President Donald J. Trump

[Dr. MD MD]

Nope. Show me the evidence that millions of illegals voted for your guy Trump.

Go ahead. I'll wait.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teZ56U-uYkc

[Dr. MD MD]

I think your inability to reason is funny too. 

[Dr. MD MD]

You're unable to maintain a coherent argument.

No, you're unable to follow one. 

[PB the Deplorable]

That's just campaign rhetoric. Your moron circle jerk buddy just said so.

I'm asking you what you mean by 'the right'.  Or don't you even know

[Gd5150]

Tell me about the lizard people, douchebag.

Shocking another brainless leftwing lemming with no substance.

James Comey under oath June 8th:

BURR: Director Comey, did the president at any time ask you to stop the FBI investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 U.S. Elections?

COMEY: Not to my understanding, no.

COLLINS: And was the president under investigation at the time of your dismissal on May 9th?


COMEY: No.

And of course we have the confirmation under oath that the election was not effected and there was no collusion.


https://youtu.be/wyiQlBrOhoo

And Democrat Senator Feinstein confirming there no evidence of collusion. And confirms the entire Russian matter was a huge load of bravo sierra created by the Demokkkrat Party/Media.


https://youtu.be/qiLyhqfdpOg

Nuff said

[PB the Deplorable]

Nope. Show me the evidence that millions of illegals voted for your guy Trump.

Go ahead. I'll wait.

This should get you started.  You can find the same pattern in all the very ''Progressive'' states, and ''Progressive'' districts within the normal US states.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/08/06/nearly-a-dozen-calif-counties-had-more-registered-voters-than-eligible-voters-in-2016-election/ 

[PB the Deplorable]

Nope. Show me the evidence that millions of illegals voted for your guy Trump.

Go ahead. I'll wait.

You know the Ds rationalization for not requiring proof of citizenship to register, and not requiring ID to vote is? 

They say blacks are too lazy and stupid to get a state ID.  And the Fake News Media goes along with that instead of calling them out.

[analog kid]

at the time of your dismissal

Another wild moron appears. What do you think that shows?

Holy crap.

[analog kid]

You know what the Ds rationalization for not requiring proof of citizenship to register, and not requiring ID to vote? 

They say blacks are too lazy and stupid to get a state ID.  And the Fake News Media goes along with that instead of calling them out.

Show me proof, jagnut.

[Dr. MD MD]

Show me proof, jagnut.

You just don't seem to have the capacity to understand it even if we did. NEXT! 

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7MV_tmhHwQ

[PB the Deplorable]

Show me proof, jagnut.

I think I've showed enough for a reasonable person to question the validity of Democrat vote totals. 

I never claimed you were a reasonable person. 

[analog kid]

I think I've showed enough for a reasonable person to question the validity of Democrat vote totals. 

I never claimed you were a reasonable person.

Link to a reputable source, and not nutjob Glenn Beck.

[Dr. MD MD]

Link to a reputable source, and not nutjob Glenn Beck.

Now he's going to challenge you if the source isn't a known, in the tank for the Dems news source. 

[PB the Deplorable]

Link to a reputable source, and not nutjob Glenn Beck.

I've provided you the information.  It's either true or false, regardless of source.  Go look at the official county websites if you wish - if the article is wrong, it should only take the information from one County to disprove it.  Or follow the results of the Judicial Watch letter, and possible follow up lawsuit yourself.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-warns-california-clean-voter-registration-lists-face-federal-lawsuit/

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt_QU1igFbg

[Gd5150]

I've provided you the information.  It's either true or false, regardless of source.  Go look at the official county websites if you wish - if the article is wrong, it should only take the information from one County to disprove it.  Or follow the results of the Judicial Watch letter, and possible follow up lawsuit yourself.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-warns-california-clean-voter-registration-lists-face-federal-lawsuit/

LA and SF, 2 of the biggest counties in the state have 115% the number of voters on the rolls as possible. Haha!

If they ever implement real voter ID laws like every other country in the free world, the democrats will lose 20% of their vote. What a complete sham.

[Taaroa]

If they ever implement real voter ID laws like every other country in the free world

Australia doesn't require id to vote, despite having compulsory voting. All they ask is for your name, address, and whether you have already voted in that election.

[PB the Deplorable]

LA and SF, 2 of the biggest counties in the state have 115% the number of voters on the rolls as possible. Haha!

If they ever implement real voter ID laws like every other country in the free world, the democrats will lose 20% of their vote. What a complete sham.

The Ds have been stealing elections forever.  A few of the more notorious:

Nixon beat Kennedy in 1960, but the vote totals in Illinois (Daley Machine), and Texas (LBJ's operatives) were rigged to give those Electoral votes to JFK and the Ds - giving them the election.

