BellGab.com Archive

Considering that Hilary promised a no-fly zone in Syria that our own generals said would require war with Russia, even there the "it would have been worse with the Clintons" rule applies.

Quote from: norland2424 on November 17, 2016, 09:29:39 PM

Yes norland, Trump should enforce a strict vegetarian diet and that we should all live like paupers.  You know, Agenda 21 type stuff.  The elites sure as hell aren't cutting back on their lavish lifestyles so somebody has to

They know Hilary would have been worse in many ways, especially regarding Wall Street and lobbyists, but they can't admit it because of the big orange boogeyman in the White House.  If he so much as eats a steak the wrong way it will be used as proof that his presidency has already failed.

Quote from: whoozit on November 17, 2016, 04:48:27 PM
Yup.  I live near Concord but may be moving to Virginia next spring/summer.

How do you feel about Libertarians invading your state?

Quote from: VoteQuimby on November 17, 2016, 02:21:34 PM
Mental illness.

Quote from: Che' Fi' on November 17, 2016, 02:23:20 PM
LOLZ...the candidate of Wall St and big money was Clinton...and she lost...now Libs are inventing resentment against Trump for what Clinton was...it's hilarious...

It's like anxiety disorder and panic attacks playing out on a massive scale.

Considering Citigroup's alleged huge influence on Obama's cabinet picks, planning legislation, and receiving the biggest bailouts, I think these lobbyist reforms are a step in the right direction, even if there is more work to be done.  Hilary wouldn't even have tried.

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/photo_of_the_week_president_who_let_citigroup_20161029

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/spending-bill-992-derivatives-citigroup-lobbyists

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42099554

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 16, 2016, 08:56:53 PM
Sounds perfect for Hoagland. Story of his show.

First fires lobbyists from transition team, now 5 year lobbying ban for administration officials.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/16/team-trump-announces-five-year-lobbying-ban-for-administration-officials/

You all should go straight edge like Trump.

Quote from: Value Of Pi on November 16, 2016, 05:18:49 PM
Trump's efforts will have to be much more aggressive to get the results his supporters are looking for. That won't be simple or easy as a practical matter. Trump supporters are expecting things in America to be very different with the new administration and I think they will be -- for better and/or worse.

I look forward to the death of NAFTA and am glad about TPP being apparently abandoned.  If that happens, it will get at the root cause of illegal immigration.  I'm personally willing to pay more for products made in USA and fair trade. 

Quote from: Che' Fi' on November 16, 2016, 05:03:31 PM
All Trump is going to do is enforce the immigration laws that are already on the books. 2.5 million have been deported during Obama's administration, which would have been over double if all applicable laws were being followed.

All this talk is hyperbole...

Shhhhhhhhhhhh!  They don't want you to know about Obama's deportations.

Quote from: Joe Shit the Ragman on November 16, 2016, 04:29:06 PM
Another Fucking Moron.

A lot of these reactions to me just seem like liberals blowing off steam about the election.  Who really believes these champagne socialists are down with "the cause"?  But to drag his children into it, that's total spineless coward behavior.  No wonder they are called cucks.

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on November 16, 2016, 09:05:09 AM
It's going to stick to them no matter what they do. They traded the working class white guys for triggered millennials that notoriously don't turn out. They're in danger of losing a large section of the black and Hispanic vote with it too. Try telling some black guy in the hood or a Mexican immigrant to check his male privilege.

Yes, that was one of the contributing factors to my DemExit years ago.  I could already see the budding of the oppression olympics, and I realized that once they were done tearing down and guilt tripping "fucking white males," they would start eating their own. 

Quote from: Paper*Boy on November 15, 2016, 08:54:42 PM
But you know what about Donald Trump?  He isn't Hilary Clinton. 

This point can't be overstated enough.

http://www.twitter.com/mtracey/status/798547046458388481

Quote from: Camazotz Automat on November 15, 2016, 02:03:08 AM
Sybil was the one who started the name "Vanderweasel." 

I recall Sybil being a hottie as well.

So attractive women used to post their pictures on this website?  This same website?  Maybe there's hope for Paranormal Date after all

Unless you all got catfished by neckbeards.

Quote from: Roswells, Art on November 15, 2016, 12:10:38 AM

OK, You kind of sold me.

lol

Quote from: Roswells, Art on November 14, 2016, 11:42:27 PM
So why did you vote for Trump? I'm guessing it will become vague about now.

He's not Hillary.

