President Donald J. Trump

[CornyCrow]

I absolutely not winding things up.
People are omitting the fact that many=many women are using their sexuality to "get things in life"
They dress sexy provocative, they send subtle erotic signals to influential rich men.
Women also talk dirty about men, about men's penises /man's "package"/,how they would like to hold them,suck on them.
Many women in order to "get things in life" make them self's available for men to 'grab their pussy'.
So let's don't be hypocritical here and feel that what Donald Trump said about 'pussy grabbing' is so worthy of eliminating him from Presidential run.

Only lunatics could conceive that option...

You are not talking about women, but a subset of whores.  This is not normal.  They are a dysfunctional group.  You seem to be implying that most women act this way, but it's not so.  I've never known one woman who acted in that manner. 

Yeah, losers, both men and women, will sell themselves for a buck.  Most people have pride.

[theONE]

You are not talking about women, but a subset of whores.  This is not normal.  They are a dysfunctional group.  You seem to be implying that most women act this way, but it's not so.  I've never known one woman who acted in that manner. 

Yeah, losers, both men and women, will sell themselves for a buck.  Most people have pride.

Well,many of those women who use their sexuality "to get things in life" are not necessary whores in total sense of that word 'whore'.
Some of them would go as far as having sex in exchange for job positions, music acting carriers ,etc etc
But many would not go that far, they would just 'cock tease' to see if they can get what they are after with out spreading their legs.

  "I've never known one woman who acted in that manner." ...hmmm, I'm having very hard time believing that.
As I said they don't have to spread their legs in order to use their sexuality to manipulate men.
Some of them are quite skilled 'cock teasers' ,but if you as a man are observant, you can easily spot them in their game

[RealCool Daddio]

Get ready for it, the age of reality politics has arrived for better or worse.

True.  And it would seem to be Trump's undoing. There will be no surviving dropping the N-bomb.

http://theslot.jezebel.com/producer-says-theres-video-of-trump-saying-the-n-word-1787592521?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=The_Slot_twitter

[albrecht]

You are not talking about women, but a subset of whores.  This is not normal.  They are a dysfunctional group.  You seem to be implying that most women act this way, but it's not so.  I've never known one woman who acted in that manner. 

Yeah, losers, both men and women, will sell themselves for a buck.  Most people have pride.

Remember the show with the "sexy lawyer" who encouraged women to use their sex appeal (and maybe more) to get ahead in the office, win cases, etc? Art was almost panting over her.

I agree with you that most women won't resort to using sex to get ahead although some will. Though in the post-Clinton era (oral sex is not sex,) the mainstreaming of porn, women's "liberation" (slut-walks, "reclaiming" the word slut, etc,) that it might increase in the future? But I think the "sexy lawyers" point wasn't so much use actual sex acts to get ahead but using your looks, charm, dress, tears, etc. Right or wrong most women learn how to manipulate men because we are often very simple creatures.

[Catsmile]

We both know you're winding things up; but just on the off chance you're not, how would your female relatives feel if the introduction from such as Trump was him reaching down to feel their genitals or inappropriately touch them elsewhere? What would you do?

Most likely he would do the same thing hes doing now.
Drop to his knees, and pipe the rich orange man.

[CornyCrow]

Remember the show with the "sexy lawyer" who encouraged women to use their sex appeal (and maybe more) to get ahead in the office, win cases, etc? Art was almost panting over her.

I agree with you that most women won't resort to using sex to get ahead although some will. Though in the post-Clinton era (oral sex is not sex,) the mainstreaming of porn, women's "liberation" (slut-walks, "reclaiming" the word slut, etc,) that it might increase in the future? But I think the "sexy lawyers" point wasn't so much use actual sex acts to get ahead but using your looks, charm, dress, tears, etc. Right or wrong most women learn how to manipulate men because we are often very simple creatures.

Yeah.  You're right.  I've seen women flirting in the workplace, but they were not the type that was being put forward.  I've never known a woman who would crudely refer to a man's sexual organs like that or dress like a slut to get attention.  Not personally.  This certainly does not represent women in general, just as Trump is a poor representation of a man.

[SciFiAuthor]

True.  And it would seem to be Trump's undoing. There will be no surviving dropping the N-bomb.

http://theslot.jezebel.com/producer-says-theres-video-of-trump-saying-the-n-word-1787592521?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=The_Slot_twitter

That'll definitely get him if it's true. It doesn't matter though, as I've been saying, Hillary has this one in the bag already. What the Democrats should be worried about is not Donald Trump, but how Hillary's presidency is going to go. It'll be the reality presidency where not only will Republican politicians be after every scandal, but hackers as well.

[Dr. MD MD]

A conspiracy theory from the 60s gets more attention that the crimes of the most prominent political family in America in your opinion and you're arguing that's a good thing?

This is like watching Republicans trying to justify Bush 2004.

