Poll

John B. Wells looks like:

A Vulcan
97 (26.4%)
Hank's Japanese half-brother, "Junichero," in King of the Hill eps. 6ABE20-21  
57 (15.5%)
A stoner sufer named "Tracker," who mentored Sean Penn & Keanu Reeves
47 (12.8%)
Frankenstein's Monster
101 (27.4%)
One of those faces on the Sgt. Pepper album (2nd row from the top. Face #5)
66 (17.9%)

Total Members Voted: 245

Author John B. Wells  (Read 802895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #120 on: September 14, 2011, 02:23:56 PM »
George:  'John Welles gets it'

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #121 on: September 14, 2011, 04:41:26 PM »
Never thought I could hear a radio host worse than Noory. John "He Smells" Wells makes Noory look like magic.
God help us, but Wells is a boring drip SOB, who sounds like he is broadcasting from a coma! How the F&*K do these people get air-time!?!

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #122 on: September 14, 2011, 04:56:56 PM »
Never heard him. Now I want to.

Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk


Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #123 on: September 14, 2011, 05:10:00 PM »
Welles is a right wing jerk off. He's Noory with better speaking skills. Sometimes

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #124 on: September 14, 2011, 06:21:12 PM »
Wells might be enhancing his voice to make it sound even deeper electronically on the air.
Noory does that for sure, without it he sounds like Mickey Mouse...  ;D

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #125 on: September 14, 2011, 06:51:52 PM »


     With his lethargic delivery, I'm thinking he's more of a white Don Cornelius.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #126 on: September 14, 2011, 07:04:36 PM »
Wouldn't Limbaugh make Limbaugh look like the Limbaugh of talk radio?

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #127 on: September 14, 2011, 07:30:45 PM »
George:  'John Welles gets it'

The last time we heard that, it was Art referring to George, and just look how that turned out.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #128 on: September 14, 2011, 08:31:07 PM »

LOL.  You compared me to a nazi and a right winged fox watching bully...not a quote.  I am a democrat and have never watched fox news nor would i ever.  I voted Obama, Kerry, Gore, Dukakis and Carter.  So you think i don't know anything about you?  you know nothing about me.  I just said you were gullible and are puking the same anti american crap that guest and host were. Ian called out a caller who rambled on about how the government lies..what Ian meant was sometimes the government lies and sometimes it doesn't.  Sometimes people in government do the wrong thing and sometimes they do good.  Ian's point was that if you go around thinking the government always lies, always is up to no good you have stopped thinking.  That guest was just like that caller and you said he was a man of reason.  Well I totally disagree..and to stand up for your country to such slander does not make you a Nazi nor even a fox news junkie.  That idiot you thought was so wonderful rambled on about things he clearly knows nothing about...as i stated in my first post on this thread when he was asked about the "blackhawk" that crashed he answered about the troop carrier that was shot down..and went on to say it was the same seal team that took down osama..which is not true..and that helicopter was a Chinook.nthe blackhawk was a steath version used in the osama mission..so this idiot the so called expert on intel is more an expert on hot air.  and i think you fall for this crap...can't help it if you are gullible.  but that kind of conspiracy, all is wrong with the american government and military is not thinking, its dogma...the left in this country is no better than the right..both extremists who have stopped thinking long ago.

Glad you cleared up your politics.   The "anti-americanism" rant had me fooled.  That kind of garbage usually comes from someone in the political realm of someone like Frank Gaffney.  You know Gaffney, don't you?  Further, you still have no clue what I'm about.  That's fine, though -- you seem to have this need to be right and I can see that you're really rigid and uptight, so fine, Pal, have it your way.   

Let's see if you can understand this:  I never said that Baker was an intel "expert."  Fact is,  he made some obvious misstatements that hopefully someone'll straighten him out on.   And pal -- gullible I'm not, OK?  Christ, it's what -- midnight and I'm half asleep -- I didn't catch every word he said, but so what??  Damn!   Finally, I still think Baker was an entertaining guest of the type that you don't get on Coast very often, namely more to the center than the usual lunatics that Noory has for "regulars."  Such a guest is more reasonable than say someone like Steve Quayle.   I don't give a damn if you agree with that or not.  Don't have an ocean view, by the way, but I'm about 10 miles away...

I still don't get the personal attack.  It was lame, man and way wrong.  And I'll tell you, like I said in another post, I don't suffer fools either online or in the real world.   Not one tiny bit. You don't like what I write and want to have a respectful conversation?  Fine. You flame me and I'll come at you like a pack of wolves. 

Now GTF out of my face.

