Author Topic: Guns  (Read 127083 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1950 on: January 31, 2019, 09:16:47 PM »
Where'd you go after Bellgab went down and you got booted from Ellgab?

Your momís. She thinks youíre a piece of shit too.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1951 on: February 01, 2019, 11:35:31 AM »
Your

Why are you trying to kill this forum off?

Why do you try to set conservative against conservative?


Re: Guns
« Reply #1952 on: February 01, 2019, 07:32:55 PM »
Why are you trying to kill this forum off?

Why do you try to set conservative against conservative?


Iím not. You are with your boring neediness and walls of text.

I donít think RINOs and neocons are real conservatives. NEXT! ;D


Re: Guns
« Reply #1953 on: February 01, 2019, 07:36:53 PM »

Iím not.

Ya you are. ;D

But why?

Quote
You are with your boring neediness and walls of text.

Reading must be difficult for you. :'(

Quote
I donít think RINOs and neocons are real conservatives. NEXT! ;D

I don't see many RINOS or Neocons here - ymmv political purity test guy.


Re: Guns
« Reply #1954 on: February 01, 2019, 07:40:12 PM »
Ya you are. ;D

But why?

Reading must be difficult for you. :'(
 
I don't see many RINOS or Neocons here - ymmv political purity test guy.

No Iím not. You are.

Weíve been all through what walking contradictions Bush voters are in the Trump era. If you didnít get it then (and you didnít) youíre never going to so stop asking for clarification on that one, you moronic faggot.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1955 on: February 02, 2019, 03:32:33 PM »
Good on YOU! What caliber(s)were you shooting?
I think it was a mix, but might be better if I just list what guns were used. Seeing as it was probably the last taste of freedom for a long while, I went all out and tried everything they had:

-Makarov       
-Smith and Wesson .44 revolver
-Glock Submachine gun CAA Tactical
-AK47
-Winchester pump shotgun
-Mosin Nagant
-Sig Sauer M400
-Colt 1911
-Glock 17
-Heckler and Koch P30
-Glock 19 (silenced and with laser sight)
-.357 Ruger revolver
-Taurus s- blue .38 revolver
-SKS


Re: Guns
« Reply #1956 on: February 02, 2019, 04:12:50 PM »
I think it was a mix, but might be better if I just list what guns were used. Seeing as it was probably the last taste of freedom for a long while, I went all out and tried everything they had:

-Makarov       
-Smith and Wesson .44 revolver
-Glock Submachine gun CAA Tactical
-AK47
-Winchester pump shotgun
-Mosin Nagant
-Sig Sauer M400
-Colt 1911
-Glock 17
-Heckler and Koch P30
-Glock 19 (silenced and with laser sight)
-.357 Ruger revolver
-Taurus s- blue .38 revolver
-SKS

A nice selection! Pretty much covered all the bases in terms of types of firearms.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1957 on: February 02, 2019, 04:24:01 PM »
Pretty much covered all the bases in terms of types of firearms.

That was my intention. They had a .308 Remington sniper rifle listed too, but it wasn't available for unclear reasons - the guy didn't speak english so I couldn't find out.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1958 on: February 02, 2019, 04:31:51 PM »
That was my intention. They had a .308 Remington sniper rifle listed too, but it wasn't available for unclear reasons - the guy didn't speak english so I couldn't find out.
Strange. One thing you left off is something lever-action. I'm surprised they didn't at least have a lever-action .30-.30 there.  Sounds like a fun time!

Re: Guns
« Reply #1959 on: February 02, 2019, 05:21:36 PM »

-Makarov       
-AK47
-Mosin Nagant
-SKS


Nice selection of slavshit, needs moar Saiga 12 tho.


Re: Guns
« Reply #1960 on: February 07, 2019, 11:42:15 AM »
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-06/real-reason-4-cops-got-shot-houston-last-week


I didn't bother sourcing any of the links in this info. Is that even still a thing anymore? Whatevah.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1961 on: February 07, 2019, 04:14:36 PM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1962 on: February 07, 2019, 05:07:42 PM »

"How to turn a tank into confetti."  ;D

Re: Guns
« Reply #1963 on: February 07, 2019, 05:37:05 PM »



Early in the A-10 program, firing the GAU-8 expelled gun gases that would cause the aircraft's engines to flameout.  The video below shows the ejection of then Maj Rusty Gideon after one such incident.  I met Gideon years later when he was a GO in command of the USAF Safety Center.



Re: Guns
« Reply #1964 on: February 07, 2019, 05:46:23 PM »

Early in the A-10 program, firing the GAU-8 expelled gun gases that would cause the aircraft's engines to flameout.  The video below shows the ejection of then Maj Rusty Gideon after one such incident.  I met Gideon years later when he was a GO in command of the USAF Safety Center.

Wow.  That is an interesting problem that I bet few thought of during the various design phases.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1965 on: February 10, 2019, 08:18:24 PM »
https://www.statesman.com/news/20190209/doggett-optimistic-about-background-check-bill-for-gun-purchases 

Yeah, right, Commie. 

"ďNo one in this audience, none of these organizations, believe in gun grabbing, (or are) anti-Second Amendment,Ē Rhodes said to those in attendance before kicking off the panel. ďWe believe you have the right to own guns, but we do believe in common-sense regulation that can help save lives, like universal background checks.Ē"

Re: Guns
« Reply #1966 on: February 12, 2019, 05:28:42 PM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1967 on: February 13, 2019, 12:20:23 PM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1968 on: February 16, 2019, 02:30:31 PM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1969 on: February 16, 2019, 02:34:56 PM »

CALIFORNIA COURT RULES THAT BAN OF MAGAZINES OVER 10 ROUNDS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
« Reply #1970 on: March 30, 2019, 01:27:26 AM »
Anyone in California can now own standard capacity magazines and websites are taking orders!

