Hillary Clinton

[Yorkshire pud]

Q: What happened to the hockey player who said to the other hockey player "$50 for a quickie."

A: He got two minutes for hooking.

He's here all week folks. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

[136 or 142]

He's here all week folks. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

The only place that will take me, I also have to be the waiter.

[chefist]

Here is the leaked memo from CTR about the corrupt strategy the Dems are using. It is psychological control on a massive level, which has been going on for years, but is ramped up in this election due to non-establishment candidate.

136 works for this group, fyi.

[136 or 142]

Here is the leaked memo from CTR about the corrupt strategy the Dems are using. It is psychological control on a massive level, which has been going on for years, but is ramped up in this election due to non-establishment candidate.

136 works for this group, fyi.

I've heard rumors about the failed psyops from Falsify The Record which fired you.

[136 or 142]

He's here all week folks. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

The Clown scare is just a diversionary tactic by McDonald's to cover up that Mayor McCheese was indicted.

[Juan]

The New York Times broke the server story on March 2,2015 - McAluiff approached the woman on March 7.

136 must be David Brock's boyfriend.

[SredniVashtar]

Here is the leaked memo from CTR about the corrupt strategy the Dems are using. It is psychological control on a massive level, which has been going on for years, but is ramped up in this election due to non-establishment candidate.

I imagine the Trump campaign would try something like that but they aren't organised enough. Instead they get people like Drudge and Alex Jones to spread smears that only reach a very small constituency of like 'minds'. It's not corrupt, it's disciplined and smart to try and exploit all the opportunities available.

[chefist]

I imagine the Trump campaign would try something like that but they aren't organised enough. Instead they get people like Drudge and Alex Jones to spread smears that only reach a very small constituency of like 'minds'. It's not corrupt, it's disciplined and smart to try and exploit all the opportunities available.

Not to those who have been corrupted...Hitler/Stalin/Mao all thought they were doing the "right" thing...pollsters and polls are presented to the public as being "accurate and fair". Oversampling one side over the other is unscientific and fraudulent.

[SredniVashtar]

Not to those who have been corrupted...Hitler/Stalin/Mao all thought they were doing the "right" thing...

You went straight to Godwin's Law there! I don't think any of those gentlemen would be wasting all that much time on social media. Comparatively, it's a benign form of manipulation, and there will be plenty of people from the other side doing their bit to redress the balance.

[chefist]

You went straight to Godwin's Law there! I don't think any of those gentlemen would be wasting all that much time on social media. Comparatively, it's a benign form of manipulation, and there will be plenty of people from the other side doing their bit to redress the balance.

When you have the main stream media in your pocket, that is a very powerful propaganda tool. You know you have the population controlled when you can come out in the open and say you are biased, and large segments of the population (including your political enemies) believe your reporting.

[136 or 142]

The New York Times broke the server story on March 2,2015 - McAluiff approached the woman on March 7.

And the FBI Deputy Director wasn't put in charge of the investigation until months later and after his wife lost the special election.  Funny how you left that bit out, liar.

I guess you're angling for a job at the Wall Street Journal. They'll hire any conservative idiot (redundant) and they, like you, have no integrity.

[GravitySucks]

Part III

http://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY

[SredniVashtar]

When you have the main stream media in your pocket, that is a very powerful propaganda tool. You know you have the population controlled when you can come out in the open and say you are biased, and large segments of the population (including your political enemies) believe your reporting.

Then this propaganda isn't very successful if you consider how far it's taken Trump. I don't doubt that most of the media outlets are against him but what does he expect when he's parachuted himself into a contest, is doing it all on a shoestring, and hasn't built up the contacts that Clinton has over a long career? Being a neophyte works for Trump in some ways, because he doesn't have a political record to criticise, but on the other hand it means that he doesn't have much of a media base to work with.

[136 or 142]

Part III

When you ain't got nothing, you've got nothing to lose.

[chefist]

https://twitter.com/KitDaniels1776/status/790603104018427904

[theONE]

Paul Singer, one of the top donors to the Republican Party, is much worse than George Soros.  However, Fox 'News' never told you to hate Paul Singer, so you don't mindlessly regurgitate his name.

