Apparently Onan - the guy nobody wants to shake hands with - has a little trouble with…math. 1989 vs. 1982 is - wait for it - seven years earlier, score it for Meier. Camazotz Automat - it's a family name, he was birthed through a vending machine - proudly gives us similar LATER numbers, apparently thinking that also pointing out that Meier wins this one means, what, that he doesn't?
Sorry, no cigar.
Then there's inuk, always good for a yuck, who's reaching quite a bit, which of course is all that's left when you try to figure out WHY a one-armed man living in the boonies in rural Switzerland would be concocting this - among hundreds of other specific, prophetically accurate examples in his thousands of pages of transcripts and, of course, never drawing any attention to it himself.
And the resident pedophile SredniVashtar - who apparently has a fascination with 10-year-old boys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sredni_Vashtar
) and is trying very hard to deflect his giveaway - by lumping in Meier with "science fiction writers", none of whom have presented this assembled body of frustrated wannabes with a 74-page authentication of 64 photos of an extraterrestrial craft.
Talk about "beyond the realm of human imagination". Kinda like the silly names people give themselves here.
Sure, I could point out that the new article in the New Yorker mag (http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one
) now goes into details about the coming NW earthquake-tsunami that scientists at OSU didn't acknowledge seven years ago (please try to keep up here) but of course Meier had already scooped them by three years (http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/9/prweb1365754.htm
). But why point out the obvious and send y'all scurrying to read all that?
Think about it, difficult as that clearly is: Meier writes about 3-D, holographic touch screen technology in 1982. You bozos cite 1988 and 1989 - but still neglect to mention, ta-da, that we don't have the 3-D, holographic kind yet and it's only well after Meier foretold it that we've started to dream it up.
And still we return to that troubling photo analysis that no one here wants to breathe a word about, more fascinated are you with my musical career.
So here it is one more time, try as you surely will to bury it with more irrelevant comments:http://www.tjresearch.info/Zahi_WCUFO%20Investigation.pdf
But wait, there's more!
My contributions here started as a rebuttal and challenge to the VERY missing John Razimus because of his false accusations pertaining to Meier and the WCUFO. Let's further ice that cake by letting YOU participate, right now.
That's right, now you can do what any kid with a computer can do (just keep initials VD away from the kids). You too can pluck a 35mm film photo right off this page:http://theyflyblog.com/2014/06/15/billy-meier-ufo-case-prove/
…plop it in PhotoShop, drop the contrast, increase the brightness and, well, go do it and then when you too see the so-called "model" is a large object hovering over a road, with a grassy hillside and one of those famous posts that dot the Swiss countryside, go ahead and - debunk yourselves for proving it!
You're gonna love that sinking feeling you get in the pit of your collective ulcer-ridden stomachs! And we're gonna just LOVE reading the ridiculous, preposterous conjured up "explanations". Don't worry, I'm all ready with my "Skeptics Prove WCUFO Authentic" article.
Really, just go on and debunk yourselves. You can run like a Ratmouse but now you can't hide. As I told a couple of other skeptics - who at least had the courage to use their real names - "There's only one of me and I've got you all surrounded."
Go on now: http://theyflyblog.com/2014/06/15/billy-meier-ufo-case-prove/