• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Hillbilly retard: AIDS, other STDs is god punishing faggots

Started by DigitalPigSnuggler, September 11, 2014, 11:25:16 AM

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/11/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-says-aids-syphilis-go/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

"Duck Dynasty’s outspoken patriarch, Phil Robertson, said during a recent Christian radio show with Family Research Council head Tony Perkins that AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are God’s way of imposing consequences for sin on gays."

bateman

Well do you have a better explanation?? REPENT, SODOMITES, REPENT!!!!!!!11

"Nothing has prevented Robertson from speaking his mind, though, and last week he compared himself to Jesus during an interview with ABC News."

http://www.christianpost.com/news/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-aids-is-gods-penalty-for-immoral-homosexual-behavior-126241/

wr250

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on September 11, 2014, 11:25:16 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/11/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-says-aids-syphilis-go/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

"Duck Dynasty’s outspoken patriarch, Phil Robertson, said during a recent Christian radio show with Family Research Council head Tony Perkins that AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are God’s way of imposing consequences for sin on gays."
must be a member of westboro church.

Quote from: bateman on September 11, 2014, 11:27:45 AM
Well do you have a better explanation??

No, but why the overspray onto the straight population?  "Use yor rifle thar, Jesus, not the scattergun!"

paladin1991

I don't know that these diseases are or are not directed at 'gays.'  I don't know the mind of GOD.  But I do know that these diseases spread due to immoral behaviors.   Or if you will, dangerous practices such as unsafe sex, drug usage, etc.  When AIDS became known, it was called the gay cancer.  It struck primarily gays....and then it spread into the general populace. 
But you all pretty much know this.

b_dubb

Why does this dirt sandwhich continue to get media exposure?

Quote from: paladin1991 on September 11, 2014, 11:47:16 AM
But you all pretty much know this.

Arthur Ashe and Ryan White called, and they said you're screwed in the head.

Kelt

Quote from: b_dubb on September 11, 2014, 11:51:24 AM
Why does this dirt sandwhich continue to get media exposure?

Because there are lots and lots and lots of people who think he's correct.


albrecht

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on September 11, 2014, 11:25:16 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/11/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-says-aids-syphilis-go/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

"Duck Dynasty’s outspoken patriarch, Phil Robertson, said during a recent Christian radio show with Family Research Council head Tony Perkins that AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are God’s way of imposing consequences for sin on gays."
Every action has a consequence (and no action also has.)  Some good, some bad. You have sex with the wrong person who is infected, you risk get infected (whether Herpes, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, etc.) Now whether that is "God's punishment", Karma, or just poor planning- it is a fact. Limiting risk (condoms, health checks, etc) does that, limit risk. But risk is still there. So clearly abstaining, or having a single clean partner, will avoid catching HIV/AIDS (unless you were one of the very unlucky ones to get infected by tainted blood. Like the stuff sold from Arkansas prisons under the Clinton's watchful eye.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_8:_The_Arkansas_Prison_Blood_Scandal

HIV/AIDS was brought to America by homosexuals and spread in that community, mainly, until it spread (from those on the "down low" as they call it in Obama's community to straight people) or by sharing needles in the drug user community, etc. So one could "blame them," I guess, recall the outrage from the homosexual community and lobby and refusal to shut down the bath-house scene etc.?

It won't be too surprising if we find out sometime in the near future that he has a lot more in common with the once vociferously anti-gay preachers, Ted Haggard and George Rekers, than he's willing to admit.

Quote from: Kelt on September 11, 2014, 12:13:28 PM
Because there are lots and lots and lots of people who think he's correct.

Did you know that more than half of people surveyed couldn't correctly identify how often the Earth revolves around the sun in a year?  I don't mean once  as opposed to the correct answer (marginally less than once), I mean like answering twice in a year, or twelve times in a year, or 1/4 a revolution in a year.  Lots and lots of people are fucking retards.

bateman

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on September 11, 2014, 12:25:20 PM
It won't be too surprising if we find out sometime in the near future that he has a lot more in common with the once vociferously anti-gay preachers, Ted Haggard and George Rekers, than he's willing to admit.

Ding ding ding. Some interesting things going on behind those duck blinds I'd bet.

