Author Hillary Clinton  (Read 258518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8430 on: October 13, 2017, 08:24:07 PM »

The former secretary of state said that sexual harassment of women was endemic in society as she appeared on the BBC show to promote her new book

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4979110/Clinton-says-Weinstein-scandal-shows-endemic-harassment.html#ixzz4vRQ3Q0va

Says the Enabler-in-Chief.




Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8431 on: October 14, 2017, 09:40:16 PM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8432 on: October 16, 2017, 02:39:10 PM »
The Daily Mail is reporting that Hillary fell after a dinner out in London with her “friend” Huma. Hillary says she was running down a flight of stairs while wearing high heels and holding a cup of coffee. The reports say she broke her toe.

She is in the eUK promoting What Happened and has miss appearances since the “accident.”


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8433 on: October 16, 2017, 03:00:55 PM »



















Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8434 on: October 16, 2017, 03:25:44 PM »
The Daily Mail is reporting that Hillary fell after a dinner out in London with her “friend” Huma. Hillary says she was running down a flight of stairs while wearing high heels and holding a cup of coffee. The reports say she broke her toe.

She is in the eUK promoting What Happened and has miss appearances since the “accident.”
Coffee, of course.  With lots of cream, no doubt.  It always helps your balance.  I'm looking forward to her next book telling us what really happened with this tumble, too.


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8435 on: October 17, 2017, 01:36:36 PM »




















What’s a little harassment and rape amongst friends. Hopefully NBC & the NYTImes enjoyed the party too.


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8436 on: October 17, 2017, 04:24:30 PM »
More emails and documents found! Amazing how with the Clintons documents and emails mysteriously disappear or appear.
More documents "found" on the "accidental" meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch at an airport:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/fbi-finds-30-pages-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting-documents-wants-six-weeks-turn-docs/
More emails found on Hillary's GalPal Huma (wife of sex convict Weiner):
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-department-reveals-2800-huma-abedin-government-documents-weiners-laptop/

Oh remember the Russian corruption stuff? Apparently Obama's FBI knew about Russian bribery but still let the Clintons and the uranium sale go through.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Good friend of and frequent donor to the Clintons and their foundation(s) who is now accused of rape or harassment by seemingly everyone in Hollywood but the Clinton won't return the money he gave them. Or even donate it to a real charity.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-foundation-wont-return-money-harvey-weinstein-donated-687074
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-foundation-250000-harvey-weinstein/
 


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8437 on: October 17, 2017, 04:29:11 PM »
More emails and documents found! Amazing how with the Clintons documents and emails mysteriously disappear or appear.
More documents "found" on the "accidental" meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch at an airport:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/fbi-finds-30-pages-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting-documents-wants-six-weeks-turn-docs/
More emails found on Hillary's GalPal Huma (wife of sex convict Weiner):
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-department-reveals-2800-huma-abedin-government-documents-weiners-laptop/

Oh remember the Russian corruption stuff? Apparently Obama's FBI knew about Russian bribery but still let the Clintons and the uranium sale go through.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Good friend of and frequent donor to the Clintons and their foundation(s) who is now accused of rape or harassment by seemingly everyone in Hollywood but the Clinton won't return the money he gave them. Or even donate it to a real charity.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-foundation-wont-return-money-harvey-weinstein-donated-687074
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-foundation-250000-harvey-weinstein/

You haven’t even touched on the $28 million the Clintons got from Morocco to shut down their phosphate competition in Florida and Lisa Jackson’s career moves from the EPA to the board of the Clinton Foundation and then on to the board of Apple.

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8438 on: October 17, 2017, 04:39:15 PM »
You haven’t even touched on the $28 million the Clintons got from Morocco to shut down their phosphate competition in Florida and Lisa Jackson’s career moves from the EPA to the board of the Clinton Foundation and then on to the board of Apple.
I was only detailing some new Clinton stuff. There is no way I could detail all the scandals concerning the Clinton over the decades! It would take me writing a series of books.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-foundation-taking-accused-rights-violator/story?id=30840212
https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/hillary-clinton-phosphates-and-western-sahara
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-morocco-wikileaks/505043

Apparently Lisa Jackson, like Hillary, liked using private email accounts for government use in the past and even would use fake names:
http://observer.com/2015/06/apples-new-top-lobbyist-has-bizarre-history-of-sock-puppeting/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watchdog-epa-grants-ethics-cyber-security-certificates-to-fake-employee-richard-windsor/article/2530993
But brags about Apple giving user information to governments:
https://www.inquisitr.com/3645134/apple-vp-lisa-jackson-bragged-to-hillary-clinton-about-giving-customer-data-to-governments-according-to-wikileaks-email/





Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8439 on: October 17, 2017, 04:58:03 PM »
I was only detailing some new Clinton stuff. There is no way I could detail all the scandals concerning the Clinton over the decades! It would take me writing a series of books.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-foundation-taking-accused-rights-violator/story?id=30840212
https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/hillary-clinton-phosphates-and-western-sahara
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-morocco-wikileaks/505043

Apparently Lisa Jackson, like Hillary, liked using private email accounts for government use in the past and even would use fake names:
http://observer.com/2015/06/apples-new-top-lobbyist-has-bizarre-history-of-sock-puppeting/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watchdog-epa-grants-ethics-cyber-security-certificates-to-fake-employee-richard-windsor/article/2530993
But brags about Apple giving user information to governments:
https://www.inquisitr.com/3645134/apple-vp-lisa-jackson-bragged-to-hillary-clinton-about-giving-customer-data-to-governments-according-to-wikileaks-email/

It took you 10 minutes. Kind of makes you wonder why she was never asked a question about this while in the campaign trail or in one of the many debates.

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8440 on: October 17, 2017, 05:21:15 PM »
It took you 10 minutes. Kind of makes you wonder why she was never asked a question about this while in the campaign trail or in one of the many debates.
I think we know the answer to that question. It is conceivable, maybe, that if the R candidate was someone like Bush or Rubio the press might have asked Hillary a few questions but when it was looking like Cruz, Trump, etc there is no way they would do so. What is weirder, maybe, is why wouldn't her opposition (on either side) ask her these kinds of questions in a debate or, at least, attack ads? Skeletons in their closets also?

"Who hired Livingstone?" would've also been a fun one to ask.

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8441 on: October 17, 2017, 05:33:14 PM »
I think we know the answer to that question. It is conceivable, maybe, that if the R candidate was someone like Bush or Rubio the press might have asked Hillary a few questions but when it was looking like Cruz, Trump, etc there is no way they would do so. What is weirder, maybe, is why wouldn't her opposition (on either side) ask her these kinds of questions in a debate or, at least, attack ads? Skeletons in their closets also?

"Who hired Livingstone?" would've also been a fun one to ask.

Kenneth Starr?

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/higher_education/baylor-schedules-festivities-for-livingstone-s-inauguration/article_f4435b6d-38f9-5a6a-933d-e80441993ec0.html

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8442 on: October 17, 2017, 05:40:22 PM »
Kenneth Starr?

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/higher_education/baylor-schedules-festivities-for-livingstone-s-inauguration/article_f4435b6d-38f9-5a6a-933d-e80441993ec0.html
ha.

I thought it was interesting how Starr goes to Baylor and it turns into a Clinton White House situation. (Not that he personally did anything, except, maybe, cover-ups but just all the sex, and rape, scandals.)

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8443 on: October 17, 2017, 06:30:57 PM »
ha.

I thought it was interesting how Starr goes to Baylor and it turns into a Clinton White House situation. (Not that he personally did anything, except, maybe, cover-ups but just all the sex, and rape, scandals.)


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8444 on: October 17, 2017, 11:05:15 PM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8445 on: October 18, 2017, 03:41:01 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8446 on: October 18, 2017, 03:42:20 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8447 on: October 18, 2017, 03:45:05 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8448 on: October 18, 2017, 03:48:23 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8449 on: October 18, 2017, 03:49:25 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8450 on: October 18, 2017, 03:50:54 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8451 on: October 18, 2017, 03:56:10 AM »


Joke if you must to divert from the fact but we all concur. You're supergay! A real fag's fag.  ;) ;D

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8452 on: October 18, 2017, 03:56:35 AM »
Joke if you must to divert from the fact but we all concur. You're supergay! A real fag's fag.  ;) ;D


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8453 on: October 18, 2017, 03:59:49 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8454 on: October 18, 2017, 04:01:30 AM »

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8455 on: October 18, 2017, 04:13:52 AM »


At being the biggest fag here, yes.  :)

Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8456 on: October 18, 2017, 04:29:29 AM »
At being the biggest fag here, yes.  :)






Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8457 on: October 18, 2017, 03:28:00 PM »


Re: Hillary Clinton
« Reply #8459 on: October 18, 2017, 08:59:09 PM »
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/18/attorney-fbi-informant-was-blocked-by-obama-administration-from-testifying-on-uranium-one-deal/


Is there any act committed by a leftist icon so heinous that the MSM is compelled to give it the coverage that that it deserves?  Of course, my question is rhetorical.