Author President Donald J. Trump  (Read 1366783 times)

2 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42870 on: April 18, 2017, 10:08:29 AM »
In other news; Trump has congratulated Erdogan. Remarkable considering the WH previous stance was the election wasn't clean, and indeed there is evidence of it being rigged.
Erdogan an now enjoy pretty much complete totalitarian rule for at least the next ten years. No wonder Trump sent his good wishes. If only he could have the same instead of those pesky Reps, Senators and voters.

 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/17/donald-trump-erdogan-turkey-referendum-congratulations?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H+categories&utm_term=222111&subid=11301906&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

You get the previous admin completely supported this guy. I remember when the coupe happened the Obama admin was in fully behind him. Same as Egypt Muslim Brotherhood takes over Admin supports, the Egyptian military says enough of the craziness takes over to keep the country from going completely radical. The Obama admin condemns.
   

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42871 on: April 18, 2017, 10:10:46 AM »

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42872 on: April 18, 2017, 10:14:06 AM »


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42873 on: April 18, 2017, 10:38:39 AM »
You get the previous admin completely supported this guy. I remember when the coupe happened the Obama admin was in fully behind him. Same as Egypt Muslim Brotherhood takes over Admin supports, the Egyptian military says enough of the craziness takes over to keep the country from going completely radical. The Obama admin condemns.
 

The previous admin supported him insofar as he hadn't played his hand. Trump invited the Egyptian general who overthrew a democratically elected (but not satisfactory to the US) government. Now Trump has two for one. Two despots he can relate to, who will have disappeared and imprisoned those who disagree with them (shades of Putin); and completely against the very thing 'patriots' rail against.

Funny how those same patriots have no issue with that. They wrap themselves in the flag, preach 'freedom', accuse Obama of being a communist (but haven't a clue what one was if they gave them a hammer and sickle), yet turn a blind eye to totalitarian regimes in other countries if Trump gets along with the despot.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42874 on: April 18, 2017, 10:43:03 AM »
This shouldn't have gotten any media attention at all

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/man-dies-home-falsely-told-trump-impeached-article-1.3067124

Well he died happy.

Trump saying on twatter the Dem candidate in GA would put taxes up, eliminate healthcare, and numerous other things he can't do, shouldn't get media attention, but it did.  :)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42875 on: April 18, 2017, 10:52:22 AM »
When the GOP sweats out a congressional election in fucking Kansas, and the opposition party doesn't even try, it doesn't bode well for the orange oaf.

Never forget what a dope this guy is, what an insult to the office, and how vulnerable he is.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42876 on: April 18, 2017, 10:55:28 AM »
Do you mean to say Cohn and Kushner aren't 'globalist'? Because if you've been reading along, those two are steering the government lately, depending on how diseased the president's cerebellum is that day of the week.

Young Jared and his family have quite a bit to lose if Obamacare goes belly up. I know you're a child, but don't be so naive.

Alex Jones, is that you?


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42877 on: April 18, 2017, 10:56:29 AM »
Never listened to him in my life, twat.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42878 on: April 18, 2017, 10:59:33 AM »
Well he died happy.

Trump saying on twatter the Dem candidate in GA would put taxes up, eliminate healthcare, and numerous other things he can't do, shouldn't get media attention, but it did.  :)
At least Trump and whoever the candidate is are public figures and an argument could be made that whatever they say on social media might be something the public would be interested in. Story I linked had no merit whatsoever - a woman lying to her husband is probably pretty common and unremarkable - but the whole thing seemed like clickbait pandering to the anti-Trump crowd.
I also disliked the story about Melania reminding Trump to put his hand on his chest during the national anthem, but I guess Americans are funny about stuff like that and would be interested.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42879 on: April 18, 2017, 11:10:24 AM »
When the GOP sweats out a congressional election in fucking Kansas, and the opposition party doesn't even try, it doesn't bode well for the orange oaf.

Never forget what a dope this guy is, what an insult to the office, and how vulnerable he is.

His own undoing. He spent his campaign tellng his followers he could deliver stuff (often contradictory) in a ridiculously short time. He patently couldn't. He blamed China for stealing American jobs to the extent that he was going to get a lacky to announce China was a currency manipulator.

