Started by albrecht, June 21, 2014, 10:05:45 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Quick Karl on July 17, 2014, 06:57:27 PMYou're just a racist.Oh, wait...
Quote from: Foodlion on July 17, 2014, 07:49:59 PMHillary is only black when she's giving a speech to blacks. Hilary's negro dialect
Quote from: onan on July 17, 2014, 07:51:46 PMSame can be said for Herman Cain.
Quote from: The General on July 17, 2014, 08:49:05 PMNope, actually he's black all the time.
Quote from: West of the Rockies on July 17, 2014, 07:55:43 PMWell, I am a Democrat, but I can't say my skivvies are in a bunch over her running. Polls show her looking pretty strong, but on a lot of the liberal blogs I visit, I see a whole lotta meh.
Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 17, 2014, 09:58:45 PMOh, she's running alright.
Quote from: wotr1 on July 18, 2014, 02:56:24 AMAll that is needed now is a Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush show down for president.
Quote from: onan on July 17, 2014, 09:04:39 PMlevity... all I am shooting for here.
Quote from: analog kid on July 18, 2014, 04:46:20 AMJeb is the military industrial complex's wet dream...
Quote from: albrecht on July 18, 2014, 11:40:28 AM... I wonder if an AIDS activist would ask Billary about it sometime?...
Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 18, 2014, 03:46:45 PMAids activists are part of the Democrat coalition, as is the Media.
Quote from: NowhereInTime on July 18, 2014, 03:56:32 PM As is Academia; most of Hollywood (including Tom Selleck, but not Patricia Heaton); Latinos (except Cubans in Miami), Blacks (except guys named Herman); Chinese Americans; all Women who enjoy thinking for themselves; all white Men who have enough self-esteem not to have to contrast themselves with other races; Christians who actually believe in the Gospels, not just Revelations; Japanese; Vietnamese; Cambodians; Hawaiians; Eskimos; Sioux; Mohicans; Navajo; Cherokee; people with disabilities, people who support people with disabilities; people who believe in justice; people who work for a living; people who believe there are better days ahead rather than pine for the white male hegemony of yesteryear...In other words, pretty much everybody who isn't a pissed off white guy.
Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 18, 2014, 03:59:14 PMYou left out the America haters, who have seized the Party and who lie to those you listed in order to keep them in the fold.
Quote from: wotr1 on July 18, 2014, 11:29:01 AMThat is the point. There would be a race for what is arguably the most important job in America and you would have two of the worst people imaginable running. Because it is pretty much a two party system there would be a guarantee that one of these two extremely distasteful people would get in. Possibly it would cause people to wake up and pay a little attention to the whole process rather than just being presented with a choice of two candidates with their names on the ballot (though i doubt it...)
Quote from: NowhereInTime on July 18, 2014, 04:02:59 PMJust checked my list, nooooo, not here...Those are pretty much in your camp. Who hates the American people more than a conservative? Maybe a libertarian...
Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 18, 2014, 04:07:14 PMOffhand I'd say someone who makes it a point to state he wants to 'fundamentally change the country' isn't someone who likes much about it the way it is.Obock Barama didn't create this Leftwing hate of America, it created him.
Quote from: albrecht on July 18, 2014, 04:18:30 PMI don't think anyone honestly ever thought Obama liked the country, or even had any even basic allegiance to it...
Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 18, 2014, 04:24:35 PMAfter all those years of taking advantage of Affirmative Action to go to the best schools and then being handed plum jobs by the Daily Machine, when Barry was nominated Michelle was finally proud of her county. Probably lasted about a day.
Quote from: NowhereInTime on July 18, 2014, 05:31:48 PM... we are so much better than the narrow vision of property activists.
Quote from: NowhereInTime on July 18, 2014, 05:31:48 PMOr at least until he got a face full of teabagging glory.I love this country, and I am disappointed about the whiny, selfish, grubby teabagger squeaky wheel. As a country, we are so much better than the narrow vision of property activists.
Quote from: albrecht on July 18, 2014, 08:32:43 PMIn all seriousness, I wonder what your views on property are? You mention "property activists", what does that mean? This Supreme Court you usually vilify for its "right wing" rulings recently (HobbyLobby, Corporate Speech, Gun rights, etc) made one of the worst rulings vis-a-vis private property in our history. So you should support them, at least on that. But, seriously, what is your view on property? It seemed, after you huffed and puffed a bit, earlier to say that the government shouldn't seize wages without at least a court hearing. But do you feel same on other types of property? Are you against, on principle, private ownership of property? Only real property or all property? Portable possessions? Bank accounts? Do you support Hollywood (big Obama supporters) in their persecution of file-sharers (after all why should that media property be held dear?) Where do you draw the line? And when does one become a "property activist?"
Quote from: NowhereInTime on July 19, 2014, 09:35:31 AMOne is a "property activist" when you place property and wealth above all else. You value your treasure so much you care only about your wealth. You do anything, say anything to keep it, even lie and commit crimes. You misrepresent anyone you feel may, in any way, endanger any part of your acquisitions. Whether there's any real danger, it doesn't matter. It yours, by God, and none shall breach! Society, be damned! Country, be damned! The reality is that we fought a war over the definition of property. The side that included black human beings as property lost. Yet that side claims God is on their side. Go figure.Property belongs to one who earns it.Earns, not homesteads native American land. (google: homestead act) (Ironically, part of the Homestead Act was to prevent slave owners from extending to other territories. Yet, from where did the land come? It had all belonged to native Americans, even if the French or Spanish claimed it. Also, the Homestead Act no longer exists, so even if you wanted to, you couldn't have the same advantages people who now own large tracts of this nation had - free land.)Earns, not connives with arcane indentures, creating perpetual debt where blacks signed back their land and sharecropped what should've been theirs.(google:sharecropping)Earned, not where a company like Bain bribes a management team with bonuses for awarding them a contract to manage all assets, then lays off thousands of people, saddles the company with debt to pay management fees to themselves, then breaks the company apart while paying themselves fees to manage the bankruptcy. (google: Bain capital)Earned, not connived by arranging low grade mortgage securities into a pool for unwary investors, then arranging to be the counterparty to those securities, knowing full well they were misgraded and going to fail. (google: John Paulson)Earned, not borrowing $6 million from Daddy, then "parlaying" it into billions by holding a city hostage and dodging out of obligations through bankruptcy. (google: Donald Trump)I think you get the point. What's ironic is the people who've schemed and connived the most are the loudest advocates about "stealing" what's theirs. As if anyone, ever in this nation's history, has been taxed into the poor house.
Quote from: albrecht on July 19, 2014, 12:54:03 PMFor someone who hates corporations and the idea of property so much you use, and mention, "google" so frequently.
Quote from: ItsOver on July 19, 2014, 01:13:13 PMShe can be the third black President. I'm not sure about her being the first lady President.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/04/03/bill_clinton_i_loved_being_called_the_first_black_president.html