Were the comments towards his Christmas photo really about 'concern'? There was a lot of positive response but you can't deny that the onslaught wasn't one of worry (for the most part) it was one of people calling Art a liar and saying that it was proof that the whole story was a fraud.
I can only speak for myself and I have a problem with the logic of his actions. If a person and their family are facing a threat to their well being/life occurring at their residence/place of work, one would assume that they would take every precaution and action to protect themselves. I don't want to rehash all the other factors of what was or wasn't done, but I do question why anyone in that position would post pictures on social media for all to see. Until Art is able to fill in the blanks as much as he can- there are too many gaps in the story and, right or wrong, people will fill them in themselves.
A person clearly exposing their loved ones in this manner is either stupid, doesn't care, or it suggests that the threat really doesn't exist. Pick one. I don't see him as stupid or not caring about his family. So what conclusion am I left with? Maybe there's another option that I haven't considered, but this is the way I see it.
