Author Woman's March Washington DC thread.  (Read 5433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #120 on: January 22, 2017, 07:58:15 PM »
Offer those lines to this one and see if they fly. I'll bet she's got the 'music in her'.



Oh dear.  Out of deference to Lily I will not say what is on my mind but, in fairness, I have seen a number of specimens of rural American female, daunting in proportion and terrible in aspect, who yield nothing to that creature.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #121 on: January 22, 2017, 08:11:48 PM »
She strikes me as a whiner. Members of the press frequently resort to pushing and shoving, turning off cameras, unplugging mic cables, etc. to keep another reporter from getting a story.  As for the guy who hit her, she has a suucessful story of an idiot displaying his stupidity foe the world to see.  When I was a news photographer, most were very big people just to avoid trouble like this.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #122 on: January 22, 2017, 08:12:21 PM »
The most beautiful video ever made...



Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #123 on: January 22, 2017, 08:12:35 PM »
Oh dear.  Out of deference to Lily I will not say what is on my mind but, in fairness, I have seen a number of specimens of rural American female, daunting in proportion and terrible in aspect, who yield nothing to that creature.

You are a gentleman, K_Dubb. Really- if she was well mannered and kind to the people around her instead of the spectacle she made of herself, she would be seen in a different light.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #124 on: January 22, 2017, 08:19:42 PM »
The most beautiful video ever made...


ROTFLMAO!!!  Nice find, chefist!  ;D ;)

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #125 on: January 22, 2017, 08:27:10 PM »
She strikes me as a whiner. Members of the press frequently resort to pushing and shoving, turning off cameras, unplugging mic cables, etc. to keep another reporter from getting a story.  As for the guy who hit her, she has a suucessful story of an idiot displaying his stupidity foe the world to see.  When I was a news photographer, most were very big people just to avoid trouble like this.

I think she played it up a bit too, but she did get a nice, little slice of irony to serve up though.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #126 on: January 22, 2017, 08:41:46 PM »




Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #127 on: January 22, 2017, 10:12:18 PM »
That's exactly how I feel.  It is ok to be a pussy-grabber if you are on the left but god help you if you are on the right.  What is wrong is wrong and should apply to both sides.

I know! I'm used to Republicans being closet homosexuals. Would people please stick with their own stereotypes? Is that too much to ask?!  ::) :D

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #128 on: January 22, 2017, 10:22:14 PM »
The most beautiful video ever made...

So many artists and actors have revealed themselves to be such idiots in real life that I just don't know if I can ever support them as artists again. Yeah, no big deal that one guy boycots them, I know...but if millions like me do, well, then it really will effect them personally.  ;)

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #129 on: January 23, 2017, 04:11:23 PM »
Wynonna Judd distances herself from sister, Ashley.  I was happy to see this.


Wynonna Judd Goes Full-Force Patriotic After Sister Ashley's Rant at the Women's March


http://ijr.com/2017/01/783733-wynonna-judd-goes-full-force-patriotic-after-sister-ashleys-rant-at-the-womens-march/?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=afternoon-newsletter&utm_medium=owned

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #130 on: January 23, 2017, 04:58:58 PM »
I know there's far more going on with this 'movement' and I'm sure the truth will out in time.

Earlier in this thread, I posted a photo of three average women like the ones you would see in your own community. I didn't choose younger, more flamboyant looking women to make a point. There you have 3 ladies who were protesting Trump in general and his use of the word, "pussy" in particular. These women stood there proudly holding up signs using the same, offensive term.

Let me get this straight- 11 or 12 years ago, Trump uses vulgar terms in what he thought was a private conversation, away from mixed company and the public forum and we should all be outraged? I don't condone his behaviour, but I'm sure worse than that has been said. Take a look at what is on display in our pop culture- by women as well as men.

These women protesters hold up signs with vulgar messages and objectify themselves with the very same term, "pussy", some even dressing the part and this is acceptable? Not only that, they did this in mixed company, in front of children, not only on the national but the global stage and this is somehow appropriate?

Let's not forget those uplifting speeches by Madonna and Judd.