But is he as influential /manipulative/ as Soros in the World politics and economy ?

[GuerrillaUnReal]

The Russian hacking story is a complete fabrication. The way Podesta got phished could have been created by a pre-teen. Also there's quietly been a few arrests made in the States in connection to the Wikileaks hacks yet no one is talking about that. Complete lying horseshit.

[K_Dubb]

Here is the leaked memo from CTR about the corrupt strategy the Dems are using. It is psychological control on a massive level, which has been going on for years, but is ramped up in this election due to non-establishment candidate.

136 works for this group, fyi.

Interesting.  Would someone using the word "valence" (which I had to look up, seems to be psychology jargon) fail to distinguish between "prescribed" and "proscribed", effectively antonyms here?

[136 or 142]

But is he as influential /manipulative/ as Soros in the World politics and economy ?

That would depend on what you consider to be important.  Singer donates a great deal more money to U.S political causes than Soros does, so there is that.

[chefist]

Interesting.  Would someone using the word "valence" (which I had to look up, seems to be psychology jargon) fail to distinguish between "prescribed" and "proscribed", effectively antonyms here?

Also, just the other day NBC was quoting a competitive poll that had HRC leading by 8%, and their own NBC poll at her and Trump tied. Polling is used as a propaganda tool, not as an unbiased indicator.

[GravitySucks]

Paul Singer, one of the top donors to the Republican Party, is much worse than George Soros.  However, Fox 'News' never told you to hate Paul Singer, so you don't mindlessly regurgitate his name.

He wouldn't let you date his son?

[GravitySucks]

That would depend on what you consider to be important.  Singer donates a great deal more money to U.S political causes than Soros does, so there is that.

Bullshit

Over $10 million documented since 1999. Doesn't include causes like BLM.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/biography/george_soros.asp

Paul Singer is a US Citizen, George Soros is not.

[K_Dubb]

Also, just the other day NBC was quoting a competitive poll that had HRC leading by 8%, and their own NBC poll at her and Trump tied. Polling is used as a propaganda tool, not as an unbiased indicator.

I suppose the linguistic abuse could be designed to discredit the memo if it ever leaked, like a self-destructing tape.  Hahaha I'm getting the hang of this.

[Astrid Galactic]

Follow the money:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihPx9M-jwuo

[GuerrillaUnReal]

[theONE]

Part III

http://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY

Incredible ,incredible how stupid they are, and funny moment is at 12:29 when she /Jenna Price/ is talking about being careful what they say to others,
and self assuring herself that ..."but you guys.I trust it all will be fine" ...haha

[136 or 142]

Bullshit

Over $10 million documented since 1999. Doesn't include causes like BLM.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/biography/george_soros.asp

Paul Singer is a US Citizen, George Soros is not.

From Wiki: Soros was naturalized as an American citizen on December 18, 1961

You're just making stuff up now.

[theONE]

Follow the money:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihPx9M-jwuo

hehe,..interesting facts

P.S. I like this presenter,her looks, her facial expressions and gesticulating is fun to watch

[136 or 142]

Bullshit

Over $10 million documented since 1999. Doesn't include causes like BLM.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/biography/george_soros.asp

Paul Singer is a US Citizen, George Soros is not.

Paul Singer has donated nearly $5 million more than Soros this cycle alone.
https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php

And

He (Singer) placed No. 3 overall in the 2014 cycle, giving $11.5 million to conservative candidates and super PACs, and No. 16 in 2012 with $3.7 in contributions. In 2014, he was the top conservative donor overall; the only individuals to give more to super PACs and candidates were investor Tom Steyer and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who both supported liberal candidates.

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2015/11/heres-why-paul-singers-endorsement-of-rubio-matters/

So, please stop lying.

[GravitySucks]

From Wiki: Soros was naturalized as an American citizen on December 18, 1961

You're just making stuff up now.

I was not aware that he had been made a US Citizen. I should have looked that up.

I am surprised they allowed him to be a citizen. You know, after turning in over 100 Jews to the Germans because "if he didn't do it, someone else would have".