Author Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?  (Read 2430 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2016, 03:47:11 PM »
As a Tasty Canadian, and "subject" of the Queen,  I must serve my alien lizard overlords. :D

Well, find a good place to hibernate because we're coming for ya!  ;)

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2016, 04:02:38 PM »
To pay all that huge money every year to support live styles of a useless monarchs their families their support service
is totally insane, especially that they serve no actual function in running the country.

What a waste of money that instead to waste on those leeches could go to support couples to have and raise babies
so your country /the UK/ would have it's own good robust natural population growth -instead you have to "import" muslim immigrants
to keep your population on some decent level,..what a luck of vision,..luck of smart money management
just for some stupid nostalgic reasons

It shows how retarded majority of people in UK /and other countries/ are for supporting that wasting of money on a institution
that doesn't even contribute to rule your country anymore to make decisions that improve lives of all it's citizens
especially of the working class but instead just sucks money from them from the public coffers...

That's how stupid those Brits who support monarchy are....


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2016, 04:10:23 PM »
To pay all that huge money every year to support live styles of a useless monarchs their families their support service
is totally insane, especially that they serve no actual function in running the country.

What a waste of money that instead to waste on those leeches could go to support couples to have and raise babies
so your country /the UK/ would have it's own good robust natural population growth -instead you have to "import" muslim immigrants
to keep your population on some decent level,..what a luck of vision,..luck of smart money management
just for some stupid nostalgic reasons

It shows how retarded majority of people in UK /and other countries/ are for supporting that wasting of money on a institution
that doesn't even contribute to rule your country anymore to make decisions that improve lives of all it's citizens
especially of the working class but instead just sucks money from them from the public coffers...

That's how stupid Brits are....

While I mostly agree with what you're saying I don't think all Brits are stupid. I'm sure many of them aren't crazy about the royal family themselves. My ancestry is pretty much 100% GB. So, it's not out of hatred of them that I want monarchy abolished but because I love them and want better for them. I also think the cumulative effects of getting rid of all monarchies will most likely benefit the whole world.  ;)

Brexit was a first good move on the chessboard. Electing Trump was an excellent second move. Let's keep the positive momentum going!  :)


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2016, 04:37:48 PM »
While I mostly agree with what you're saying I don't think all Brits are stupid. I'm sure many of them aren't crazy about the royal family themselves. My ancestry is pretty much 100% GB. So, it's not out of hatred of them that I want monarchy abolished but because I love them and want better for them. I also think the cumulative effects of getting rid of all monarchies will most likely benefit the whole world.  ;)

Brexit was a first good move on the chessboard. Electing Trump was an excellent second move. Let's keep the positive momentum going!  :)

yes, you are correct -Thanks for pointing that out -I already corrected my post /but I left the original text,just added to it/

As to Bretix it looks like it might be reversed and they might not be allowed to leave the EU according to latest decision by the court 

"Will MPs block Brexit? Backbenchers plot against Theresa May’s Article 50 law"
https://www.rt.com/uk/366535-brexit-vote-article-50/
Published time: 11 Nov, 2016 16:38



Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #34 on: November 13, 2016, 05:44:55 PM »
Let's keep the positive momentum going!  :)

OK, in that case here it comes...
"I Slept With Your Mom Prank" (animated) - Ownage Pranks
*I called a guy in the UK and pretended like I've been dating his mom, he doesn't seem to be very happy to hear from me.*




Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #35 on: November 19, 2016, 11:25:58 AM »

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #36 on: November 19, 2016, 11:26:39 AM »

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #37 on: November 19, 2016, 01:15:48 PM »


Thanks Dr.MD
Hmmmm, --just watched this video /part 6/ ,next I will watch part 5,...but I think I will watch all of them from part 1.
Very interesting,..at first might sound like lunacy but there is something to it I think, .....hmmm??

Interesting that they will be spending fortune on renovating this old barn.

"Buckingham Palace renovation: 9 things you may not know"
What needs to be renovated at Buckingham Palace? Who’s paying? Is it worth it?
The Queen’s officials are nothing if not organized. So before announcing a massive 10-year, $700-million renovation to Buckingham Palace,
they had a cornucopia of diagrams, photos and explanations of the intended work ready, so they could plaster the royal website
and social media feeds with details.

http://www.macleans.ca/society/buckingham-palace-renovation-9-things-you-may-not-know/
November 18, 2016



Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #38 on: November 19, 2016, 09:34:54 PM »


So I got the full compilation of that series (total 12 part series) ,and I started watching from part I.
Very interesting ..very!!!

Here is the link:
"What the Royal Family Doesn't Want YOU To See! Zion King" ~ Part 1


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #39 on: November 19, 2016, 10:20:50 PM »
Watching now Part II, o my o my ...this is incredible stuff.
The inbreeding amongst them is horrifying... 

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #40 on: November 19, 2016, 10:24:10 PM »
So I got the full compilation of that series (total 12 part series) ,and I started watching from part I.
Very interesting ..very!!!

Yeah, I was just going to keep posting them one or two at a time to bump the thread whenever pud pisses me off.  :D

There are actually several other documentaries regarding this subject I intend to post.  ;)

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #41 on: November 19, 2016, 10:29:52 PM »
Yeah, I was just going to keep posting them one or two at a time to bump the thread whenever pud pisses me off.  :D

There are actually several other documentaries regarding this subject I intend to post.  ;)

I really wonder if pud is an inbreed also ;D
I'm mean really reading his retarded posts it sure gives that impression,...he got so stuck on Trump, it's crazy,,,,

Once again Dr.DM ...Thank you for posting that...
/very well made documentary in my opinion/

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #42 on: November 20, 2016, 11:56:54 AM »
the artist taxi driver and his opinion of the house of saxe-coburg and their spending habits


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #43 on: November 20, 2016, 12:00:40 PM »
the artist taxi driver and his opinion of the house of saxe-coburg and their spending habits




Oh wait until SV sees this! Never been to the UK then? In that case you don't know its a national pastime for cab drivers (especially in London) to pontificate about how the country should be run, and would be run if they were the PM!