As the late Rep. James Traficant used to say, "Beam me up, Mr. Speaker."


Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #131 on: January 23, 2017, 05:11:44 PM »
I know there's far more going on with this 'movement' and I'm sure the truth will out in time.

Earlier in this thread, I posted a photo of three average women like the ones you would see in your own community. I didn't choose younger, more flamboyant looking women to make a point. There you have 3 ladies who were protesting Trump in general and his use of the word, "pussy" in particular. These women stood there proudly holding up signs using the same, offensive term.

Let me get this straight- 11 or 12 years ago, Trump uses vulgar terms in what he thought was a private conversation, away from mixed company and the public forum and we should all be outraged? I don't condone his behaviour, but I'm sure worse than that has been said. Take a look at what is on display in our pop culture- by women as well as men.

These women protesters hold up signs with vulgar messages and objectify themselves with the very same term, "pussy", some even dressing the part and this is acceptable? Not only that, they did this in mixed company, in front of children, not only on the national but the global stage and this is somehow appropriate?

Let's not forget those uplifting speeches by Madonna and Judd.

As the late Rep. James Traficant used to say, "Beam me up, Mr. Speaker."

This makes far too much sense for this forum.
Reported.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #132 on: January 23, 2017, 05:13:29 PM »
This makes far too much sense for this forum.
Reported.

Dang! Was I supposed to swear? You've got to get me up to speed on these things, aldous.  ;) ;D

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #133 on: January 23, 2017, 05:18:33 PM »

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #134 on: January 23, 2017, 05:54:19 PM »
I know there's far more going on with this 'movement' and I'm sure the truth will out in time.

Earlier in this thread, I posted a photo of three average women like the ones you would see in your own community. I didn't choose younger, more flamboyant looking women to make a point. There you have 3 ladies who were protesting Trump in general and his use of the word, "pussy" in particular. These women stood there proudly holding up signs using the same, offensive term.

Let me get this straight- 11 or 12 years ago, Trump uses vulgar terms in what he thought was a private conversation, away from mixed company and the public forum and we should all be outraged? I don't condone his behaviour, but I'm sure worse than that has been said. Take a look at what is on display in our pop culture- by women as well as men.

These women protesters hold up signs with vulgar messages and objectify themselves with the very same term, "pussy", some even dressing the part and this is acceptable? Not only that, they did this in mixed company, in front of children, not only on the national but the global stage and this is somehow appropriate?

Let's not forget those uplifting speeches by Madonna and Judd.

As the late Rep. James Traficant used to say, "Beam me up, Mr. Speaker."


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/27/ex-wife-donald-trump-made-feel-violated-during-sex.html



Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #135 on: January 23, 2017, 06:06:31 PM »
my mother even thought all those women interviewed were ugly, probably never had (or have) a man and showed very little intelligence ?
I did not see any I would be interested in at all
(I prefer university educated attractive ladies...not a homely feminazi)

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #136 on: January 23, 2017, 06:12:19 PM »
****RoseGirl's Last Post****

You know those four kids on CNN right now....the ones that lured their friend who couldn't defend himself and then cornered him, humiliated him, abused him and then tortured him...just what is the difference between that and what goes on here at BellGab? Or, indeed, in this very thread? Asking for a friend.

I mean really, was the kid bacon flavoured or something?

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #137 on: January 23, 2017, 06:26:48 PM »

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #138 on: January 23, 2017, 06:34:50 PM »
That didn't take long.

Transgender Activists Upset Over ‘White Cis Women March’
Women's march 'dangerous space' with 'oppressive message' that 'having a vagina is essential to womanhood'

http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #139 on: January 23, 2017, 06:40:05 PM »
That didn't take long.

Transgender Activists Upset Over ‘White Cis Women March’
Women's march 'dangerous space' with 'oppressive message' that 'having a vagina is essential to womanhood'

http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/


I can't speak for other Yorkshiremen or indeed other heterosexual men (even the one or two American ones); but I can confirm from my point of view, a vagina is absolutely a pre-requisite to the definition of a woman. Yes. But I'm willing to take a straw poll on that to see what other blokes think.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #140 on: January 23, 2017, 06:42:54 PM »

I can't speak for other Yorkshiremen or indeed other heterosexual men (even the one or two American ones); but I can confirm from my point of view, a vagina is absolutely a pre-requisite to the definition of a woman. Yes. But I'm willing to take a straw poll on that to see what other blokes think.

