Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 03, 2016, 03:09:55 PM
This is a scarecrow, not a strawman.
It may not be perfect for strawman but works for numbskull
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: 136 or 142 on October 03, 2016, 03:09:55 PM
This is a scarecrow, not a strawman.
Quote from: 21st Century Man on October 03, 2016, 02:05:33 PM
I watched the Frankenstein films again last night for the zillionth time on TCM. I never get tired of them. Karloff brings such humanity to his performance as the Monster. For what it is worth, I give Frankenstein 4.75 stars, Bride of Frankenstein 5 stars and Son of Frankenstein 4 stars. Bride has a little something extra that the first film did not have thus the higher rating.
Quote from: 21st Century Man on September 26, 2016, 03:43:05 PM
I just watched Robert Flaherty's silent documentary, Nanook of the North (1922)...
Quote from: Uncle Duke on September 30, 2016, 01:57:57 PM
The wingnut she interviewed later in the show who related his Iowa UFO sighting described it as looking "like a square on its side". Admittedly it's been many years since I took "Plane Geometry", but isn't a square on its side still a square?
Quote from: ItsOver on September 30, 2016, 07:45:04 AM
Ian's just started teaching at Ohio Northern University in Ada, which surprised me. I'm familiar with that part of Ohio and it must be a bit of a shock for Ian, after an Arizona metro and Minneapolis. A very small town, even for a college town, in the heart of Buckeye farm country, very rural. I'll be surprised if he stays long.
Quote from: GravitySucks on September 30, 2016, 01:15:49 AM
The aliens use anti-gravity cold fusion torsion field hyper dimensional physics unobtanium fueled propulsion devices. Your dainty lobes will be fine. 😉
Quote from: GravitySucks on September 30, 2016, 01:09:49 AM
For your ears when you attend your next Alien Woo Woo Con
Quote from: GravitySucks on September 30, 2016, 01:04:17 AM
We need to get us a bedside lamp
Quote from: albrecht on September 23, 2016, 11:42:05 PM
I don't presume to know everyone's, or that guy's, motivation but likely for fear of being attacked, not necessarily physically, audited by the IRS, demonitized by YouTube, or marginalized etc. Sort of a "yellow star" situation by Clintonistas and leftists. It is, indeed by my provocative analogy, not that bad, yet, but, of course, that started out slowly also with riots etc but seems maybe true considering that the majority of media, bankers, and universities are in the bag for her and the rigging at the DNC, IRS targeting, etc? And considering the violence and terrorism on the streets now? I doubt it will go full on no matter who is elected. Hopefully. Personally, my reason is more trolling and trying to logically argue. Whatever happened to the Australian ballot? The idea that privacy is important? Freedom of conscience? In essence what "progressives" and "liberals" have claimed to support for decades but, now, due to Trump, or other issues that demands to accommodate people who hate, and often rape, women, gays, Jews, Christians, etc we in our countries should not have free speech, secret ballots, or not telling people how you will vote is "hiding" isms etc.
Quote from: Zetaspeak on September 25, 2016, 10:52:05 AM
Clinton/Trump football odds: Here's Lilys favorite part lol. Last week I said Trump odds match The Bengals while Hillary matched Steelers. Pittsburgh won the game giving Hillary 3-0 record. This week is difficult because many teams have similar odds as Clinton/Trump. Yet the closest I found is another Pittsburgh Steelers game. Comparing to the Sportsbet site Pittsburgh/Hillary are favorite (1.52) while Philadelphia/Trump are underdogs (2.61) It said to be a close game, which I think reflects the election.
Quote from: norland2424 on September 25, 2016, 10:49:08 PM
Its too late now, since regardless he will be out in less than 6 months
Quote from: starrmtn001 on September 26, 2016, 10:02:40 AM
Yeah, I know. So damn depressing.
Quote from: analog kid on September 23, 2016, 09:12:45 PM
Obama lets congress off the hook. International shitstorms don't have to happen, and they're all relieved. They get a scapegoat while appeasing their base.
Quote from: Dr. MD MD on September 25, 2016, 03:42:53 PM
Like the way most media seem to be apologizing for and stumping for Hillary? And how she's been getting a pass for hiding out from the public while Trumps been campaigning like mad? That kind of con?
Quote from: Lt.Uhura on September 25, 2016, 03:11:09 PM
Cats know best
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMVAHwfbT4A
Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 25, 2016, 02:34:54 PM
What you make of this?
ib4 racism and sexism.
Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 25, 2016, 12:47:05 PM
Currently a bit more disturbed by the Assange revelation that Hillary knew full well what classified brackets are in sensitive government emails. This means that she lied to the FBI. She'll get away with it because top level government is full of crooks, but if you or I lied to the FBI . . . well, we know what would happen. That sort of thing disturbs me far more than almost anything Trump could do.
Quote from: brig on September 25, 2016, 11:08:37 AM
Go Bills!
Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 25, 2016, 12:39:37 PM
Pfffft, if I ever say anything political to her she just says "that's nice, honey" as she polishes her collection of Lenin busts.
Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 25, 2016, 12:33:09 PM
No it doesn't.
We're getting economic analysis from someone who uses the phrase "super duper multimillionaires" in their reasoning.
I asked you why an estate tax is a good thing.
Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 25, 2016, 12:02:59 PM
If he runs it properly, it'll be fine. It hasn't been run properly in decades.
Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 25, 2016, 12:09:37 PM
And this is good because?
Quote from: bateman on September 25, 2016, 11:17:18 AM
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/23/hillary-clinton-wants-higher-estate-taxes-but-not-on-her-family/
I'm trying to find a three year-old to explain this to me. It sounds like hypocrisy but I can't be sure.
Quote from: WOTR on September 25, 2016, 11:48:36 AM
Actually, it's win / win for Trump. If he gets in- he has won. If he does not get elected, he has tens of thousands of admirers (and they are not likely to ever "one day realize that he is not the word.") People who used to only know him from the apprentice will now hang on his every word and he will be relevant as somebody who can drive public policy (to some degree). There will be tens of thousands who will buy whatever his Chinese factory pumps out and he slaps his name on because they want to support him. He will be able to "sell" his support to the next republican nominee (you scratch my back, I support yours...)
This has to be the smartest thing I have seen anybody do in a long time. There is an unlimited upside with almost no risk (was there a downside at all- aside from risking a few million at the start?) Like him or hate him- it is brilliant.