Carbon dioxide levels highest for 800,000 years.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

The results put out have been riddled with errors - always on the side of alarmism.  The 'scientists' have been caught discussing how to amplify data that supports them and how to suppress data that doesn't, on and on.  And the solution is clear:  More Taxes, yay. 

Wait.  Were you talking about climate change, or how claims of WMDs got us into a war in Iraq?  Three trillion $ and counting, right?  Oh, well, at least we got rid of "the dictator."  That's one!

[albrecht]

Oh, well, at least we got rid of "the dictator."

Last I heard he was swilling beers in Colorado on yet another junket and instructing his ICE agents to stand-down and allow the flood of diseased, and often criminal, illegal aliens swarm over the open-border. What do you mean we "got rid of "the dictator""? His supposed political enemies (Boehner, et al_ even said they don't want to initiate impeachment proceedings, so our dictator is no where close to gone or "got rid of."

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Last I heard he was swilling beers in Colorado on yet another junket and instructing his ICE agents to stand-down and allow the flood of diseased, and often criminal, illegal aliens swarm over the open-border. What do you mean we "got rid of "the dictator""? His supposed political enemies (Boehner, et al_ even said they don't want to initiate impeachment proceedings, so our dictator is no where close to gone or "got rid of."

Oh, look, another hysterical characterization about Obama from a tea bagger.

[albrecht]

Oh, look, another hysterical characterization about Obama from a tea bagger.

I can post photos also!
I don't think this guy with the great tattoo was an illegal, simply just a regular criminal from this character Obama's core constituency. But, interestingly, it was alleged that at least one of his more recent "dreamers" was caught wearing Obama shoes (though it cannot be determined who manufactured said shoe.) http://www.dmldaily.com/yes-we-can/

Meanwhile, Obama is using our tax dollars to buy his latest batch of dreamers games like Monopoly. Sure it gets them used to using fake money as our economy crumbles but I wonder, why not La Lotteria? Certainly that would be more politically correct and make his dreamers more comfortable with a popular game from their culture. There is a character in the traditional Mexican game that his dreamers would much more likely to know....and maybe even associate with their hero/leader Obama.

[wr250]

Oh, look, another hysterical characterization about Obama from a tea bagger.

irony. it rocks.

your using phrase associated with those you wish to promote  (gays) , to denigrate a political group.
most excellent.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

your using phrase associated with those you wish to promote  (gays) , to denigrate a political group.

I wish I had some idea what you are talking about.

[wr250]

I wish I had some idea what you are talking about.

teabagger
1. n. A man that dips his scrotum and testicles into the mouth of another person. (as if dipping a tea bag into hot water)

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

teabagger
1. n. A man that dips his scrotum and testicles into the mouth of another person. (as if dipping a tea bag into hot water)

Thanks.  Would you kindly explain why using the term "tea bagger" in the context of talking about a political group (i.e. the Tea Party, whose first appellation was The Tea Baggers until someone took them aside and explained it) necessarily means talking about gays, AND why you believe I am trying to "promote" gays in some way?  Then, maybe, possibly, I would have some idea what you are gargling about.

[wr250]

Thanks.  Would you kindly explain why using the term "tea bagger" in the context of talking about a political group (i.e. the Tea Party, whose first appellation was The Tea Baggers until someone took them aside and explained it) necessarily means talking about gays, AND why you believe I am trying to "promote" gays in some way?  Then, maybe, possibly, I would have some idea what you are gargling about.

ill gargle no more.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

ill gargle no more.

Promise?

[PB the Deplorable]

Thanks.  Would you kindly explain why using the term "tea bagger" in the context of talking about a political group (i.e. the Tea Party, whose first appellation was The Tea Baggers until someone took them aside and explained it) necessarily means talking about gays...

Sure.  It's a snide way for an ass-hat to try to smear the tea party.  By referring to them with a term for gays.

Amazing how it always seems to be the Libs - you know, the people always preening about gay rights - who think calling someone 'gay' is an insult. 

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Sure.  It's a snide way for an ass-hat to try to smear the tea party.  By referring to them with a term for gays.

Amazing how it always seems to be the Libs - you know, the people always preening about gay rights - who think calling someone 'gay' is an insult.

I never thought I would be the one on this site to educate you about sex, cuzz.  But here goes.

Tea bagging is not an exclusively homosexual act.  In fact, most often it refers either to a man and a woman, or pranking someone (usually asleep or passed out) who may also be male.

Here, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_%28sexual_act%29

Do you see your fellow brain-dead neocon's definition of the act, above?  It doesn't refer to the tea-baggee as a male.  It says "person."  You might want to take special note that "person" can refer to either a male or a female.  I realize that you neocons don't consider women to be persons, but that's how the rest of the world uses the term.

It's really surprising to me how often neocons display a profound level of ignorance about things that are very simple and well-understood by normal people.  This is just another such case.

[Catsmile]

Sure.  It's a snide way for an ass-hat to try to smear the tea party.  By referring to them with a term for gays.

Amazing how it always seems to be the Libs - you know, the people always preening about gay rights - who think calling someone 'gay' is an insult. 

Didn't the tea party movement call themselves teabaggers first?

How to even start?... 
I'm sure the genetic female will get a good laugh to find out what raging gays we are, because of the above sexual act.
I reckon being gay in the eyes of teabaggers is a cross we'll have to bear.

Seems like conservatives are hung up on gay aspect of the act of teabagging, or sexually repressed/retarded. My mind doesn't jump to homosexual acts when teabagging comes up... dunno maybe that is just me though.

Conservative Pro Tip: Women do have mouths, that is a fact. Despite others beliefs, or wishes.   

[albrecht]

I never thought I would be the one on this site to educate you about sex, cuzz.  But here goes.

Tea bagging is not an exclusively homosexual act.  In fact, most often it refers either to a man and a woman, or pranking someone (usually asleep or passed out) who may also be male.

Here, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_%28sexual_act%29

Do you see your fellow brain-dead neocon's definition of the act, above?  It doesn't refer to the tea-baggee as a male.  It says "person."  You might want to take special note that "person" can refer to either a male or a female.  I realize that you neocons don't consider women to be persons, but that's how the rest of the world uses the term.

It's really surprising to me how often neocons display a profound level of ignorance about things that are very simple and well-understood by normal people.  This is just another such case.

Wasnt one of of Obama's favorite body-men accused of that male tea-bagging "joke" you mention? I think whilst at UNC?  Interesting he would choose that player as his personal body-man for all those vacations sans Michelle.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

Despite the ongoing exposure of the lies, the debunking of the 'evidence'.

Is this the sort of debunking to which you're referring?

"As you [Energy & Environment Cabinet official] sit there in your chair with your data, we sit up here in ours with our data and our constituents and stuff behind us. I won’t get into the debate about climate change but I’ll simply point out that I think in academia we all agree that the temperature on Mars is exactly as it is here. Nobody will dispute that. Yet there are no coal mines on Mars. There’s no factories on Mars that I’m aware of."

Kentucky State Senate Minority Whip, Brandon Smith (R)

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

I won’t get into the debate about climate change but I’ll simply point out that I think in academia we all agree that the temperature on Mars is exactly as it is here. Nobody will dispute that.

Kentucky State Senate Minority Whip, Brandon Smith (R)

Ayep, another product of "Kentucky love."

[Yorkshire pud]

Is this the sort of debunking to which you're referring?

"As you [Energy & Environment Cabinet official] sit there in your chair with your data, we sit up here in ours with our data and our constituents and stuff behind us. I won’t get into the debate about climate change but I’ll simply point out that I think in academia we all agree that the temperature on Mars is exactly as it is here. Nobody will dispute that. Yet there are no coal mines on Mars. There’s no factories on Mars that I’m aware of."

Kentucky State Senate Minority Whip, Brandon Smith (R)

He's one of those goddam experts; how could anyone defy his logic? Ducks don't sink, they must be witches.

[Foodlion]

Seems like conservatives are hung up on gay aspect of the act of teabagging, or sexually repressed/retarded. My mind doesn't jump to homosexual acts when teabagging comes up... dunno maybe that is just me though.

Conservative Pro Tip: Women do have mouths, that is a fact. Despite others beliefs, or wishes.   

lol let's just be honest about this all, would calling the Tea Partiers a sexually suggested name constantly mean that THEY had issues with the sexual act in reference?
Maybe the name caller's just couldn't stop thinking about someone's balls in their mouth. Not their fault if that's their kind of thing. To each their own...

Now, If I called every guy I knew a Fag, wouldn't that be my own personal problem and not the others? And if other's had issues with me calling them fags, then would it be right for me to say
"Hey fags, you got issues cause every time I call YOU fags? Well if you've got issues with me calling you fags, then maybe it's because YOU ARE a fag"

It's a no win situation. You can't blame the guy being called the name for just simply being called the name.


Personally I think name calling is stupid anyways. I'd much rather focus on the failed policies of the other side. It's much more fun that way.

[PB the Deplorable]

I never thought I would be the one on this site to educate you about sex, cuzz.  But here goes.

Tea bagging is not an exclusively homosexual act.  In fact, most often it refers either to a man and a woman, or pranking someone (usually asleep or passed out) who may also be male.

Here, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_%28sexual_act%29

Do you see your fellow brain-dead neocon's definition of the act, above?  It doesn't refer to the tea-baggee as a male.  It says "person."  You might want to take special note that "person" can refer to either a male or a female.  I realize that you neocons don't consider women to be persons, but that's how the rest of the world uses the term.

It's really surprising to me how often neocons display a profound level of ignorance about things that are very simple and well-understood by normal people.  This is just another such case.

So you're an expert in tea-bagging, yay. 

You can use any amount of sophistry you want, but you know good and well that you meant to insult the Tea Party and you meant to do so by calling them some form of 'faggot'.  Why else would you mention 'tea-bagging'?


I'm sure gay America is thrilled with the pandering they get from the Left, and quite pleased that their go-to insult is to call people they disagree with 'gay'.  Very supportive.  Very pro-gay rights

[Catsmile]

lol let's just be honest about this all, would calling the Tea Partiers a sexually suggested name constantly mean that THEY had issues with the sexual act in reference?
Maybe the name caller's just couldn't stop thinking about someone's balls in their mouth. Not their fault if that's their kind of thing. To each their own...

Now, If I called every guy I knew a Fag, wouldn't that be my own personal problem and not the others? And if other's had issues with me calling them fags, then would it be right for me to say
"Hey fags, you got issues cause every time I call YOU fags? Well if you've got issues with me calling you fags, then maybe it's because YOU ARE a fag"

It's a no win situation. You can't blame the guy being called the name for just simply being called the name.


Personally I think name calling is stupid anyways. I'd much rather focus on the failed policies of the other side. It's much more fun that way.

"Didn't the tea party movement call themselves teabaggers first?"

Nice quote snip. The Tea Party started calling themselves Teabaggers.
If I call myself fag, then others start calling me a fag. Who has the problem?
The Tea Party has lost the plot in my eyes. No matter what they call themselves.
It's just a bit ironic they called themselves nut suckers at this point.

Now the Tea Party wants to twist it into the Libs. are calling us a GAY sex act.
That isn't true on 2 counts. They started calling themselves "Teabaggers," not Libs..
Teabagging isn't exclusive to homosexuals as an act. Again, it's them who are screaming GAY act. Just read the conservative posters here, to verify the claims of Libs. calling Tea Party a gay act.

When I first heard the Tea Party ideas of smaller government, lower taxes, et al, they were appealing to me. Then they called themselves Teabaggers, mmm...okay (chortle) no problem. Other things starting cropping up. Such as. Keep gov. hands off my medicare! Shut er down!... it just goes down hill from there. Don't even get me started about their anti-science bent. How quickly the seeds of a good idea escalated into howling madness.

Now they are pretty much The Crazy Howling at the Moon, 0bstructionist Party. If "that charter 0bama," or someone who is atom to the left of them said. "The sky is blue." they scream and howl that it's Socialist end times, and Lib. lies.  :

[West of the Rockies]

You are correct, Paperboy:  tea bagger is now pejorative in reference to those members of the Tea Party.  Why self-aware liberals use such wink-wink, nudge-nudge insults, I do not know.  It is silly and a bit juvenile.

May I assume you are equally bothered by the Something About Barry thread with all its far-more blatant homophobic horse shit?

I ask this of you because of all the conservative posters on this forum, you are IMO the most consistently civil.  Can we reach across the aisle on this point and acknowledge that it's all pretty immature and foolish?

[albrecht]

Wasnt one of of Obama's favorite body-men accused of that male tea-bagging "joke" you mention? I think whilst at UNC?  Interesting he would choose that player as his personal body-man for all those vacations sans Michelle.

I knew in the back of my mind there was some weird "teabagging" incident with one of Obama's closest "body-men", the guy who always was going on all those vacations with Obama (without Michelle, of course.) It was Reggie Love.
http://gawker.com/393526/obamas-body-man-violated

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

Nice quote snip. The Tea Party started calling themselves Teabaggers.
If I call myself fag, then others start calling me a fag. Who has the problem?
The Tea Party has lost the plot in my eyes. No matter what they call themselves.
It's just a bit ironic they called themselves nut suckers at this point.

Now the Tea Party wants to twist it into the Libs. are calling us a GAY sex act.
That isn't true on 2 counts. They started calling themselves "Teabaggers," not Libs..
Teabagging isn't exclusive to homosexuals as an act. Again, it's them who are screaming GAY act. Just read the conservative posters here, to verify the claims of Libs. calling Tea Party a gay act.

