Various treaties and fast-track: TPP, TiSA, TTIP, etc etc

[albrecht]

It appears again that the more "extreme," I know that is a loaded word but couldn't come up with a better one right now, of both main Parties (in the USA) and pretty much all of the minor parties seem to be against this latest round of secretive trade agreements. So does it mean the deals are good? Since I think folks like Alex Jones, Code Pink, National Front, Greenpeace etc (so you have communists, white nationalists, conspiracy theorists, labor unions, libertarians, environmentalists, etc) are against them where as most of the big shots in office or in the Parties are for them? In other words the "crazies" or "extremists" are against so it is a good deal? Does this mean "the people" are against it but corporate/government interests are for it? Or a sign, as some would say, that both Parties, at least at the national level, serve the same interests? (Of course, this could be a good thing if those interests benefited the country and its citizens.)

And aside from the secretive treaties what about so-called "fast track?" A good thing, or not. Or is it something that should be given to some Presidents and not to others?

Thoughts?

[albrecht]

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/house-gop-tpa-vote-trade-vote-119056.html?hp=t3_r

[DanTSX]

It only matters here if it is republican or democrat sponsored or supported.  Arguments and support will fall in line with talking points based on political alignment of the proposal. 


Since this is supported by democrat leaders, anyone against it here will be judged as a stupid, racist, hillbilly, who is homophobic and In love with the corporations that fuck them.



Why do hate obama and migrants?  This bill will fix what bush fucked up.   It's a secret so republics s can't ruin it.  Now trust your leaders and support them.

[albrecht]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/17/ryans-misperceptions-on-trade-deal-unveiled-reports-suggest/