Author Bigfoot  (Read 20601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #150 on: July 05, 2014, 10:10:37 AM »
And why no UFOs ever seen hovering in the distance in tintypes, American Civil War battle photos, etc?

Those type of photographic systems required long exposure times and would not be able to capture an object in motion.  But other than that I agree with you.

This issue creates a big hole in the notion of UFOs being anything other than hoaxes.  With dash cams and video cameras everywhere, it is now quite common to find footage of traffic accidents.  But back when people were using Super 8 film, it was exceedingly rare.  Traffic accidents, which happened regularly and happened everywhere, were almost never imaged while there was any number of films purporting to show UFOs flying around, which by comparison were uncommon and area-specific events.

Does this disprove the existence of UFOs?  No, but it consistent with those reports being hoaxes while it is inconsistent with them being genuine.  Some folks say, "Well, they can't ALL be hoaxes."  My question is: why not?

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #151 on: July 05, 2014, 11:20:14 AM »
Well I've seen three ufo. Two of those sightings were in the presence of others. Had I not seen them myself I would not give the ufo subject must thought.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #152 on: July 05, 2014, 11:40:26 AM »
Those type of photographic systems required long exposure times and would not be able to capture an object in motion.  But other than that I agree with you.

Yes, they would be blurs at best if moving much at all, which is why I specified "hovering." 

I should have said "hovering in place," as that's what I meant.

The link to one of b_dubb's UFO sightings - comment 41 on this page:

http://bellgab.com/index.php?topic=192.msg26616#msg26616



Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #153 on: August 29, 2014, 02:16:43 PM »
Now's your chance to own a piece of 'Squatch history, well, Yeti.  It's all about locale
http://www.livescience.com/47590-yeti-footprints-photos-auction.html?cmpid=558188

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #154 on: September 20, 2014, 06:20:38 AM »
The truth needs to be told:



Incontribvertable (sp)

Question all you like, but I think the little Microsoft arrows &c make you wonder...

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #155 on: September 20, 2014, 07:39:09 AM »
The truth needs to be told:



Incontribvertable (sp)

Question all you like, but I think the little Microsoft arrows &c make you wonder...

Far be it for me to spoil the party; but it looks like a bear. And the 'monkey' is a cub. Still, that would be simple explanation.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #156 on: September 20, 2014, 10:04:01 AM »
Bigfoot and UFOlogy provide sociological petri dishes where we can see the how religion and religious faith grow from interpretation, manipulation and exploitation of the unclear and unfamiliar.  The above posted video is a great example of manipulation of perception.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #157 on: September 20, 2014, 12:34:41 PM »
The truth needs to be told:



Incontribvertable (sp)

Question all you like, but I think the little Microsoft arrows &c make you wonder...

Its a good breakdown. That clips been going around a while. The crew member explanation is a stretch. It's not a bear. Send Bobo to recreate the scene.

Bigfoot and UFOlogy provide sociological petri dishes where we can see the how religion and religious faith grow from interpretation, manipulation and exploitation of the unclear and unfamiliar.  The above posted video is a great example of manipulation of perception.

True. Similar to how the man made global warming/cooling/climate-change/distruption campaign provides a sociological petri dishe where we can see the how religion and religious faith grow from interpretation, manipulation and exploitation of the unclear and unfamiliar.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #158 on: September 20, 2014, 01:04:14 PM »
Great northern... it's a bear. Exactly the terrain one would see a grizzly in. Size and speed are that of a grizzly. The film is too unfocused to see specifics, but the posture of a bear running on rough open terrain looks similar.

Grizzly bears eat caribou. Grizzly bears live in that environment. So it must be something else.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #159 on: September 20, 2014, 01:28:03 PM »
Its a good breakdown. That clips been going around a while. The crew member explanation is a stretch. It's not a bear. Send Bobo to recreate the scene.
 