Hilarity ensues!  ;D

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #44 on: November 20, 2016, 12:04:03 PM »
I really wonder if pud is an inbreed also
You claim to be Mongolian and hook up witn yaks, and wonder if I'm inbred? Interesting.


Quote
I'm mean really reading his retarded posts it sure gives that impression,...he got so stuck on Trump, it's crazy,,,,

Wait, you mean you, Md and VQ keeping it going 24/7 isn't 'stuck on Trump'? I see..


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #45 on: November 20, 2016, 12:12:50 PM »
You claim to be Mongolian and hook up witn yaks, and wonder if I'm inbred? Interesting.


Wait, you mean you, Md and VQ keeping it going 24/7 isn't 'stuck on Trump'? I see..

Oh, you and your silly ad hominem attacks and accusations. Adorable! Really!  :D

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #46 on: November 21, 2016, 01:16:57 AM »
Hilarity ensues!  ;D

Better than that the NormalMensch inbabe yore wand and wave it in yore fasces!



Wot eels thus sprung stone lanks?  A yarble?  Warble, nus.  Me likey!

Bonnry, ain't Bee?

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #47 on: November 21, 2016, 01:46:59 AM »
You claim to be Mongolian and hook up witn yaks, and wonder if I'm inbred? Interesting.


Wait, you mean you, Md and VQ keeping it going 24/7 isn't 'stuck on Trump'? I see..

hey pud did you watched that series of 12 videos that Dr.MD posted ??
I'm watching now part 7 [I'm at 10 minute mark] very very interesting -you should watch it if you haven't yet-

"What the Royal Family Doesn't Want YOU To See! Zion King" ~ Part 7




Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #48 on: November 21, 2016, 01:57:46 AM »
hey pud did you watched that series of 12 videos that Dr.MD posted ??
I'm watching now part 7 [I'm at 10 minute mark] very very interesting -you should watch it if you haven't yet-

"What the Royal Family Doesn't Want YOU To See! Zion King" ~ Part 7


Uuuu, at 11:40 mark stuff get's really weird ...far out to the max,...

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #49 on: November 21, 2016, 02:04:26 AM »
Uuuu, at 11:40 mark stuff get's really weird ...far out to the max,...

Whoa, is that the bit where in the written version (that over-ruled the radio version) had the bit about the guy recalling his Taorite-age urm sumtheen?




mmm

ediot:  no that is at 3:48 or so...

twediot:  'ave you any aye deer wot a minuette can do?

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #50 on: November 21, 2016, 11:56:43 PM »
the bit about the guy recalling his Taorite-age urm sumtheen?

I don't know what it means that I knew exactly what he was talking about, because I still don't, but still, I wanted to comment on that.

pate's right, it's a bomb moment.

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #51 on: November 22, 2016, 11:37:59 PM »
Watching video #9 now.
Very interesting explanation of Denver Airport murals
..starts weird at 1:00 minute mark

"What the Royal Family Doesn't Want YOU To See! Zion King" ~ Part 9


Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #52 on: November 23, 2016, 01:40:20 PM »

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #53 on: November 23, 2016, 01:48:06 PM »


Great work MD (Not a real doctor); seriously, great work and research.

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #54 on: November 23, 2016, 01:52:58 PM »
Great work MD (Not a real doctor); seriously, great work and research.

Yes, thank you. The research is actually going great. For example, it was predicted that I could get you to post simply by uploading a video and you did. Thesis confirmed! Thanks for your participation, pud!  :D

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #55 on: November 23, 2016, 01:57:40 PM »
Yes, thank you. The research is actually going great. For example, it was predicted that I could get you to post simply by uploading a video and you did. Thesis confirmed! Thanks for your participation, pud!  :D

Don't mention it. I can only do what I can to bolster your self worth; as I'm not on fartbook and able to give you a 'like' for some vacuous photo or comment that only you give a shit about. But, be assured, I would if I were so desperate to move in such circles.

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #56 on: November 23, 2016, 01:59:51 PM »
Don't mention it. I can only do what I can to bolster your self worth; as I'm not on fartbook and able to give you a 'like' for some vacuous photo or comment that only you give a shit about. But, be assured, I would if I were so desperate to move in such circles.

I wouldn't know. I don't have a facialbook account. Based on my research, I'd say you really are that desperate but I still like you anyway, pud.  ;)

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #57 on: November 23, 2016, 02:03:38 PM »
I wouldn't know. I don't have a facialbook account. Based on my research, I'd say you really are that desperate but I still like you anyway, pud.  ;)

Your research stops at trawling for YT videos. Therefore you won't have any on me.

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #58 on: November 23, 2016, 02:12:14 PM »
Your research stops at trawling for YT videos. Therefore you won't have any on me.

My research is based only on what you've posted here.  ;)

Re: Monarchy: It's Relevance in the 21st Century?
« Reply #59 on: November 23, 2016, 02:22:46 PM »
My research is based only on what you've posted here.  ;)


You believe everything you see on the interwebs? Oh dear.