North Korea announces it has successfully tested a hydrogen bomb

[Jackstar]

Perhaps a bit too clever for clarity outside of your thoughts, however.

This isn't even English. Can't you just call me a fag like everyone else?

[onan]

Oh boy. I'm ecstatic.

See, we can be supportive to each other.

There's gonna be some kind of event, and subsequent to that event, something that everyone used to do, won't be done anymore.
I wish I could be more specific, but I'm only told so much.

I need to write that down.

[onan]

This isn't even English. Can't you just call me a fag like everyone else?

I would, but see, in my own way, I do think you are a very bright guy. I know, I know you could give a rat's ass.

It is English. It means you try way too hard to be clever.

And the funny thing is, you are clever.

[Jackstar]

I need to write that down.

I doubt the BellGab archive will be the thing that leaves, and leaves humanity in a smoking ruin--a bookmark should suffice. My hunch is a culling, but it could be lots of things.

See, we can be supportive to each other.

Better check the DSM. Hey, where are you at with the natural gas disaster in California?

[Jackstar]

It means you try way too hard to be clever.

And the funny thing is, you are clever.

Buy me a pitcher, I get sexy too.

[onan]

Hey, where are you at with the natural gas disaster in California?

About 2500 miles away.

[Jackstar]

About 2500 miles away.

Great, thanks for acknowledging you've heard about it.

So. Natural, or sabotage? Pop quiz.

[onan]

Buy me a pitcher, I get sexy too.

I think the pitchers of beer are in that other thread.

[Jackstar]

I think the pitchers of beer are in that other thread.

What's that saying when you ask somebody a question and then in response they diverge the conversation so they don't have to do that question anymore what's that called do you see that everyday a lot or not?

This post brought to you courtesy of voice recognition

[Jackstar]

https://youtu.be/Qc_204tXHZY

I might have to watch the whole damn movie now thanks

[onan]

What's that saying when you ask somebody a question and then in response they diverge the conversation so they don't have to do that question anymore what's that called do you see that everyday a lot or not?

This post brought to you courtesy of voice recognition

Alright, Alright, send me your address and I will send you a 12 pack. Pitchers don't travel well.

[Jackstar]

They're just questions, Onan, designed to provoke an emotional response. In answer to your query, they are not written down for me--I parrot the mandates of the Archangel Michael.

Alright, Alright, send me your address and I will send you a 12 pack. Pitchers don't travel well.

Where are you at on Building 7 these days?

Turns out, I didn't have to watch the whole film again.

[Jackstar]

Great, thanks for acknowledging you've heard about it.

So. Natural, or sabotage? Pop quiz.

By the way it's now too late for you to answer this question ever congratulations thanks for playing

[onan]

They're just questions, Onan, designed to provoke an emotional response. In answer to your query, they are not written down for me--I parrot the mandates of the Archangel Michael.

Where are you at on Building 7 these days?

Turns out, I didn't have to watch the whole film again.

Well obviously, it was perpetrated by the Bush administration, the insurance companies, Wall Street, and some lackeys from Iraq.

[Jackstar]

Well obviously, it was perpetrated by the Bush administration, the insurance companies, Wall Street, and some lackeys from Iraq.

You're really invested in deflection.

EDIT: "you appear to be:; how do you feel about that"

[onan]

You're really invested in deflection.

EDIT: "you appear to be:; how do you feel about that"

I am invested in not debating the destruction of the World Trade Towers. I would have thought that was apparent.

As to the exact criticism of deflection. This is the internet. But you did ask me about Building 7. I am pretty sure you have at least one filled file cabinet with specific information regarding that building alone. I have less than noory's 3x5 card. And yet I still choose to believe it wasn't an inside job.

I guess, we will have to agree to disagree or slit each other's throat. perhaps there is some middle ground?

[Jackstar]

I am invested in not debating the destruction of the World Trade Towers.

Building 7 wasn't a tower!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQvtlWACmKU

I would have thought that was apparent.

In fact, it actually was not, at least to me. However, now that you have made it
undeniably apparent, I am, well, not happy, per se, but content, or, at least, satisfied, to give you a pass on being called to account on discussing this issue.