Last week he decided they're not because he realises he can't save the world alone, so presumably he'll drop his chest thumping about China stealing jobs and manipulating their currency. He said he'd reveal his tax returns, now he won't 'because he won'. In other words, he accepts and expects everyone else to accept that whatever he said pre election is meaningless, because he won.

Same goes for his golfing excursions he wouldn't have time for. Remember how he would 'love the WH" and never want to leave? He changes what he says from one day to another. And lies so easily, you could be forgiven for thinking he hadn't said the opposite previously, if it wasn't for the archives of his twatter account and tv interviews.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42880 on: April 18, 2017, 11:16:04 AM »
At least Trump and whoever the candidate is are public figures and an argument could be made that whatever they say on social media might be something the public would be interested in. Story I linked had no merit whatsoever - a woman lying to her husband is probably pretty common and unremarkable - but the whole thing seemed like clickbait pandering to the anti-Trump crowd.
I also disliked the story about Melania reminding Trump to put his hand on his chest during the national anthem, but I guess Americans are funny about stuff like that and would be interested.

Nearly everything these days is clickbait. Trump sends out his tweets as policy without understanding that what he says will be noticed and taken as what he really 'thinks'. He's stymied because he has no conviction or aspirations other than his and his family's wealth and position. He just so coincidentally doubled the joining fee for his playground in Florida when he took office. Meanwhile his many excursions there are draining money from Palm Beach.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42881 on: April 18, 2017, 12:06:40 PM »
I understand math has a known liberal bias, but I saw a figure the other day (on a conservative forum) that he needs to create 200K jobs a month just to keep pace with Obama. He's currently ticking below 100K per month.

Job creation, like actual governing, is hard. It takes more than scribbling a messy signature on a stack of EOs or threatening a plant boss in Buttfuck Springs, Indiana. On Twitter.

But hey - maybe he can build a golf course or cake factory somewhere.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42882 on: April 18, 2017, 12:19:25 PM »
I understand math has a known liberal bias, but I saw a figure the other day (on a conservative forum) that he needs to create 200K jobs a month just to keep pace with Obama. He's currently ticking below 100K per month.

Job creation, like actual governing, is hard. It takes more than scribbling a messy signature on a stack of EOs or threatening a plant boss in Buttfuck Springs, Indiana. On Twitter.

But hey - maybe he can build a golf course or cake factory somewhere.

He might not need to. He's had (as too Ivanka) many patents approved in China since taking office. And being the generous sort, he made the boss of Trump hotel Manila the envoy for the Philippines.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42883 on: April 18, 2017, 12:40:21 PM »
Ossoff may force a run-off today but he has no chance to win the seat.  I live a half-mile from the 6th district boundary and roughly 75% of the district is conservative territory.  He has been pouring money into local ads but all that does is give him name recognition among prospective Democratic constituents.  There are 3 other Democratic candidates who probably will not do well at all but there are 12 Republican candidates who will probably split the vote but Karen Handel will win out among them.  A candidate must win 50% +1 to win the seat.  No way will Ossoff get there but he will most likely make the run-off  The Democrats are wasting money but that is not unusual.  They love to waste money.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42884 on: April 18, 2017, 12:54:52 PM »
Ossoff may force a run-off today but he has no chance to win the seat.  I live a half-mile from the 6th district boundary and roughly 75% of the district is conservative territory.  He has been pouring money into local ads but all that does is give him name recognition among prospective Democratic constituents.  There are 3 other Democratic candidates who probably will not do well at all but there are 12 Republican candidates who will probably split the vote but Karen Handel will win out among them.  A candidate must win 50% +1 to win the seat.  No way will Ossof get there but he will most likely make the run-off  The Democrats are wasting money but that is not unusual.  They love to waste money.

Since when has pouring money (usually from the corporations who want a payback later) into politics been an issue? This particular vote should be a doddle so soon after Trump has led the US to the promised land, but its put the willies in the republicans.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42885 on: April 18, 2017, 01:00:13 PM »
Since when has pouring money (usually from the corporations who want a payback later) into politics been an issue? This particular vote should be a doddle so soon after Trump has led the US to the promised land, but its put the willies in the republicans.