Feel sorry for him. In the 90s he was hypnotized into believing that ANY allegation against the Clintons MUST be false and the result of a VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY! His leader told him so. They are a paragon of virtue!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwtkorQKGFE

[theONE]

Yeah.  You're right.  I've seen women flirting in the workplace, but they were not the type that was being put forward.  I've never known a woman who would crudely refer to a man's sexual organs like that or dress like a slut to get attention.  Not personally.  This certainly does not represent women in general, just as Trump is a poor representation of a man.

You didn't have the blessed opportunity to listen [to overheard] some of hot conversations very proper ladies are having about men's sexual organs.
Your ears would get burned how explicit they can be. But after they leave the room they are so fucking proper and well behaved
that you would never ever think that they are capable of such spicy filthy descriptive in detail men's cock conversations.

[Catsmile]

Sexual assault, like rape isn't acceptable. At least in Western society. No matter what gender or profession one is in life. A pillar of the community, or a whore matters not. Nether should ever be sexually assaulted.

[Dr. MD MD]

I'm saying your constant shit throwing is working against you. Is it a good thing? absolutely not, but as I have said before much of the attack and many that stand with you are irrational.

Right, but your conveniently ignore a mountain of evidence pilling up against Hillary. VERY rational!  :

You are a disgrace to the dude! 

[analog kid]

You didn't have the blessed opportunity to listen [to overheard] some of hot conversations very proper ladies are having about men's sexual organs.
Your ears would get burned how explicit they can be. But after they leave the room they are so fucking proper and well behaved
that you would never ever think that they are capable of such spicy filthy descriptive in detail men's cock conversations.

That you're a red piller is not surprising.

[Dr. MD MD]

People still don`t want an uneducated, adulterous pig to represent them.

What do you mean? You love Bill Clinton! 

[Yorkshire pud]

You didn't have the blessed opportunity to listen [to overheard] some of hot conversations very proper ladies are having about men's sexual organs.
Your ears would get burned how explicit they can be. But after they leave the room they are so fucking proper and well behaved
that you would never ever think that they are capable of such spicy filthy descriptive in detail men's cock conversations.

Well, over thirty prominent republicans have disowned him and obviously don't subscribe to your take of blaming women for Trump behaving like a dirty old man. Unless you also think that him describing his own daughter as a 'piece of ass' is the mark of a normal father?

[136 or 142]

The basic concept of a superdelegate is rigging. Open, clear, obvious rigging of a system.

These Super Delegates were made part of the Democratic Party nominating process in 1984 and they've continued on since then, although this primary may be for the last time.  They were nothing to do with any attempt to help Hillary Clinton, Dunning Kruger.

Hillary Clinton defeated Bernie Sanders in the primary vote by nearly 57-43% and won the pledged delegates by approximately 54-46%.  Under no circumstances would Bernie Sanders have won the nomination.

The worst that can be claimed is that the there weren't many debates scheduled and the dates of some of those debates seemed chosen to minimize viewership.  However, however much the debates scheduling may have been rigged, the final debate had something like five million total viewers.  Even if this was one of those debates put on a date to minimize viewership, that low a number of viewers suggests to me that Democratic Primary voters had already made up their minds and weren't interested in seeing more debates.

[136 or 142]

So there is 4 options for America.

A. Donald Trump
B. Hillary Clinton
C. Donald Trump is replaced as a candidate
D. NO ELECTIONS / martial law -Obama stays!

I'd choose 'D'

[Dr. MD MD]

What is wrong with everyone having a safe and nurturing environment?

The crux of the problem with liberal thinking these days. While you're providing a safe and nurturing space for fundamentalist Muslims here they're shooting you and blowing you up...but that's ok because it's their way. We can't judge! Go on and retreat to your safe space now, maggot!  :

[Yorkshire pud]

The crux of the problem with liberal thinking these days. While you're providing a safe and nurturing space for fundamentalist Muslims here they're shooting you and blowing you up...but that's ok because it's their way. We can't judge! Go on and retreat to your safe space now, maggot!  :

Oh dear! You're getting into statistics again. You know that isn't your strong suit. Look up murders in the US, and the percentage perpetrated by muslims. Its vanishingly small. Then look up the murders perpetrated by 'god fearin christians'.

[136 or 142]

For instance the wikileaks drop of Hillary's "dream of open borders and..." I do not find that in any way damning. What is wrong with everyone having a safe and nurturing environment? After all it is a dream that should inspire working for the good of all.

A dream of open borders is nothing to do with a 'safe and nurturing environment.'  What she said here (if these leaks are genuine leaks and not false) is that she'd like to see real free trade agreements where both capital AND labor can relocate freely. 

Given the economic disparities between the United States and Mexico, this isn't the most practical position, but that's why she is said here to have called it a 'dream.'  Hillary Clinton is a supporter of the concept of free trade and free trade doesn't really make sense when capital is freely mobile but labor mobility is restricted.