See also: Marcus Bachmann.

albrecht

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on September 11, 2014, 12:27:41 PM
Did you know that more than half of people surveyed couldn't correctly identify how often the Earth revolves around the sun in a year?  I don't mean once  as opposed to the correct answer (marginally less than once), I mean like answering twice in a year, or twelve times in a year, or 1/4 a revolution in a year.  Lots and lots of people are fucking retards.
While it is certainly true that public education is pretty abysmal in the US (just one reason great champions of public education, like the Obamas, send their daughters to elite, private schools like Sidwell Friends) it doesn't mean people are "retarded." In fact, you would be criticized by the politically-correct crowd for using that term ("intellectually disabled" or "learning disabled" is more trendy now), it is true that many people are uneducated or mis-educated. Not as many true "retards" out there as our test scores and C2C open-line callers would suggest.

That was a pretty common viewpoint in the 80s when AIDS first started to get media attention.  Society's view on this issue seem to have matured since then.  I guess Phil Robertson was an impressional lad at the tender age of 40 and hasn't been able to overcome his youthful belief system.  He only remains relevant because so many others still have their heads buried in the sand.

Quote from: bateman on September 11, 2014, 12:52:12 PM
Ding ding ding. Some interesting things going on behind those duck blinds I'd bet.

See also: Marcus Bachmann.

Nah, it's probably just a bunch of guys hanging out and blowing their "duck commanders" and "buck commanders."

And try as he might, Marcus just can't seem to pray it away.

Gd5150

Robertson is an buffoon. Fortunately no one cares what he says accept leftwing assclowns which unfortunately is also our mainstream media. Has Obertard called for his resignation from Duck Dynasty yet?

Everyone knows Aids is Reagan's fault and as soon as he's out of office and we get a Democrat president we'll have cure. - Said every leftwinger in the 1980's.

eddie dean

Quote from: Gd5150 on September 11, 2014, 01:46:12 PM
Robertson is an buffoon. Fortunately no one cares what he says accept leftwing assclowns which unfortunately is also our mainstream media. Has Obertard called for his resignation from Duck Dynasty yet?

Everyone knows Aids is Reagan's fault and as soon as he's out of office and we get a Democrat president we'll have cure. - Said every leftwinger in the 1980's.

Using idiotic comments from people on the extreme fringe of society to suggest the other side is wrong, immoral or crazy isn't  limited to liberals.

onan

Biology has no ideology. If there is a god using a disease to punish homosexuals, then lesbians get a pass... why?

Using disease to find a new reason to hate a group is nothing but superstition. And it does seem to lean conservative/stupid.

albrecht

Quote from: onan on September 11, 2014, 04:45:55 PM
Biology has no ideology. If there is a god using a disease to punish homosexuals, then lesbians get a pass... why?

Using disease to find a new reason to hate a group is nothing but superstition. And it does seem to lean conservative/stupid.
Well, I'm not saying it was the Big G who dictated this but.....don't let facts get in your way.
Lest you think government tax money is being wasted it was found that lesbians are 25% more likely to be obese than normal women. Obesity can lead to things, or exacerbate conditions, like heart disease, diabetes, and other health problems. The "lipstick lesbian", "I kissed a girl and liked it", is, according to this study, mainly a Skin-e-max and men's fantasy. (They didn't say it, but I did.)
http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8703150&icde=21539564%C2%A0

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/02/why-the-federal-government-spent-3-million-to-study-lesbian-obesity/

Also HPV, which can cause cervical, and other types, of cancer can be transmitted orally and lesbians are particularly at risk.
http://www.cancer-network.org/cancer_information/hpv_and_cancer/

Having said that I guess our bearded Duck-killing friend would say that God wasn't just punishing the homosexual (though they started the HIV/AIDS outbreak at least in the USA) and fought hard against stopping it (refusing to close bath-houses and stop risky behavior for quite some time.) But punishing those who don't take proper precautions or are not in sexual relationships with only one trusted partner. (Not sure what he would say about those unfortunate enough to get some tainted blood like those people who got blood from Arkansas prisoners under the Clinton's watch which was sold around the world. Maybe straight shot to heaven. I don't know.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_8:_The_Arkansas_Prison_Blood_Scandal



Kelt

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on September 11, 2014, 12:27:41 PM
Did you know that more than half of people surveyed couldn't correctly identify how often the Earth revolves around the sun in a year?  I don't mean once  as opposed to the correct answer (marginally less than once), I mean like answering twice in a year, or twelve times in a year, or 1/4 a revolution in a year.  Lots and lots of people are fucking retards.

