• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Malaysia Flight 370: for suspicious minds!

Started by Stellar, April 23, 2014, 03:49:49 AM

Stellar

People people we can either put on our sheeple suit or act like a ostrich with its head buried in the sand.

My condolences to the family's who lost their loved ones in this whole debacle.

First off lets really think about how CNN, Fox and MSM feed us either lies or extremely subjective news stemming from the Corporotocrazy or the monetary machine which all governments represent. It's obvious the news media deliberately regurgitated their ambiguous thoughts as if it were fact that 370 crashed over the Indian Ocean. It's all a farce, because flight 370 lost its transponder over the Gulf of Thailand and so knowing that how did the U.S. Navy track the flight all the way to the Indian Ocean if the plane's was off GPS radar. This is a complete lie and their is no evidence what so ever to substantiate the claim! What's amazing is HAARP can actually communicate with submarines at huge distances and its located in Gakona, Alaska. Wow I wonder why they have not picked up that frequency from flight 370. What perhaps can be rationally ascertained here are two plausible reasons which I have no evidence either and the way news reports now a days I guess my speculation is just as valid as the news.

1) The plane was simply shot down by the U.S. to stop a hand over of cloaking and stealth technology to China by info given from Freescale. And a meeting may have occurred prior to this incident where the engineers said screw the deal and were headed to China for better pay.

2) The planes transponder was ordered off by the U.S. Navy deliberately, so they could escort all the passengers to a classified base in Diego Garcia.

What I feel went down is that some engineers had row with Freescale over pay and decided to take their technology to China which is a threat to U.S. interests. If you don't believe corporations run the world in collusion with politicians and their tool is the major news outlets, you're so naive: please don't read any further, because you can't handle the sociopaths' which run the world.

QuoteOn board Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 were employees from Freescale Semiconductor, a Texas-based technology firm.

They were based in several manufacturing sites in Kuala Lumpur and Tianjin, China; 12 of the employees were from Malaysia and eight were from China, a spokeswoman for the company confirmed.


"The general public might not hear about how far the US has really come, because it is and should remain classified," noted firearms expert Chris Sajnog, a former Navy Seal. "Other countries are still playing catch-up â€" but they're closing the gap."

Freescale Semiconductor has been developing microprocessors, sensors and other technology for the past 50 years. The technology it creates is commonly referred to as embedded processors, which according to the firm are "standalone semiconductors that perform dedicated computing functions in electronic systems".

The passengers on board were engineers and other experts working to make Freescale Semiconductor chip facilities in Tianjin and Kuala Lumpur more efficient, said Mitch Haws, vice- president, global communications and investor relations.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malaysia-airlines-plane-mh370-latest-conspiracy-theory-were-freescale-semiconductor-top-employees-1440097






Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Stellar on April 23, 2014, 03:49:49 AM
People people we can either put on our sheeple suit or act like a ostrich with its head buried in the sand.

My condolences to the family's who lost their loved ones in this whole debacle.

First off lets really think about how CNN, Fox and MSM feed us either lies or extremely subjective news stemming from the Corporotocrazy or the monetary machine which all governments represent. It's obvious the news media deliberately regurgitated their ambiguous thoughts as if it were fact that 370 crashed over the Indian Ocean. It's all a farce, because flight 370 lost its transponder over the Gulf of Thailand and so knowing that how did the U.S. Navy track the flight all the way to the Indian Ocean if the plane's was off GPS radar.

Okay: GPS and radar and transponders are different things. Radar can only work if it has line of sight. It's why AWACS was developed so it could see far far further than from a mast mounted on the top of a ship or land based mast.
GPS will work if the satellites are over the horizon and three can be handshaked to make a triangulation with the aircraft.