I sort of get it. It's a sensitive thing. Not everyone is as able to handle processing that event to the extent to which I am, and that has nothing to do with the time that has elapsed since, nor my massive, throbbing braincase. I am honored to give you a pass on this, frankly--it's important to have boundaries.

I suppose I should apologize for not noticing your signals for what they have been, over these many months--I honestly thought you were just being churlish. If you really don't want to talk about it, that's cool. I noticed that you posted "I don't want to debate," which implies that you simply don't want to LOSE, but once again--you have a pass!

As to the exact criticism of deflection.

Seriously: this isn't even English, Fucko, and if you think it is, you've been consulting on too many textbooks.

This is the internet. But you did ask me about Building 7. I am pretty sure you have at least one filled file cabinet with specific information regarding that building alone. I have less than noory's 3x5 card. And yet I still choose to believe it wasn't an inside job.

I thought we weren't talking about this anymore? I suppose when you wrote this, you weren't aware that you were about to get A Pass, so I'll allow it. As it happens, I agree with you, it wasn't an "inside job"--anyone with clearance to perform the acts of treason required, would have been, in the very instant of acting against the Constitution of the United States, no longer authorized to do so. Was Watergate an "inside job"? No, not really. Not at all.

I guess, we will have to agree to disagree or slit each other's throat. perhaps there is some middle ground?

Well, we could go to a key party, but I already had her.

[FightTheFuture]

Yeah, I don't think so. Anyone that thinks China is all that concerned with NK and the pretend HB isn't paying attention. The story as presented in the news makes the point that China will have to contend with the NK population moving into China, that is laughable. The next part of the story is the US and SK moving north. That is even more laughable. What would SK and the US do in the NK area? Neither would want to try to stabilize, what is a mess now, and would be much worse with NK collapsing, although I think that would be a good outcome.

The problem for the US is the shitstorm that may well hit us beginning at the end of the year, when all the petrol dollars start rolling back to us. Gee, I wonder how many petrol dollars China has? Unless we start rebuilding our manufacturing base, like 20 years ago, inflation will be strangling us.

China`s economy is beginning to crumble. As I predicted years ago, you can only cook the books for so long on the value of endless streams of worthless crap before the world wakes up. We just aren`t buying their junk like we used to. Further, they have desperate problems with their infrastructure and environmental issues, not to mention a dire population situation (too few breeding females after decades of 1 child policy).

The NK  detonation thing is just China trying to raise a few eyebrows and get some more rice for the starving population of their neighbor. Not to mention a few cases of scotch and porn for the little fella. Nobody`s overly worried about it. China won`t let the midget light off a nuke. That would be a complete disaster for China.

[Yorkshire pud]

Building 7 wasn't a tower!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQvtlWACmKU


In fact, it actually was not, at least to me. However, now that you have made it
undeniably apparent, I am, well, not happy, per se, but content, or, at least, satisfied, to give you a pass on being called to account on discussing this issue.

I sort of get it. It's a sensitive thing. Not everyone is as able to handle processing that event to the extent to which I am, and that has nothing to do with the time that has elapsed since, nor my massive, throbbing braincase. I am honored to give you a pass on this, frankly--it's important to have boundaries.

I suppose I should apologize for not noticing your signals for what they have been, over these many months--I honestly thought you were just being churlish. If you really don't want to talk about it, that's cool. I noticed that you posted "I don't want to debate," which implies that you simply don't want to LOSE, but once again--you have a pass!

Seriously: this isn't even English, Fucko, and if you think it is, you've been consulting on too many textbooks.

I thought we weren't talking about this anymore? I suppose when you wrote this, you weren't aware that you were about to get A Pass, so I'll allow it. As it happens, I agree with you, it wasn't an "inside job"--anyone with clearance to perform the acts of treason required, would have been, in the very instant of acting against the Constitution of the United States, no longer authorized to do so. Was Watergate an "inside job"? No, not really. Not at all.

Well, we could go to a key party, but I already had her.

One day your internet trawling of things to support what you already believed to be true will be redeemed with real value. I'll take a guess the value being equal to 50 cents and a pickled egg. Seriously.

You and Stellar really should hook up, pool your browsing time and any prescriptions you enjoy recreationaly and make the ultimate website to bring all the disparate threads of batshit crazy together in one place. It will be a hoot.

[Jackstar]

You and Stellar really should hook up,