This is exactly why I pray to all the gods I don't believe in that Agenda 21 is going to go down exactly like the Conspiracy Theorists tell us it will.

Currently you have about 10% of the world's population doing all the thinking for the other 90%, but you have the 90% who think, say, Iceland is in Africa or that the Sun revolves around the Earth, you have that 90% wielding the electoral power.  That's why you get the guy with the slickest suit as a President rather than someone who might actually, I don't know, be able to chew gum and Presnidentify at the same time.

I heard some guy on Nooreh telling us that Africa, for example, is to be almost entirely depopulated... well, good... that place is just a fucking catastrophe of AIDS, Ebola, genocide, starvation, and pancake tits. I can't remember the last time anything good came from Africa... and if I found myself holding something that had come directly from any portion of that fucked continent I'd scream like a girl, stick my hand in boiling water, set fire to the thing I was holding, then pour bleach on the ashes, lock them in a fireproof safe, and sink them at the bottom of Lake Superior with a beacon warning people to stay away like the one in Alien starring the fascinating Sigourney Weaver as a partially undressed Lt Ellen Ripley.

If the NWO wants some other suggestions for global depopulation I can give them a list of places I've been to that all need to be cemented over and turned into empty plazas.


onan

Quote from: albrecht on September 11, 2014, 05:04:22 PM
Well, I'm not saying it was the Big G who dictated this but.....
Lest you think government tax money is being wasted it was found that lesbians are 25% more likely to be obese than normal women. Obesity can lead to things, or exacerbate conditions, like heart disease, diabetes, and other health problems. The "lipstick lesbian", "I kissed a girl and liked it", is, according to this study, mainly a Skin-e-max and men's fantasy. (They didn't say it, but I did.)
http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8703150&icde=21539564%C2%A0

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/02/why-the-federal-government-spent-3-million-to-study-lesbian-obesity/

Also HPV, which can cause cervical, and other types, of cancer, can be transmitted orally and lesbians are particularly at risk.
http://www.cancer-network.org/cancer_information/hpv_and_cancer/

First, obesity isn't caused by bacteria or virus. HPV in the lbgt... which variant of HPV? What percentage progresses to cancer? How many get vaccinated? HPV isn't cancer. No one is without risk of most diseases sans distance. Government spending money that displeases you... heavens no!!






albrecht

Quote from: onan on September 11, 2014, 05:29:26 PM
First, obesity isn't caused by bacteria or virus. HPV in the lbgt... which variant of HPV? What percentage progresses to cancer? How many get vaccinated? HPV isn't cancer. No one is without risk of most diseases sans distance. Government spending money that displeases you... heavens no!!
As mentioned our bearded, duck-killing friend says that AIDS, etc is a punishment from God. However, he doesn't say that other predicaments, diseases, or medicals are not also. Various religious texts are full of various calamities and diseases that are caused by God. Or, one could say, you brought it on yourself from some past-life or some karmic wheel. Whatever. So why not obesity (which, via various health conditions caused or exacerbated by it) kills more people than HIV/AIDS, syphilis, etc? You claimed lesbians were not afflicted by the alleged "judgement." Clearly government studies, and our tax dollars, say that they are!

Over all point though, muddy the water though I may, is that ACTIONS have CONSEQUENCES (so does inaction.) Whether one claims it is God, the person's choices, Karma, the universe, or just plain biology and nature. Not all can be predicted or prevented. But, clearly, participating in behavior with high risk potential is just that. Complain after? Sure. Everyone does. Woe is me. Old as The Bible (or older.) But you sleep in the bed you made. It sucks that some actions have deathly consequences but now we know it. So stop risking it. Or, at least, don't ask for sympathy or tax-payer money that could go to other areas of research in which the diseases are not caused, at least usually, by one's choices in life.

Quote from: albrecht on September 11, 2014, 06:04:29 PM

...Over all point though, muddy the water though I may, is that ACTIONS have CONSEQUENCES (so does inaction.) Whether one claims it is God, the person's choices, Karma, the universe, or just plain biology and nature. Not all can be predicted or prevented. But, clearly, participating in behavior with high risk potential is just that. Complain after? Sure. Everyone does. Woe is me. Old as The Bible (or older.) But you sleep in the bed you made. It sucks that some actions have deathly consequences but now we know it. So stop risking it. Or, at least, don't ask for sympathy or tax-payer money that could go to other areas of research in which the diseases are not caused, at least usually, by one's choices in life.

