Dude, this fossil obviously can’t think for himself. It’s official stories only for him. Now he does what they told him; now he does what they told him. 
"A Cruel and Shocking Act" is by no means the "official story." it points out procedural and process errors, inconsistent/conflicting/missing testimony and challenges conclusions and findings of both the Warren Commission and the House Investigation. It also definitively disproves some of the popular myths such as the alleged presence of GHWB in Dallas on 11/22/63.
How is it that you have come to be so profoundly invested in many of the highly questionable narratives written by various sensationalist authors and promoted by the George Noorys of the world who rarely ask penetrating questions in interviews but always treat these intellectual giants and models of integrity with cloying deference and gushing approval. You invariably become defensive and nutzoid-snarky when additional clarifying or dispositive information is brought to your attention that doesn't square with the articles of faith you are so committed to.. This tells me that you have no real interest in finding the truth but only in clinging to the narrative that gives you a sense of moral superiority to the villains identified for you by the professional conspiracy theorists who you cultishly follow, and, who knows what other psychological cover such pat beliefs provide you.
Some people never outgrow their need for such a psychological security blanket and it's clear that you and some others who post here are in no rush to do so.