Transponders are an onboard identifier to interrogate the specific aircraft from the clutter on a screen. It says hello to the ground base and then expects a reply to confirm it's been identified. Without the transponder, the aircraft will simply be a blip on a radar screen. Military aircraft have complex algorithms to identify them as friendly or potential threats, and clearly if an enemy could break that in a time of war they could use the Trojan horse principle, but clearly it's open to being counter productive if the memo didn't go to all friendly anti aircraft defences!

Submarines don't use the same frequencies as aircraft for two way comms. They can receive (we suppose because it's classified) all frequencies including air and land based if they have an antenna to pick up said frequencies..

The US (and other) navy is saying it tracked it, but isn't saying exactly how I suspect. Radar is an easy thing that people can relate to: Radio wave goes out, gets bounced back.. The best land based radar on an island will have potentially a limit due to the curvature of the earth, so unless the said airliner without the transponder came within say 250 miles of a radar it would be a blip. DG isn't a top secret base, it's used as an emergency landing airport and a stop over point for civilian light aircraft whose pilots are going across the Indian Ocean.

Quote
This is a complete lie and their is no evidence what so ever to substantiate the claim! What's amazing is HAARP can actually communicate with submarines at huge distances and its located in Gakona, Alaska. Wow I wonder why they have not picked up that frequency from flight 370.

Specific antenna will pick up specific band widths, there isn't a one size fits all. Consequently if HAARP is being used to communicate with submarines, it won't be used to communicate with aircraft, because essentially there's no need to, there's enough land based radar and onboard ability to go pretty much where it needs to go without communicating with anyone. There's quite a bit of misinformation regarding that final point. The navigation ability of modern airliners is supremely sophisticated and accurate.   


Quote
What perhaps can be rationally ascertained here are two plausible reasons which I have no evidence either and the way news reports now a days I guess my speculation is just as valid as the news.

1) The plane was simply shot down by the U.S. to stop a hand over of cloaking and stealth technology to China by info given from Freescale. And a meeting may have occurred prior to this incident where the engineers said screw the deal and were headed to China for better pay.

2) The planes transponder was ordered off by the U.S. Navy deliberately, so they could escort all the passengers to a classified base in Diego Garcia.

What I feel went down is that some engineers had row with Freescale over pay and decided to take their technology to China which is a threat to U.S. interests. If you don't believe corporations run the world in collusion with politicians and their tool is the major news outlets, you're so naive: please don't read any further, because you can't handle the sociopaths' which run the world.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malaysia-airlines-plane-mh370-latest-conspiracy-theory-were-freescale-semiconductor-top-employees-1440097








Hmmm, but no actual evidence?

Grov505th

Thanks Yorkshire, you answered it better then I could.   I got a feeling this is going to turn into some 911 Truther sized Derp before its over....

The OP did say the thread was for "suspicious minds". Its supposed to be about weird ideas.

Grov505th

I know, but why start another thread.  And the whole Sheeple thing.  I dont know... I mean with the whole 24hr News thing everything is getting blown out of proportion.
There is NO secret base at DG, hell commercial flights land there all the time.    And how would the US Navy shoot down the plane, was there any Carrier Groups near by that could have launched fighters? Or even ANY Warships in the area?
I mean its starting to sound like the whole 911 truther saying that the planes that hit the WTC where remote controlled and that the real plane landed at a secret base and all the passengers where offloaded.
Also to communicate with Subs you need to use VLF frequency....the problem with that is you have to have a HUGE antenna to send, The E6 which is the Navys TACMO aircraft has to use a REEL to store the antenna when  not in use.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Grov505th on April 23, 2014, 06:17:23 AM
I know, but why start another thread.  And the whole Sheeple thing. 

I did find that somewhat irritating, making the assumption that because someone doesn't buy into 'they' don't want you to know, we're somehow demented and unable to have critical thoughts.

Quote
I dont know... I mean with the whole 24hr News thing everything is getting blown out of proportion.

Yep.. It's how media works. Not because they're in on a plot, but because it sells. There are more than enough advertisers to buy the time if the story can be made big enough.

