SBX-1

[Jackstar]

Instead of pasting irrelevant links, what about you telling us in your own words how frequency is related directly to Volts, Amps and Watts.,. ?

How about you address the strange inconsistencies in the mysterious death of Loretta Fuddy?

You are fooling absolutely no one.

[Stellar]

Instead of pasting irrelevant links, what about you telling us in your own words how frequency is related directly to Volts, Amps and Watts.,. ?

Ok lets get to the race track or is it the circuit board?   The track is analogous to a trace line which runs along the circuit board; these trace lines feed the electricity needed for a particular function of the circuit board.  Resting upon the circuit board of say a radio are components which alter the electrical current that are attached to the traces.  Depending on input and output the alternating current in a transmitter attached to an antenna produces radio frequency waves.

Now let's look at a schematic of a transmitter:


Phased Array IC:

[wr250]

a transmitter can operate on 12V. it can also operate on 5V , or 120V . output can be controlled to any frequency. mu 500 milliwatt transmitter cna transmit on any frequency in the FM band. yes even 91.8. power (watts) has no bearing on frequency. you can transmit on 91.8 with .5W or 50,000 W. the only difference is how far away the signal can be picked up. there is no relationship between W and HZ .

[Stellar]

a transmitter can operate on 12V. it can also operate on 5V , or 120V . output can be controlled to any frequency. mu 500 milliwatt transmitter cna transmit on any frequency in the FM band. yes even 91.8. power (watts) has no bearing on frequency. you can transmit on 91.8 with .5W or 50,000 W. the only difference is how far away the signal can be picked up. there is no relationship between W and HZ .

I'm wrong what I meant was that with the amount of Joules you can figure out a frequency.

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

[Jackstar]

Just so we're clear here: even though we probably agree, I have literally no idea what the fuck he is even talking about.

I kind of like it that way. Fresh eyes to old problems.

[wr250]

How do i convert Energy (joules) into frequency (Hz)?

You can't, in general.

IF you're talking about photon energies, then the relationship

E = h nu

applies. E is the photon energy (which will be a very small number of Joules), nu is the frequency (Hertz), and h is Planck's Constant which, as I recall, is about 6.63 x 10^-34 Joule seconds.

note this applies to each photon and not all the photons emitted . and it only applies to photons. it does not apply to ac current (dc current by definition has 0hz),sound, or any other item. it is simply the energy of the photon (which determines its wavelength, and thus its frequency),which determines what the photon is (visible light, radio, gamma ray, etc) . the higher the energy the shorter the  wavelength ,radio begin long and gamma ray being short.

it should be noted that watts measure rate of work, and joules measure energy. not the same and not interchangeable (at least as far as photons go) .

refer to my post here http://bellgab.com/index.php?topic=6051.msg259975#msg259975
where i said:

frequency has nothing to do with watts

and asked :

please explain the electo-magnetic theory behind your statement.

[Stellar]

How do i convert Energy (joules) into frequency (Hz)?

You can't, in general.

IF you're talking about photon energies, then the relationship

E = h nu

applies. E is the photon energy (which will be a very small number of Joules), nu is the frequency (Hertz), and h is Planck's Constant which, as I recall, is about 6.63 x 10^-34 Joule seconds.

note this applies to each photon and not all the photons emitted . and it only applies to photons. it does not apply to ac current (dc current by definition has 0hz),sound, or any other item. it is simply the energy of the photon (which determines its wavelength, and thus its frequency),which determines what the photon is (visible light, radio, gamma ray, etc) . the higher the energy the shorter the  wavelength ,radio begin long and gamma ray being short.

it should be noted that watts measure rate of work, and joules measure energy. not the same and not interchangeable (at least as far as photons go) .

refer to my post here http://bellgab.com/index.php?topic=6051.msg259975#msg259975
where i said:
and asked :

wr250 I really hate to do this to you, but plagiarism from yahoo answers seems to me a bit kinda well sad.  Obviously you are not really an electrical engineer, which I was hoping for, but some people play that way.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071203150250AAm545p
lets be basic here:

Joule=Joule so once again we refer to the easy calculator which yes makes life fun and easy.
http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm
Wow check this out 5.8111009e-26 Joules gives you 87.701Mhz. So Joules will tell you the frequency.  Yet Joules can be converted to watts.  Simply input the Joules above and if you can read it properly you will see the frequency in Mhz.


https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071203150250AAm545p

[Yorkshire pud]

wr250 I really hate to do this to you, but plagiarism from yahoo answers seems to me a bit kinda well sad.  Obviously you are not really an electrical engineer.

Typical CT rank arrogance. You don't have a clue yet assume no-one else has. Typical CT hypocrisy too, you plagarise all day long yet when some else posts clarification it's all wrong. Tosser.

[Jackstar]

Numfar! Do the Dance of Tentative Unblocking!


http://youtu.be/2hngBzDDyFE

[Stellar]

Typical CT rank arrogance. You don't have a clue yet assume no-one else has. Typical CT hypocrisy too, you plagarise all day long yet when some else posts clarification it's all wrong. Tosser.

Yorkshire there is a difference between sources and plagiarism.  Show me one post that is not my original idea and prove it.

[Yorkshire pud]

Yorkshire there is a difference between sources and plagiarism.  Show me one post that is not my original idea and prove it.

That's easy to answer. All of them. You simply rejurgitate whatever shite you've found on a CT website or heard on YT. The CT site will be full of feedback telling the deluded fool he's doing great work, thus meaning they're good to go. It's still bollox of course but feels so real to you.

[wr250]

wr250 I really hate to do this to you, but plagiarism from yahoo answers seems to me a bit kinda well sad.  Obviously you are not really an electrical engineer, which I was hoping for, but some people play that way.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071203150250AAm545p
lets be basic here:

Joule=Joule so once again we refer to the easy calculator which yes makes life fun and easy.
http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm
Wow check this out 5.8111009e-26 Joules gives you 87.701Mhz. So Joules will tell you the frequency.  Yet Joules can be converted to watts.  Simply input the Joules above and if you can read it properly you will see the frequency in Mhz.


https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071203150250AAm545p

please note that was the 1st answer on google search. for review here is the initial post to which i am responding.

And yes SBX-1 raised the bar of BS, because satellites can detect missile launches.
http://www.space.com/20309-military-launches-missile-defense-satellite.html

The SBX-1 power capabilities are enough for a phased array of the latest technology. The SBX-1 is 350 times smaller than HAARP.  According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.  Because over time and due to Moore's law technology becomes exponentially smaller and more powerful every 2 years, I believe the capabilities out do HAARP.  Also due to a tilt mechanism I believe the Azimuth of the SBX-1 can be extended in any direction within so many degrees.  Here are some photos.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar

4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds which is the electrical resonate frequency of igneous rock within the lithosphere.
http://www.rapidtables.com/calc/electric/Watt_to_Joule_Calculator.htm

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

and according to
http://chemistry.oregonstate.edu/courses/ch660/Supplement%201.pdf , watts in the terms you specify above, is measured in photons per second

Each photon has an energy of h in Joules so photons/s times joules/photon is
joules/s or Watts. Hence to convert any radiometric quantity in terms of Watts per whatever (e.g.,
W/sr) to photons/s per whatever, just divide by h.

which is exactly what you did.

And yes SBX-1 raised the bar of BS, because satellites can detect missile launches.
http://www.space.com/20309-military-launches-missile-defense-satellite.html

ok maybe thats its purpose

The SBX-1 power capabilities are enough for a phased array of the latest technology. The SBX-1 is 350 times smaller than HAARP.  According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.  Because over time and due to Moore's law technology becomes exponentially smaller and more powerful every 2 years, I believe the capabilities out do HAARP.  Also due to a tilt mechanism I believe the Azimuth of the SBX-1 can be extended in any direction within so many degrees.  Here are some photos.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar

radio frequency  output is limited by antenna size. the longer the wave, the larger the antenna is needed. that is simply the way it is. using smaller antenna introduces losses (1/4 wave antenna for example is not quite as efficient as a full wave antenna and for reason of space im not going into antenna theory).

the output of haarp reached a "target of 1MW output" ( http://www.alaska.edu/federal/fedinit02/HAARP.html )in 1998. since i cant find any other credible (and ATS or GLP dont count as "credible") spec quickly lets go with that. 1MW = 1 million watts .
1,000,000 / 350 = 2857.14285714 W, which on a platform that size isnt much, really (considering a 50,000W radio station, w/ancillary equipment/buildings) takes up less than an acre. 

moores law only states that computing power (not frequency or watts) doubles every 18 months
http://www.mooreslaw.org/
although often referenced for shrinking other applications , it is most used for computing power (computations per second not watts).

4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds which is the electrical resonate frequency of igneous rock within the lithosphere.
http://www.rapidtables.com/calc/electric/Watt_to_Joule_Calculator.htm

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

single photon has that amount of energy via your calculator. photon energy is more correctly referenced using either electron volts (Ev) or ergs.

now the lithosphere is the earths crust. what are you proposing here?: 4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds which is the electrical resonate frequency of igneous rock within the lithosphere.

without knowing what you are proposing ill speculate:
1. power generation -probably a losing cause
2. causing earthquakes -another loser, the amount of photons you would need would be in the trillions of watts unless you are thinking butterfly effect which would require precise knowledge of where  a pending earthquake is about to occur anyways, which we do not have at this time.
3. long wave communication (say with submarines) - possible , but with 2857W unlikely, would need a larger antenna to receive as well (sub itself could be the antenna though)
4. although not in the lithosphere, radar type platform (weather, aircraft,missile detection) is the most likely give the above.
so please explain

[wr250]

just to be clear:
i am not an electrician or electrical engineer.
im just a guy who has reasonable and average intelligence amongst the human species.
i can think cognatively, despite the majority of my posts (most of which bash jorch).
i believe i have an open mind, but not so open my brain falls out.

