Author Topic: President Donald J. Trump  (Read 1827475 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63270 on: December 18, 2017, 06:21:03 PM »
I'm going to post this here even though it is not about Trump but his predecessor.  From Politico.

The Secret Backstory of How Obama Let Hezbollah Off The Hook


https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/


I see Kid might have posted the same thing but don't know for sure.


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63271 on: December 18, 2017, 06:21:10 PM »
[size=0px][font=.SF UI Display][font=.SFUIDisplay-Semibold][size=0pt]This is an excerpt from the Politico article posted above:[/font][/size][/size][/font][/color]
[size=0px][font=.SF UI Display][font=.SFUIDisplay-Semibold][size=0pt][/font][/size]
[/size][/font][/color]
[size=0px][font=.SF UI Display][font=.SFUIDisplay-Semibold][size=0pt]ďBut as Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way, according to interviews with dozens of participants who in many cases spoke for the first time about events shrouded in secrecy, and a review of government documents and court records. When Project Cassandra leaders sought approval for some significant investigations, prosecutions, arrests and financial sanctions, officials at the Justice and Treasury departments delayed, hindered or rejected their requests.Ē[/font][/size][/size][/font][/color]
[size=0px][font=.SF UI Display][font=.SFUIDisplay-Semibold][size=0pt][/font][/size]
[/size][/font][/color]
[size=0px][font=.SF UI Display][font=.SFUIDisplay-Semibold][size=0pt]No one would argue that Politico is a right leaning,  pro-Trump publication.  What will it take for some to realize that the Obama Administration was a combination of The Gang Who Couldnít Shoot Straight and the Muslim Botherhood?[/font][/size][/size][/font][/color]
There is some weird formatting problem in your post (at least when viewed on my computer.) Yes, the article(s) are very interesting and shows the length and loyalty Obama had to certain Muslims over the safety of the country and our citizens. What makes it even more troubling is that a lot of the drugs that Obama's administration, and maybe weapons, allowed in go to those "inner cities" that Obama purported to have concern for and "organize." Simply so that Iran can get faster access to nuclear weapons and get some hostages back, the latter a worthy goal, but at what cost? Billions paid to Iran, released terrorists to the world, drugs into our country, etc? Just to help out Iran? Or some weird perceived "legacy" for Obama?
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63272 on: December 18, 2017, 06:22:05 PM »
I'm going to post this here even though it is not about Trump but his predecessor.  From Politico.

The Secret Backstory of How Obama Let Hezbollah Off The Hook


https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/


I see Kid might have posted the same thing but don't know for sure.
Yeah, I posted it last night also (and immediately the crazed lefties here went ape with their 'outrage') but it deserves all the reposting. An interesting article and I noticed that the nightly "news" didn't mention it at all, of course.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63273 on: December 18, 2017, 06:26:27 PM »
Yeah, I posted it last night also (and immediately the crazed lefties here went ape with their 'outrage') but it deserves all the reposting. An interesting article and I noticed that the nightly "news" didn't mention it at all, of course.

Kid falls out of his computer chair every time he tries to jack off to internet porn.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63274 on: December 18, 2017, 06:27:22 PM »
There is some weird formatting problem in your post (at least when viewed on my computer.) Yes, the article(s) are very interesting and shows the length and loyalty Obama had to certain Muslims over the safety of the country and our citizens. What makes it even more troubling is that a lot of the drugs that Obama's administration, and maybe weapons, allowed in go to those "inner cities" that Obama purported to have concern for and "organize." Simply so that Iran can get faster access to nuclear weapons and get some hostages back, the latter a worthy goal, but at what cost? Billions paid to Iran, released terrorists to the world, drugs into our country, etc? Just to help out Iran? Or some weird perceived "legacy" for Obama?
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/


Iím using an iPad Pro and Iím trying to figure out what the problem is.  Iíve had it since the new features were added to BellGab and nowhere else.  Itís intermittent.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63275 on: December 18, 2017, 06:46:34 PM »


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63277 on: December 18, 2017, 07:32:57 PM »
A woman in SW Florida was just arrested for murdering her wife.  Neighbors suspected foul play when she used a backhoe to dig a hole in her back yard.  Both the killer and the victim are transgender former males. 


Takeaway:  Donít marry a backhoe operator.

that's messed up.


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63278 on: December 18, 2017, 07:51:54 PM »

Iím using an iPad Pro and Iím trying to figure out what the problem is.  Iíve had it since the new features were added to BellGab and nowhere else.  Itís intermittent.
Idk Apples and wasn't even aware of "new features" on BG except for a short, wild time in which spammers and guests were allowed free rein to post.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63279 on: December 18, 2017, 08:07:00 PM »

Iím using an iPad Pro and Iím trying to figure out what the problem is.  Iíve had it since the new features were added to BellGab and nowhere else.  Itís intermittent.

someone should call Derek.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63280 on: December 18, 2017, 08:10:31 PM »


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63282 on: December 18, 2017, 08:34:55 PM »

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63283 on: December 18, 2017, 08:44:06 PM »
At this point it is pretty obvious that Trump has put all his most hated enemies inside his cabinet so that he can then find dirt on them and fire their ass and/or put them in jail. Brilliant move! "Friends close! ENEMIES CLOSER!"