You shudna said that, YP- you'd better hide.  ;D

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #141 on: January 23, 2017, 09:50:11 PM »

I can't speak for other Yorkshiremen or indeed other heterosexual men (even the one or two American ones); but I can confirm from my point of view, a vagina is absolutely a pre-requisite to the definition of a woman. Yes. But I'm willing to take a straw poll on that to see what other blokes think.

Nice try but no one believes you're straight.  :D

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #142 on: January 23, 2017, 10:02:18 PM »

I can't speak for other Yorkshiremen or indeed other heterosexual men (even the one or two American ones); but I can confirm from my point of view, a vagina is absolutely a pre-requisite to the definition of a woman. Yes. But I'm willing to take a straw poll on that to see what other blokes think.
To be fair, I have never been with a woman who was lacking one- so I really cannot contribute to the conversation nor offer up an opinion.  ;)




The CBC played clips form a 6 year olds speech (Sophie Cruz) that made me vomit.  Yeah, I'm sure nobody has coached her to yell that love will bring the world together and wrote her thoughts the words to her speech out for her.

And then they played an excerpt from ____ Davis (the communist party organizer in the US) who was upset with white men and talked about freedom (something that communists are renowned for.)

All in all, it reminded me why Trump won.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #143 on: January 24, 2017, 05:31:13 AM »
I suspect a primary motivation for the organizers was collecting contact data for future elections.  I lost my job just as Obama was being elected, and I applied for everything I could - including the Obama transition team.  Even though I registered as an independent, I received email from Obama and from national and local Democrats for his entire time in office.  During the recent election, I received numerous text messages from the Hillary campaign.

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #144 on: January 24, 2017, 10:23:40 AM »
Gross!



Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #145 on: January 24, 2017, 10:33:08 AM »
Gross!




Someone has to fight for the women of all genders...

Is this like a real life South Park episode?

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #146 on: January 24, 2017, 10:45:58 AM »
Someone has to fight for the women of all genders...

Is this like a real life South Park episode?

Sounds like it. I bet they will have a field day with this event. How many genders for women are there?

AAFAIK- there were 58 genders- not sure how many apply to women exclusively.

Quote
The following are the 58 gender options identified by ABC News:

    Agender
    Androgyne
    Androgynous
    Bigender
    Cis
    Cisgender
    Cis Female
    Cis Male
    Cis Man
    Cis Woman
    Cisgender Female
    Cisgender Male
    Cisgender Man
    Cisgender Woman
    Female to Male
    FTM
    Gender Fluid
    Gender Nonconforming
    Gender Questioning
    Gender Variant
    Genderqueer
    Intersex
    Male to Female
    MTF
    Neither
    Neutrois
    Non-binary
    Other
    Pangender
    Trans
    Trans*
    Trans Female
    Trans* Female
    Trans Male
    Trans* Male
    Trans Man
    Trans* Man
    Trans Person
    Trans* Person
    Trans Woman
    Trans* Woman
    Transfeminine
    Transgender
    Transgender Female
    Transgender Male
    Transgender Man
    Transgender Person
    Transgender Woman
    Transmasculine
    Transsexual
    Transsexual Female
    Transsexual Male
    Transsexual Man
    Transsexual Person
    Transsexual Woman
    Two-Spirit

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/02/heres-a-list-of-58-gender-options-for-facebook-users/

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #147 on: January 24, 2017, 10:54:19 AM »
Quote
Two-Spirit



Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #148 on: January 24, 2017, 10:57:37 AM »
Someone has to fight for the women of all genders...

Is this like a real life South Park episode?
If it's not already, I'm sure it soon will be.  ;) 

Re: Woman's March Washington DC thread.
« Reply #149 on: January 24, 2017, 11:00:16 AM »
Two-Spirit

Does that make an exorcism an oppressive removal of a same sex partner?  ???