[wr250]

upon further examination i may have misread the following:

The SBX-1 is 350 times smaller than HAARP.  According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.

so is this 350 x less output (how i read it initially) or physically 350 times smaller in size?

if in size, i have problems with the 1MW output, the energy has to come from somewhere, probably a generator, which requires fuel. since haarp occupies 30 acres, and this is 350x smaller or .08 acres (3484.8 sq ft or 323.7 sq meters, assuming its square, ~60ft on a side (20 meters) ), which really isnt that big, considering the USS Ronald Reagan  has over 4 acres of deck space.

[Yorkshire pud]

upon further examination i may have misread the following:

The SBX-1 is 350 times smaller than HAARP.  According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.

so is this 350 x less output (how i read it initially) or physically 350 times smaller in size?

if in size, i have problems with the 1MW output, the energy has to come from somewhere, probably a generator, which requires fuel. since haarp occupies 30 acres, and this is 350x smaller or .08 acres (3484.8 sq ft or 323.7 sq meters, assuming its square, ~60ft on a side (20 meters) ), which really isnt that big, considering the USS Ronald Reagan  has over 4 acres of deck space.

Stellar won't bother with mere probability; He's already bored and gone to 'research' his next conspiracy theory.

[Jackstar]

Stellar is immature. You're no better.

[onan]

Stellar is immature. You're no better.

Really? You want to address immaturity?

[wr250]

Really? You want to address immaturity?

your on a roll today. please dont hold back anymore lol.

[steelbot]

Really? You want to address immaturity?

Especially on BellGab?

[Jackstar]

You want to address immaturity?

No.










Where does all this water vapor go? Address that.

[Yorkshire pud]

No.

Where does all this water vapor go? Address that.

Everyone knows that!!! It's collected by 'them' in secret invisible domes that hover in the stratosphere. When 'they' have collected enough water vapour (or to give it, it's true name 'human death gas') it's sent down invisible pipes to ground level and becomes the staple ingredient in most foods we eat, even for vegetarians and vegans. Anyone who says otherwise is a paid shill and works for 'them'. 

[Jackstar]

8) BONUS TRAIT: Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

1) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth  can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

Re: SBX-1 by Yorkshire pud (General Discussion)
Today at 04:27:29
Re: SBX-1 by Jackstar (General Discussion)
Today at 04:20:50

Dat nigga be on dis like white on ri... oh, wait, excuse me. Wrong Queen.

[Yorkshire pud]

Re: SBX-1 by Yorkshire pud (General Discussion)
Today at 04:27:29
Re: SBX-1 by Jackstar (General Discussion)
Today at 04:20:50

Dat nigga be on dis like white on ri... oh, wait, excuse me. Wrong Queen.

Pah!! You think the CIA don't already pay me a Queen's ransom to keep you and Stellar under investigation? You're a bigger threat to the establishment than you think; Just check your phones before calling...three clicks is a clue...(I didn't tell you that, okay?)

Oh and be careful about your prosthetic spine..the implants are already in there...I can't say any more. 

[Stellar]

Pah!! You think the CIA don't already pay me a Queen's ransom to keep you and Stellar under investigation? You're a bigger threat to the establishment than you think; Just check your phones before calling...three clicks is a clue...(I didn't tell you that, okay?)

Oh and be careful about your prosthetic spine..the implants are already in there...I can't say any more.

Off topic:
Jackstar this is what you call reverse psychology, but for Yorkshire Pud he is probably using triple reverse psychology in which what he said he will claim its a joke, but really he is a government shill and perhaps he is either Mi5 or Mi6 and the CIA is just a cover!  The worldly establishment is afraid of folks like us so this graph will tell you why.

Wealth Inequality/Distribution in America

To be clear Jackstar there is plenty of money to be offered to shills by the top 1% Fractional Reserve siphon leeches.

[Jackstar]

Off topic? I thought that was the topic.

[wr250]

Off topic:
Jackstar this is what you call reverse psychology, but for Yorkshire Pud he is probably using triple reverse psychology in which what he said he will claim its a joke, but really he is a government shill and perhaps he is either Mi5 or Mi6 and the CIA is just a cover!  The worldly establishment is afraid of folks like us so this graph will tell you why.

Wealth Inequality/Distribution in America

To be clear Jackstar there is plenty of money to be offered to shills by the top 1% Fractional Reserve siphon leeches.

gee ,looks like retired41 is right, we are all bottom feeders.period..

[Jackstar]

"They even had to move five cemeteries."


http://youtu.be/s5KgYFvsW0c

[Yorkshire pud]

"They even had to move five cemeteries."

Ah yes, the old conflation of a rocket engine producing H2O that dissipates into the sky with a floating radar scanner mistake.. I see why you might confuse the two..

[Jackstar]

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentatorbecome argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

[Yorkshire pud]

Is that an admission that you do think clouds and radar are the same thing?