Author London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7  (Read 636 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« on: October 07, 2017, 09:44:19 AM »
London police say one man arrested after running over multiple pedestrians with a car. Lone wolf, Iím sure.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2017, 09:49:58 AM »
London police say one man arrested after running over multiple pedestrians with a car. Lone wolf, Iím sure.

Are you implying this was done by the Religion of Peace?

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2017, 09:53:29 AM »
It was probably just a man driving a Prius while having a heart attack.


Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2017, 10:17:50 AM »
Haven't they banned cars, yet?  No one has the right to move around.  Everybody should just stay home and post on BellGab.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2017, 01:22:10 PM »
Haven't they banned cars, yet?  No one has the right to move around.  Everybody should just stay home and post on BellGab.
                                                   ^^^

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2017, 01:25:01 PM »
It happened on a semi pedestrianised street that runs from a trainstation past a number of major museums up to Hyde Park and Royal Albert Hall. I don't recall there being any bollards etc where it occurred though (was last there in December), but they might have been added as a result of all the other attacks.

The TFL site says the station is still partially closed.
At least we know it doesn't involve Pud.  He knows his priorities.


Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2017, 01:50:54 PM »
Some reports say itís a cab driver.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2017, 02:49:19 PM »
Now it is said  the driver, who appears to be black, was an uber driver in a Prius minicab- not one of the cool diesel old legit black cabs- and was "shouting" as passersby tackled him and held him for the police. London's Islamic mayor, who once called moderate Muslims "Uncle Toms," has said "it is not terrorism" but a "road traffic collision'.  :o

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2017, 06:24:48 PM »
Now it is said  the driver, who appears to be black, was an uber driver in a Prius minicab- not one of the cool diesel old legit black cabs- and was "shouting" as passersby tackled him and held him for the police. London's Islamic mayor, who once called moderate Muslims "Uncle Toms," has said "it is not terrorism" but a "road traffic collision':o

Seems you've deduced important clues from your internet vantage point, thousands of miles away, that others on the actual scene haven't. Why tease bellgab with nebulous narratives, instead of informing Scotland Yard with your brilliant deductions, Sherlock?

Are you shocked it's not being immediately called a terror attack? Or that your implied narrative doesn't fit with their narrative? :o :o :o
<Triple Shocked someone with such important information won't inform the police>

If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. Maybe it's fear of snitches geting stitches? Yeah yeah thatz it!

Dude, it could be the second coming of Fuhrer Islama Bien-isis of a terror attack, on the other hand maybe not. Why even bother typing such nebulousness, unless you enjoy blowing dog whistles, or virtue signaling? If you've got something to say, say it. If you know something that others don't, please call the police A.S.A.P.

You seem reluctant to disclose Information, you just tease bellgab with your profound knowledge of world events. Peoples lives could depend upon your valuable information. Please share it with us, or the proper authorities.



           ^^^ Seems legit ^^^

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2017, 06:39:51 PM »
Seems you've deduced important clues from your internet vantage point, thousands of miles away, that others on the actual scene haven't. Why tease bellgab with nebulous narratives, instead of informing Scotland Yard with your brilliant deductions, Sherlock?

Are you shocked it's not being immediately called a terror attack? Or that your implied narrative doesn't fit with their narrative? :o :o :o
<Triple Shocked someone with such important information won't inform the police>

If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. Maybe it's fear of snitches geting stitches? Yeah yeah thatz it!

Dude, it could be the second coming of Fuhrer Islama Bien-isis of a terror attack, on the other hand maybe not. Why even bother typing such nebulousness, unless you enjoy blowing dog whistles, or virtue signaling? If you've got something to say, say it. If you know something that others don't, please call the police A.S.A.P.

You seem reluctant to disclose Information, you just tease bellgab with your profound knowledge of world events. Peoples lives could depend upon your valuable information. Please share it with us, or the proper authorities.



           ^^^ Seems legit ^^^
Sounds like......you.......nai...le....d.........it?

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2017, 06:40:36 PM »
Peoples lives could depend upon your valuable information. Please share it with us, or the proper authorities.





#1) ... who the fuck are they?

#2) You forgot an apostrophe. Gas yourself.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2017, 07:11:38 PM »
Seems you've deduced important clues from your internet vantage point, thousands of miles away, that others on the actual scene haven't. Why tease bellgab with nebulous narratives, instead of informing Scotland Yard with your brilliant deductions, Sherlock?

Are you shocked it's not being immediately called a terror attack? Or that your implied narrative doesn't fit with their narrative? :o :o :o
<Triple Shocked someone with such important information won't inform the police>

If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. Maybe it's fear of snitches geting stitches? Yeah yeah thatz it!