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63284 on: December 18, 2017, 08:46:10 PM »
President Trump would like you to join his team! Step inside little bitch!


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63285 on: December 18, 2017, 08:57:06 PM »
Yeah, I posted it last night also (and immediately the crazed lefties here went ape with their 'outrage') but it deserves all the reposting. An interesting article and I noticed that the nightly "news" didn't mention it at all, of course.


I hadn't gone through the last 36 hours of posts here.  I've been off the computer doing other things.  I see Pud is back though.   It is funny how the lefties go crazy if Trump or another Republican did those things but they turn a blind eye when there is corruption in their dear leaders.  Funny, the article even came from a liberal  SWAMP-approved  news source.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63286 on: December 18, 2017, 09:08:15 PM »

The way news should be done: investigate, report findings to the public.

The modern MSM cycle. Manufacture a conclusion. Cite non existent sources, or lying sources that support predetermined conclusion. Speculate on what nonexistent sources information means. Speculate on what other lying members of the MSM are saying. Speculate on what you speculated on. Hijack late night ďcomedyĒ shows to further promote speculation. Speculate on what late night ďcomedyĒ shows speculated on about the speculation from the MSM the day before. Stir, add salt to flavor.


CNN has tantrum over FoxNews reporting the obvious: The Mueller team is made up of 16 democKKKrst doners. It is therefore bias and corrupt. It has yet to find a single piece of evidence regarding Trump campaign and collusion with Russia. The investigation is no longer investigating the period prior to the election of Donald J Trump thus confirming the investigation is now over.


Thank you CNN for providing countless laughs over the last year and a half. Your 3 viewers are in your debt. And thank you lemmings, for your continued stupidity.



Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63287 on: December 18, 2017, 09:11:43 PM »

I hadn't gone through the last 36 hours of posts here.  I've been off the computer doing other things.  I see Pud is back though.   It is funny how the lefties go crazy if Trump or another Republican did those things but they turn a blind eye when there is corruption in their dear leaders.  Funny, the article even came from a liberal  SWAMP-approved  news source.


It could come from God himself through a burning bush and the lefties still wouldnít believe it. 

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63288 on: December 18, 2017, 09:20:24 PM »

It could come from God himself through a burning bush and the lefties still wouldnít believe it.


Of course they wouldn't.  Many of them don't believe in God either. ;)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63289 on: December 18, 2017, 09:26:03 PM »

I hadn't gone through the last 36 hours of posts here.  I've been off the computer doing other things.
Thatís the best way to do it. The endless 24/7 irrelevant fake news cycle is tiring and pointless and has zero impact on real life. Keeping people angry is how the MSM thinks they keep viewsers. All it does is keep the left in a perpetual misery cycle. Which is quite humorous. Even when they tune in to fake comedy for a laugh itís nonstop anger and hatred. Itís why the left is so incredibly uninspiring and uninspired.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63290 on: December 18, 2017, 09:38:19 PM »
LEGAL ANALYSIS: Why Muellerís Seizure of Transition Emails Likely Violated the Law
https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analysis/legal-analysis-heres-why-muellers-seizure-of-transition-emails-likely-violated-the-law/




And probably didn't. Any e mail address that ends in .gov has no guarantee of privacy, it says that in the small print. The biggest clue that Trump's briefs know Mueller's team have followed procedure is because they went whining to Trump news and Congress (Republicans). If they were serious they'd have gone to a judge and pressed an injunction. They haven't, and won't.  ;)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63291 on: December 18, 2017, 09:40:15 PM »

I hadn't gone through the last 36 hours of posts here.  I've been off the computer doing other things.  I see Pud is back though.   It is funny how the lefties go crazy if Trump or another Republican did those things but they turn a blind eye when there is corruption in their dear leaders.  Funny, the article even came from a liberal  SWAMP-approved  news source.




My dear leader? I didn't vote for Clinton, and wouldn't have been allowed to even if I had wanted to, which I didn't.  ;D   Whereas you own Trump and his circus.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63292 on: December 18, 2017, 09:42:49 PM »
Thatís the best way to do it. The endless 24/7 irrelevant fake news cycle is tiring and pointless and has zero impact on real life. Keeping people angry is how the MSM thinks they keep viewsers. All it does is keep the left in a perpetual misery cycle. Which is quite humorous. Even when they tune in to fake comedy for a laugh itís nonstop anger and hatred. Itís why the left is so incredibly uninspiring and uninspired.