True. Similar to how the man made global warming/cooling/climate-change/distruption campaign provides a sociological petri dishe where we can see the how religion and religious faith grow from interpretation, manipulation and exploitation of the unclear and unfamiliar.

No not similar; not even a comparison. Climatology is based on verifiable and reproducible scientific data. The other stuff is based on superstition, indoctrination, manipulation and exploitation. I do see though that with limited understanding you'd reach your conclusion.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #160 on: September 20, 2014, 01:34:21 PM »
No not similar; not even a comparison. Climatology is based on verifiable and reproducible scientific data. The other stuff is based on superstition, indoctrination, manipulation and exploitation. I do see though that with limited understanding you'd reach your conclusion.
it is also funded by politicians and governments. which are based in superstition, indoctrination, manipulation and exploitation.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #161 on: September 20, 2014, 01:34:45 PM »
For the benefit of the tldr; crowd, this short animation summarizes what the longer "bigfoot" video is all about:


Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #162 on: September 23, 2014, 11:23:56 PM »
Great northern... it's a bear. Exactly the terrain one would see a grizzly in. Size and speed are that of a grizzly. The film is too unfocused to see specifics, but the posture of a bear running on rough open terrain looks similar.

Grizzly bears eat caribou. Grizzly bears live in that environment. So it must be something else.

Please do an analysis before you make such a claim.    You're a genius when it comes to Santa Claus but I don't agree with you, and obviously neither does the guy commenting on the footage.   But, I'm open to listening if you can show why it's a bear.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #163 on: September 24, 2014, 12:15:20 AM »
No not similar; not even a comparison. Climatology is based on verifiable and reproducible scientific data. The other stuff is based on superstition, indoctrination, manipulation and exploitation. I do see though that with limited understanding you'd reach your conclusion.

Absolutely! No agenda driven science there. Like this prediction following hurricane Katrina and the 2005 season: "NOAA PREDICTS VERY ACTIVE 2006 NORTH ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON"

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2634.htm

And the reality: "The 2006 Hurricane Season Was Near Normal: After the record setting season of 2005 with 27 named tropical cyclones, many meteorologists and hurricane specialists were forecasting another above average hurricane season for 2006, but it didn't happen."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2006/normal_2006.html

And even funnier: "The 2006 Atlantic hurricane season was significantly less active than the record previous season. It marked the first since 2001 in which no hurricanes made landfall in the United States"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Atlantic_hurricane_season

The only thing predictable is that leftwing climatologists will continue their tradition of making up a cause for every weather change for the last 40 years, and suggest bigger government, higher taxes, and more regulations as the solution. Be it global cooling/warming/climate-change/disruption. Thats the inconvenient truth.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #164 on: September 24, 2014, 12:17:40 AM »
Great northern... it's a bear. Exactly the terrain one would see a grizzly in. Size and speed are that of a grizzly. The film is too unfocused to see specifics, but the posture of a bear running on rough open terrain looks similar.

Grizzly bears eat caribou. Grizzly bears live in that environment. So it must be something else.

Please do an analysis before you make such a claim.    You're a genius when it comes to Santa Claus but I don't agree with you, and obviously neither does the guy commenting on the footage.   But, I'm open to listening if you can show why it's a bear.

If this turns out to be a sasquatch in a bear suit, we are fucked four ways to Friday.







Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #165 on: September 24, 2014, 12:48:34 AM »
If this turns out to be a sasquatch in a bear suit, we are fucked four ways to Friday.

One can hope.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #166 on: September 24, 2014, 01:45:47 AM »
Absolutely! No agenda driven science there. Like this prediction following hurricane Katrina and the 2005 season: "NOAA PREDICTS VERY ACTIVE 2006 NORTH ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON"

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2634.htm

And the reality: "The 2006 Hurricane Season Was Near Normal: After the record setting season of 2005 with 27 named tropical cyclones, many meteorologists and hurricane specialists were forecasting another above average hurricane season for 2006, but it didn't happen."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2006/normal_2006.html

And even funnier: "The 2006 Atlantic hurricane season was significantly less active than the record previous season. It marked the first since 2001 in which no hurricanes made landfall in the United States"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Atlantic_hurricane_season

The only thing predictable is that leftwing climatologists will continue their tradition of making up a cause for every weather change for the last 40 years, and suggest bigger government, higher taxes, and more regulations as the solution. Be it global cooling/warming/climate-change/disruption. Thats the inconvenient truth.