 


Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #129 on: September 14, 2011, 08:34:20 PM »

 
Jesus H. Christ!! Did I ever not explain myself well! 
 
Rico, in no way, shape, or fashion was I calling you a "flamer"!!!
 
I was saying that I may have been flaming the flamer (mbrown) when I asked him if he was drunk when he flamed you.
 
Wish you had pm'd me, but then there may have been others who also misunderstood my intentions.  Wouldn't be the first time.  :(

You're right, a pm would have been a better way to go. 

 So OK, all noted and thanks for letting me know.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #130 on: September 14, 2011, 10:08:59 PM »
Hey fabucat. I disagree. It's not racist at all. People (black, yellow, white, purple) are motivated by money, and the rebels/opposition leaders are definitely obtaining funding and support. The hope and promise of future riches and control of a wealthy nation is why they will fawn at white people from the USA, not because they are color struck.


Ghaddafi is a looney, and I enjoyed some of his speeches over the years, but I have to say that it is highly suspicious that right after he demanded a settlement from an oil company, and right after his sons started flexing their way into leadership, the West turned on him.


The same thing happened to the shah of Iran, of whom I am not a big fan, but even I can admit that the USA did him dirty.

The West turned on Daffy because: 1) they were tired of indulging his craziness just to get oil; 2) Europeans didn't want a shitload of Libyan refugees washing onshore after a Gadaffi crackdown.  Europe these days is ESPECIALLY unequipped these days to absorb a couple hundred thousand immigrants. 

I started talking to Libyan and Syrian activists around the time of the January 24th Egyptian uprising.  I find it *very* hard to believe that the US could orchestrate the Libyan uprising and it's very natural that Libyan activists were heartened by the Tunisian and Egyptian successes.  Gadaffi, not the West, is to blame for this uprising.  The man and his family were using Libya's natural resources as if it was his private property and not sharing it with most of his people.  Plus he used extraordinary repression to keep people down.  He had no problem killing 13,000 political prisoners when they staged a protest in a jail in the 1990s.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Now compare Gadaffi with another repressive leader, the Saudi King.  Saudi has democracy activists galore, and a lot of them spend time on the internet bitching.  Why does the Saudi regime endure?  First, while the regime is repressive, it's not completely over the top.  Second, the Saudi king has been obliged to share the nation's wealth with his people.  Sure, you could call $10,000 to every Saudi a bribe, or you could call it insurance against regime change.  Contrast the Saudi payment to the people with Gadaffi allowing his people to exist on an average of $2 a day. 

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #131 on: September 14, 2011, 10:25:35 PM »

I got so into critiquing Welles, I forgot about some of the meat of the subject. 
 
I remember thinking "whhhaaaaattt?" when Baker stated authoritatively that the Seals who died were the ones who took down bin Laden. I had heard that initially, too, but then heard (as Paper Boy says in his post) that they were Seals from the same unit, but not the same individuals.
 
When Welles swallowed Baker's story whole with nary a peep, I wrongly assumed that I had missed something. When two guys from different political perspectives seem to agree on a critical point, it sounds impressive to me.
 
Baker should have been called on to back up a statement of such obvious implication. Welles is just not up to an interview of that depth.

Wow.  Baker is living proof that far lefties are liars too.  (Of course I already knew that...but I thought we'd pretty much wiped out Communism, lol).  That's pretty damned ignorant of Baker to say that the dudes who died in the Chinook helicopter were the same ones who offed Osama.  Baker feels he needs to lie just to highlight his opposition to the killing of Osama.  He obviously doesn't have enough balls simply to say that he felt that Osama's murder was wrong. 

I now remember I got into a flame war with Baker on the Alternet website.  Baker wrote this editorial that the woman who claimed that loyalist forces ganged raped her was a CIA plant who was lying just to make the rebel's cause more sympathetic.  I saw the video of the woman approaching the foreign reporters and it looked real to me.  Plus about 5 different reporters described her physical condition after she lifted her skirt to show them.  Baker alleged that the woman had deliberately scarred her private parts and bruised her thighs to make it look like she'd been raped.  Now whether you're pro-Gaddafi, pro-rebel, or just non-interventionist, you've got to admit that Baker's statement was extremely sexist.  Even one of Gaddafi's sons was so appalled by the woman's story that he intervened on her behalf, and probably saved her life.  Yes, Saadi Gaddafi believed the rape victim's story but Russ Baker did not.

I wrote to Baker that it was possible to believe the woman's story and be totally anti-interventionist or even pro-Gaddafi.  He really couldn't deal with that.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #132 on: September 14, 2011, 10:27:29 PM »
Welles is a right wing jerk off. He's Noory with better speaking skills. Sometimes

Bwahahahahahahahahah. 

