• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

Quote from: RoseGirl on April 10, 2017, 09:39:11 AM
Quick ladies...grab your burkas.
Quote from: RoseGirl on April 10, 2017, 09:54:06 AM
Oh and guns. I forgot to mention guns. Guns for everyone!

I truly hope the miserable shrinking base of Democrat supporters continue to make absurd accusations and mock middle America.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: pyewacket on April 10, 2017, 01:10:12 PM


But then again, you already know my thoughts on the 'superior intellect'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYPWoNfyW04


What happened to Khan?

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 01:37:24 PM
I truly hope the miserable shrinking base of Democrat supporters continue to make absurd accusations and mock middle America.

She's Canadian. Globalists.  ::)

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 01:37:24 PM
I truly hope the miserable shrinking base of Democrat supporters continue to make absurd accusations and mock middle America.

The shrinking base that outnumbers Republicans? That one? Add in the haemoraging support for Trump (cue: Syria), and the Reps essentially have for the moment, power without support.

SredniVashtar

Quote from: pyewacket on April 10, 2017, 01:10:12 PM
Unfortunately I only accomplishes two of the three things I set out to do here.

1) Flushed you out, SV- I thought this might work. I knew RoseGirl would have to call for backup from the Obsequious Squad. Welcome back- good to see ya- glad you're not dead.

2) My point proven about name calling being a staple response from the left. Didn't I talk to you about this a year ago? Please don't cross personal growth off your to do list. 

3) People still fail to understand the irresponsible use of the term 'rapist' and fail to provide any truth to their accusations about President Trump. RoseGirl's assertion fails and your predictable deflection away from the subject by invoking Hillary also fails. This is not consistent with superior intellect.

If you have been following this thread and paying attention, you may have noticed that many of us are starting to seriously question those who claim to possess the 'superior intellect'.

But then again, you already know my thoughts on the 'superior intellect'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYPWoNfyW04


I wish you luck in dislodging whatever foreign body you appear to have tightly wedged at the moment. I haven't been following the thread because it never offers much of interest and people like you can write stuff like that remaining blissfully free of self-knowledge whatsoever.

I don't know where you got this 'superior intellect' thing from, but just writing a coherent sentence in this place marks you out as some sort of dashing intellectual.

In the kingdom of the blind etc

pyewacket

Quote from: SredniVashtar on April 10, 2017, 01:44:44 PM
I wish you luck in dislodging whatever foreign body you appear to have tightly wedged at the moment. I haven't been following the thread because it never offers much of interest and people like you can write stuff like that remaining blissfully free of self-knowledge whatsoever.

I don't know where you got this 'superior intellect' thing from, but just writing a coherent sentence in this place marks you out as some sort of dashing intellectual.

In the kingdom of the blind etc


High marks for not cursing this time around. That shows some personal growth. Don't get me started on imperious attitude now.

Where do we stand on that whole "rapist" charge again? I still haven't seen any serious attempt at an answer.

SV?

RoseGirl?

Bueller?   Bueller ?

Lt.Uhura

Quote from: TigerLily on April 10, 2017, 09:16:25 AM
Hey, guys. You know those leakers you've been trying to find?


Karl Rove: WH staff has been leaking info on each other for weeks

"[T]hese people have been leaking on each other for weeks," Rove told host Maria Bartiromo on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures."

"Unnamed White House officials are dissing to reporters about other people inside the White House," he added.

Trump's 'fine-tuned machine' is a slow-motion train wreck. Weak, fragile egos in power are always their own worst enemy. Make some more popcorn and pray they don't take us down with them.

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on April 10, 2017, 01:42:18 PM
The shrinking base that outnumbers Republicans? That one? Add in the haemoraging support for Trump (cue: Syria), and the Reps essentially have for the moment, power without support.

''Power without support''?  Since when has that bothered the left-wing fascists? 

I think your description better fits the Obama dictatorship.  The first couple of years when they were passing things like ObamaCare against the wishes of the American people, and later when control of the Congress was removed he ruled by illegal Executive Orders, illegally legislated through agency regulations, and illegally implemented unapproved treaties.  ''Power without support''? - he didn't even have the power, but took it anyway.

As far as party popularity, we just had an election and we can look at the results.  A large portion of ''haemoraging [sic] support for Trump'' is people disappointed he isn't getting his agenda pushed through fast enough.  Much of the blame belongs to those obstructing his every move, and a clueless leaderless Congress.


But since you brought it up, lets look at the popularity of the parties.

2016 electoral map by county (president):
   


Current Governorships:



Current State Legislatures:


Lt.Uhura

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:12:20 PM
If you say so.  I think your description better fits the first year or two of the Obama dictatorship, when they were passing things like ObamCare against the wishes of the American people.

Look over there, it's Obama!

Dyna-X

Quote from: Lt.Uhura on April 10, 2017, 02:08:49 PM
Trump's 'fine-tuned machine' is a slow-motion train wreck. Weak, fragile egos in power are always their own worst enemy. Make some more popcorn and pray they don't take us down with them.
The only thing that would rally a majority around him at this point would be a distraction, like a war :/ 

SredniVashtar

Quote from: pyewacket on April 10, 2017, 01:59:16 PM

High marks for not cursing this time around. That shows some personal growth. Don't get me started on imperious attitude now.

Where do we stand on that whole "rapist" charge again? I still haven't seen any serious attempt at an answer.

SV?

RoseGirl?

Bueller?   Bueller ?

Again, I doubt you take the same high-minded attitude towards Bill Clinton. It all depends on which team you are waving your pom-poms for. His wife accused him of rape, take it up with her. Unless the media was reporting fake screws.

Lt.Uhura

Quote from: Dyna-X Ⓤ on April 10, 2017, 02:24:09 PM
The only thing that would rally a majority around him at this point would be a distraction, like a war :/

:/

Quote from: Lt.Uhura on April 10, 2017, 02:17:19 PM
Look over there, it's Obama!

Yes, some people remember beyond the daily headlines.  It's how we know the Fake News Media treats similar sets of facts very differently based on whether its the Party of Big Government, or everyone else.  Without that ability to recall even the recent past, on the surface current spin appears reasonable.

And yes, it's unfortunate I had to bring up that piece of dog shit.  I realize everyone would prefer to forget him.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:12:20 PM

As far as party popularity, we just had an election and we can look at the results.  A large portion of ''haemoraging [sic] support for Trump'' is people disappointed he isn't getting his agenda pushed through fast enough.  Much of the blame belongs to those obstructing his every move, and a clueless leaderless Congress.



You support dictator Trump then? I seem to remember (several times) that you advocate the two houses (and the DoJ) being the checks and balances that exist? Is that all changed now? His 'agenda' changes with the wind; remember how he was going to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one? Sadly of course, he believed (and still does) that he could be POTUS the way he can sit in one of his hotels shouting the odds. It was a hell of a shock when he found out he can't fire the Senate or the Congress. He only has one working for him apparently, Nunes. Who just happened to be the chairman on the house investigation into Trump's poodles and the Russians. Just another misunderstanding. ;)

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:37:17 PM
Yes, some people remember beyond the daily headlines.  It's how we know the Fake News Media treats similar sets of facts very differently based on whether its the Party of Big Government, or everyone else.  Without that ability to recall even the recent past, on the surface current spin appears reasonable.

And yes, it's unfortunate I had to bring up that piece of dog shit.  I realize everyone would prefer to forget him.


When you say everyone, you don't include Trump. Trump uses any excuse for him being a twat/ idiot/ incompetent on Obama.

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on April 10, 2017, 02:44:17 PM

When you say everyone, you don't include Trump. Trump uses any excuse for him being a twat/ idiot/ incompetent on Obama.

Well, that's true.  He sure left a mess didn't he

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on April 10, 2017, 02:41:39 PM

You support dictator Trump then? I seem to remember (several times) that you advocate the two houses (and the DoJ) being the checks and balances that exist? Is that all changed now? His 'agenda' changes with the wind...

I don't support the people outside the Congress obstructing Trump's policies.  That means the deep state entrenched O-bots, the Fake News Media, and anyone else who hasn't been elected. 

The members of Congress, and the Congress itself certainly have their part to play, but the Establishment Republicans in charge of it need to start serving their constituents and not their cronies.

RoseGirl

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:53:27 PM
I don't support the people outside the Congress obstructing Trump's policies.  That means the deep state entrenched O-bots, the Fake News Media, and anyone else who hasn't been elected. 

The members of Congress, and the Congress itself certainly have their part to play, but the Establishment Republicans in charge of it need to start serving their constituents and not their cronies.