Quote
There is NO secret base at DG, hell commercial flights land there all the time.    And how would the US Navy shoot down the plane, was there any Carrier Groups near by that could have launched fighters? Or even ANY Warships in the area?
I mean its starting to sound like the whole 911 truther saying that the planes that hit the WTC where remote controlled and that the real plane landed at a secret base and all the passengers where offloaded.

I agree.

Quote
Also to communicate with Subs you need to use VLF frequency....the problem with that is you have to have a HUGE antenna to send, The E6 which is the Navys TACMO aircraft has to use a REEL to store the antenna when  not in use.

And the entire Scottish highlands is used as an antenna. Because of the high granite content the VLF signal can be sent pretty much around the globe; Sure it takes about 20 minutes to send five words but it's almost unbreakable. The sneaky service...

Stellar

Quote from: Yorkshire pud on April 23, 2014, 04:38:48 AM
Okay: GPS and radar and transponders are different things. Radar can only work if it has line of sight. It's why AWACS was developed so it could see far far further than from a mast mounted on the top of a ship or land based mast.
GPS will work if the satellites are over the horizon and three can be handshaked to make a triangulation with the aircraft.

Transponders are an onboard identifier to interrogate the specific aircraft from the clutter on a screen. It says hello to the ground base and then expects a reply to confirm it's been identified. Without the transponder, the aircraft will simply be a blip on a radar screen. Military aircraft have complex algorithms to identify them as friendly or potential threats, and clearly if an enemy could break that in a time of war they could use the Trojan horse principle, but clearly it's open to being counter productive if the memo didn't go to all friendly anti aircraft defences!

Submarines don't use the same frequencies as aircraft for two way comms. They can receive (we suppose because it's classified) all frequencies including air and land based if they have an antenna to pick up said frequencies..

The US (and other) navy is saying it tracked it, but isn't saying exactly how I suspect. Radar is an easy thing that people can relate to: Radio wave goes out, gets bounced back.. The best land based radar on an island will have potentially a limit due to the curvature of the earth, so unless the said airliner without the transponder came within say 250 miles of a radar it would be a blip. DG isn't a top secret base, it's used as an emergency landing airport and a stop over point for civilian light aircraft whose pilots are going across the Indian Ocean.

Specific antenna will pick up specific band widths, there isn't a one size fits all. Consequently if HAARP is being used to communicate with submarines, it won't be used to communicate with aircraft, because essentially there's no need to, there's enough land based radar and onboard ability to go pretty much where it needs to go without communicating with anyone. There's quite a bit of misinformation regarding that final point. The navigation ability of modern airliners is supremely sophisticated and accurate.   



Hmmm, but no actual evidence?

What I should have mentioned since the search was a military operation that HAARP should been employed to pick up the Black Box signal.  Remember I was speculating from my personal perception which does not include facts.  I was operating from a standpoint of a subjective reporter not much unlike the vast news carriers.  I think your points are just as vague as my ideas and perhaps even your technical mumbo jumbo are just to deflect what possibly could have happened.  Yorkshire your comments here are just a plausible as mine.  Why we were both not in the know unless your contacts are feeding you info on how to respond to keep the silence up.  And to go along with the news story well you either put on a tin foil hat or wear sheeple garments you choose.  Thanks for the education regarding radar, yet that was just a side show for the gullible.  Did you not read who were on board the plane whom possibly had thumb drives on them with cloaking and stealth technology.  Thanks Yorkshire your statements have not convinced me tho until you bring back more info from MI6 or the CIA to convince us here lol.  Have a nice day grin :)

Yorkshire pud

I'll try to answer the paragraph in pieces, as there are several points to be addressed.

Quote from: Stellar on April 23, 2014, 10:34:28 AM
What I should have mentioned since the search was a military operation that HAARP should been employed to pick up the Black Box signal.