Sure, actions have consequences and it's important to be responsible.  Getting back to the original post, though, this really has nothing to do with sexual orientation.  Heterosexuals are just as likely to be promiscuous and engage in risky sexual behaviours as those who identify themselves as LGBT.  Moreover, women are more susceptible to contracting HIV due to both biology and social pressures.  Sexual abuse is common especially in the nations of developing regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa where 76% of young people with HIV are women and AIDS runs rampant.  That can't be pinned on the victims of HIV engaging in risky activities just for the hell of it.  As well, obviously, a lot of responsible people get involved with people who have less stellar backgrounds and become victims themselves.  I don't think you can dismiss the cases that can't be predicted or prevented as a minor addendum to the AIDS epidemic.

onan

Quote from: albrecht on September 11, 2014, 06:04:29 PM
As mentioned our bearded, duck-killing friend says that AIDS, etc is a punishment from God. However, he doesn't say that other predicaments, diseases, or medicals are not also. Various religious texts are full of various calamities and diseases that are caused by God. Or, one could say, you brought it on yourself from some past-life or some karmic wheel. Whatever. So why not obesity (which, via various health conditions caused or exacerbated by it) kills more people than HIV/AIDS, syphilis, etc? You claimed lesbians were not afflicted by the alleged "judgement." Clearly government studies, and our tax dollars, say that they are!

Over all point though, muddy the water though I may, is that ACTIONS have CONSEQUENCES (so does inaction.) Whether one claims it is God, the person's choices, Karma, the universe, or just plain biology and nature. Not all can be predicted or prevented. But, clearly, participating in behavior with high risk potential is just that. Complain after? Sure. Everyone does. Woe is me. Old as The Bible (or older.) But you sleep in the bed you made. It sucks that some actions have deathly consequences but now we know it. So stop risking it. Or, at least, don't ask for sympathy or tax-payer money that could go to other areas of research in which the diseases are not caused, at least usually, by one's choices in life.

NO someone did make the claim that god did it. Yes an idiot made the statement.

HPV isn't comparable to HIV as some divine punishment. Your source of LGBT and HPV is wrong. It does say "may be at higher risk" but then lists the vague usage of lifestyle and poor overall health. HPV is rarely transmitted through oral transmission. Even if someone contracts HPV, there are several variants, not all are at a high risk of cervical cancer. Whereas with HIV... the prognosis is never good... not as bad as 25 years ago but not good.

Yeah life almost always leads to poor health and always to death. Studying disease in any setting helps to understand the disease process better and develop better strategies for everyone. Even studying vagina licking fatties may help all of us down the road. It is certainly better spent money than building another atomic clock or extra bridge in Alaska.

Actions always have consequences. Alcoholics wear out livers faster than most. Liver transplants are costly, but the knowledge gained has helped in other transplants. Voila Cheney and his new heart. OK bad money all around.

albrecht

Quote from: Georgie For President 2216 on September 11, 2014, 06:54:10 PM
Sure, actions have consequences and it's important to be responsible.  Getting back to the original post, though, this really has nothing to do with sexual orientation.  Heterosexuals are just as likely to be promiscuous and engage in risky sexual behaviours as those who identify themselves as LGBT.  Moreover, women are more susceptible to contracting HIV due to both biology and social pressures.  Sexual abuse is common especially in the nations of developing regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa where 76% of young people with HIV are women and AIDS runs rampant.  That can't be pinned on the victims of HIV engaging in risky activities just for the hell of it.  As well, obviously, a lot of responsible people get involved with people who have less stellar backgrounds and become victims themselves.  I don't think you can dismiss the cases that can't be predicted or prevented as a minor addendum to the AIDS epidemic.
1) I don't have time to research this, right now, but I seem to recall a NIH study (maybe an article in Lancet etc) that you are not correct in terms of number of "partners" of a homosexual man versus a normal man over a period of time. This might have changed as HIV/AIDS developed (of course.) It took a good decade for the homosexual activists to admit that the "bath-house" scene was not a good thing vis-a-vis a viral outbreak. But, of course, normal folks engage in risky behavior, unfortunately now that behavior the risk is much more than "the drip" or something a shot can cure due to the actions of homosexuals who brought the disease to the USA and Europe.

