President Donald J. Trump

[Dr. MD MD]

Get a Dictionary, idiot.

Poor dears, playing “the victims”. If there’s one thing your-kind needs no help with, has no deficit of, and requires no added help or exaggeration from us, it’s, “all things demonic”. This is the overarching problem. You and yours have not a single shred of Goodness or Virtue among or between you, no moral or ethical fibre, not a decent bone in your bodies, not one ounce of compassion or concern, sensitivity, sympathy, understanding, love, nothing to offer, give, or contribute to the world, no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

I could and should double or triple the size of that list, and will do at some later time. But make no mistake, evil, all things demonic, is the one-word identifier, the #1 characteristic and trait which best describes and becomes you(all). Prove me wrong -- I dare you.

Up your meds! I dare you!  :

[Meister_000]

. . . Talk about a susagefest with that lone woman in the front row and to the left, the only logical guess is she there to be a human sacrifice.

I'm pretty sure she's Trump's translator (she's in most/many other shots, always just feet away, the whole Saudi leg of the trip).

[PaulAtreides]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bboVUTgDDug

Adam, they know where you live.

[Dr. MD MD]

Adam, they know where you live.

Then they're welcome to come find me anytime they want. 

[chefist]

he's declared bankruptcy too many times to ever debate fiscal responsibility.  he's doing this for ratings.  and i'd like to see someone hold him down and shave off that ridiculous comb over

bwahahha...you are the biggest dumb fuck ever on BG...and that is saying a lot! 

[Gd5150]

Hahahaha i can't believe this actually happened look at his face

Knew I'd seen that before.

[Meister_000]

Shaming America Again
INFOWARS has White House Press Credentials now

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/866665355950907394

[Dr. MD MD]

Shaming America Again
INFOWARS has White House Press Credentials now

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/866665355950907394

[starrmtn001]

WATCH President Trump Press Conference with Palestinian President Abbas 5/23/2017 Trump Live.


https://youtu.be/2NT7YXZEy6o

[(Sandman) Logan-5]

Here's your Russian hacker.
We'll see if it proves out...       

http://bigleaguepolitics.com/kim-dotcom-offers-congress-evidence-prove-seth-rich-wikileaks-source/

[Gd5150]

Here's your Russian hacker.
We'll see if it proves out...       

http://bigleaguepolitics.com/kim-dotcom-offers-congress-evidence-prove-seth-rich-wikileaks-source/

Wonder if the latest fake investigation into the nonexistent Trump/Russian collusion will touch the Seth Rich murder suicide.

[The King of Kings]

Shaming America Again
INFOWARS has White House Press Credentials now

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/866665355950907394

What's wrong with having a diverse field of journalists and reporters?

Oh, that is right.  Infowars isn't part of the jew media.

[PaulAtreides]

What's wrong with having a diverse field of journalists and reporters?

Oh, that is right.  Infowars isn't part of the jew media.

Infowars journalist is an oxymoron.  Alex Jones is a regular moron.

[The King of Kings]

Infowars journalist is an oxymoron.  Alex Jones is a regular moron.

How would define a great journalist?

I am not looking for examples, but your own definition of a great journalist.

[Kidnostad3]

Infowars journalist is an oxymoron.  Alex Jones is a regular moron.

Alex Jones is anything but "regular."  There was a time when I would be hard pressed to call Info Wars a legitimare news outlet.  However, given that the MSM has abrogated all journalistic standards in waging it's war on Trump and the American Right,  I now consider that news source to be as legitimate as any and much preferable to listening to left wing propagandists that dominate the corporate media, some of whom are pictured below. 

[Dr. MD MD]

Infowars journalist is an oxymoron.  Alex Jones is a regular moron.

This guy should know. He's an expert on being a moron. 

[starrmtn001]

Former CIA Dir. John Brennan testifies to House committee on Russia investigation.


https://youtu.be/indnLXEyNwQ

Watch Brennan's hands, especially when being questioned by Trey Gowdy.    

[Gd5150]

Former CIA Dir. John Brennan testifies to House committee on Russia investigation.


https://youtu.be/indnLXEyNwQ

Watch Brennan's hands, especially when being questioned by Trey Gowdy.    

Another nothing burger. Still zero evidence of collaboration between Trump/Russians. Any questions?

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eXwaiOBv7g

[Yorkshire pud]

Former CIA Dir. John Brennan testifies to House committee on Russia investigation.


https://youtu.be/indnLXEyNwQ

Watch Brennan's hands, especially when being questioned by Trey Gowdy.    

Because what? Trump tells the unvarnished truth? Jeeeze.    You know don't you that Flynn and Trump said anyone invoking the fifth had something to hide? And Flynn said anyone wanting immunity must be guilty? He has done both, at the same time as his lawyer saying he has a story to tell. You do know that?

[Gyoza Girl]

Last night, George Noory tried to bring up the Seth Rich murder. Guess this seasoned newsman isn't aware the Rich-DNC-WikiLeaks story was immediately debunked, to the point that Fox News finally was forced to issue a retraction. Here's a little something from the Columbia Journalism Review:

"Hannity has used his immense platform to repeatedly peddle a conspiracy theory, born from the fever swamps of right-wing media, that a Democratic National Committee staffer murdered last year was Wikileaks’s source for the leak of internal DNC emails. The false narrative around Seth Rich’s killing, which has been pushed by everyone from Infowars to Russian officials, has been compellingly debunked by mainstream sources. And yet Hannity and others with huge media platforms continue to ask questions about his death."

[starrmtn001]

Another nothing burger. Still zero evidence of collaboration between Trump/Russians. Any questions?

We are in agreement here.

[Yorkshire pud]

We are in agreement here.

No surprises there... :

[GravitySucks]

Last night, George Noory tried to bring up the Seth Rich murder. Guess this seasoned newsman isn't aware the Rich-DNC-WikiLeaks story was immediately debunked, to the point that Fox News finally was forced to issue a retraction. Here's a little something from the Columbia Journalism Review:

"Hannity has used his immense platform to repeatedly peddle a conspiracy theory, born from the fever swamps of right-wing media, that a Democratic National Committee staffer murdered last year was Wikileaks’s source for the leak of internal DNC emails. The false narrative around Seth Rich’s killing, which has been pushed by everyone from Infowars to Russian officials, has been compellingly debunked by mainstream sources. And yet Hannity and others with huge media platforms continue to ask questions about his death."

What is your definition of debunked?

Seth Rich died in a suspicious murder. He might have been the source of the DNC server leaks. That much has not been debunked. Kim Dotcom claims he was involved in helping Seth Rich get that data to Wikileaks. That hasn't been debunked.

Maybe the reports about the independent PI have been walked back, but Seth Rich remains dead and there is more evidence that he is the source for Wikileaks than there is for the Russians being the source.

The DNC would not allow the FBI to have access to the server. They had it reviewed by their own contractor. I believe the owner of that company is Ukrainian and has a pretty strong hatred for Russia.

No evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC has been presented. Maybe they did, but that doesn't mean they were the source for Wikileaks. Or it could have been someone using the tools to make it look like a Russian hack.

Maybe Seth Rich was a random murder. I still think he was the source for Wikileaks. Maybe his death, even if not connected, will be the key to disclosing this whole Russian narrative has been a misdirection by the Clinton/Podesta/DNC crowd.

[Yorkshire pud]

What is your definition of debunked?

Seth Rich died in a suspicious murder. He might have been the source of the DNC server leaks. That much has not been debunked. Kim Dotcom claims he was involved in helping Seth Rich get that data to Wikileaks. That hasn't been debunked.

Maybe the reports about the independent PI have been walked back, but Seth Rich remains dead and there is more evidence that he is the source for Wikileaks than there is for the Russians being the source.

The DNC would not allow the FBI to have access to the server. They had it reviewed by their own contractor. I believe the owner of that company is Ukrainian and has a pretty strong hatred for Russia.

No evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC has been presented. Maybe they did, but that doesn't mean they were the source for Wikileaks. Or it could have been someone using the tools to make it look like a Russian hack.

Maybe Seth Rich was a random murder. I still think he was the source for Wikileaks. Maybe his death, even if not connected, will be the key to disclosing this whole Russian narrative has been a misdirection by the Clinton/Podesta/DNC crowd.

How do you explain then that CIA and FBI officials have confirmed the Russians are the source of the DNC hacking? And they're very interested in Messrs Flynn ("invoking the fifth implies guilt"), Manifort, Page, Kushner, Stone, and others...No mention of the late Mr Rich.

[GravitySucks]

How do you explain then that CIA and FBI officials have confirmed the Russians are the source of the DNC hacking? And they're very interested in Messrs Flynn ("invoking the fifth implies guilt"), Manifort, Page, Kushner, Stone, and others...No mention of the late Mr Rich.

I won't bother you with details you won't believe.

I have said it over and over. The Russians may have hacked the DNC. That doesn't mean they are the source for Wikileaks. I stand by everything I typed above. CIA and FBI never examind the DNC server. They might have hacked the Russians and found some of the same files, but that still does not prove they were the source for Wikileaks.

Or, It might have been Flynn. Trump should have never trusted a lifelong democrat.

[Dr. MD MD]

How do you explain then that CIA and FBI officials have confirmed the Russians are the source of the DNC hacking?

Propaganda. Clearly our "intelligence" agencies (and I use that term loosely) have become political. Maybe they always have been but so far it's really curious that intelligence agencies would want to keep fanning the flames of a totally unfounded conspiracy theory with absolutely no evidence while this conspiracy theory just gets juicier. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7dJIgm3d78

[Yorkshire pud]

I won't bother you with details you won't believe.

I have said it over and over. The Russians may have hacked the DNC. That doesn't mean they are the source for Wikileaks. I stand by everything I typed above. CIA and FBI never examind the DNC server. They might have hacked the Russians and found some of the same files, but that still does not prove they were the source for Wikileaks.

Or, It might have been Flynn. Trump should have never trusted a lifelong democrat.

Wikileaks is run by the FSB..The CIA said that. And how do you explain Trump saying he loved Wikileaks and called on Russia to release e mails (But oddly he's gone quiet on that now)? Then there's Roger Stone and Rudy Giuliani both miraculously tweeting and stating on TV about upcoming revelations that just happened to be made public a day or so later by Wikileaks. Flynn is still being cited by Trump as badly treated by anyone and everyone, and regrets firing him.

[Dr. MD MD]

Wikileaks is run by the FSB..The CIA said that.

More propaganda and obfuscation. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycrJvOLEWc8

[Yorkshire pud]

Propaganda.