The same way submarines avoid detection, black boxes are hostages to the nature of the sea if that is where they end up: Depth and current. Whatever the depth they need to be detected by a receiver that is submerged in the sea. Even then it's hit and miss to narrow down the position due to the layers of water between the seabed and the surface. There's also such a thing called the thermocline , something every submariner knows about and takes advantage of it to avoid being found. If as been suspected the aircraft has gone into the ocean at the approximate area, the depth is over two miles down. That isn't taking into account crevasses and holes that the boxes could be in after sinking. It's easy to sit and say that 'this should have been done, and this would work'...it's usually statements made by those who know nothing about the reality of the situation or the conditions that the ships are sailing in. That part of the ocean has some of the worst weather and strongest currents on the planet. 

Quote
Remember I was speculating from my personal perception which does not include facts.  I was operating from a standpoint of a subjective reporter not much unlike the vast news carriers.  I think your points are just as vague as my ideas and perhaps even your technical mumbo jumbo are just to deflect what possibly could have happened.  Yorkshire your comments here are just a plausible as mine.

My opinion (and that is all it is) is that I don't know what happened to it, but the likely scenario is it headed south from it's scheduled heading. I'm not going to speculate as to why or who was responsible for that, because like you I don't know.

What I would say didn't happen is that it was shot down by the US Navy, stolen and landed at DG, or abducted by aliens.

Quote
Why we were both not in the know unless your contacts are feeding you info on how to respond to keep the silence up.

We are not in the know because those who are looking for it (RN, RAN, USN, Chinese and Malaysian ships as well as several others, some civilian) don't know yet. Why should we know? We're not important enough to the investigation to know. We're neither family, fellow pilots and crew, work for Boeing, RR or the investigators.

As for my contacts feeding me? I take it you read the other thread and what my acquaintance said? He's an aircraft engineer. He gave his opinion and the facts that surround a likely scenario. His actual qualifications as an engineer are extensive, as I said before. He has no personal axe to grind but he doesn't suffer fools or their ill informed ideas. He is however very helpful and free with his expertise (I build radio control gliders) and has never yet refused to come up with the goods when I have a question regarding airframe structure and stress paths. Although models, the principles are similar to full size practice.

So no, he isn't feeding me anything, he doesn't even know I'm on this forum. And the post I copied and pasted was his reply to someone else in another forum.

Quote
And to go along with the news story well you either put on a tin foil hat or wear sheeple garments you choose.  Thanks for the education regarding radar, yet that was just a side show for the gullible.  Did you not read who were on board the plane whom possibly had thumb drives on them with cloaking and stealth technology.  Thanks Yorkshire your statements have not convinced me tho until you bring back more info from MI6 or the CIA to convince us here lol.  Have a nice day grin :)

I have no info regarding the circumstances of this aircraft disappearance, but that's the same as everyone else. As I've said before about conspiracy theories and the theorists; I've yet to to see a retraction and an apology from one when they're shown to be wrong. Take the 'Nibiru' crap; How many CT's made a videa saying they were wrong and they're sorry for causing unneccesay anxiety? Or the ones who claim vapour trails are nefarious chemical trails? Even when someone goes to considerable trouble to show what it is they're looking at is normal they dismiss it as being someone paid by the CIA or similar..

Conspiracy theories will have credibility when their proponents start being as critical of their own 'findings' as they are at accepting any crap they log into today, or tomorrow, or next week.

Alex Jones is the extreme of touting this crap and knowing the paranoid, mentally ill and lonely will believe it. In a just world AJ would be disemboweled with a rusty razor blade and hav eit fed to him..

Not that I have any strong feelings about the cretin.

MrMajestik

Quote from: Stellar on April 23, 2014, 10:34:28 AM
  Remember I was speculating from my personal perception which does not include facts. 

This is upper right side material.

Grov505th

They are all having Mai Tais with Amelia Earhart in Atlantis......Makes about as much sense as what was posted before

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: MrMajestik on April 23, 2014, 12:18:33 PM
This is upper right side material.