When I first heard the Tea Party ideas of smaller government, lower taxes, et al, they were appealing to me. Then they called themselves Teabaggers, mmm...okay (chortle) no problem. Other things starting cropping up. Such as. Keep gov. hands off my medicare! Shut er down!... it just goes down hill from there. Don't even get me started about their anti-science bent. How quickly the seeds of a good idea escalated into howling madness.

Now they are pretty much The Crazy Howling at the Moon, 0bstructionist Party. If "that charter 0bama," or someone who is atom to the left of them said. "The sky is blue." they scream and howl that it's Socialist end times, and Lib. lies.  :

Just call them the Tealiban.  No sexual connotations there.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

So you're an expert in tea-bagging, yay. 

Compared to you, I would expect to look like an expert in many areas.

you know good and well that you meant to insult the Tea Party

You figured that out for yourself?  Without any help at all?  Impressive!

and you meant to do so by calling them some form of 'faggot'.  Why else would you mention 'tea-bagging'?

{     {    {   {  { {{{{  S  I  G  H  }}}} }  }   }    }     }

I see that the lesson didn't take.  Here, let me try and explain it to you, as if to a small child.  If I call Sarah Palin a teabagger, does that mean that I am calling her a faggot?

Think really, really, really hard about it and see if you can figure it out for yourself.  No cheating, now! 

[Catsmile]

Just call them the Tealiban.  No sexual connotations there.

That won't stir any shit at all.

They have devolved into acting more like Muslim fundamentalist than they seem to know, or acknowledge. Thats okay because Christian fundamentalist are the guys in white hats. All the "0thers" wear black hats. (Sigh)  :

Anyone who wants to live a fundamental religious lifestyle, I'm all for their right to do so. Believe anything you want. Just don't try to enforce your religious beliefs on others using legislation. See how well that works for the Muslims. What makes anyone think it will do better here? But it's Christianity it won't be bad like the Muslims. If that is true look at the nonsecular Christian governments, see how well they work out. And if you think they work so well go live there for a while. Fuck... I just made baby Jesus cry. Now I'll hear about it.

[PB the Deplorable]

That won't stir any shit at all.

They have devolved into acting more like Muslim fundamentalist than they seem to know, or acknowledge. Thats okay because Christian fundamentalist are the guys in white hats. All the "0thers" wear black hats. (Sigh)...

Wait, I thought the Moslems were another of the Lib's mascot groups.  "Unfairly singled out for the actions of the very few", we're instructed that "referring to them negatively only serves to perpetuate the stereotype".  And isn't 'faaair', sniffle.

First we have one Lib making gay-baiting posts, now we have another unfavorably comparing Moslems to the Tea Party and to Christians.  I almost expect one of them to start calling us n***ers.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

First we have one Lib making gay-baiting posts

You've been taken to school on this fantasy of yours by multiple people, and not a single person has supported you.  Yet you continue to talk about it like it is objective fact.

That, in a nutshell, describes the process of being a neocon.  It's malevolence mixed with stupidity and ignorance.

[West of the Rockies]

It seems pretty odd to be all bent out of shape by the mocking use of "teabagger" and be fine with a whole thread suggesting that the FLOTUS is a tranny and another thread arguing the POTUS is a cross-dressing homosexual.

Strange, that....

Oh, I get it:  it is all just in good fun! (Except when you use "teabagger" -- then the gloves come off!)

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

It seems pretty odd to be all bent out of shape by the mocking use of "teabagger" and be fine with a whole thread suggesting that the FLOTUS is a tranny and another thread arguing the POTUS is a cross-dressing homosexual.

Strange, that....

Well, not exactly.  They hate fags and women as much as ever, that hasn't changed.  The criticism comes from a belief (or should I say, wishful thinking) that the "libs" are being hypocrites.  Then their existence, and their hate, is validated.

Like I said, stupid and ignorant.

[Yorkshire pud]

It seems pretty odd to be all bent out of shape by the mocking use of "teabagger" and be fine with a whole thread suggesting that the FLOTUS is a tranny and another thread arguing the POTUS is a cross-dressing homosexual.

Strange, that....

Oh, I get it:  it is all just in good fun! (Except when you use "teabagger" -- then the gloves come off!)

,,and as has been pointed out, they ignore it's a thing that women do to men too..In fact I first heard of it from a woman I used to work with who was want to think everyone else in the office wanted to know about her (supposedly) creative sex life. It's what she did with her boyfriend apparently.