Author Topic: Frazzledrip  (Read 459 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Frazzledrip
« on: April 18, 2018, 10:03:50 AM »
This is my new safe word.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2018, 10:09:20 AM »
I'm pretty sure penicillin will help that. 

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2018, 10:27:55 AM »
I'm not clear if you're clear on what a safe word is for, or if I've just been doing things wrong for a long, long, long time.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2018, 10:30:09 AM »
Your safe word is touching my special area. That's not right!  :-\

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2018, 11:42:34 AM »
This dropped a day ago:




Obvious psyop is obvious.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2018, 12:08:44 PM »
This dropped a day ago:




Obvious psyop is obvious.

Porn sites have already banned videos where celebrities are digitally manipulated like this to be in prono vids.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2018, 12:13:37 PM »
Porn sites have already banned videos where celebrities are digitally manipulated like this to be in prono vids.

Who are they to tell me which virtual celebrities I can and can't fap to?!

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2018, 12:47:06 PM »
This dropped a day ago:




Obvious psyop is obvious.
About 3 years ago some of my local AM radio guys were talking about a new software (I think Adobe) in the office and how great it was. "Makes things so much easier" because "if they mess up doing a promo ad the software can correct it by using their own voices." They said that Adobe, I think it was, put a digital marker though so that by digital analysis you "could tell" that the person really wasn't speaking but the software used the voice-print analysis to insert the proper work. I'm sure the tech is much more advanced by now and that someone could 'work around' the voice-stamp thing.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2018, 01:48:07 PM »
You can do it with video now if there are a lot of available pictures of the subject.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2018, 01:54:25 PM »
You can do it with video now if there are a lot of available pictures of the subject.

It's funny that this comes out now that they're talking about releasing a disturbing Hillary video. ::)

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2018, 02:04:11 PM »
It's funny that this comes out now that they're talking about releasing a disturbing Hillary video. ::)
What could they release on a Hillary video that would be disturbing? At this point, there’s no disturbing left.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2018, 02:06:07 PM »
What could they release on a Hillary video that would be disturbing? At this point, there’s no disturbing left.

Yes there is...if what they're saying is on it actually is.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 08:03:05 AM »
What could they release on a Hillary video that would be disturbing?


Multiple sources claim:

Quote
It started out with Hillary and Huma laying on opposite sides of a ping pong table. Hillary was wearing silver spandex pants. The girl was brought in, she was tortured, and then they "unmasked" the girl by cutting her facial skin off. The eyes stayed in place, without eyelids (which went with the facial skin). They then wore the girl's face over their own faces and had her watch them do it, to cause her to totally freak out. They then killed her and drank her blood.



Just think of it: silver spandex pants. How can one's imagination not reel in horror?

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2018, 08:07:00 AM »

Multiple sources claim:



Just think of it: silver spandex pants. How can one's imagination not reel in horror?

You had me in horror at “Hilary”

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 11:29:10 AM »
Just think of it: silver spandex pants. How can one's imagination not reel in horror?
Meh. No pants would be disturbing.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2018, 11:34:36 AM »
Silver skin
massive dirigible
full of hot air

I present to you the Hildeberg.

“Oh the humanity!”


Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2018, 12:58:27 PM »
Quote
They then wore the girl's face over their own faces and had her watch them do it, to cause her to totally freak out.

Is this how desperate and delusional you all have become?

Mother fuckers need Jesus.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2018, 01:07:32 PM »
Is this how desperate and delusional you all have become?

Mother fuckers need Jesus.

Delusional? You believe CNN and NBC are telling you the truth and are probably an atheist and most likely a communist.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2018, 01:14:14 PM »
Is this how desperate and delusional you all have become?

Mother fuckers need Jesus.

Hillary and Huma are the ones that cut a underage girls face off killed her and drank her blood in a adrenochrome harvesting ritual at Comet Ping Pong not us.




Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2018, 01:21:16 PM »
Delusional? You believe CNN and NBC are telling you the truth and are probably an atheist and most likely a communist.

You've lost touch with reality.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2018, 01:27:25 PM »
You've lost touch with reality.

And you've never been in touch with it. :D

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2018, 05:04:35 PM »
You've lost touch with reality.

Who killed Kennedy?

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2018, 06:52:40 AM »
Who killed Kennedy?

The little girl?  Is that why they ate her face, or whatever?

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2018, 10:08:59 AM »

Multiple sources claim:

Who are these sources? Are you sure they weren't watching The Office when they came up with that scenario?

The similarities are too close to be mere coincidence:



Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2018, 11:23:07 AM »
Who are these sources?

Look, read--I'm hearing things.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2018, 12:55:13 PM »
Quote from: JS
FRAZZLE DRIP HOAXES ABOUND. HERE IS WHAT THE REAL ONE IS LIKE IF YOU FIND IT.
There are hoax reports out there claiming to be of the video and they portray it as an expensive ball room type scenario where everyone looks ultra sophisticated with the classic old ball room masks. HERE IS WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE.
It is in a shitty dungeon with a ping pong table. Hillary and Huma are dressed like crap. They did not dress up for this. Hillary is wearing silver spandex leggings and an ordinary shirt, Huma is wearing black leggings and an ordinary top, and the video is clear enough to see what is going on but the camera is struggling for light enough so that it can't get the white balance correct and has noise reduction artefacting smearing fine detail. The video is clear enough to definitely know what is happening, it is a lot better than a "blurry UFO video", but it is not pretty.

The stupid fake "screen captures" of the video showing victorian style face masks at a nicely lit ball are all hoaxes, the real video is freakishly gruesome dark dungeon "you would never want to be there" type video. Keep in mind with this that there are going to be a pile of hoaxes surrounding this, staged by people who want a coverup. Some are so ridiculous they will make people think "gee, it was all a hoax", but no, if you did not see Hillary in silver spandex on a ping pong table, you did not see the actual video, and now that I have made this clear, I am waiting for a hoax based on that!.

The demons never give up. The lawsuit is again, for conspiring with Russia and Wikileaks to hack the DNC, and is worded with classic mind control intent, with "establishing facts" like this:
"The Trump advisers and associates have denied assisting Russia in its hacking campaign."
What is wrong with that statement? Because it establishes, as fact, that Russia had a hacking campaign when there has never been evidence there was one in this context at all. That is how mind control works - by wording things this way, people automatically accept there indeed was a "Russian hacking campaign," and now all we have to do is get to the bottom of it. That's a very useful tactic for weaving deceptive scenarios.

BUT THERE WAS A "Russian hacking campaign" for real, HILLARY'S MAIL BOX, where she transferred countless American secrets to Russia, and has not yet had to answer for JACK. AND IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY, IT IS CALLED PEDOVORE AND FRAZZLEDRIP.


Obvious limited hangout is obvious.

Re: Frazzledrip
« Reply #26 on: April 24, 2018, 12:01:04 AM »
The little girl?  Is that why they ate her face, or whatever?

Can't even get the facts straight. ::)