The 2004 governors race in Washington State.  Democrat Christine Gregoire lost, but on multiple recounts King County kept ''finding'' more uncounted ballot boxes, until they had enough votes to give Gregoire the victory.  King County ended up with more votes than residents.  Not more votes than registered voters, more votes than residents.  I believe a Lib judge threw out the ensuing lawsuit

''B-1'' Bob Dornan lost his House seat to Loreta Sanchez in 1996 by 979 votes.  The House investigation found 624 non-citizens voted and 125 other votes were improper.  Working with INS, they discovered 4700 additional votes cast by illegal aliens, but the cowardly Rinos in the House ''leadership'' dropped the investigation so as not to upset ''Latino'' voters.

Algore and the Ds tried to steal the presidency in 2000.  The plan was to have multiple recounts in Florida, including and omitting various categories of ballots until they found the combination giving him the most votes, then stoppig and declaring victory.  He never found a combination giving him a majority of votes, and time (per the Florida Constitution for federal elections) ran out.  The US Supreme Court said Florida had to follow it's Constitution.

Al Franken stole the 2008 election for a Senate seat representing Minnesota.  He used the same strategy as Algore in Florida in 2000, except it worked for him.


These voter registrations numbers are nothing new, the Ds have been stealing elections for decades.  Who in the hell would vote for them, other than those wanting handouts, and Libs educated beyond their intelligence who think they should be using government to tell everyone else how to run their lives?  They are far from a majority, other than in certain big city enclaves. 

Given what's been going on with the lawsuits blocking proof of citizenship to register, and IDs to vote, I think they have millions of fake voters on the rolls.  Look how corrupt and dishonest the Ds are in general, Bill and Hilary Clinton (enough said), Berock Obama routinely thumbing his nose at the Constitution and his followers supporting him doing that - they don't care about democracy, the country, following the law, or anything other than gaining more power for themselves and their party.  It seems obvious they would have plans to steal elections and do so where they could.

[Gd5150]

Nixon beat Kennedy in 1960, but the vote totals in Illinois (Daley Machine), and Texas (LBJ's operatives) were rigged to give those Electoral votes to JFK and the Ds - giving them the election.


''B-1'' Bob Dornan lost his House seat to Loreta Sanchez in 1996 by 979 votes.  The House investigation found 624 non-citizens voted and 125 other votes were improper.  Working with INS, they discovered 4700 additional votes cast by illegal aliens, but the cowardly Rinos in the House ''leadership'' dropped the investigation so as not to upset ''Latino'' voters.

I've always thought someone should do a story, what if Nixon had won in 1960. Think of all the things that would have changed drastically. Assassinations. Vietnam wars. Going to the moon. Watergate. And all because of such a close election and the TV debate snafu that changed everything.

As for Sanchez, she never should've been awarded that seat. And now she's our fricken Senator. Just when you thought it couldn't get worse than Barbara Boxer.

[PB the Deplorable]

I've always thought someone should do a story, what if Nixon had won in 1960. Think of all the things that would have changed drastically. Assassinations. Vietnam wars. Going to the moon. Watergate. And all because of such a close election and the TV debate snafu that changed everything.

As for Sanchez, she never should've been awarded that seat. And now she's our fricken Senator. Just when you thought it couldn't get worse than Barbara Boxer.

Loretta Sanchez actually lost the California Democrat Senate primary to Kamala Harris.  The Ds have no leadership and no ideas, so they are trying to groom Kammy as the ''new'', ''fresh'' face of the party, like Obama before her.  And like Hilary Clinton before her, as a rookie Senator she was given plum committee assignments:  Homeland Security, Budget, Intelligence, and Environment (Climate Change).  I think she's the first Democrat Senator we've had fromCalifornia under 100 years old in my lifetime.

[Gd5150]

Loretta Sanchez actually lost the California Democrat Senate primary to Kamala Harris.  The Ds have no leadership and no ideas, so they are trying to groom Kammy as the ''new'', ''fresh'' face of the party, like Obama before her.  And like Hilary Clinton before her, as a rookie Senator she was given plum committee assignments:  Homeland Security, Budget, Intelligence, and Environment (Climate Change).  I think she's the first Democrat Senator we've had fromCalifornia under 100 years old in my lifetime.

Alan Cranston anyone? Haha

[paladin1991]

Really? Instead of dishing out useless platitudes such as: "I'm/we're praying for you" and feeling smug that you can abdicate doing anything useful to a fairy story, I'm the bloke who says 'Okay, what's the problem, how can I help you?" Faith like sympathy is a waste of emotion. Do something that actually makes a difference.

BWahahahaahaah.   Sell it to senda, sister.

[Taaroa]

http://www.newsweek.com/fire-and-fury-trump-being-held-higher-standard-655382

[PB the Deplorable]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG629uoizro

I rarely watch this guy's videos, and if I do it's just to hear his premise in the first few minutes.  He's just a little too full of shit.  One of the old style lefties who think the mainstream media isn't Left-wing enough.  I watched this one all the way through.

