But know licensed medical providers have to operate under laws. Are you saying it's "OK" for George Noory to bring on paid sponsors, claim it's a "medical show" in which people call in and receive solid medical "recommendations"? Is that kind of nonsense what you are defending?
We are not here to argue whether licensed medical providers are right and wrong. We know of a certain overnight radio program that hosts guests that steer people away from doctors, act like a medical provider and then only recommend -- basically order -- such suckers to buy the unproven crap they sell at outrageous prices at that "criticalhealthnews(dot)com".
OK. Where is their legal responsibilities in that? Know that no disclaimers are aired that indicates the views of the host and the guests are for informational purposes only and not meant to replace consultation with a medical provider. Then, further, at daring to label callers as their "patients," sans ever seeing the person themselves, taking vital signs or drawing blood to be tested, sans any paperwork every licensed-medical provider requires...and you are OK with that? I'm not.
Again, the way those "alternative-health programs" are conducted should be scrutinized. If that's "news" or objective, editorial matter, I'm a monkey's uncle. Noory likes to brag about "the handful of emails he receives" for those who have been "helped," even though we never know whether they had a condition in the first place, but what about hearing from those who were lied to, cheated and maybe harmed? Not a word, huh?
I encourage people who suspect something shady going on to file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission over "Coast To Coast AM" and its association with "criticalhealthnews(dot)com." Noory likes to brag "people will burn" or how he stands for the light and truth, but he is one to be questioned himself. The guy is a known fake. The guy thinks just because he "says it," it must be true. Baloney. He is not a nice person. That's obvious. He cares nothing about the health and welfare of his listeners. He talks and he talks. That's all he does.
He is out to sell you a bill of goods. That's his mode of operation, using the argumentum ad hominem in response to anyone who sees through him and that program. If he really cared, he'd air proper disclaimers and even perhaps fully disclose any and all business ties with that "criticalhealthnews(dot)com" sponsor, or Youngevity International itself, or whether "anything of value" is being exchanged for such "news" programs aired under Premiere Networks.
Check the "Coast" Twitter feed. Are any such posts sponsored? In other words, are sponsors having "news" posts inserted alongside the program's "editorial matter?" Sans disclosure that such posts are from a paid sponsor? Are they. If so, that's a big no-no -- one that could weaken the program's First Amendment rights. Ask any capable mass-media attorneys. They'll tell you the same things I am.
You've heard it from Noory himself: "All we want to do is help one person." One person? Imagine any licensed medical provider who claimed that? Any hospital? Just one? Noory implies that even if one thousand people seek out that snake-oil, and nine-hundred-and-ninety-nine get cheated, that's "OK" with him and his guests. Huh? Is that what you are defending? I hope not, in the name of proven medical science.
We are here to argue any point we see fit. Doctors sign off on the Hippocratic Oath and every time they fail to prevent MSRAs (which they originate), every time they prescribe an unnecessary surgery, every time they are negligent on amputating the wrong limb (so both limbs end up coming off), and every time they let a patient die of an infection without telling them about the acid/alkaline diet or other therapies, they violate their Hippocratic Oath. OATHS ARE EVERY BIT AS IMPORTANT AS LAWS. IF THEY CAN'T SUPPORT THEIR OATH DUE TO RESTRICTIVE LAWS, THEY SHOULD NOT TAKE THE OATH. THEY ARE FRAUDS BECAUSE THEIR OATH HAS BECOME A LIE. THEY PROSTITUTE THEIR SERVICE OUT TO INSURANCE COMPANY DIRECTIVES, INSURANCE COMPANIES WHO HAVE NEVER EXAMINED THE PATIENT.
What do you think I am, a lawyer? I'm just saying the things Doc Wallach says are true.
And, there is room within the law to be more ethical. Patients are payers, not prisoners. If a patient wants expectorant or epsom salts while hospitalized, there is no law saying the patient can't have them. But, the medical profession refuses to provide. Creating unnecessary dependence on insurance-defined, outrageously expensive, substandard care.
Hospitals are not prisons. Hospitals have the duty to provide the level of care a patient needs, expects, and requests. IT IS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION NOT TO GIVE A HOSPITAL PATIENT WITH A WRACKING COUGH, EXPECTORANT (OR OTHER OTC).
What I am saying is that the allopathic medical profession shirks its duties and allows patients to die not only through negligence, but because of bias and indoctrination. There is no law a doctor can't prescribe an acid/alkaline alternating diet for a person with a bacterial infection. But, doctors won't do it because it is not popular in their profession to do it. So innocent victims die, of hospital-born diseases.
Did you know that hospital hand sanitizers don't kill E-Coli, but vinegar does. So, be sure to wash your hands after touching anything at a hospital, because E-Coli could still be on them, and if your immune system is low because of a cold, a chronic condition, a disease, old age, debilitation, or any other reason, then your body might not be able to fight off the E-coli from the hospital restroom latch, because medical professionals are too indoctrinated and biased to simply wet a rag with vinegar periodically and wipe everything down. If they did this, they might not have so many antibiotic-resistant infections, and might not have to shut down entire facilities to "sanitize them" after big outbreaks where innocent people die.
Innocent people die because medical professionals shirk common sense. Doc Wallach, on the other hand, isn't killing anyone. And he is helping many.
Poll