Indeed so. And apparently although Stellar thanked me for the clarification on radar, they went onto say the accounts about it's use is for the gullible... So from a position of admitted ignorance of the subject, apparently there is qualification in knowing that those using it (AKA the experts) are duping anyone who will listen...

Ten 'Conspiracy theory is shite' points if you can spot the above flaw in Stellar's proposition. Slides and margin notes are allowed.

Grov505th

Well....
1)why would you ask a Navy SEAL firearms expert about semiconductors and aviation.

Also:
They were based in several manufacturing sites in Kuala Lumpur and Tianjin, China; 12 of the employees were from Malaysia and eight were from China, a spokeswoman for the company confirmed.

Why would you need to take thumb drives from malaysia to china, when you already have offices in.....CHINA?

Also if the US knew this, wouldnt they try and recover said thumb drives and arrest whoever was stealing sensitive data and the rub Chinas face in it?

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Grov505th on April 23, 2014, 01:39:47 PM
Well....
1)why would you ask a Navy SEAL firearms expert about semiconductors and aviation.

Also:
They were based in several manufacturing sites in Kuala Lumpur and Tianjin, China; 12 of the employees were from Malaysia and eight were from China, a spokeswoman for the company confirmed.

Why would you need to take thumb drives from malaysia to china, when you already have offices in.....CHINA?

Also if the US knew this, wouldnt they try and recover said thumb drives and arrest whoever was stealing sensitive data and the rub Chinas face in it?

Apparently some author called Chuckman (yes really) has posed a question (Shades of Discovery channel and Ancient Aliens)..'Could the US military have shot it down?' he asks, knowing full well that fellow CT's will grab that with both hands as if he's presenting as fact..And with some justification on his actual theory he cites several occasions that the US have shot down civilian aircraft. I found it repulsive that a crew was decorated when the US ship brought down the Iranian airliner, but  that doesn't make this theory correct.

Grov505th

Several Occasions? I know of only the Irainian Air incedent? What others are there?

Besides that Stellar does throw a lot of the Buzz words around...HAARP, Sheeple, CIA and Tin Foil Hats. I am waiting for MJ12, brainwashing and Flase Flag to come up next.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Grov505th on April 23, 2014, 02:15:46 PM
Several Occasions? I know of only the Irainian Air incedent? What others are there?

Wasn't there another Middle Eastern one before the Iranian one? I would only have been young/teenager then so maybe I'm wrong.

Quote
Besides that Stellar does throw a lot of the Buzz words around...HAARP, Sheeple, CIA and Tin Foil Hats. I am waiting for MJ12, brainwashing and Flase Flag to come up next.

Yeah, the cast is there. Sadly the plot is the same. CT= good...healthy scepticsm/ facts/ common sense= are you kidding? You're paid by the CIA/them/NWO, you shouldn't be allowed to breed....

Grov505th

Quote from: Yorkshire pud on April 23, 2014, 02:36:08 PM
Wasn't there another Middle Eastern one before the Iranian one? I would only have been young/teenager then so maybe I'm wrong.

No he is counting TWA 800 and Fligh 93 from 911:

http://chuckman.blog.ca/

Thats all I need to know about him.......classic CT

McPhallus

Quote from: Yorkshire pud on April 23, 2014, 02:36:08 PM
Yeah, the cast is there. Sadly the plot is the same. CT= good...healthy scepticsm/ facts/ common sense= are you kidding? You're paid by the CIA/them/NWO, you shouldn't be allowed to breed....

Many of the conspiracy fruits seem to be ego-driven; i.e., they string together stuff they read on web sites, and that makes them a genius over the rest of us sheeple since they were the first to figure it out.  They always fall into the trap of assuming that it's everyone else's responsibility to prove them wrong rather than actually prove the validity of their fringe ideas.  As a group, they're an amazingly arrogant bunch (Hoaxland, barra, etc).

onan

I think the aircraft was hijacked. I am pretty sure my accutron shows variations in torsion fields at 19.5 degrees latitude on the moon. Look at the data.