[Dr. MD MD]

Oh dear! You're getting into statistics again. You know that isn't your strong suit. Look up murders in the US, and the percentage perpetrated by muslims. Its vanishingly small. Then look up the murders perpetrated by 'god fearin christians'.

You should explain that to their victims, pud. I'm sure they'll find it very comforting.  :

[CornyCrow]

The crux of the problem with liberal thinking these days. While you're providing a safe and nurturing space for fundamentalist Muslims here they're shooting you and blowing you up...but that's ok because it's their way. We can't judge! Go on and retreat to your safe space now, maggot!  :

The Germans caught another Syrian with bombs, intending to blow up an airport. 

[pate]

Oh dear! You're getting into statistics again. You know that isn't your strong suit. Look up murders in the US, and the percentage perpetrated by muslims. Its vanishingly small. Then look up the murders perpetrated by 'god fearin christians'.

Not that I care one way or the other, but I had difficulty finding data on religious preference and murder convictions.  I think it has something to do with some old law or something.  I think it's called the Constitution or Billary's Amen or something.  I am just a dumb-ass 'murican so my not being aware of this is unacceptable, but you as a filthy foreigner may be forgiven.  Heck, I'll write old Lizzy and recommend you for a knighthood or something!  Your continuing and steadfast loyalty to the crown, your ongoing "keyboard commando" efforts to subdue the rebellious colonies, and frankly that sexy dress you are wearing in your avatar are both a credit to yourself and your country.

Yay!  Ima tard!

[CornyCrow]

A dream of open borders is nothing to do with a 'safe and nurturing environment.'  What she said here (if these leaks are genuine leaks and not false) is that she'd like to see real free trade agreements where both capital AND labor can relocate freely. 

Given the economic disparities between the United States and Mexico, this isn't the most practical position, but that's why she is said here to have called it a 'dream.'  Hillary Clinton is a supporter of the concept of free trade and free trade doesn't really make sense when capital is freely mobile but labor mobility is restricted.

Actually, trading in a market should be linked to how many of your people are employed from that market.

[theONE]

I'd choose 'D'

What about updated option E.

So there is 4 options for America.

A. Donald Trump
B. Hillary Clinton
C. Donald Trump is replaced as a candidate
D. NO ELECTIONS / martial law -Obama stays!

Update: 5-th option for America.
E. Hillary's health becomes an issue again or some legal-criminal facts will surface
and she gets replaced as a candidate.

[albrecht]

Oh dear! You're getting into statistics again. You know that isn't your strong suit. Look up murders in the US, and the percentage perpetrated by muslims. Its vanishingly small. Then look up the murders perpetrated by 'god fearin christians'.

Sure, there will always be more of whatever crime in the larger group until Obama's Muslims become a major minority I would suspect, assuming no large-scale 911-like peaceful actions, that more murders will be committed by white men (and especially black men.) But importing more murderers or criminals certainly doesn't help the crime problem. That is what I can't fathom about you 'no borders,' anti-Western culture immigration adherents on the left. They complain our schools are failing, they complain no jobs, they complain about low wages, complain about crime, complain about healthcare access, but, somehow, importing a bunch of uneducated, poor, often criminal and/or unhealthy immigrants into the country is going to help solve those problems? The only reason I will still vote for Trump because at least he talks about the reality and claims he will try to solve the immigration, illegal immigration, and "refugee" problem. The other guys either vocally support it or tacitly support doing nothing about it.

[136 or 142]

Actually, trading in a market should be linked to how many of your people are employed from that market.

Old trick from economics class.  When someone makes a normative statement (in economics and philosophy, a normative statement expresses a value judgment about whether a situation is desirable or undesirable. It looks at the world as it "should" be) the appropriate response is 'why?'

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Actually, trading in a market should be linked to how many of your people are employed from that market.

Explain please.

[136 or 142]

Regarding the terrible things that Hillary Clinton allegedly said about Bill Clinton's alleged rape victims.  The more these things are looked into, the more it seems the Hillary Haters simply make stuff up nearly all the time.

Chuck Todd: "But those accusations have not been true."

[albrecht]

Old trick from economics class.  When someone makes a normative statement (in economics and philosophy, a normative statement expresses a value judgment about whether a situation is desirable or undesirable. It looks at the world as it "should" be) the appropriate response is 'why?'

Hardly a "trick." Not everything is about economics, well, in many cases they can be described in economic terms but that might not fundamentally describe the activity or mean the activity is "good." Slavery, heck even the child sex trade, can be described by economics but, aside from some perverts and many Muslims, most people agree they are not a good thing for society. Likewise economists can describe things like love or charity in economic terms but most people think there is some higher value there than simply looked at as a economic relationship. Though clearly in some case it can be (no, I'm not talking Clinton marriage or their charity.  )

[Corona Kitty]

Hi I'm here for the pussy grabbing.

I kid, what a mess this election turned out to be.