Mr. Deplorable? Still waiting for my schooling. Time's up. Got nothing, right?
Several of us have been pointing out their Fake News, Fake Statistics, and Fake Polls on a daily basis for months. On threads you read. If none of that sunk in with you, I'm not sure what would.
But since you asked, lets look at some of the big stories from the Democrat Fake News Media (DFNM) over the past several months. Sometimes looking at a timeline, rather than just todays headlines, clears things up a bit:
Hilary is caught storing classified data on a home-brew server she keeps in her barn. This is a clear felony - intent is not needed for this to be a crime. The DFNM ignores it when they can, downplays it when it gets to be too big of a story, and relentlessly defends her. The Conservative media covers the story fairly and accurately.
The server is hacked, and emails embarrassing to Hilary and the Democrat National Committee are released. The DFNM barely covers the story, defends her and them relentlessly, and makes it about ''the Russians'' interfering with the election. They go on to accuse Trump - with zero evidence - of being in cahoots with Putin and Russia in interfering with the election. The Conservative media covers the story fairly and accurately.
Meanwhile, the DFNM attacks Trump relentlessly in order to delegitimize his presidency, and distract him from implementing his campaign promises. No lie is too small, no smear is too vile.
Trump tweets he's been surveilled by the Obama White House. The DFNM goes wild, says he's lying, he's crazy, adds this to the list of BS they've been smearing him with. When it turns out to be true, the DFNM makes the story about Devin Nunes, and has zero interest in investigating the Obama Administration. And completely drops the storyline about Trump being crazy for bringing it up. Meanwhile the Conservative media covers the story fairly and accurately.
The US bombs an airfield of the Syria government - a Russian client. The DFNM drops the story of Trump being in Putin's pocket, and goes on to new smears. The DFNM says nothing about the role the Obama Administration played in Russia being is Syria in the first place, or about the deal Obama, Kerry, and Rice put together with the Russians and bragged about, that supposedly removed ALL poison gas from Syria. Meanwhile the Conservative media covered the story fairly and accurately.
I could sit down with you and go through any of these fraudulent Democrat newspapers on any day and point out various misrepresentations, articles with crucial information not included, portions of the articles that is opinion, quotes from only one side, important events not reported on, fake statistics, misleading headlines, on and on and on - this is just the short list.
The TV news is worse. They have limited time, and can only cover a limited number of events. They can only spend a few minutes on each. Video is powerful, and that is used to control what you see. As with print, often it's not so much what's covered, it's how it's spun.
I'm sure you've seen me debunk statistics from the Fake News Media that people have posted, when I've had the time and inclination to do so. It's not difficult, because people tend to believe numbers they are presented, and don't ask or even consider what went into them.
I hope that helps. I'm pretty sure it didn't.