Grov505th

Quote from: onan on April 23, 2014, 03:39:25 PM
I think the aircraft was hijacked. I am pretty sure my accutron shows variations in torsion fields at 19.5 degrees latitude on the moon. Look at the data.

No it was totaly Angels, you see they grabbed the plane and took it into the light thru a portal....

wr250

Quote from: Grov505th on April 23, 2014, 03:44:05 PM
No it was totaly Angels, you see they grabbed the plane and took it into the light thru a portal....

no it was sasquatch who arrived via a portal and with the help of angels hijacked the plane into a mothership ufo piloted by Louis Farrakhan . this happened at 19.5 degrees latitude, and RCH detected it with the aforementioned  torsion field detector.

Grov505th

Quote from: wr250 on April 23, 2014, 04:20:06 PM
no it was sasquatch who arrived via a portal and with the help of angels hijacked the plane into a mothership ufo piloted by Louis Farrakhan . this happened at 19.5 degrees latitude, and RCH detected it with the aforementioned  torsion field detector.

Where does the NWO fit into this? Or thr Trilateral commission?   Alex Jones needs to tell us....

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

Jackstar

Quote from: Grov505th on April 23, 2014, 06:17:23 AM
There is NO secret base at DG,
True enough, given that it is hardly a "secret" any longer: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/634034-diego-garcia-dispute-international-court-to-rule-on-claim-could-end-us-base-there/

Further links abound. Go forth and research, Apologists! (Although I must admit, a new thread is hardly needed. Vote for merge?)

Stellar

Quote from: McPhallus on April 23, 2014, 03:20:46 PM
Many of the conspiracy fruits seem to be ego-driven; i.e., they string together stuff they read on web sites, and that makes them a genius over the rest of us sheeple since they were the first to figure it out.  They always fall into the trap of assuming that it's everyone else's responsibility to prove them wrong rather than actually prove the validity of their fringe ideas.  As a group, they're an amazingly arrogant bunch (Hoaxland, barra, etc).

You guys make light of this topic and I guess you are disturbed by the content of what I said which has no ground or basis, except for Mind Flayer Monk; He alone apparently understands English.  As I stated the content of this is subjective, but what logic is true or what was the reality of what happened to Flight 370.  I think McPhallus has taken the Koolaid here and well this fish we need to reel back to shore before he gets to deep into this.  McPhallus is one of those types who reads the news and probably thinks its the Bible or something.  LMFAO what a joke McPhallus and the rest of you; what a sad lot!

You guys apparently feel that just, because I don't know what happened your side is conclusive and you all know its on the heads of the perpetrators that only know.  This experiment with CT here just shows me there maybe plants who receive a couple nickles from who cares what govenments to tote the Major Media.... You guys make me want to throw up oops I just did and there is vomit all over McPhallus name.  Anyway here is a photo for people who don't understand what suspicious, subjective is defined to be.  You guys don't even mention anything about the passengers; truly a sick lot eh?


Jackstar

Quote from: Stellar on April 23, 2014, 10:17:10 PM
You guys don't even mention anything about the passengers; truly a sick lot eh?
http://www.realfarmacy.com/breaking-hijacked-flight-370-passenger-sent-photo-from-hidden-iphone-tracing-back-to-secret-u-s-military-base-diego-garcia/

Do they even have cell phone towers on D.G.? Well, yeah--of course they do.

"[...] from GPS coordinates which put Wood only a few miles away from the U.S. controlled Diego Garcia military base which is located on an island south of the Maldives in the Indian Ocean."

South of the Maldives, oh really, is that so?

http://metro.co.uk/2014/03/18/flight-mh370-residents-on-remote-island-in-maldives-saw-jet-matching-missing-malaysia-airlines-planes-description-4640688/

"Islanders claim they were disturbed by an incredibly loud noise at about 6.15am local time on March 8 and saw a plane travelling from north to south-east, towards Addu â€" the southern tip of Maldives, it is reported."


At this point, the lack of evidence is evidence.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Stellar on April 23, 2014, 10:17:10 PM
You guys make light of this topic and I guess you are disturbed by the content of what I said which has no ground or basis, except for Mind Flayer Monk; He alone apparently understands English.  As I stated the content of this is subjective, but what logic is true or what was the reality of what happened to Flight 370.  I think McPhallus has taken the Koolaid here and well this fish we need to reel back to shore before he gets to deep into this.  McPhallus is one of those types who reads the news and probably thinks its the Bible or something.  LMFAO what a joke McPhallus and the rest of you; what a sad lot!

You guys apparently feel that just, because I don't know what happened your side is conclusive and you all know its on the heads of the perpetrators that only know.  This experiment with CT here just shows me there maybe plants who receive a couple nickles from who cares what govenments to tote the Major Media.... You guys make me want to throw up oops I just did and there is vomit all over McPhallus name.  Anyway here is a photo for people who don't understand what suspicious, subjective is defined to be.  You guys don't even mention anything about the passengers; truly a sick lot eh?



I have to assume the gibberish you've typed is chemical induced because it's almost all incomprehensible. Your last sentence is along the lines of pathos. How do you know no-one has thought of the passengers? However like all stereotypical CT's you like to tell others how they feel. CT's don't usually give a shit about victim's feelings (take Sandy Hook for instance), they just want to peddle their unsubstantiated junk no matter who it insults, disrespects or upsets.



Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Jackstar on April 23, 2014, 11:57:32 PM
http://www.realfarmacy.com/breaking-hijacked-flight-370-passenger-sent-photo-from-hidden-iphone-tracing-back-to-secret-u-s-military-base-diego-garcia/

Do they even have cell phone towers on D.G.? Well, yeah--of course they do.

Oh do keep up. It's bullshit. Freelance journo worked all that out? How come he isn't part of the media conspiracy?  The exif data can be fabricated, I've done it on my photos.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Jackstar on April 23, 2014, 06:21:04 PM
True enough, given that it is hardly a "secret" any longer: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/634034-diego-garcia-dispute-international-court-to-rule-on-claim-could-end-us-base-there/

Further links abound. Go forth and research, Apologists! (Although I must admit, a new thread is hardly needed. Vote for merge?)

It never was a secret. No more than Hawaii or the Solomon islands.



Jackstar

Quote
Yorkshire pud
Re: SAD SAD what a bunch?
« Reply #24 on: Today at 10:57:59 PM »

You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.

Report to moderator 
Yorkshire pud
Re: SAD SAD what a bunch?
« Reply #25 on: Today at 11:03:28 PM »

You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.

Report to moderator 
Yorkshire pud
Re: Malaysia Flight 370: for suspicious minds!
« Reply #26 on: Today at 11:05:52 PM »

You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.


Is this guy's contract set up for hourly payments and lots of overtime, or what? It is hard to imagine someone being naturally so invested in writing off everything as mere coincidence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident#Later_statements_about_the_incident

^^^ you know... that shit actually happened, yo... and it didn't happen all that long ago.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Jackstar on April 24, 2014, 12:12:25 AM

Is this guy's contract set up for hourly payments and lots of overtime, or what? It is hard to imagine someone being naturally so invested in writing off everything as mere coincidence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident#Later_statements_about_the_incident

^^^ you know... that shit actually happened, yo... and it didn't happen all that long ago.

I don't know which is more hilarious, being reported to MV (oh please be true) or being told I've said everything is coincidence! Comprehension not a strong suit eh.

Jackstar

There, there.

*soothing music, gently patting*

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod