Author Connie Willis  (Read 77822 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lisa Garr
« Reply #240 on: January 31, 2015, 11:42:12 PM »
I have yet to decide whether Lisa Garr is:

1.  Extremely intelligent and a bit bored by her guests.

2.  Just trying to hold her own with guests she feels are smarter than she

3.  Not really listening and trying to remember which button to push when the music starts to play.

Either way, she puts me right to sleep.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #241 on: February 01, 2015, 07:43:32 PM »
"Welcome to Moron Trivia!"


but but but she giggles

Re: Lisa Garr
« Reply #242 on: February 01, 2015, 11:18:52 PM »
I have yet to decide whether Lisa Garr is:

1.  Extremely intelligent and a bit bored by her guests.

2.  Just trying to hold her own with guests she feels are smarter than she

3.  Not really listening and trying to remember which button to push when the music starts to play.

Either way, she puts me right to sleep.


She is not Coast "material".....NPR is calling!


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #243 on: February 15, 2015, 12:36:19 AM »
Entire show on Montauk Chronicles.....


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #244 on: February 15, 2015, 12:42:31 AM »
After doing some research through previously classified U.S. Department of Defense files, I discovered that a Naval Reserve officer named Jorch Noory was once a willing participant in a top-secret experiment called the "Monsuck Project."

And it worked.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #245 on: February 15, 2015, 12:58:17 AM »
I wish Knapp was doing this interview. I wonder if Connie visits Bellgab. She seems to be giggling less enthusiastically and isn't making weird food references. Now, Connie, if you could just stop giggling, period, it'd help all women in being taken seriously.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #246 on: February 15, 2015, 12:59:09 AM »
Entire show on Montauk Chronicles.....



Also, it sounds 100% bullcrap.

I bet Snoory's upset he doesn't get to talk about young boys supposedly experimented on and murdered.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #247 on: February 15, 2015, 01:00:21 AM »

I bet Snoory's upset he doesn't get to talk about young boys supposedly experimented on and murdered.



I'll be damned if you didn't just take the words right out of my Snore-hole.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #248 on: February 15, 2015, 01:00:41 AM »
This broad  is a fucking bore

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #249 on: February 15, 2015, 01:02:35 AM »
After doing some research through previously classified U.S. Department of Defense files, I discovered that a Naval Reserve officer named Jorch Noory was once a willing participant in a top-secret experiment called the "Monsuck Project."

And it worked.

Remember the Philadelphia experiment. ? Jorch was in the similar but lesser known St Louis experimentů


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #250 on: February 15, 2015, 01:03:15 AM »
I wish Knapp was doing this interview. I wonder if Connie visits Bellgab. She seems to be giggling less enthusiastically and isn't making weird food references. Now, Connie, if you could just stop giggling, period, it'd help all women in being taken seriously.

That Knapp hasn't touched this story before makes me less inclined to give this story any kind of credence.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #251 on: February 15, 2015, 01:05:17 AM »
Is it just me, or does she laugh/giggle at the most inappropriate times?

The guest will be explaining something, dead serious, then out of nowhere she'll chuckle and the guest will go silent for a second or two, as if to say, "Did I miss something?"

I find it to be pretty annoying--distracting, even.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #252 on: February 15, 2015, 01:06:03 AM »
Remember the Philadelphia experiment. ? Jorch was in the similar but lesser known St Louis experimentů



Snorge was a mean baby? That explains a lot.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #253 on: February 15, 2015, 01:08:28 AM »
Is it just me, or does she laugh/giggle at the most inappropriate times?

The guest will be explaining something, dead serious, then out of nowhere she'll chuckle and the guest will go silent for a second or two, as if to say, "Did I miss something?"

I find it to be pretty annoying--distracting, even.

Connie's gotta quit smoking the ganja before she goes on the air.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #254 on: February 15, 2015, 01:08:57 AM »
Remember the Philadelphia experiment. ? Jorch was in similar but lesser known St Louis experimentů




Goldendeal, your research has outdone itself this time.

That kid looks like he's destined for an unusual future . . . like never really getting English and cooking his esophagus with over-microwaved snack food.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #255 on: February 15, 2015, 01:13:36 AM »
Connie's gotta quit smoking the ganja before she goes on the air.


She ate a whole pot pot pie.


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #257 on: February 15, 2015, 01:16:00 AM »
This crazy guest -- Preston Nichols -- just claimed that he sound-engineered at Montauk the Rolling Stones song that just played, "Street Fighting Man."

Except that song is called "Gimme Shelter."

He doesn't even know the title of the song he claims to have been a part of at Montauk.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #258 on: February 15, 2015, 01:19:26 AM »
I think this character was part of "The Jim Beam Project."

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #259 on: February 15, 2015, 01:23:41 AM »
I've heard a lot of drunks speak in my life, but this guest sounds like the bar stool is sitting on him.

Kids were "beatened"?


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #260 on: February 15, 2015, 01:24:32 AM »
Since the show is bombing perhaps Willis can save it by changing the subject to the   Montauk Monster.....just tell this talking Ambien she booked the wrong guest and dismiss him  back to his rocker...


Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #261 on: February 15, 2015, 01:25:14 AM »
Did this guest just describe jacking off with a glowing orb?

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #262 on: February 15, 2015, 01:25:36 AM »
What's worse? Listening to this guest slur his way through blatant lies or Connie nervously giggling to end her sentences?

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #263 on: February 15, 2015, 01:25:37 AM »
Okay, pedophelia. This interview just became awkward. :o

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #264 on: February 15, 2015, 01:26:15 AM »
What's worse? Listening to this guest slur his way through blatant lies or Connie nervously giggling to end her sentences?

Yes.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #265 on: February 15, 2015, 01:27:34 AM »
Connie's a little sick.

The guest mentioned sexual abuse done on young boys, and did she really want to discuss it?

Connie:  "Well, it is Valentines Day."


Goodbye, Connie.

This ranks up there with guest-host Katherine Albrecht joking about having to use Zyklon B on the mice problem in her basement.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #266 on: February 15, 2015, 01:27:51 AM »
Since the show is bombing perhaps Willis can save it by changing the subject to the   Montauk Monster.....just tell this talking Ambien she booked the wrong guest and dismiss him  back to his rocker...



Oh, Connie's way past Ambien.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #267 on: February 15, 2015, 01:28:24 AM »
I've heard a lot of drunks speak in my life, but this guest sounds like the bar stool is sitting on him.

Kids were "beatened"?

Just wait, soon he will invite Willis to a real hootenanny....

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #268 on: February 15, 2015, 01:28:38 AM »
Noory's head would've exploded by this point in the interview.

But his penis would be glowing.

Re: Connie Willis
« Reply #269 on: February 15, 2015, 01:31:50 AM »
Now if only Connie would accidentally call it "The Mon-cock Project."