Quote from: Paper*Boy on November 14, 2016, 09:58:37 PM
No matter what happens, we'll know Hilary would be much worse in every way.  We can live with that, but thanks.

Agreed.

Quote from: chefist on November 14, 2016, 08:52:07 PM
Lolz...there are others as well.

Milo would be fabulous!

Quote from: Catsmile on November 14, 2016, 08:33:44 PM

lol, renaming site is not a bad idea.

Hilary the plunderer of Haiti?  The one who bragged about Qadafi getting sodomized by a bayonet?  The one who wants WWIII thanks to her no-fly zone over Syria? No, we are better off without her thanks.

Giuliani is also being named as a possibility according to WSJ.

ignore feature is a nice compromise between those who want to censor speech, and those who like your hands off approach.

Quote from: 21st Century Man on November 14, 2016, 03:16:30 PM
Savage goes off the deep end a lot.  I'm sure Trump will come on the show in a few days and ease Savage's mind.

Yeah, hosts like Savage, Wells, and especially Rense tend to be pessimistic by nature.  They are good radio hosts but if you listen too much it can get depressing.

Quote from: Brody on November 14, 2016, 08:25:30 AM
I was a bit bothered this morning watching the local news report on Trump selecting Steve Bannon as his Chief Strategist, as they only referred to him as a "right-wing journalist" and ignored his controversial past statements in which he came out as anti-Semitic, anti-African American, anti-latino, anti-Islamic and anti-Catholic (He called the Pope a "communist" and believes the Pope's kind views towards Hispanics is merely because he wants them to stay part of the ever shrinking Catholic base.)
Thankfully the national press is doing a far better job sounding the alarms of controversy. Bannon is also against Speaker Paul Ryan, due in part to Ryan's beliefs of allowing immigrants a pathway to become citizens - a stance that also puts Ryan at odds with Trump. It will be interesting to watch this political theater unfold over the next few months. I suspect Speaker Ryan will step down, considering he had to be coaxed into the position to begin with. Reince Priebus becoming Trump's Chief-of-Staff is somewhat intriguing as well. It is very much a move to quell the establishment Republicans, but is a major roadblock to Trump's #draintheswamp goal.
I can only hope the moderate Republicans (the handful that are left) can help stop most of the crazier aspects of Trump's plans from taking fruition. The mass immigration force Trump insists is going to come to fruition will create level of civil unrest in our cities that will match anything the protests of the sixties could offer. THE WALL remains a major expense that, with the military increases and tax cuts planned, will help rack up mega debt. Keep an eye out for Wall Street deregulations that will be forthcoming soon. History is repeating itself....
http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FPolitics%2Fobamas-deportation-policy-numbers%2Fstory%3Fid%3D41715661&h=AAQGFTvBe

Of course doing it slowly helped keep a mass hysteria from developing. The Trump plan comes across far more fascist, due to the caustic language and threats that have been used.

Bannon is Irish-Catholic.  Trump won the Catholic vote this time around.  I think Hilary's staunch defense of partial birth abortion, and her staffers referring to Catholics as backward and talking about planting the seeds of revolution in the Church may have had something to do with it.  Not to mention weirdo freak performance art like spirt cooking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA

Quote from: Segundus on November 13, 2016, 08:27:17 PM
Yes.  There are druggie moms who have kids so they can prostitute them out at an early age.  There are druggie moms who save for an abortion, but when they keep eyeing that money they end up spending it on drugs until it's too late for an abortion. 

People hear 'abortion' or 'government mandated birth control' and become upset, but no child should ever be born to such parents.

None of which is the child's fault.  There are plenty of examples of adults who had a lousy childhood but overcame it all and became successful later on.

Quote from: Segundus on November 13, 2016, 08:17:09 PM
No.  Indians have a problem with diabetes because it's so hard for them to get a low carb diet there.  They end up taking lots of dangerous meds. 

My husband is diabetic and because he does not want to get on to meds that have serious side effects (he takes a low dose of metformin) he is on a very strict diet - 30 to 40 grams of carbs daily.  It's not a matter of just staying away from sugar and white flour and pasta.  No beans, tomatoes, onions - and the list goes on and on.  There are no canned soups that he can have.

Low carb diets are not a one size fits all answer.  I know diabetics too.  Some people just handle carbs better.

Quote from: mikuthing01 on November 13, 2016, 06:42:04 PM
I figured i was something like that because mexican food is generally high in carbs

lol if we're going to generalize, Asians can eat carbs all day and not get fat.  (Not including Pacific Islanders, they can get huuuuuge.)