I was talking more about how the Democrats like to waste money in general not just in elections.  Republicans who know the district aren't the least bit scared.  Just Republicans who listen to the national media.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42886 on: April 18, 2017, 01:05:48 PM »
I was talking more about how the Democrats like to waste money in general not just in elections.  Republicans who know the district aren't the least bit scared.  Just Republicans who listen to the national media.

I think there's a very good chance that Trump will indirectly spend far more money than the Democrats or Republicans, combined.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42887 on: April 18, 2017, 01:43:21 PM »
I think there's a very good chance that Trump will indirectly spend far more money than the Democrats or Republicans, combined.

Well, I have never said he was a conservative though being a businessman he might choose his investments a bit more wisely.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42888 on: April 18, 2017, 02:00:48 PM »
Well, I have never said he was a conservative though being a businessman he might choose his investments a bit more wisely.

He'll try to use OPM, though he might think its his to spend. :)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42889 on: April 18, 2017, 02:12:39 PM »
He'll try to use OPM, though he might think its his to spend. :)

Now you are talking like a Dem!!!

I work strictly private industry, couple years ago we were invited to a conf put on by IBM. Me and one of the guys I work with realized after about 5 minutes in that we did not fit. It was ALL government contractors and such so we said fuck it lets hang out free booze later. I got to talking to someone who in the past worked private and is now strictly public. I asked which do you prefer and she said "Well Gov is a lot slower from lead until slow BUT the big ticket items are easier to sell." I said really how so and her response was this. In private sector you have to convince the owner to spend his money but in public it is not that difficult it is not their money.

And that is one of the many things wrong with public sector.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42890 on: April 18, 2017, 02:54:55 PM »
Now you are talking like a Dem!!!

I work strictly private industry, couple years ago we were invited to a conf put on by IBM. Me and one of the guys I work with realized after about 5 minutes in that we did not fit. It was ALL government contractors and such so we said fuck it lets hang out free booze later. I got to talking to someone who in the past worked private and is now strictly public. I asked which do you prefer and she said "Well Gov is a lot slower from lead until slow BUT the big ticket items are easier to sell." I said really how so and her response was this. In private sector you have to convince the owner to spend his money but in public it is not that difficult it is not their money.

And that is one of the many things wrong with public sector.

That's the case the world over. I worked at a printers that had a huge government department contract. It made me feel guilty and thankful in equal measure. They really knew how to spend money. Looking back, its a bit depressing to think of the unneccessary stuff we had to do. Most could have been done for cheaper and a lot not at all.  :-\

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42891 on: April 18, 2017, 02:58:31 PM »
I worked at a printers that had a huge government department contract. It made me feel guilty


Still, about as innocent as a Clinton presidency.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42892 on: April 18, 2017, 03:05:11 PM »

Still, about as innocent as a Clinton presidency.

We had the contract when Clinton was president. No coincidences.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42893 on: April 18, 2017, 03:08:24 PM »
Most could have been done for cheaper

I don't think you understand how commerce functions. Read a book.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42894 on: April 18, 2017, 03:08:48 PM »
Most could have been done for cheaper and a lot not at all.


Like, your wife.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42895 on: April 18, 2017, 03:19:07 PM »

Like, your wife.

And you still single, who could have guessed?

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42896 on: April 18, 2017, 03:20:44 PM »
FULL SPEECH: President Donald Trump Speech and Signs the Buy American, Hire American Executive Order.
Published on Apr 18, 2017
President Trump Delivers Remarks in Kenosha, Wisconsin on Manufacturing - President Trump Makes Remarks and Signs the Buy American, Hire American Executive Order.




Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42897 on: April 18, 2017, 03:22:37 PM »
I think there's a very good chance that Trump will indirectly spend far more money than the Democrats or Republicans, combined.

You still think there's a good chance he's colluding with the Russians, is the next Hitler and the sky is falling!  ::)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42898 on: April 18, 2017, 03:37:52 PM »


Here is Trump's first attempt at building a wall. As long as you are throwing other people's money (OPM in Trump lingo) at it, I suppose, anything is possible. What a guy!


https://www.good.is/articles/trump-wall-golf-scotland-balmedie


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #42899 on: April 18, 2017, 03:38:01 PM »
FULL SPEECH: President Donald Trump Speech and Signs the Buy American, Hire American Executive Order.
Published on Apr 18, 2017


He won't be wearing his hats and ties then?  ::)  He really believes his own bullshit. Bless.