2) Yes, now, in parts of Africa HIV/AIDS is rampant in the normal community as well as the homosexual community. As of now (NIH) there is still more of a risk for the homosexual community (and IV drug users) than the normal community in the USA. As I said, before it jumped (in the US and Europe) from the homosexual community to the drug-using and straight community but still higher in what the CDC calls "higher risk" groups here (for now.)
3) No matter whether in Africa or at the CDC in Atlanta the chances of catching HIV/AIDS are much less if you abstain from risky sexual behaviors, have a monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner (regardless of sexual orientation), don't do IV drugs, etc.

Choices matter, exception, in cases (of like Africa where rape is rampant) or infected blood (like what happened in Arkansas Prison system selling infected blood under the Clinton's watch), being a LEO or healthcare worker and getting stuck with a needle, or a husband (to use a term the Obama community uses) being on the "downlow" and brings it back to his wife, etc. And, increasingly, and especially in Africa whores being infected and then also wayward husbands/boyfriends spreading it back to wives and far-flung communities. And, of course, for children born to those infected.

albrecht

Quote from: onan on September 11, 2014, 07:15:54 PM
NO someone did make the claim that god did it. Yes an idiot made the statement.

HPV isn't comparable to HIV as some divine punishment. Your source of LGBT and HPV is wrong. It does say "may be at higher risk" but then lists the vague usage of lifestyle and poor overall health. HPV is rarely transmitted through oral transmission. Even if someone contracts HPV, there are several variants, not all are at a high risk of cervical cancer. Whereas with HIV... the prognosis is never good... not as bad as 25 years ago but not good.

Yeah life almost always leads to poor health and always to death. Studying disease in any setting helps to understand the disease process better and develop better strategies for everyone. Even studying vagina licking fatties may help all of us down the road. It is certainly better spent money than building another atomic clock or extra bridge in Alaska.

Actions always have consequences. Alcoholics wear out livers faster than most. Liver transplants are costly, but the knowledge gained has helped in other transplants. Voila Cheney and his new heart. OK bad money all around.
I don't know. Many have been crying about our infrastructure and bridges being in disrepair (recall that bridge in Minnesota falling not too long ago?) It could be one bigger bridge could be worth more than studying some "vagina licking fatties" as you so derisively call them? Cheney, even without his government platinum health plan, I reckon would be able to pay for his heart work fairly easily. Probably even cheaper if he went to one of those special clinics in India. Not sure how much medicine has gained from his work. Neither do I like liver transplants going to rich alkies who, amazingly, get at the top of the list but some Vet gets put on a "secret waiting list." (For that matter, or some wino doesn't even get on the list.) And, I don't know, how much that contributes to science. What is "tougher" medically than a "Dallas" star alkie getting a liver or some wino getting a liver or some Vet who got his liver damaged getting a liver? I'd rather spend limited funds on non-choice made disease though. Enough with HIV/AIDS. We know how to cure it (over time.) Make better/safer choices and screen blood supplies. Focus funds on various blood cancers, childhood diseases, genetic based stuff, pollution caused stuff, cancers, etc. Or to even things like Ebola.

Quote from: albrecht on September 11, 2014, 06:04:29 PM
So why not obesity (which, via various health conditions caused or exacerbated by it) kills more people than HIV/AIDS, syphilis, etc? You claimed lesbians were not afflicted by the alleged "judgement." Clearly government studies, and our tax dollars, say that they are!

JFC, dude, are you saying that god makes the carpet munchers eat more and exercise less?  If he can control their behaviour to that extent, why doesn't he just stop them from "french kissing Mr. Lincoln"?  Wait wait I know, it all part of God's Wonderful PlanTM.  Wanna know another part of that Plan?  Priests who fuck little boys up the ass don't get AIDS or any other STD, nor do they get punished by the Church.  Isn't that a hoot?  God's holy wrath is only for "vanilla" fags, not for child rapists who commit that crime inside the walls of god's fuckin house.

Religious whack-a-doodles are just nuttier than a squirrel turd.  Nothing is too weird to be waived when it comes to justifying their prejudice and hate.

Quote from: onan on September 11, 2014, 07:15:54 PM
Voila Cheney and his new heart.

His "new" heart?  Doesn't that imply that he had one in the first place?

[attachimg=1]

Quote from: onan on September 11, 2014, 04:45:55 PM
If there is a god using a disease to punish homosexuals, then lesbians get a pass... why?

I think god is trying to get us to jack off to lesbian porn rather than sucking each other's dicks.  It's the only explanation that makes sense.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod