marxist Democrats and the POTUS Obola and his agenda, and NOT for the GOP. Michael Savage on his radio program made a great point recently. He said basically postulated that the DemoRATS are a closed shop. They cannot be reached or bargained with. No amount of phone calls or letters are going to dissuade them from their agenda. At least with the GOP we still have some chance to influence the leadership with the few remaining Conservatives in their ranks.

Want to see more dead American children from TB and enterovirus? Then by all means, vote Democrat as hussein obola will certainly bring in millions more diseased illegals into this country.

[MV/Liberace!]

Want to see more dead American children from TB and enterovirus? Then by all means, vote Democrat as hussein obola will certainly bring in millions more diseased illegals into this country.

yeah, because the republicans did soooo much to stop illegal immigration when they had control of the white house, senate, and house.

[bateman]

yeah, because the republicans did soooo much to stop illegal immigration when they had control of the white house, senate, and house.

Both parties LOVE illegal immigration - cheap labor for businesses on the right, and guaranteed votes for the left.

[Ruteger]

I agree 100%. Unfortunately, the GOP is the best we have at this moment (apart from a 2nd American Revolution). The American People had their chance to rid themselves of their incumbents in the primaries. They chose not to. The time to eliminate the slime-balls like McConnell and Boehnor are at the PRIMARIES. So, ask yourselves this - will you have more liberty or less with the sow alison lundergan grimes as your senator?

[DanTSX]

I agree 100%. Unfortunately, the GOP is the best we have at this moment (apart from a 2nd American Revolution). The American People had their chance to rid themselves of their incumbents in the primaries. They chose not to. The time to eliminate the slime-balls like McConnell and Boehnor are at the PRIMARIES. So, ask yourselves this - will you have more liberty or less with the sow alison lundergan grimes as your senator?

That's not how primaries work


And not all incumbents are up for reelection.


This election isn't just about immigration.   Why get so wrapped up on this?


But I'm voting GOP.

[Eddie Coyle]

   I have been knocked over by this feather! Never imagined such a 180.

[WOTR]

Make no mistake...

I have to admit that I read the title and questioned if you would be voting any other way.  Is there anything that would ever convince you to vote Democrat?  Somehow, I assume that you can safely type "why I am voting GOP on every future election" and just get it over with.

There is nothing wrong with this- I know plenty of people who have never voted for anyone but the representative of the party they favour... They just do not make it sound like a huge shock when they announce that they will be voting for the Conservatives (or Liberals) next election...

Would you like to beat the rush and announce which party you will be voting for next presidential election- or are we to be kept in suspense?

[RedMichael]

Both sides have dogshit candidates and I really believe they do not even remotely represent their party's citizens if the citizens are honest with themselves.

The political parties used to represent the people's view. Now it is the opposite. People get their views and talking points from their news channel of choice and adopt them.

"They say this is bad? Well ok I say this is bad."
"I am supposed to be for this? Ok, I am for this."


What is really crazy is I can remember VERY politically inclined people in my life from 20 years ago and the extremes they have gone to in their views the last 10 years is bizarre and no one even thinks twice about this.

First step to get rid of these entrenched problems is term limits.


To the above poster: I agree completely. Everytime someone makes a statement about where they are voting, you already know where they are voting. The thing I hate is "Well I don't like it/it is the less of the two evils." Something is very very very wrong when its that same broken record everytime they vote. Either the system is broke and the parties don't represent the people or they are lying to themselves about what the believe.

[Little Hater]

I'm voting NOPE this time. See ya (maybe) in 2016.

[Yorkshire pud]

Oh shock! Rutger announces his voting intentions and the indifference from everyone is predicable. Who gives a shit, Although I thought there were restrictions on what batshit crazy people could do.


In this thread he's said Obama is a Marxist; and on another that he's turning into Mussolini. Mussolini was killed and hung up by ......Communists.
Doesn't it scare anyone that Rutger isn't fully informed?

[albrecht]

Oh shock! Rutger announces his voting intentions and the indifference from everyone is predicable. Who gives a shit, Although I thought there were restrictions on what batshit crazy people could do.


In this thread he's said Obama is a Marxist; and on another that he's turning into Mussolini. Mussolini was killed and hung up by ......Communists.
Doesn't it scare anyone that Rutger isn't fully informed?

I don't blame anyone for not being quite able to define this guy Obama. His background, from what we were allowed to discover about it, is so bizarre that I imagine historians and psychiatrists will spend decades be trying to figure him out and break through the veil of mystery surrounding him. He likely conflicted in his own mind about what he believes and, if all the rumors are true, even about his own self etc. He reads like a playbook for some serious "couch time":  a biracial parents (one of whom- the female- was name Stanley), an alcoholic father (who left him,) went through divorce and then raised by an Islamic stepfather (but attended both Catholic and Islamic schools), apparently he underwent a name change then (and presumably changed his name back later- though no records are available,) taken care of by a cross-dressing nanny while in the Muslim country, then whisked away to attend one of the more elite, private schools in the country in Hawaii to be mentored by a known pornographer and avowed communist (Davis). His of addictive personality, with regard to both cigarettes and illegal drugs. The racial confusion and animosity he writes about in his books. And the statements that black nationalist turned Muslim covert, Khalid Al-Monsour, helped bank-roll his schooling and those connections to certain Saudis, political operatives like the Jarrets, Percy Sutton, Rezko, etc.

[FightTheFuture]

I just voted a straight GOP ticket. We`re very happy with our Governor, the right honorable Nikki Haley, as well as Sen. Tim Scott. Lindsey Graham...not as much, but this is no time to cast a protest vote. It`s imperative that we wrestle the majority leader reigns from Harry Reid.

[PB the Deplorable]

I don't blame anyone for not being quite able to define this guy Obama. His background, from what we were allowed to discover about it, is so bizarre that I imagine historians and psychiatrists will spend decades be trying to figure him out and break through the veil of mystery surrounding him. He likely conflicted in his own mind about what he believes and, if all the rumors are true, even about his own self etc. He reads like a playbook for some serious "couch time":  a biracial parents (one of whom- the female- was name Stanley), an alcoholic father (who left him,) went through divorce and then raised by an Islamic stepfather (but attended both Catholic and Islamic schools), apparently he underwent a name change then (and presumably changed his name back later- though no records are available,) taken care of by a cross-dressing nanny while in the Muslim country, then whisked away to attend one of the more elite, private schools in the country in Hawaii to be mentored by a known pornographer and avowed communist (Davis). His of addictive personality, with regard to both cigarettes and illegal drugs. The racial confusion and animosity he writes about in his books. And the statements that black nationalist turned Muslim covert, Khalid Al-Monsour, helped bank-roll his schooling and those connections to certain Saudis, political operatives like the Jarrets, Percy Sutton, Rezko, etc.

After he leaves, we are going to hear some of it.  And more will drip out over time.  I can't wait for the unraveling

[VtaGeezer]

After he leaves, we are going to hear some of it. 

Yes, you will. And you'll still deny it.

[Quick Karl]

Yes, you will. And you'll still deny it.

How can you defend Obama's background, when no one knows what it really is?

Unless, you just believe what you hear on MSNBC?..

[Yorkshire pud]

I don't blame anyone for not being quite able to define this guy Obama.

Really? It hasn't stopped the usual suspects in doing so.

[Kelt]

...because I'm Republican.

Was the correct answer.

[Zoo]

I Vote Third Party anymore. Thats right does not matter what the third party is I vote for it. If there is not one I will write one in. If you vote Democrat or Republican you are voting for the same party the Greed Party and they will keep fucking things up like normal!!1

[Quick Karl]

Because anything is better than what we've had for the last 6-years, and where we are as a country and society, as of this moment.

[PB the Deplorable]

Really? It hasn't stopped the usual suspects in doing so.

This is a President who has spent literally millions of dollars suppressing his background and ensuring the records (all school records, passport records, birth and adoption records, even records from his time as Illinois State Senator) other politicians routinely release remain sealed and hidden.  I really hope he's at least spending his own money on this, but it's probably taxpayers money.

That is going to draw interest, it's going to draw suspicion, and it's going to draw speculation.  People are going to take what they do know from his life, things he says, and things he does, and extrapolate from that.

It's very difficult for a major politician - or anyone really - to hide who they are, and it's unusual for anyone to even bother.  Since a certain amount of what has been revealed is contradictory (such as him claiming at different times to have been born in 2 separate hospitals in Hawaii, let alone him claiming at different times to have been born on 2 separate continents, etc) It almost has to be more than him being just an extremely private person. 

So what is he hiding? 

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

This is a President who has spent literally millions of dollars suppressing his background and ensuring the records (all school records, passport records, birth and adoption records, even records from his time as Illinois State Senator) other politicians routinely release remain sealed and hidden.  I really hope he's at least spending his own money on this, but it's probably taxpayers money.

That is going to draw interest, it's going to draw suspicion, and it's going to draw speculation.  People are going to take what they do know from his life, things he says, and things he does, and extrapolate from that.

It's very difficult for a major politician - or anyone really - to hide who they are, and it's unusual for anyone to even bother.  Since a certain amount of what has been revealed is contradictory (such as him claiming at different times to have been born in 2 separate hospitals in Hawaii, let alone him claiming at different times to have been born on 2 separate continents, etc) It almost has to be more than him being just an extremely private person. 

So what is he hiding?

That's clearly the fault of the people the GOP hired to do opposition research.  If they hadn't done such a sloppy, indifferent job (or maybe they were secretly working for the Dems and in on the cover up?), we would know what he's hiding and more.  Somebody needs to investigate the investigators.

[albrecht]

That's clearly the fault of the people the GOP hired to do opposition research.  If they hadn't done such a sloppy, indifferent job (or maybe they were secretly working for the Dems and in on the cover up?), we would know what he's hiding and more.  Somebody needs to investigate the investigators.

There could be some there, there. Considering the "change" quickly turned into continued banker bailouts, more wars, more regulatory capture rules and regulations benefiting the larger banks, and corporate boondoggles there might be something to your theory. Think about just one aspect. Obamacare. Forcing citizens to buy a product from large, corporations and using the government (IRS) to punish you if you don't buy their product. Then, as a part of the quid-pro-quo, the same corporations purposely will delay telling actual costs to consumers until after the election.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/11/unprecedented-obama-forces-insurance-industry-to-withhold-2015-prices-until-after-election/

[MV/Liberace!]

There could be some there, there. Considering the "change" quickly turned into continued banker bailouts, more wars, more regulatory capture rules and regulations benefiting the larger banks, and corporate boondoggles there might be something to your theory. Think about just one aspect. Obamacare. Forcing citizens to buy a product from large, corporations and using the government (IRS) to punish you if you don't buy their product. Then, as a part of the quid-pro-quo, the same corporations purposely will delay telling actual costs to consumers until after the election.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/11/unprecedented-obama-forces-insurance-industry-to-withhold-2015-prices-until-after-election/

and then a republican appointed supreme court justice casts the deciding vote, allowing the mandate to stand.

[Quick Karl]

and then a republican appointed supreme court justice casts the deciding vote, allowing the mandate to stand.

The fraud of it all is enough to make a person puke.

[albrecht]

The fraud of it all is enough to make a person puke.

Yep, any system where the representatives and justices all, somehow, after those dedicated years of public service, come out millionaires is suspect- only difference is some come out multimillionaires and others just small potato millionaires it seems. They should have to forfeit all earnings, including those in blind trusts, whilst in office. Have whatever money they had going in be locked away in a lock-box (hat tip to Gore Jr) and accrued interest only linked to inflation (and the fake rate, not real one, they give us in their government stats) not any investments from their legislation and contacts. They go out with what they brought in.

The only important reason to vote this year is for local State and Cty races, bond elections, school boards, judges, etc and at least as a moral "No Obama" stance. The local stuff effects the normal person more, usually, anyway on a daily level and there is a least a slighter chance of your vote 'mattering' statistically.

[FightTheFuture]

Fox News just called Wisconsin for Governor Scott Walker. That's huge. The path is now cleared for Governor Walker to run for president in 2016, just as I predicted

[GeorgieForPresident2216]

and then a republican appointed supreme court justice casts the deciding vote, allowing the mandate to stand.

That really seems like a weakness in the system.  There are constant claims that Obama is breaking the constitution, but despite an angry Republican house there have never been any impeachment proceedings.   So, I suppose it comes down to nine supreme court justices and what they allow to stand and what they allow to fall based on their interpretation of the constitution.  That's nine individuals, appointed for life, who can direct the fate of the Union any way they wish.  If I'm not interpreting this correctly please have leniency since I'm not educated in the American political system.

In industry, if an individual is doing something wrong it is ultimately blamed on the company's operating procedures rather than the individual.  If the current administration is breaking the system, isn't that then a basic fault with how the system is set up, such as the oligarchy of the Supreme Court, and such as the way campaign funding is handled and used to manipulate politics?

[albrecht]

That really seems like a weakness in the system.  There are constant claims that Obama is breaking the constitution, but despite an angry Republican house there have never been any impeachment proceedings.   So, I suppose it comes down to nine supreme court justices and what they allow to stand and what they allow to fall based on their interpretation of the constitution.  That's nine individuals, appointed for life, who can direct the fate of the Union any way they wish.  If I'm not interpreting this correctly please have leniency since I'm not educated in the American political system.

In industry, if an individual is doing something wrong it is ultimately blamed on the company's operating procedures rather than the individual.  If the current administration is breaking the system, isn't that then a basic fault with how the system is set up, such as the oligarchy of the Supreme Court, and such as the way campaign funding is handled and used to manipulate politics?

In many ways you are correct. The Court has aggrandized their purview and created their own jurisdiction (this is, of course, arguable with many valid arguments on all sides- I personally hold more to the original letters, statements, and correspondence and then, of course, what was written into law but any Court creating their own jurisdiction is, at best, questionable.) The "system" with regard to impeachment itself is fairly clear (the politics to do so though is much a bigger issue.) Sure Obama should be impeached. Certainly more so than Clinton (who deserved it but for lesser reasons, call them misdemeanors, though as an officer of the court and lawyer he should know better) and Bush also , but it is a political issue. Funding is a legitimate issue, but separate, issue. Funding is a whole other fish from personal or professional corruption. Though I tend to agree. Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world and without funding from decent people, or (yes) even rich people we would be electing based on the black economy, illegal donations, etc. I, guess, the idea is keep it somewhat above board and big spending is at least trackable- if anyone wishes too. Sort of the legalize drugs argument....at least it is legal now.

[FightTheFuture]

A veritable tsunami for the GOP tonight! Total repudiation of Obama and Harry Reid.

[WOTR]

...conflicted in his own mind about what he believes and, if all the rumors are true, even about his own self etc.

Naturally.  If all the rumours are true, his wife is a man and he eats babies while worshiping Allah during a Satanist ceremony to maintain power...  How could he not be conflicted if all the rumours are true?