Started by Falkie2013, December 12, 2015, 01:13:40 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Mind Flayer Monk on December 12, 2015, 07:04:20 PMAnd I also never argued with you about that (your user experience).What I addressed was the "ad hominem" as ineffective claim. If an ad hominem was ineffective, you would have not responded and everyone else in addition would have not responded.The actual results are that these ad hominem attacks took over the next two pages of the thread. So they were effective and we negate your claim.
Quote from: Gassy Man on December 12, 2015, 07:06:31 PMAsked and answered. Again, your refusal to accept what I posted is not my issue -- it's yours. But, keep posting so I can use this, etc., etc.
Quote from: MV on December 12, 2015, 04:58:27 PMi get that heather wants to be a radio host, but if i were her, i would walk away from this altogether and go do my own thing somewhere else, unencumbered by the ghost of art bell which will continue to haunt her until she's run out of town by crazies with pitch forks. to start off as the host of a show under these circumstances is less than auspicious, to say the least.
Quote from: onan on December 12, 2015, 06:49:30 PMYou did goad a bit. We only have your word about publishing and awards. And it does smack of sanctimony. I get your point about the better argument. Most of us are quite aware of points of debate. And usually we are protective of people with some history here. With your presentation of teaching others I am somewhat perplexed that you do not see a small part of this as your responsibility. Not that civil conversation isn't a worthy goal. But for a learned man to come into the neighborhood bar and not only criticize one of its members but then to make a claim to authority that can't be proven does shows some limited insight.
Quote from: Freyja on December 12, 2015, 07:18:06 PM+1 Agreed.A seasoned host would have a difficult time doing what she is trying to do.I would listen to her and give her a chance for a great career on another venue, just not in late night radio.For me she just doesn't have the tone, manner and nuance ( perhaps yet) to carry an intimate late night program like we are used to with Art.
Quote from: guildnavigator on December 12, 2015, 08:19:04 PMI think that if Heather continues to do the show, it will get better and better, moving towards this natural and honest delivery. If anything it sounded like she was putting up her guard a little bit. Rightfully so, seeing as how there are threads titled like THIS popping up.
Quote from: WhiteCrow on December 12, 2015, 08:43:06 PMBest to you Heather
Quote from: Falkie2013 on December 12, 2015, 01:13:40 AMDiscuss.
Quote from: Freyja on December 12, 2015, 07:18:06 PMI would listen to her and give her a chance for a great career on another venue, just not in late night radio....and especially on MITD.
QuoteFor me she just doesn't have the tone, manner and nuance ( perhaps yet) to carry an intimate late night program like we are used to with Art.
Quote from: NXOEED on December 12, 2015, 09:08:55 PMI thought she was great under the circumstances.
Quote from: MV on December 12, 2015, 09:14:45 PMFrom what i heard of it, she held things together about 1000% better than most would have.
Quote from: Mind Flayer Monk on December 12, 2015, 07:08:08 PMI understand that, but can you prove your claim?
Quote from: RealCool Daddio on December 12, 2015, 07:19:56 PMSanctimony 101 SyllabusAbout the teacher: Mr. Gassy is frequently published, both on popular internet forums and in the local penny saver, where his weekly column "Limited Insight" can be found between the car wash coupons and the minutes from the neighborhood Cat Fanciers' meeting. He is the recipient of many awards, including Customer of the Week at the Sizzler on route 6 and a certificate of participation for Dale Carnegie training. An inveterate gadfly, Mr. Gassy is known to strike up conversations with complete strangers by informing them he makes a comfortable living.Class materials: Stuff Mr. Gassy finds on Bellgab.comWeek 1:Logical Fallacy definedWeek 2:Ad hominem definedWeek 3:Repeat of week 1Week 4:Repeat of week 2Week 5:Repeat of week 1Week 6:Repeat of week 2
Quote from: Claudius on December 12, 2015, 10:28:30 PMI agree, but it was still really quite terrible. If I throw you a bomb it's not going to go well no matter how well you personally deal with it.
Quote from: Gassy Man on December 12, 2015, 10:27:13 PMAs before, personal attack, but like I said, just keep proving the point.
Quote from: RealCool Daddio on December 12, 2015, 11:17:14 PMYou mean an ad hominem attack, right? Or are you unfamiliar with the term?