I enjoy the weekends for what they provide.  Relief from the M-F 24 hours news cycle.  Sure there is news on the weekends but few expound on it other than the network news and CNN/MSNBC/ and Fox which I usually don't bother with anyway.  I've got better things to do in life.


Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63293 on: December 18, 2017, 09:47:19 PM »


My dear leader? I didn't vote for Clinton, and wouldn't have been allowed to even if I had wanted to, which I didn't.  ;D   Whereas you own Trump and his circus.


I was speaking in a general sense.  Not specifically about you.  Sure, you can't vote and I don't think you are that far gone save for your diatribes against guns.  You must admit though you are far more likely to support the Obamites and Clintonites than Republicans even those not affiliated with Trump.


And yes, I realize that I am as biased sometimes but I really don't want to be.  Some others revel in it.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63294 on: December 18, 2017, 09:51:50 PM »
The way news should be done: investigate, report findings to the public.

The modern MSM cycle. Manufacture a conclusion. Cite non existent sources, or lying sources that support predetermined conclusion. Speculate on what nonexistent sources information means. Speculate on what other lying members of the MSM are saying. Speculate on what you speculated on. Hijack late night ďcomedyĒ shows to further promote speculation. Speculate on what late night ďcomedyĒ shows speculated on about the speculation from the MSM the day before. Stir, add salt to flavor.


CNN has tantrum over FoxNews reporting the obvious: The Mueller team is made up of 16 democKKKrst doners. It is therefore bias and corrupt. It has yet to find a single piece of evidence regarding Trump campaign and collusion with Russia. The investigation is no longer investigating the period prior to the election of Donald J Trump thus confirming the investigation is now over.


Thank you CNN for providing countless laughs over the last year and a half. Your 3 viewers are in your debt. And thank you lemmings, for your continued stupidity.




Hey bitch.. Shut up trying to understand something you have no clue about. Hows the tax 'deal' going to go for you, will you afford a new virtual train set? How are you on the Reps who said they'd vote against now voting for, because they found out that their multi millionaire real estates will be worth more with the new tax breaks you won't enjoy?  ;D Oh, and 'My rich friends don't like it' Trump is going to be better off to the tune of about 10 million per year.

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63295 on: December 18, 2017, 09:51:57 PM »



And probably didn't. Any e mail address that ends in .gov has no guarantee of privacy, it says that in the small print. The biggest clue that Trump's briefs know Mueller's team have followed procedure is because they went whining to Trump news and Congress (Republicans). If they were serious they'd have gone to a judge and pressed an injunction. They haven't, and won't.  ;)


In other words you didnít read the article

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63296 on: December 18, 2017, 09:54:36 PM »

I was speaking in a general sense.  Not specifically about you.  Sure, you can't vote and I don't think you are that far gone save for your diatribes against guns.  You must admit though you are far more likely to support the Obamites and Clintonites than Republicans even those not affiliated with Trump.


And yes, I realize that I am as biased sometimes but I really don't want to be.  Some others revel in it.


So, if you answered 2+2= correctly on your math test as a kid and one of your friends didn't did you feel like you were being biased against them?  :)

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63297 on: December 18, 2017, 09:56:06 PM »

In other words you didnít read the article


Bingo! He'll only drink from his "trusted" sources. :D

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63298 on: December 18, 2017, 10:01:08 PM »

So, if you answered 2+2= correctly on your math test as a kid and one of your friends didn't did you feel like you were being biased against them?  :)


LOL. Absolutely not. They just were not very bright obviously. 

Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Reply #63299 on: December 18, 2017, 10:04:30 PM »



Hey bitch.. Shut up trying to understand something you have no clue about. Hows the tax 'deal' going to go for you, will you afford a new virtual train set? How are you on the Reps who said they'd vote against now voting for, because they found out that their multi millionaire real estates will be worth more with the new tax breaks you won't enjoy?  ;D Oh, and 'My rich friends don't like it' Trump is going to be better off to the tune of about 10 million per year.
Ideally the tax plans, if we couldn't just go for a national sales tax or flat tax, would eliminate state income tax and property tax deductions against Federal income tax entirely thereby forcing voters to rein in state budgets and reform state tax policies or, as we see already, people moving to places with more friendly taxation policies, people buying homes they can actually afford, and saving/investing instead of spending beyond means. Or, if the voters want it, keep their high tax and spend policies in some States and pay for them out of their pocket. The whole game that both Parties play with constituencies via the Tax Code is bad. And harder, politically, for Republicans because it is hard to cut taxes when rich people pay more.  And for Democrats hard because at some point you can't just keep giving a way stuff, as your favorite PM used to say, more eloquently.