• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

The Rise of Londonistan and Paristan

Started by jazmunda, August 27, 2014, 05:34:32 PM

Tarbaby

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 01:36:22 PM
Tarbaby you haven't challenged a single opinion I have posted with any rational argument, whatsoever, but decided to jump in (on a few other threads) and start the name-calling out of the clear blue sky, because you think you are a genius.

Now you are asking MV to finish your battles for you...

I wager MV disagrees with me, but he has never resorted to 6th grade tactics in doing so - thank God, or Allah, or the black magic that created the big bang and all the matter in the known Universe out of absolutely nothing in the middle of an absolutely nowhere that didn't exist beforehand, just because it wanted to...
oh my. I haven't challenged you on any issues because I don't read your posts. When I started to read your post yesterday I noticed that I did have one specific complaint that I registered which is that you call all your phoes "faggots". And I voiced my objection. I certainly don't think I'm a genius so I don't know why you threw that in there. Again, unwarranted conclusion based on imaginary premise. And I wasn't calling in MV  as back up. But I won't disclose why I asked him for his viewpoint. Don't worry about it.
You really are rather highly strung aren't you? Jumping to conclusions, imagining the worst…

Quick Karl

Quote from: Tarbaby on September 01, 2014, 04:52:32 PM
oh my. I haven't challenged you on any issues because I don't read your posts. When I started to read your post yesterday I noticed that I did have one specific complaint that I registered which is that you call all your phoes "faggots". And I voiced my objection. I certainly don't think I'm a genius so I don't know why you threw that in there. Again, unwarranted conclusion based on imaginary premise. And I wasn't calling in MV  as back up. But I won't disclose why I asked him for his viewpoint. Don't worry about it.
You really are rather highly strung aren't you? Jumping to conclusions, imagining the worst…

Well before you go rushing to emotional conclusions based on a few posts, maybe you should look back at the long list of insults thrown my way based solely on my avatar, and my support for the RIGHT of Phil Robertson to believe and express whatever belief he wants.

Tarbaby

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 05:04:51 PM
Well before you go rushing to emotional conclusions based on a few posts, maybe you should look back at the long list of insults thrown my way based solely on my avatar, and my support for the RIGHT of Phil Robertson to believe and express whatever belief he wants.
Okay, Carl. Will do. Thanks.

Quick Karl

Quote from: Tarbaby on September 01, 2014, 05:08:49 PM
Okay, Carl. Will do. Thanks.

I will add, the latest Karl-hatefest started after two events:

1. When I told a few of the participants here about my childhood experience at summer camp wherein a Camp Councilor tried to touch my dick when I was maybe 8 or 9-years old, and I told the pervert that if he ever came near me again I would steal a knife from the cafeteria and stab him to death in his sleep, and,

2. When I mentioned the fact, after some Catholic-Priest-hatred was being hurled at every Christian on the planet because of the church covering up its crimes, that the perpetrators of the crimes against little boys in the Catholic Church were carried out by "obvious homosexual perverts pretending to be priests".

So, after that, it's been non-stop let's-get-Karl...

The truth hurts, and when certain people have some reality fed to them, they don't like how it tastes.

Oh ya, I am not a Catholic or a Christian.


NowhereInTime

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 05:44:48 PM
I will add, the latest Karl-hatefest started after two events:

1. When I told a few of the participants here about my childhood experience at summer camp wherein a Camp Councilor tried to touch my dick when I was maybe 8 or 9-years old, and I told the pervert that if he ever came near me again I would steal a knife from the cafeteria and stab him to death in his sleep, and,

2. When I mentioned the fact, after some Catholic-Priest-hatred was being hurled at every Christian on the planet because of the church covering up its crimes, that the perpetrators of the crimes against little boys in the Catholic Church were carried out by "obvious homosexual perverts pretending to be priests".

So, after that, it's been non-stop let's-get-Karl...

The truth hurts, and when certain people have some reality fed to them, they don't like how it tastes.

Oh ya, I am not a Catholic or a Christian.
Boo fucking hoo, Karl.  If you hadn't waded onto these threads, tossing insults, disparaging remarks, and smugly bloviating condescending assertions you wouldn't be getting slagged non-stop.
Actions have consequences.  You started it; you can stop it. I personally have already committed to no longer reference your childhood or question your sexual proclivity toward the underaged without any concession from you. Why don't you man up and commit to discussing issues without disparaging comments?

Quick Karl

Quote from: NowhereInTime on September 01, 2014, 05:57:12 PM
Boo fucking hoo, Karl.  If you hadn't waded onto these threads, tossing insults, disparaging remarks, and smugly bloviating condescending assertions you wouldn't be getting slagged non-stop.
Actions have consequences.  You started it; you can stop it. I personally have already committed to no longer reference your childhood or question your sexual proclivity toward the underaged without any concession from you. Why don't you man up and commit to discussing issues without disparaging comments?

