Author Pizzagate  (Read 21917 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #270 on: December 06, 2016, 11:42:09 PM »
Okay, smart guy.

Is this a general call to action, or are you announcing your consent to be picked on by those not of your... stature?

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #271 on: December 06, 2016, 11:47:52 PM »
You will? What about the posting of the very pictures you claim signify child abuse? How will you talk yourself out of that one?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test


This loathsome troll once again demonstrates its complete lack of familiarity with the justice system it's busy discouraging people from talking about.

Note the use of the apostrophes above. Don't call it a standard.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #272 on: December 06, 2016, 11:54:32 PM »



Pizza theory is conspiracy news.

The dominoes begin to fall.  :)


Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #273 on: December 06, 2016, 11:58:48 PM »



Pizza theory is conspiracy news.

Is that what you're going to go with? Guilt by association?

If someone raised campaign cash for Trump, and it turns out he's raped a child, this implicates Trump as being a child molester too?

Your logic is solid.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #274 on: December 07, 2016, 12:01:54 AM »
Is that what you're going to go with?

Are you going to make everything into a rhetorical bullshit straw man question?

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #275 on: December 07, 2016, 12:05:16 AM »
Are you going to make everything into a rhetorical bullshit straw man question?

That's not a straw man. It's pointing out the logical problem with the argument made by that youtube guy.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #276 on: December 07, 2016, 12:06:18 AM »
That's not a straw man. It's pointing out the logical problem with the argument made by that youtube guy.

What argument? It sounded merely factual.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #277 on: December 07, 2016, 12:08:01 AM »
What argument? It sounded merely factual.

Guilt by association
    1.
    guilt ascribed to someone not because of any evidence but because of their association with an offender.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #278 on: December 07, 2016, 12:10:51 AM »
Guilt by association
    1.
    guilt ascribed to someone not because of any evidence but because of their association with an offender.

He was only pointing out that besides Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the "too big to fail" banks some rich pedophiles are among Hillary's (and the DNC's) biggest financial supporters.  What's the big deal? :D

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #279 on: December 07, 2016, 12:12:48 AM »
the logical problem with the argument made by that youtube guy.

... and then you attempted to conflate ownership of said argument with me.

transparent shill


The point that I have made through demonstration, is that it is absurd of anyone to make the claims that you are making, given the readily available facts.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #280 on: December 07, 2016, 12:17:53 AM »
He was only pointing out that besides Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the "too big to fail" banks some rich pedophiles are among Hillary's (and the DNC's) biggest financial supporters.  What's the big deal? :D

No. He argued Obama's association (12 degrees of separation) with a fund raiser implicates him child sex rings. It's a specious argument.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #281 on: December 07, 2016, 12:20:09 AM »
It's a specious argument.

That's really just your opinion, that you're maintaining in the face of a colossal mountain of circumstantial evidence.

Precisely how do you explain the existence of this mountain? Is it crop-circlists, re-purposed?

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #282 on: December 07, 2016, 12:21:44 AM »
... and then you attempted to conflate ownership of said argument with me.

Nope. Hell, I have a hard time deciphering what you're even talking about most of the time.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #283 on: December 07, 2016, 12:23:15 AM »
Nope. Hell, I have a hard time deciphering what you're even talking about most of the time.

Then, would you describe yourself as more of an r-strategist, or a K-strategist?

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #284 on: December 07, 2016, 12:24:18 AM »
That's really just your opinion, that you're maintaining in the face of a colossal mountain of circumstantial evidence.

Precisely how do you explain the existence of this mountain? Is it crop-circlists, re-purposed?

Evidence of what's claimed in that particular video? That a fund raiser for Obama raped a 15-year-old, and therefore Obama rapes 15-year-olds?

Let's see that colossal mountain.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #285 on: December 07, 2016, 12:27:44 AM »
Let's see that colossal mountain.




As with essentially all mountains, one spies the summit at a distance, and then proceeds to the base.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #286 on: December 07, 2016, 12:29:15 AM »



As with essentially all mountains, one spies the summit at a distance, and then proceeds to the base.

Start with the base then.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #287 on: December 07, 2016, 12:30:08 AM »
Start with the base then.

I would be more likely to start with your mother.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #288 on: December 07, 2016, 12:32:03 AM »
I would be more likely to start with your mother.

See, now that's an ad hominem.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #289 on: December 07, 2016, 12:33:34 AM »
See, now that's an ad hominem.

Yeah but you were egging him on.  :D

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #290 on: December 07, 2016, 12:33:50 AM »
See, now that's an ad hominem.

welcome to bellgab

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #291 on: December 07, 2016, 12:35:02 AM »

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #292 on: December 07, 2016, 12:35:30 AM »
Precisely how do you explain the existence of this mountain? Is it crop-circlists, re-purposed?

I will just leave this here for you for when you realize that it is time for you to get to it.


See, now that's an ad hominem.

Once more. With feeling.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #293 on: December 07, 2016, 01:33:32 AM »



(((behold this obviously fraudulent document)))

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #294 on: December 07, 2016, 01:42:58 AM »
I along with other /pol/locks have been fucking with their facebook page

https://www.facebook.com/cometpingpong/


Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #295 on: December 07, 2016, 01:46:02 AM »
I along with other /pol/locks have been fucking with their facebook page




Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #296 on: December 07, 2016, 01:47:10 AM »
It's very clear and has been proven many times that child pedophile rings do exist with people who are in high places of power.   Boystown in the 80's (watch Conspiracy of Silence), the Hollywood ring in the 2000's (watch An Open Secret), recently in Portugal and Norway and I'm sure a dozen times or more.    Alefantis was the boyfriend of one of the men in the heart of the Open Secret scandal.   It's one thing to have a couple of coincidences, but when there is a mountainload of them you can't ignore them any longer.   I'm not necessarily saying Obama did anything..  maybe he did but I hope he didn't.   I'm not saying Hillary did anything either.   But I would definitely suspect that Podesta, Alefantis and others (Bill Clinton?) might be involved in something sinister.  For you non believers, you need to take a deeper look.  You're ignoring obvious stuff and writing the theory off as wrong because a few popular "research" points were/are incorrect.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #297 on: December 07, 2016, 01:51:01 AM »

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #298 on: December 07, 2016, 01:51:43 AM »
I just wonder if their actual pizza was any good.

Re: Pizzagate
« Reply #299 on: December 07, 2016, 01:55:32 AM »
I just wonder if their actual pizza was any good.

doubt it