Dianne Feinstein gettin' dabbed on!



https://therightscoop.com/california-gets-a-constitutional-slapdown-in-federal-court-over-10-round-magazine-ban/

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna989136

Re: Guns
« Reply #1971 on: March 31, 2019, 09:39:09 PM »
The NewYork Times amazed that size matters!  At least in aggregate and not in precision "button-pushing" or poaching.  The article shows you there are people making serious coin writing "academic" articles and studies, University of Chicago  no surprise,  on what is basic understanding, sometimes with tax-payer funded grants etc. And RAND involved also which cause me to guffaw.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/27/upshot/deadly-bullets-guns.html 


And then ends with the whole article, study, tax money, job ending idea undermines the studies and article, in a way at least, or minimizes the alarming claims: 

'Homicides in most major American cities peaked in the early 1990s, just before larger-caliber pistols became common. The homicide rate has fallen nearly by half since then. But the research about weapon caliber suggests it could have dropped by even more."

Re: Guns
« Reply #1972 on: March 31, 2019, 10:22:38 PM »
The NewYork Times amazed that size matters!  At least in aggregate and not in precision "button-pushing" or poaching.  The article shows you there are people making serious coin writing "academic" articles and studies, University of Chicago  no surprise,  on what is basic understanding, sometimes with tax-payer funded grants etc. And RAND involved also which cause me to guffaw.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/27/upshot/deadly-bullets-guns.html 


And then ends with the whole article, study, tax money, job ending idea undermines the studies and article, in a way at least, or minimizes the alarming claims: 

'Homicides in most major American cities peaked in the early 1990s, just before larger-caliber pistols became common. The homicide rate has fallen nearly by half since then. But the research about weapon caliber suggests it could have dropped by even more."

The homicide rate began to drop as more states changed laws to "will issue" concealed carry permits, which started in the early-to-mid 90s.  Also, most concealed carry permit holders tend to buy more expensive, higher caliber handguns, so at least that part of the article rings true.

Buy them (((legally))) while you can Cali-bros!
« Reply #1973 on: April 04, 2019, 10:02:40 PM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1974 on: April 05, 2019, 09:50:59 AM »

Re: Guns
« Reply #1975 on: April 29, 2019, 09:34:32 AM »
I have a solution to the problem. Lay down our arms and everyone learn Jiu Jitsu. Itís easier to pull a trigger than Roll with someone on the mats.

Re: Guns
« Reply #1976 on: April 29, 2019, 04:39:32 PM »
I have a solution to the problem. Lay down our arms and everyone learn Jiu Jitsu. Itís easier to pull a trigger than Roll with someone on the mats.

Or stab them in the face with a soldering iron


1000s Guns Seized
« Reply #1977 on: May 09, 2019, 06:46:36 PM »
I'm not sure why having such a large collection is illegal or the legal method the police could gain a warrant and seize private property on a random anonymous caller but it is California so....
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/us/massive-seizure-of-guns-la-trnd/index.html 


Now cue various conspiracy theories, I saw some reference in the news to the mansion being connected to J.Paul Getty's son, Jay-Z, etc? But maybe I misheard.  Reminds me of the even weirder one that never was properly followed-up on due to the mysterious death of suspect. That also involved some kind of underwater car.  Frankly if I'm a billionaire/millionaire I would buy cool stuff like lots of guns, underwater cars, and what-not. This is America, Dammit! Why is that illegal? A prominent Texas attorney bought an old tank for his ranch and had it parked in River Oaks for weeks even! Fuck yeah!

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/us/massive-seizure-of-guns-la-trnd/index.html


Re: 1000s Guns Seized
« Reply #1978 on: May 09, 2019, 06:51:59 PM »
I'm not sure why having such a large collection is illegal or the legal method the police could gain a warrant and seize private property on a random anonymous caller but it is California so....
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/us/massive-seizure-of-guns-la-trnd/index.html 


Now cue various conspiracy theories, I saw some reference in the news to the mansion being connected to J.Paul Getty's son, Jay-Z, etc? But maybe I misheard.  Reminds me of the even weirder one that never was properly followed-up on due to the mysterious death of suspect. That also involved some kind of underwater car.  Frankly if I'm a billionaire/millionaire I would buy cool stuff like lots of guns, underwater cars, and what-not. This is America, Dammit! Why is that illegal? A prominent Texas attorney bought an old tank for his ranch and had it parked in River Oaks for weeks even! Fuck yeah!

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/us/massive-seizure-of-guns-la-trnd/index.html

I was wondering why it was illegal as well. But some of the AR15's in the pictures looked like they were not compliant with state law. There were also some Thompson submachine guns but they may have been modern semi auto reproductions and not a real full auto. If there are full auto's the guy is completely fucked.

Re: 1000s Guns Seized
« Reply #1979 on: May 09, 2019, 06:57:56 PM »
I was wondering why it was illegal as well. But some of the AR15's in the pictures looked like they were not compliant with state law. There were also some Thompson submachine guns but they may have been modern semi auto reproductions and not a real full auto. If there are full auto's the guy is completely fucked.
Aren't some of those grandfathered via "curio" laws? Or maybe he held Class III but I guess not considering the raid. Still one anonymous caller results in this kind of raid? Highly suspect, if true. It could be the call lead to deeper investigation and surveillance that THEN resulted in a warrant a raid/seizure. Though I still have some problems with an anonymous caller starting the process, if that is indeed what happened. Also, isn't there some kind of "ex post facto" protection via Article 1, Section 9 Constitutionally if some of his collection was deemed illegal after his initial possession/purchase?