Nitwit, you started hating me and hurling your schoolyard insults purely because I disagreed with you, and kicked a few holes in your bullshit. So grow a set of balls and and grow the fuck up.

And I have no reason to discuss anything with you as doing so would be the exact same thing as having a discussion with a bible-thumper about the existence of a God that has personal relationships with people - completely pointless... You are as closed and narrow-minded as any Jehovah's Witness that ever rang my doorbell.

NowhereInTime

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 06:05:09 PM
Nitwit, you started hating me and hurling your schoolyard insults purely because I disagreed with you, and kicked a few holes in your bullshit. So grow a set of balls and and grow the fuck up.

And I have no reason to discuss anything with you as doing so would be the exact same thing as having a discussion with a bible-thumper about the existence of a God that has personal relationships with people - completely pointless... You are as closed and narrow-minded as any Jehovah's Witness that ever rang my doorbell.
Sadly, this was the response I expected.

I'll just say this: 1) go back and your first interaction with me.  Any conclusion other than you started it (not just with me, either) is a lie and 2)
Don't cry to newer posters on here about how people gang up on poor little you just because you try to make some "common sense" points and the "liberals are out to get you for telling the truth".
You are reprehensible. You could change if you wanted to, but you would rather instigate, provoke, and insult. Says a lot about you, your beliefs, and your inability to deal with truth.
Offers still stands as of this post. Ball is in your court.

Quick Karl

Quote from: NowhereInTime on September 01, 2014, 09:01:01 PM
Sadly, this was the response I expected.

I'll just say this: 1) go back and your first interaction with me.  Any conclusion other than you started it (not just with me, either) is a lie and 2)
Don't cry to newer posters on here about how people gang up on poor little you just because you try to make some "common sense" points and the "liberals are out to get you for telling the truth".
You are reprehensible. You could change if you wanted to, but you would rather instigate, provoke, and insult. Says a lot about you, your beliefs, and your inability to deal with truth.
Offers still stands as of this post. Ball is in your court.

The suggestion that 1., I should change tactics to satiate you, or 2., that you are the arbiter of how anyone should be, contrasted against your own radically immature behavior when given a spoonful of your own medicine, defies any standard of reason and logic imaginable. Everything I have seen from you here is all I need to know that there isn't any circumstance I can imagine that I would endeavor to engage you in any mutually respecting dialogue, because you are incapable of such.

You can have your ball back.

 

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 05:44:48 PM
1. When I told a few of the participants here about my childhood experience at summer camp wherein a Camp Councilor tried to touch my dick when I was maybe 8 or 9-years old, and I told the pervert that if he ever came near me again I would steal a knife from the cafeteria and stab him to death in his sleep, and,

I can't speak for anyone else, but there's something wrong with that story.  I had a similar confrontation when I was young with someone older than me, different circumstances and at a different age, and I just physically tore into him right on the spot.  I didn't even get the best of that battle, but he never fucked with me again and neither did anyone else who knew about it.  That was the nominal point of your story, but all you really communicated -- if the story is even true -- is that you're good for one freebie for all comers.  More likely, the details of that story are what you dreamed up, punctuated by "that's what I SHOULD have done," in the aftermath of the event, and now you're narrating this stormy romance to us to make yourself look like a tough guy even before your balls dropped.  At least some of this story, maybe all of it, is pure horseshit, as evidenced by your need to keep reminding us about it.

As for the second story, I never even read that until now, so there goes your theory about that. 

The truth is that you're getting attacked because you''re an obnoxious blowhard, a relentless troll, and a gigantic faggot.  You could end it tomorrow simply by not being that way and expressing your opinions in a rational way, but you love the attention and just can't help coming back for more.

b_dubb

No one's even discussing politics anymore. Just a series of personal attacks.

No one wins this game.

HAL 9000

Quote from: Yorkshire pud on August 28, 2014, 05:48:10 AMThere is a sizable Jewish population in Manchester, I suppose that's what you're referring to.


I know we speak the same language, but perhaps Yorkshireites have a different definition for "sizable?"

According to the UK's Office for National Statistics, the 2011 census provides the following data for Manchester:

NOTE: (I have rounded off percentages)

Manchester's Jewish population dropped by 15% (2001-2011)
Manchester's Jewish population comprises 0.5% of total
Manchester's Muslim population increased 74% (2001-2011)
Manchester's Muslim population comprises 16% of total
Manchester's Christian population dropped by 22%
Manchester's Christian population comprises 49% of total

(click on image for full size)



Using the analogous standard format:   a : b :: c : d ("a" is to "b" as "c" is to "d")

So, in Yorkshire or Manchester, apparently the definition of "sizable" would look like this? :

4 inches : penis :: Yorkshireites : sizable

(Are we allowed to use dry humor on this board?)



b_dubb

Quote from: HAL 9000 on September 02, 2014, 03:15:32 AM
(Are we allowed to use dry humor on this board?)
It's encouraged. However, I'm a little disappointed that the attached pie chart was not a breakdown of penis size by religious faith. 

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: HAL 9000 on September 02, 2014, 03:15:32 AM

I know we speak the same language, but perhaps Yorkshireites have a different definition for "sizable?"

According to the UK's Office for National Statistics, the 2011 census provides the following data for Manchester:




FtF said this:

Quote from: FightTheFuture on August 28, 2014, 03:00:45 AM
I first began traveling to the UK in the 70s. It was exactly as I imagined; lots of pasty-white people with bad teeth, that spoke a funny language.

Over the last 15-20 years, I noticed a significant change as I traveled there.

My last trip was just a few years ago. I flew into Manchester, and if I had not known better, I would have sworn I was back in the Middle East.




I surmised he was referring to geographic ethnicity. As there aren't that many Arabs, I guessed he was referring to the Jewish contingent. The vast majority of the Muslims aren't from the ME.  In fairness to you, you wouldn't know that, as it's unlikely you even know where Manchester is, (I know it quite well) so in this instance you can take it as read I'm correct.  ;D


My assertion therefore that Jews as a Middle Eastern contingent outnumber Arabs is a valid one, and yes, as a proportion of the population are sizable in comparison to Arab Muslims (or even Arab Jews). Even taking into account that about 90% are Mancunians. You want to see Arabs, you need to go to London. Further, (cont pp94)

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 01:36:22 PM


Now you are asking MV to finish your battles for you...



You don't need reminding, but you know it was you not so long ago who went running to MV; and he posted on here what he thought of your whining.


NowhereInTime

Quote from: b_dubb on September 01, 2014, 11:57:58 PM
No one's even discussing politics anymore. Just a series of personal attacks.

No one wins this game.
So let's discuss politics.  I, for one, would really like to understand what it is everyone wants the President to do about ISIS?  Did you see today we used a drone attack against a senior Al-Shabab commander in Somalia? 
Why can't this be effective against ISIS rather than full troop commitment? Also, the Peshmerga and Iraqui regulars did okay at Mosul dam with our aerial assistance.  Good enough or do we need troops?  (I oppose redeployment).
Why is a reconstituted (surgery obvious) John McCain (running in '16?) screaming "in denial or overwhelmed"?  Does he see this as his moment to seize the high ground on the security debate?

On a more sinister note, notice how, with midterm elections coming here in the US amid a stagnant economy and the Scottish Independence referendum little more than 2 weeks away in UK how much we are hearing about ISIS?  Am I just being cynical or, with Diane Feinstein and David Cameron leading the charge, are we looking away from other issues because of the boogeyman?

Finally, as to Scottish Independence, or UK Disunion, I have seen the debates between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling and, though I really don't have skin in the game, see no compelling case for disunion.  Anyone disagree?  How much do you want to pay for Scotch, anyway?

Quote from: NowhereInTime on September 02, 2014, 08:30:55 AM
So let's discuss politics.  I, for one, would really like to understand what it is everyone wants the President to do about ISIS?  Did you see today we used a drone attack against a senior Al-Shabab commander in Somalia? 



Fair question, NIT. I am a proponent of "boots on the ground". As few as possible, but I believe we won`t be able to fully eradicate this threat without at least 30k troops (20-25k American, and the rest coalition).

It`s going to require arming the Kurds with heavy weaponry and providing several hundred advisers, along with, of course, intel, satellite logistics, etc.

We`ll need to put about 1500 advisers in Baghdad and PUSH the Iraqis to go on the offensive from the South.

Also, the U.S. MUST strike command and control in Syria. It`s going to be messy, and many innocents will die, but there is NO CHOICE.

Our troops will be dropped in in the West and cut off escape routes and clean up any survivors.

Of course, I should include the need to seal our borders, but thats simply not going to happen. The President has no will to do that.

Quick Karl

Quote from: FightTheFuture on September 02, 2014, 08:48:45 AM

Fair question, NIT. I am a proponent of "boots on the ground". As few as possible, but I believe we won`t be able to fully eradicate this threat without at least 30k troops (20-25k American, and the rest coalition).

It`s going to require arming the Kurds with heavy weaponry and providing several hundred advisers, along with, of course, intel, satellite logistics, etc.

We`ll need to put about 1500 advisers in Baghdad and PUSH the Iraqis to go on the offensive from the South.

Also, the U.S. MUST strike command and control in Syria. It`s going to be messy, and many innocents will die, but there is NO CHOICE.

Our troops will be dropped in in the West and cut off escape routes and clean up any survivors.