So, I guess Freedom of Speech ain't so free in the US, then is it? The most 'popular' or the most corrupt get to speak the loudest...is that what your advocating here?

Face it, the little American experiment isn't working out so well.


Kidnostad3

Quote from: pyewacket on April 10, 2017, 01:19:31 PM
Are you kidding, PB? They'll hollow Ginsburg out and make her into a ventriloquist dummy before they let her step down.  ;)

Okay that's some funny shit right there I don't care who you are.  Too bad I don't use emojis.  That would rate at least 4 😊s.


Yorkshire pud

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:53:27 PM
I don't support the people outside the Congress obstructing Trump's policies.  That means the deep state entrenched O-bots, the Fake News Media, and anyone else who hasn't been elected. 

The members of Congress, and the Congress itself certainly have their part to play, but the Establishment Republicans in charge of it need to start serving their constituents and not their cronies.

Oh if it were that easy eh? You see, the congress and senate have separate Rep factions who don't see eye to eye with each other, or Trump. Trump promised so much with health care, but alas the Reps who voted against ACA over 60 times haven't a clue what to replace it with after eight years. Yep, eight years. And of course any notion of everyone having affordable care is anathama to many Republicans. Jeeze, the bleeding hearts will be wanting free air next. Still winning.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on April 10, 2017, 10:30:10 AM
Left to their devices, most of the Trump cabinet would encourage similar subjugation. So far they only want women to have no say in their own sex life/reproduction choices.

Yeah!  Those tight  asses are drawing the line at drive-through abortion clinics and sale or fetus parts on Amazon.  The reactionary S.O.B.s!


Spy

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 01:12:03 PM
Point taken.

But the hope is Ginsburg (84), Breyer (78), and Kennedy (80) begin their dirt naps soon

Aside from Bashar al-Assad, Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin, it's pretty evil to hope people die. Bad karma too.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Meatie Pie on April 10, 2017, 06:55:37 AM
Jackstar, Kidney Stone and Dr. MD sit down for dinner after a long day of doing so very little.

Okay Jackstar, I'm not going to be the one on the right who looks like he fixin' to do something really strange with those Cheetos.   I'll be the one in the middle.  You and Doc can fight it out to see who gets to be Cheeto Guy.


Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on April 10, 2017, 03:14:41 PM
Yeah!  Those tight  asses are drawing the line at drive-through abortion clinics and sale or fetus parts on Amazon.  The reactionary S.O.B.s!

And mamograms, and cervical smears. But its good you don't stop yourself having a knee jerk extreme scenario to justify the misogyny. How about withdrawing the subsidy on Viagra? Women's health is essential. An erection isn't. Ask Trump.

Spy

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on April 10, 2017, 03:14:41 PM
Yeah!  Those tight  asses are drawing the line at drive-through abortion clinics and sale or fetus parts on Amazon.  The reactionary S.O.B.s!

Conservatives, including Evangelical Christians, are "pro-life" until the child is born. Then they couldn't care less if he/she goes to bed hungry every night, goes to a crappy inner-city school and has no healthcare. 

pyewacket

Quote from: SredniVashtar on April 10, 2017, 02:28:21 PM
Again, I doubt you take the same high-minded attitude towards Bill Clinton. It all depends on which team you are waving your pom-poms for. His wife accused him of rape, take it up with her. Unless the media was reporting fake screws.

I know it's late and you had a busy day attempting to support false accusations, but this is poorly written by any standards. Not quite up to your wordsmithing of years past.

Whose wife accused who of rape?

It really does not matter because you are deflecting yet again.

If you or RoseGirl ever stumble across those court documents proving that he was convicted of rape, please post the links. 






Kidnostad3

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on April 10, 2017, 03:25:21 PM
And mamograms, and cervical smears. But its good you don't stop yourself having a knee jerk extreme scenario to justify the misogyny. How about withdrawing the subsidy on Viagra? Women's health is essential. An erection isn't. Ask Trump.

You mean to say that viagra is subsidized?  The bastards have been charging me full price.  There will  be a stiff response to this outrage!

3OctaveFart

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on April 10, 2017, 02:53:27 PM
I don't support the people outside the Congress obstructing Trump's policies.  That means the deep state entrenched O-bots, the Fake News Media, and anyone else who hasn't been elected.
I don't recall Bannon and Eddie Haskell in the tiny bulletproof vest being on a ballot.

Or his daughter, for that matter.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod