Author The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast  (Read 40247 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2013, 12:15:55 PM »
bring em on.  That slideshow presentation you did was really good.  Should link to it from the Hoaxland thread too.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2013, 12:08:29 AM »

Conspiracy strikes!
But Stuart says, “Mars’ color
Is natur’ly red.”


Episode 74, "The True Color of Mars," has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2013, 05:08:13 AM »
Can you analyze the gallactic alignment info in the "magical egypt" series?  And how long do you think human civilization dates back to?  shoot from the hip if you could and just throw a date out that you honestly think could mark humanities birthday... 10,000+ for modern man?


im talking about the napta playa stones... sorry this is an edit like ten mins later after my next comment... drinking+astornomy+pseudo science = silly questions


Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2013, 05:09:46 AM »
just pretend yer an anthropoligist...

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2013, 02:30:00 PM »
I've been watching season 4 of ancient aliens again.  Best episodes are the NASA and Bigfoot ones.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #35 on: May 13, 2013, 01:34:09 PM »
I've not heard of the "magical egypt" series.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #36 on: May 14, 2013, 12:39:19 PM »
Robert Schock is the geologist that said the sphyinx is much older than everything around it and john west is the anthropoligist.  Schock will push back the earliest date for "civilization" to like 10 or is it 12,000 BC.  West is a little more speculative about things.  The series is based mostly on Wests theories it seems... he looks like Tommy Chong tho its strange.  I found it interesting but a bit flakey at times.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #37 on: May 21, 2013, 08:58:10 PM »
Okay, yeah, I've heard of Schock and his stuff on C2C.  I don't really have enough expertise to critique his stuff, but I'd refer to the general idea that, if you've had your ideas out there for a long time, and you're still the only one who believes them, you're probably wrong.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #38 on: May 21, 2013, 09:00:00 PM »

You’re just a jerk. Don’t
Sue NASA for religious
Discrimination.


Episode 75, "Young-Earth Creationist, David Coppedge, Sues NASA for Discrimination, and He Loses," has been posted.  Some of you may recognize the voice of my guest.  If you do, please don't post his name.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2013, 03:57:01 AM »
Okay, yeah, I've heard of Schock and his stuff on C2C.  I don't really have enough expertise to critique his stuff, but I'd refer to the general idea that, if you've had your ideas out there for a long time, and you're still the only one who believes them, you're probably wrong.
i think the geologists all say there's water erosion that dates the rocks and the archaeologists are dating the sphinx itself which has been a bit bastardized through time.  It doesn't fit with the established archaeological dates that squeeze the sphinx into that third dynasty of egypt(?)... when the  great pyramid was made.  He's got a tiny ass head, the sphinx, and they used to change peoples faces to fit what ever megalomaniac was in power at the time.  If you find the time look into it.  There's an alignment site that has an astronomical dating involved I was curious if you heard of it.  The site is "napta playa."  I looked around adding "debunked" to the search and found nothing.

oh and the ep75 link has an extra " at the end... for a sec i thought the site was down :P

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2013, 11:40:50 AM »
Yeah, I realized the extra quote, but it was after the five-minute rule and I couldn't edit.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #41 on: June 01, 2013, 09:26:40 PM »

Crazy astron'my
P-Xer Nancy Lieder
Has in abundance.


Episode 76, "Nancy Lieder's Astronomy Clip Show," has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #42 on: June 17, 2013, 05:11:31 PM »

Twenty-twelve doomsday
Is said and done. What doomsday
Is next, yet to come?


Episode 77, "2012 Back-Peddling," has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #43 on: June 17, 2013, 07:30:58 PM »
I had a little chuckle too when I watched the new star trek and the brightly painted people of Nibiru.  The role reversal joke wasn't lost on the trekkie/coasters I'm sure.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #44 on: June 21, 2013, 11:43:42 PM »
I have to wonder (a) how many people got it, and (b) who snuck it into the script.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #45 on: June 21, 2013, 11:53:36 PM »

Geocentrism:
An outdated idea some
Still choose to believe.


Episode 78, "Historic and Modern Geocentrism," has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #46 on: July 01, 2013, 11:10:00 PM »

John Carter of Mars
And Richard C. Hoagland: An
Int'resting combo.


Episode 79, "Is the Movie "John Carter" a Leak by Those "In the Know?"" has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #47 on: July 11, 2013, 01:55:21 AM »

Planet X, again,
With claims like Nancy Lieder's,
By Mark Hazlewood.


Episode 80, "The Fake Story of Planet X, Part 7 - Mark Hazlewood," has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #48 on: July 11, 2013, 02:55:45 AM »
Very good; it would be interesting if Mike Hazelwood had anything to say about his 'predictions' when he's presented with the pesky science shit.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #49 on: July 12, 2013, 06:18:59 AM »
 
Planet X, again,
With claims like Nancy Lieder's,
By Mark Hazlewood.

Episode 80, "The Fake Story of Planet X, Part 7 - Mark Hazlewood," has been posted.

     I liked it.  My only critique is that you may want to get some drunks to call in and mumble nonsensical, but otherwise a fine job.  I'll check out some more for sure.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #50 on: July 12, 2013, 04:12:27 PM »
Thanks, glad you like it.  And no, I don't need C2C-style callers.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #51 on: July 22, 2013, 09:27:08 PM »

Creationism ...
But stars, etc. are far away.
So, can light speed change?


Episode 81, "Is the Speed of Light Constant?" has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #52 on: August 01, 2013, 12:36:39 PM »
Very well done Sir.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #53 on: August 02, 2013, 01:24:37 AM »
Thanks!

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #54 on: August 02, 2013, 01:54:05 AM »
Hyper-D physics
Could be tested with a watch.
So, is Hoagland right?

Episode 82, "How to Design a Hyperdimensional Physics Experiment" has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #55 on: August 12, 2013, 12:15:38 AM »
David Sereda:
UFOs, quantum, new-age ...
Let's see what's out there.

Episode 83, "David Sereda's Claims Clip Show, Part 1" has been posted.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #56 on: August 12, 2013, 02:56:53 AM »
I always love your show, Stuart.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #57 on: August 12, 2013, 03:16:30 AM »
Entertaining as ever Stuart..Looking forward to part two.

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #58 on: August 12, 2013, 01:55:04 PM »
Thanks guys.  So it wasn't too background-y?  Not too much quotes and too little rebutting?

Re: The "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Podcast
« Reply #59 on: August 22, 2013, 02:33:30 AM »
David Sereda:
UFOs, quantum, new-age ...
Let's see what's out there.

Episode 84, "David Sereda's Claims Clip Show, Part 2" has been posted.