President Donald J. Trump

[Jackstar]

Careful with those tweezers!

« Reply #21511 on: Today at 01:47:57 »

« Reply #21512 on: Today at 01:49:28 »


Even tweezers were overkill, you Establishment chump.

[NowhereInTime]

I wish to be clear here--it took me less than eight minutes (mv's unimpeachable timestamps support this) to read this shitbag's posts and to determine that this shitbag was a shitbag.

It is my hope that this is obvious to all. Anyone still mystified, please PM--I have more nudes of myself to offer in exchange for cogent analysis.

As usual, good stuff. Do they ever let you out?

[Jackstar]

On a cellphone no less.

I see you've found my honeypot! Can you patch its Linux while you're there? Thanks in advance.

[Jackstar]

they

Tell us more.

[Jackstar]

Coming from a pinhead like you this is a compliment.

Thereby voiding the tiniest shred of credibility you had left.

The most dubious claim of the day...

Really? You just happen to have that thesis and found evidence to support? Well I'll be damned!


I love it when some Breitard thinks he's going to get me good. It's like kids drawing on  the walls.

Sigh. And you need to learn how to read. Go back and re-read it. Better yet, have an adult read it to you so you will understand that I hope that Drumpf & Bannon push their trillion dollar plan through.

So.far the "ripping's" off to an inauspicious start....

Ok, let's see if you do better here.

Ummm, it seems you're proving my point for me. A) Targeting one group of people based on race or faith is bigotry, B) so far our recent terror attacks (Orlando, San Bernardino) were done  by homegrown, radicalized Muslims (before that they had names like James Holmes, Adam Lanza, Eric Rudolph, and Timothy McVeigh. Allahu Akbar). Still not "ripped".


Systems and safeguards we already have in place. NYPD's analysis of the recent spate of attacks concluded that France & Belgium were lax in implementing already extant security protocols, not that they needed a "registry".

And you forgot the Phoenix Memo, where the FBI had identified threat and potential offender, but an indifferent conservative administration ignored the police work.

Ripping's turned into a bit of soft bite.

No. It's not okay they do that. It's UnAmerican.

You know, every time you right wingdings claim this mass violence that's burning down cities and shutting down roads I look for it and don't see it anywhere. My friend runs a store in Times Square. A couple nights ago as a safety protocol she had to close doors normally kept open. Not close shop, just doors. Not one item was stolen. No looting in Times Square. Or anywhere.

This isn't a ripping. It's a rout.

So you see, theONE, you've really embarrassed yourself here.

No, what I've seen here is the absolutely worst attempt at rebuttal ever on Bellgab. And that includes Paper*Boy.  You were ill prepared, made incorrect assertions, actually made my point on bigotry for me, and lost tremendous face here.

So much for "ripping me a new one".

One last thing: the "guy " may not be in office yet but how about showing better communication skills than Twitter? Too much to ask?

btw, I just quoted and posted this wall of bullshit because I thought it looked cool, like some kind of faggy Picasso.

[theONE]

Careful with those tweezers!

NIT , putting our "discussions" aside, this is more serious issue here,..
you might like to know that we are dealing here with a real life pedophile Jackstar
aka A Star Is Porn aka jafstar who posted picture of a naked baby in his avatar.
it happened few (2) pages back... just so you know that Jackstar is a pedo creep

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Jackstar]

a real life pedophile

[Jackstar]

no one should be surprised at this .

What about all your faggot recruits?

That plane crash?  No.
I don't believe it crashed in the ocean, nor have I ever.

Jackstar is a pedo creep

[paladin1991]

Their coffee is so over roasted that is gross, reason is over roasted is to cover shitty quality beans.
I seldom buy coffee in coffee shops, I grind fresh each time I make cup at home and brew it in a top stove stainless steel espresso pot
and buy 100% arabica beans,..long time ago I was thinking that 100% arabica beans is just a snobbish thing ,but after tasting various beans
I do prefer arabica for sure.

Elitist Scum.

[paladin1991]

I would only check that box if it helps me get into college or get government benefits of some kind.     

Do I suck dick? No. Do I support sucking dick? Absolutely. Some of the best people I know are dick suckers. Take my wife. Please. :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMkN8bMWTdw

Which position?

[Jackstar]

Which position?

Can I get her to spam the Quote button while making one-off one-liners that are never, ever funny? Asking for a friend who wants to make a quick buck off your diseased mother whore.

[Jackstar]

Which position?

P.S. your work in Iraq was a lie, you trench faggot

[paladin1991]

Nah, not the least bit funny. Clinton is smart enough, and tough enough, to fill the billet. Why not do it? It might give some measure of assurance to folks that think Trump is a complete, flaming asshole. He`s willing to cross the aisle to mend political anal fissures...and all that.

FIFY

[paladin1991]

You heard about the depression then.? Oh, and WW2. Although the US were two years late for the party.

Late to a fight you started and couldn't finish?  Meh. 

[paladin1991]

Poor Glenn, he had to go on CNN and suck their cock to try to remain relevant after the election. The Trump tears just were over the top and stupid and barely anyone listened, surprising considering that not all that long ago he was a huge radio host. The man can shed audience faster than Art, which is saying something.

Yeah.  Unlike ART, the man just won't quit.

[Jackstar]

you trench faggot

wow, look who thinks this thread is suddenly so important

[CornyCrow]

A Jewess.

Well, it's the sort of thing that David Duke might say and get blasted for in the media, but not her.  She said it and everyone treated it as normal.   

[SredniVashtar]

Its a given; I'm a Yorkshireman. Englishmen are as a rule (other than those from Lancashire, Norfolk, parts of Shropshire and most of Hertfordshire) far wittier than the average American male. Yorkshiremen are simply the cream.

Yeah, rich and thick.

[PB the Deplorable]

... You know, every time you right wingdings claim this mass violence that's burning down cities and shutting down roads I look for it and don't see it anywhere. My friend runs a store in Times Square. A couple nights ago as a safety protocol she had to close doors normally kept open. Not close shop, just doors. Not one item was stolen. No looting in Times Square. Or anywhere...

Interesting.  Come to Oakland.

Let me ask you this - if personal observation is what counts here, how much of the following have you personally observed (quote from your own post ):  ''... painting swastikas, bullying muslims, or chanting "Build the Wall" at high school football games...'' 

And remember, be honest.  I know when you're lying.

[PB the Deplorable]

... painting swastikas, bullying muslims, or chanting "Build the Wall" at high school football games.

[PB the Deplorable]

... No, what I've seen here is the absolutely worst attempt at rebuttal ever on Bellgab. And that includes Paper*Boy.  You were ill prepared, made incorrect assertions... and lost tremendous face here...

Says the guy who won't tell us whether those who wish to obstruct a presidents agenda are always racist/racialist, or whether he was lying about that the last time around.

[PB the Deplorable]

Here's one for NIT:

When folks here pointed out Obama ignored court orders, ignored the laws he swore to uphold, bypassed Congress to decree new law, evaded Senate consent by calling treaties 'agreements', illegally declared the Senate in recess when it wasn't and made appointments without confirmation, wrote Executive Orders that were illegal in that they had the effect of making new law rather that reorganizing priorities and the like, shielded information using Executive Privilege in order to avoid personal political consequences rather than protecting national security and the like, made certain decisions requiring the consent of Congress without it - what did NIT say?

He said this was simply Obama ''testing the limits to his office''.  He actually said that.  And in his usual pretentious manner.  (And of course anyone who disagreed was racist)

Being nothing if not consistent, no doubt NIT will say the same if Trump were to cross any of those lines too, right?  Right?

[NowhereInTime]

Says the guy who won't tell us whether those who wish to obstruct a presidents agenda are always racist/racialist, or whether he was lying about that the last time around.

Boy you keep coming back to this intellectually dishonest point. Your question makes no sense because it is inherently dishonest. To even imply that so much opposition to Obama wasn't based on race is, much like yourself, wholly fraudulent, especially since you think the same type of opposition would apply to Trump.

Did you hear Chuck Schumer say "We need to make Trump a one term president"? No. He's already eager to work with Trump on infrastructure, ending carried interest loophole, and is open to improving Obamacare (not repealing.) Far different from the reception Obama received.

You really are a lightweight.

[NowhereInTime]

Here's one for NIT:

When folks here pointed out Obama ignored court orders, ignored the laws he swore to uphold, bypassed Congress to decree new law, evaded Senate consent by calling treaties 'agreements', illegally declared the Senate in recess when it wasn't and made appointments without confirmation, wrote Executive Orders that were illegal in that they had the effect of making new law rather that reorganizing priorities and the like, shielded information using Executive Privilege in order to avoid personal political consequences rather than protecting national security and the like, made certain decisions requiring the consent of Congress without it - what did NIT say?

He said this was simply Obama ''testing the limits to his office''.  He actually said that.  And in his usual pretentious manner.  (And of course anyone who disagreed was racist)

Being nothing if not consistent, no doubt NIT will say the same if Trump were to cross any of those lines too, right?  Right?

Again, typical Paper*Boy: use a false assertion to build an argument that topples like a house of cards.

First, if Obama did anything "illegal" do you really think the Tea Party Congress wouldn't draft articles of impeachment? For Heaven's sake how many Benghazi hearings did they have??

Only you and your craven ilk think Obama did anything "illegal".

Second, let's see what Trump does after he's sworn in before we assume we know the answer.

You Dubra soaked fraud.

[NowhereInTime]

I see you quoted withouf comment; must mean you are in agreement.

[Dateline]

Folks, I saw it this morning on Twitter, so you know it is true. 

Trump has announced that he is doing away with all public speeches, ceremonial address and State of Union presentations.  All of the above will be done through Twitter, and if it over the amount of characters that Twitter will allow, it will be posted on the White House Facebook page.  Be sure and hit the Like button and share it with all of the Hilary supporters.  If you Pin Interest it and are a female beware of men with bad toupees.

[Yorkshire pud]

Oh yeah? then why are all those countries considered commonwealth? 

Because its the Commonwealth. If you don't know the difference between that and the BE, I suggest you get a grown up to read you a book about it.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Because its the Commenwealth. If you don't know the difference between that and the BE, I suggest you get a grown up to read you a book about it.

Someone ignorantly commenting on another country's history and society? That's a shame.

[Yorkshire pud]

Someone ignorantly commenting on another country's history and society? That's a shame.

Yeah. I should read Trump's version of truth in the USA.

[Yorkshire pud]

LOLZ...and you draw comparison to a casino? pathetic...

I drew no comparsons to the casino per se; only Trump's malpractice as an employer. But it's fine, after all, just because he can shaft employees, there's no reason to think he'd try to shaft the US population. He's ethics personified.