Author NASA Moon photos  (Read 1392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #30 on: December 25, 2016, 12:56:59 PM »
You don't have any friends. So the question is moot.
Ouch Yp.

Climb down from that liberal tower sometime eh?

You probably smell your own farts, asshole.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #31 on: December 25, 2016, 01:03:15 PM »
You don't have any friends.


The owls are not what they seem.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #32 on: December 25, 2016, 01:13:58 PM »

The owls are not what they seem.
Hoo hoo kachoo


Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #33 on: December 25, 2016, 01:17:28 PM »
Ouch Yp.

Climb down from that liberal tower sometime eh?

You probably smell your own farts, asshole.

If that avatar is you, you're sooooo handsome.  :)

Smell my own farts? I export them, the trade is thriving in the US.
 

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #34 on: December 25, 2016, 01:18:53 PM »

The owls are not what they seem.

And contrary to myth, not that bright. Now, falcons... go with falcons.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #35 on: December 25, 2016, 01:28:43 PM »
How did he get the camera, and why do you find that plausible?

That you choose to spend your time on that which you do, rather than answer that which you do not, has been a described pattern for long enough.

It's frankly embarrassing.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #36 on: December 28, 2016, 02:46:19 PM »
How long has it been since I asked "how did he get the camera?" My soup has gotten cold.


The soup is not what it seems.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #37 on: December 28, 2016, 02:50:30 PM »
New moon photo

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #38 on: December 28, 2016, 02:54:14 PM »



New photo of Mind.

Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #39 on: December 30, 2016, 06:02:10 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes


lets see a computer that my watch can beat out, a tin can, and the Van Allen Radiation Belt.

Nah it was a Hoax NASA.

Here is how it was done Huston release the submarine astronauts and film them being picked up. lol


Re: NASA Moon photos
« Reply #40 on: December 30, 2016, 07:18:23 AM »
Quote
That technology was actually created for spy satellites in the 1950s. The Lunar Orbiter used that same technology. It just made negatives, not full photos. But those negatives were on 70mm film, which is the same size as IMAX movies.

The satellite had a light beam installed to "scan" the negatives and then they would beam them back to the earth from space, one little strip at a time. It took 98 of those strips for a high-resolution image; 29 of them for medium resolution.
This is pretty awesome. A primitive digitizer, from a photo lab in space!