You're confusing climate with weather. That's a common trait with that rightwing moonbeam who is parroting their crib sheet of 'blame it all on leftwingers when you haven't a clue what you're talking about, which is most of the time'.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #167 on: September 24, 2014, 05:06:35 AM »
Please do an analysis before you make such a claim.    You're a genius when it comes to Santa Claus but I don't agree with you, and obviously neither does the guy commenting on the footage.   But, I'm open to listening if you can show why it's a bear.

I've hunted grizzly bear. There are a couple "frames" that look exactly like a running grizzly. Yeah the video is out of focus. But as with all things... if you see hoof prints in Alaska think horse not zebra.


Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #168 on: September 24, 2014, 06:09:04 AM »
I've hunted grizzly bear. There are a couple "frames" that look exactly like a running grizzly. Yeah the video is out of focus. But as with all things... if you see hoof prints in Alaska think horse not zebra.

Occam's Razor = Onan's Grizzly

(and O' Cam's Razor = old style Gillette)

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #169 on: September 24, 2014, 07:58:55 AM »
This is truly incredible! The following video is Clearly not a bear chasing prey


Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #170 on: September 24, 2014, 08:14:02 AM »
You're about to have a very bad day when you see a bear running at you like that.  Climb a tree or curl up in a ball.  And hope the bear isn't that hungry. Or mad.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #171 on: September 24, 2014, 08:15:24 AM »
You're about to have a very bad day when you see a bear running at you like that.  Climb a tree or curl up in a ball.  And hope the bear isn't that hungry. Or mad.

that aint a bear. it is clearly a man in a gorilla costume.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #172 on: September 24, 2014, 08:47:29 AM »
that aint a bear. it is clearly a man in a gorilla costume.


...pretending to be a Sasquatch. Anyone can see that.

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #173 on: September 24, 2014, 08:53:14 AM »
No it's a sasquatch in a dude suit wearing a bear suit wearing ... wait ... nevermind

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #174 on: September 24, 2014, 09:27:25 AM »
Here`s the original documentary. You can see the bear appear at about 08:55 into the video. It shows the bear at a strange angle.


Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #175 on: September 24, 2014, 02:25:48 PM »
Amazing no one has pointed out the other 2 Sasquatch up the hill from the main Sasquatch. All sharing similar cone shaped heads, pronounced brow-ridge, and exceptional speed. A precision digital enlargement confirms the presence of the more than one man like beast. The debate is over.

[attachimg=1]

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #176 on: September 24, 2014, 02:33:11 PM »
Amazing no one has pointed out the other 2 Sasquatch up the hill from the main Sasquatch. All sharing similar cone shaped heads, pronounced brow-ridge, and exceptional speed. A precision digital enlargement confirms the presence of the more than one man like beast. The debate is over.

[attachimg=1]


Aww bless you; you actually believing it was a debate. But you carry on believing what you do, it's sure to break the ice at any party you get invited to. "Hey guys, did you see the shadows and grizzly bears that look like big foot?"

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #177 on: September 26, 2014, 03:16:16 AM »
This is truly incredible! The following video is Clearly not a bear chasing prey



Looks like a bear to me  ???

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #178 on: November 07, 2014, 08:13:07 AM »
i not believe is big foot are something ,,,

 Every know our planet create and change hold time our nature  animals  ,, .

Evolution never stop,  hold time something are going on ,,,

Re: Bigfoot
« Reply #179 on: November 07, 2014, 11:57:00 PM »