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #133 on: September 14, 2011, 11:26:59 PM »
hmmm...is this a board for thought or a closed board for a clique?  i think i will move on.  no real new thought here...just a few quasi intellectuals trying to impress each other.  please delete my profile..i cannot find that option.

Good riddance

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #134 on: September 15, 2011, 12:00:20 AM »

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #135 on: September 15, 2011, 12:51:23 AM »
He asked: What's it like to be a punk ass bitch? I said: oh it has its good days and its bad days.
lol,  nice.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #136 on: September 15, 2011, 04:17:39 AM »
The last time we heard that, it was Art referring to George, and just look how that turned out.

If I haven't said it yet: Analog Kid has the coolest avatar ever.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #137 on: September 15, 2011, 11:43:48 PM »
i accidentally deleted all of mbrown's posts.  sorry about that.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #138 on: September 15, 2011, 11:45:01 PM »
i accidentally deleted all of mbrown's posts.  sorry about that.
at least you can see what the douche was saying here through quotes, though.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #139 on: September 16, 2011, 08:57:52 AM »
i accidentally deleted all of mbrown's posts.  sorry about that.

Awfully clumsy of you.   8)

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #140 on: September 16, 2011, 10:10:51 AM »
Wells might be enhancing his voice to make it sound even deeper electronically on the air.

That comment made me remember a little horrible idea called
"Cash Box". Speeds up the radio program allowing for more commercials to be squeezed in. What about it Noory??

Wells..I listened to a show of his last Winter or so that completely freaked me the F out. Also, when he traded punches with J.C. he was
quite good. Creepy, but good.

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #141 on: September 16, 2011, 11:10:44 AM »
Awfully clumsy of you.   8)
lol, no, it really was an accident. Wish I could explain how it happened, but it's kinda complicated. Oh well.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

Re: John B. Wells
« Reply #142 on: September 16, 2011, 01:06:56 PM »
... Speeds up the radio program allowing for more commercials to be squeezed in. What about it Noory??

George is happy to reduce air time if it means more commercials.  What is it now on the non-infomercial nights, about 50-50? 
 
And does he love commercials, he gets free storable food, a free safe, seeds.  Probably got to stay a few weekends at Tahiti Villiage.

Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #143 on: September 18, 2011, 07:28:32 PM »
So JBW is doing open lines on 9/23/11... Furthering my thought of his continuous test. Noory will pass the mic to JB when his reign ends, so I say now...

Re: Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #144 on: September 18, 2011, 11:25:37 PM »
So JBW is doing open lines on 9/23/11... Furthering my thought of his continuous test. Noory will pass the mic to JB when his reign ends, so I say now...

So noted, HorrorReporter. 
 
And I can't argue with your analysis.   

Re: Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #145 on: September 19, 2011, 10:18:16 AM »
I'm guessing you two are probably correct.  What happened to Rob Simone?  Is he out of the running for Prom King?  It's been a while since we heard Wells and Simone in the same time frame, but I have a vague memory of preferring Simone.  Can't say I remember why. 

Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #146 on: September 19, 2011, 10:52:34 AM »
I think he does radio somewhere else? Even when he was on they rarely played his shows up.. I like him though, a little clumsy on air but I think he asks great questions

Re: Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #147 on: September 19, 2011, 11:22:21 AM »
I think he does radio somewhere else? Even when he was on they rarely played his shows up.. I like him though, a little clumsy on air but I think he asks great questions

You're right, HR.  I googled him, and lo and behold, he's got a paranormal show based in Los Angeles. Guess Snoory doesn't like the local competition? 

http://startalkfm.com/category/rob-simone-talk-show/

Re: Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #148 on: September 19, 2011, 11:24:52 AM »
So JBW is doing open lines on 9/23/11... Furthering my thought of his continuous test. Noory will pass the mic to JB when his reign ends, so I say now...

Noory has repeatedly stated that he wants to hold on to his job "10 more years". That seems like a long time for JBW to wait to take the reigns. Hell, the man may not even be alive then.

Re: Premeire.. Wells?
« Reply #149 on: September 19, 2011, 11:58:15 AM »
Noory has repeatedly stated that he wants to hold on to his job "10 more years". That seems like a long time for JBW to wait to take the reigns. Hell, the man may not even be alive then.

And if he is, I hope he doesn't get the gig. He's smarter than Noory (who isn't, I guess), but doesn't do much better as an interviewer, I don't think.