The main premise of this video is the Taliban tried to surrender several times, that the US ''rebuffed'' them, and we've been lied to about it.  He also sprinkled in plenty of other facts on other topics - many of which probably need a bit of background or some additional explanitory details, but doing so would lead the viewer to the complete opposite conclusion than the one he wants them to have.

Regarding the Taliban ''surrender'', he says they accepted their defeat, ceded power, put down their weapons, and returned to their villages.  That all they wanted was peace.  The US ''needed an enemy'' for its war machine and began soliciting unsubstanciated information from sources in Afghanistan who were more than happy to turn in innocent people for cash. 

How does he know this?  Someone from Afghanistan wrote a book - call it an unsubstantiated source - saying that's what happened there.  In other words, he's doing what the book says the US is doing - relying on unsubstantiated sources to support the conclusions he wants to draw.

I've paid attention to the war in Afghanistan from the start.  The Taliban never gave in, never stopped fighting, never had any plans to do so.  What does happen is winter is so harsh there the fighters do return to their villages over the winter because it's impossible to carry on a war in the field - they wait for spring thaw.  Meanwhile the leaders spend their winters planning their next offensives.  Do people turn in their neighbors, enemy clans, people they have disputes with?  No doubt.  Is that who we've been fighting?  No.

[Dr. MD MD]

I rarely watch this guy's videos, and if I do it's just to hear his premise in the first few minutes.  He's just a little too full of shit.  One of the old style lefties who think the mainstream media isn't Left-wing enough.  I watched this one all the way through.

The main premise of this video is the Taliban tried to surrender several times, that the US ''rebuffed'' them, and we've been lied to about it.  He also sprinkled in plenty of other facts on other topics - many of which probably need a bit of background or some additional explanitory details, but doing so would lead the viewer to the complete opposite conclusion than the one he wants them to have.

Regarding the Taliban ''surrender'', he says they accepted their defeat, ceded power, put down their weapons, and returned to their villages.  That all they wanted was peace.  The US ''needed an enemy'' for its war machine and began soliciting unsubstanciated information from sources in Afghanistan who were more than happy to turn in innocent people for cash. 

How does he know this?  Someone from Afghanistan wrote a book - call it an unsubstantiated source - saying that's what happened there.  In other words, he's doing what the book says the US is doing - relying on unsubstantiated sources to support the conclusions he wants to draw.

I've paid attention to the war in Afghanistan from the start.  The Taliban never gave in, never stopped fighting, never had any plans to do so.  What does happen is winter is so harsh there the fighters do return to their villages over the winter because it's impossible to carry on a war in the field - they wait for spring thaw.  Meanwhile the leaders spend their winters planning their next offensives.  Do people turn in their neighbors, enemy clans, people they have disputes with?  No doubt.  Is that who we've been fighting?  No.

Jimmy is a disillusioned Democrat who moved even further left instead of right in response to their moral implosion. However, he's not full of shit. I've consistently found him to be one of the more measured, reasonable and well spoken of political commentators on the left (H.A. Goodman too). Yes, it could just be Taliban propaganda or something but I've heard similar reports from other investigators too. Besides, how do we know the reports we've seen over the years weren't anything but propaganda given that they came from a now entirely discredited industry? Ultimately, we're there to create a stable trade zone with people who are willing to go along with the world bank scheme. Those who won't (like Assad) will be demonized and attacked militarily.

[Gd5150]

http://www.newsweek.com/fire-and-fury-trump-being-held-higher-standard-655382

It just seems like a higher standard because Obama wasn't held to any standard. He was lifted and carried through 8 years of worthlessness. Media did the same for Hillary, and Kerry. Never asking any policy questions at all. Never challanging them. Just praise and softballs and magazine covers of the family playing catch and holding puppies. Obamas coverage by far was the the most disgraceful. When he was elected it was 12 months of puff piece magazine covers. The rascist left was obsessed with the fact he was brown.



Looking forward to the issue of People Mag when they talk about the Trumps "pillow talk".



And the left wonders why they're a laughing stock.

[WOTR]

Looking forward to the issue of People Mag when they talk about the Trumps "pillow talk".

Pillow talk with his wife, or with one of the women he grabbed by the pussy?   

[albrecht]

I've provided you the information.  It's either true or false, regardless of source.  Go look at the official county websites if you wish - if the article is wrong, it should only take the information from one County to disprove it.  Or follow the results of the Judicial Watch letter, and possible follow up lawsuit yourself.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-warns-california-clean-voter-registration-lists-face-federal-lawsuit/

"Fake News" of just one of many examples:
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/08/02/boston-fake-ids/
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2017/08/02/6-charged-with-selling-stolen-id-cards-drivers-licenses
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2017/08/rmv_clerks_nabbed_in_fake_id_bust

[Jackstar]

I have witnessed voter fraud with mine own two eyes--ergo, anyone who spams the Internet with posts like, "voter fraud doesn't exist and isn't a problem" is a Got-damn troglodyte.

Link to a reputable source, and not nutjob Glenn Beck.

For example, take this immense faggot... please.