Of course, I should include the need to seal our borders, but thats simply not going to happen. The President has no will to do that.

I would like The president to resign.

albrecht

We also need to worry about the political chaos in the one of the "original 'stans", Pakistan. They have nukes, have released information (and maybe material) on how to build them in the past, and has had suspicious links with radical Islamist terrorists in the past.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/pakistans-sharif-clings-to-power-as-protesters-step-up-assault/2014/09/01/c00bd2ac-320b-11e4-a723-fa3895a25d02_story.html

b_dubb

NIT re: your sinister note ... I asked who is controlling ISIS last night on the GabCast. I'd love to know.

Quote from: b_dubb on September 02, 2014, 11:47:14 AM
NIT re: your sinister note ... I asked who is controlling ISIS last night on the GabCast. I'd love to know.


Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi


paladin1991

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 11:25:13 AM
In an obscure way, when London is ruled by Muslims, it will serve the English people right - it's what they deserve for burying their heads in the sand in return for their socialist handouts for so long...

Of course, they will look to America's young to sacrifice their lives to bail them out of their mess, again...
I agree with you somewhat, Karl.  But if you say that the English ppl are dumber than Americans, I think you're wrong. 

Everybody looks to America's young to save their asses. 

paladin1991

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 01:36:22 PM
..... - thank God, or Allah, or the black magic that created the big bang and all the matter in the known Universe out of absolutely nothing in the middle of an absolutely nowhere that didn't exist beforehand, just because it wanted to...
HHEHEHEHEH.  This always makes me laugh.   

Bart Ell

Can we get a Buffalostan and then bomb the shit out of it?

Thanks

paladin1991

Quote from: Quick Karl on September 01, 2014, 05:44:48 PM
I will add, the latest Karl-hatefest started after two events:

1. When I told a few of the participants here about my childhood experience at summer camp wherein a Camp Councilor tried to touch my dick when I was maybe 8 or 9-years old, and I told the pervert that if he ever came near me again I would steal a knife from the cafeteria and stab him to death in his sleep, and,

2. When I mentioned the fact, after some Catholic-Priest-hatred was being hurled at every Christian on the planet because of the church covering up its crimes, that the perpetrators of the crimes against little boys in the Catholic Church were carried out by "obvious homosexual perverts pretending to be priests".

So, after that, it's been non-stop let's-get-Karl...

The truth hurts, and when certain people have some reality fed to them, they don't like how it tastes.

Oh ya, I am not a Catholic or a Christian.
"WHAT?  You don't believe in the Virgin Mary?"  *Bitchslap!*

paladin1991

Quote from: b_dubb on September 01, 2014, 11:57:58 PM
No one's even discussing politics anymore. Just a series of personal attacks.

No one wins this game.
Guess they forgot their ball(s) at home? 

*Trying for levity

paladin1991

Quote from: b_dubb on September 02, 2014, 03:54:10 AM
It's encouraged. However, I'm a little disappointed that the attached pie chart was not a breakdown of penis size by religious faith.
Yeah.....but wouldn't that leave the Jews a little light in the meat department?  Because of circumcision, I mean.  That pie chart, does it take into account actual meat weight (before cooking) or is it a length and girth thingy?  Or...is it just a very basic count of meatsticks?

And would that not, in acuality, make that a meat pie?  An English specialty, IIRC.

VtaGeezer

Quote from: FightTheFuture on September 02, 2014, 11:52:43 AM

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi


I think that's a pic of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, dead leader of al Qaida in Iraq.

This is al Baghdadi

Quick Karl

Quote from: paladin1991 on September 03, 2014, 05:20:11 PM
  "WHAT?  You don't believe in the Virgin Mary?"  *Bitchslap!*

;D ;D ;D

What I believe is that no matter HOW the Universe started, the shear awesomeness of it, and of physics, and of life/biology, proves that something profound had to have put things in motion -- but the notion that it all popped into existence one day, from absolutely nothing, in the middle of absolutely nowhere, just because absolutely nothing wanted to, is beyond absolutely stupid.

VtaGeezer

Quote from: b_dubb on September 02, 2014, 11:47:14 AM
NIT re: your sinister note ... I asked who is controlling ISIS last night on the GabCast. I'd love to know.
al Baghdadi is the identified leader, but the more I learn about their thoroughly efficient and savvy organization, the more I suspect ISIS is really being directed by someone who's scary savvy on strategy, tactics, media, running a complex organization and Western sensibilities.  They're successfully achieving what AQ, Hamas, Hezbollah, and others have struggled to do for decades.  Not to join the ranks of the resident paranoids, but I've wondered if it's a coincidence that ISIS came to the fore, and blew across Iraq like the 4th Panzer Div hitting Poland, just as Putin began his European territory grab in Ukraine.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod