Quote from: BobGrau on May 14, 2012, 08:33:27 AMthe strange thing is that I'm a big Ian fan, yet I AGREE with most of the criticism of him being argumentative and so on.
No one likes redundant posts, so I'll just say that I share Bob Grau's opinion. I lied. I have a bit more to say. Ian's an energetic and engaged host. He's a truly gifted conversationalist with few peers in that regard. However, there's another side to him that bugs. Most of PB's criticisms (repetitive or not) ring very true to me. My biggest complaint is that Punnett has to be right, even when he's wrong. He once made a mistake about a historical event, and a caller pointed it out to him. Instead of doing a mea culpa, he went off on the guy. Ian acted like the caller challenged his manhood. He tried to make 2+2=5 in a convoluted tirade rather than just admit that he was [Fonzie] wr-wr-wr-wrong [Fonzie]. Here's another thing that aggravates me: he jumps to unfounded conclusions at times. It's as if he suspects that callers are bigots and/or zealots if they don't share his views on certain subjects. One exchange was hilarious.
(paraphrasing)
Caller: "I think that genes play a huge role in determining traits. Look at the NFL; two brothers are quarterbacks."
Punnett: "That's racist!"
Guest: "Uh, I think that he was talking about Peyton and Eli Manning."
Ian laughed, to his credit. Still, I think that he sometimes assumes the worst about his callers and his guests. I just get that vibe when I listen to him. Maybe it's just me. I could be wr-wr-wr-wrong.