Dude, it could be the second coming of Fuhrer Islama Bien-isis of a terror attack, on the other hand maybe not. Why even bother typing such nebulousness, unless you enjoy blowing dog whistles, or virtue signaling? If you've got something to say, say it. If you know something that others don't, please call the police A.S.A.P.

You seem reluctant to disclose Information, you just tease bellgab with your profound knowledge of world events. Peoples lives could depend upon your valuable information. Please share it with us, or the proper authorities.

In other words:



How original.  ::)

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2017, 08:17:03 PM »
Seems you've deduced important clues from your internet vantage point, thousands of miles away, that others on the actual scene haven't. Why tease bellgab with nebulous narratives, instead of informing Scotland Yard with your brilliant deductions, Sherlock?

Are you shocked it's not being immediately called a terror attack? Or that your implied narrative doesn't fit with their narrative? :o :o :o
<Triple Shocked someone with such important information won't inform the police>

If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem...

Because we have a bunch of complete assholes - who call themselves Liberals, Democrats, and ''Progressives'' - running around who will say or do anything to pretend Islam isn't a problem in general, and isn't behind any given recent attack - when they either don't know, or know that it is. 

Too often media doesn't print the name, media doesn't publish the photo, media witholds certain information such as the person screaming ''allah akbar'' during their crime.  People like Obama have provided fake explanations for Islamic terror, such as telling us it was just ''workplace violence'', a ''man made trajedy'', or a routine crime.  The European authorities are especially cowardly regarding their denials of what's clearly going on.

So it can't be both ways - the fact that certain events were driven by Islamic furor can't be continually covered up and denied on the one hand, then the people covering them up getting to act all surprised and offended when that's the speculation on new events when pertinent details aren't forthcoming.  It's disengenuous to act as if it's improper, if not foolish, to speculate.  Sorry, there is no reason to believe the London Mayor, a proven terrorist sympathizer, when the first thing out of his mouth is that it's just a ''traffic accident''.  Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but hearing that it isn't from a dishonest person siding with those who would do so is meaningless.


As far as being part of the solution or part of the probelm, which category would you say people who lie about Islamic terror and cover it up fall into, Sherlock?

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2017, 08:29:37 PM »
The reason for the proliferation of YouTube investigators is that most have lost faith in the system in all of it's corrupt aspects. They see that their "trusted" media sources, their government and the intelligence services who are supposed to investigate are all lying to and manipulating them and have turned into nothing but propaganda factories. So, some say Fuck it! I'm going to investigate it myself. Now there are a community of citizen journalists and investigators that people trust more because they actually trust that their motives are pure and they haven't been paid to have an opinion. If that's something you can't understand or have a problem with then, as others have suggested, maybe gas yourself. You're useless anyway.  ;)

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2017, 08:37:25 PM »
Oh but wait, Fake Media have served up some fake polls on their trustworthyness and soaring approval ratings.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2017, 01:24:57 AM »
It was another false flag.  Show me one legitimate victim.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2017, 01:32:22 AM »
It was another false flag.  Show me one legitimate victim.

Well, you're obviously a victim of the modern education system.  ;)

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #17 on: October 08, 2017, 05:21:58 AM »
Itís not terrorism, but the driver is still detained and assisting the police in their investigation.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #18 on: October 09, 2017, 02:26:51 PM »
Well, you're obviously a victim of the modern education system.  ;)
The thread has gone quiet pretty fast.  Shouldn't we still be upset by this act of terrorism committed by another adherent to the religion of peace?

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #19 on: October 09, 2017, 02:36:47 PM »
The thread has gone quiet pretty fast.  Shouldn't we still be upset by this act of terrorism committed by another adherent to the religion of peace?

Probably.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2017, 04:04:02 PM »
Nothing to see here, please be on your way. The latest claim is that it was some kind of accident. Despite witnesses saying he was laughing, despite the potential racial angle, despite the numbers of people hit, and despite the recent history of attacks using vehicles. They won't even identify the person or give any updates except they have let him go and are "investigating."


"Metropolitan Police detective Darren Case said the collision raised fears because of where It occurred and because of the number of pedestrians involved. "I fully appreciate the concern and alarm this incident caused," he said.  He said none of the head and leg injuries turned out to be serious and that most of the nine people who had been hospitalized have been discharged."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/uk-police-release-driver-detained-london-crash-104519149.html

The original articles have not been sanitized for the narrative of "simple car accident." Note witness saying he was laughing, people tackling and holding the guy, and also the funny part of the American (have to love us American tourists) who was in a KFC before the episode.
http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/car-hits-people-at-londons-natural-history-museum/news-story/12e6e8fb7ce04d5164d611c24ccb8402

Re: London pedestrians struck Gourmet Narratives to Soothe the Soul
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2017, 05:01:12 PM »
Gourmet Narratives to Soothe the Soul

Whatever happened in London could be a terror attack, or not. If the act was deliberate or accidental, I'm sure it terrorized all the people who were there, not to mention the ones harmed or killed. Much like the deliberate actions perpetrated recently in Las Vegas which terrorized over 20,000 people. Were these actions a Muslim terrorist attack, or organized Muslim terrorist attacks? I don't know, not enough information. Do you know, or does anyone else on bellgab know? Maybe it's simple navel gazing, through our personal biases? ...

I haven't any special love or hate for Muslims, Christians, Jews, or most organized religions. Abrahamic religions have used/use their belief systems to commit heinous acts upon each other and the world for around 2 millennia. Orders bequeathed from upon high. Using God as a shield of righteousness, that protects their mortal souls & conscience from the abominations they've foisted upon Humankind during their brief existence in history. The same religions also unified large groups of people focusing there energies, which helped transform western civilization into what it is today.   

Does that mean all religions are bad, or good? Like most things in life it's not a simple yes or no answer. Most people realize some things in life can't be reduced down into simple narratives. Which one oscillates between as it comforts or offendeds personal expedience. Then using said narratives as a means to cubby hole ideas, facts, and beliefs into some over simplified bifurcated "logic" consisting of black/white, good/bad, right/wrong, us/them. There is much middle ground between these polarized conclusions. Which is where most things tend fall on the spectrum of life. Sometimes things in life don't have a single simple answer, or even have a correct answer. No matter how hard we try to force order into the chaos. Such a notion can be discomforting, or down right scary to some. Which is why they find comfort in answers, any answers. Even incorrect answers are more comforting than no answers at all. 

Life can be brutal and scary at times, and always has been. When our first world existence is slapped in the face with that brutality, it's shocking to our nerfed collective psyche. Which sends all of us reeling grasping for answers, any answers. Seeking comfort, attempting to create order from chaos.

Being attacked from outsiders or "others" is always more comforting than being attacked from within. We are wired to suspect the the former over the latter scenario. Biological imperatives forged eons ago demands we protect the tribe. However, it was much simpler to define who was us and who was them long ago, when tribal sizes were counted in the tens or hundreds.

Being attacked from within is always a far more repugnant notion to consider. Such a notion could lead to thoughts of rot from within the society in which we've forged our identity. Casting doubt not only on our society, but within ourselves. Expedients demands we make a monster out of these rouge elements living among us. Lines get rapidly drawn, defining us from them. This act of segregation is another form of the outsiders or others narrative, which is more comforting to a societies tribal consensus.

Those lines can be any combination of things gender, religion, politics, social status, financial status, race, mental health, to name a few. Once all these lines are drawn, what can we make of such a profile, and how accurate can our conclusions be about that persons real motives? People can create a deceptive narrative for investigations to follow. People lie and deceive each other about their true motives all the time, even in death. How often are these deceptions caught or missed? How often does a profiles conclusions align with someones real underlying motives, once they break from social norms in a blaze of glory? How often is a profile right or wrong? How do you determine if a profile is more or less right or wrong, with only part of the equation? None of these questions can be answered with any high degree of certitude. You have to determine just how much faith and belief you give these methods. Which team, ideology, religion, does any berserker truly belong? Something larger than themselves, a party of one, both, or none?

Demonization or monster narratives as a whole helps to dehumanize the rouge berserkers. Making it easier for society to segregate out those who would dare slaughter their own, after the fact. Which in turn absolves society as a whole. Leading to a collective sigh of relief, and very little introspection. Case closed.

We are all ultimately responsible for our own actions in life. However what roll does society play in creating these monsters as they gestate, if any? They aren't created in a vacuum.

This isn't even scratching the surface, but the bullet points will have to suffice. We all can't hit it out of the park in 140 charters or less with original copy & paste content like our resident Dr..

Re: London pedestrians struck Gourmet Narratives to Soothe the Soul
« Reply #22 on: October 09, 2017, 05:07:18 PM »
Gourmet Narratives to Soothe the Soul

Whatever happened in London could be a terror attack, or not. If the act was deliberate or accidental, I'm sure it terrorized all the people who were there, not to mention the ones harmed or killed. Much like the deliberate actions perpetrated recently in Las Vegas which terrorized over 20,000 people. Were these actions a Muslim terrorist attack, or organized Muslim terrorist attacks? I don't know, not enough information. Do you know, or does anyone else on bellgab know? Maybe it's simple navel gazing, through our personal biases? ...

I haven't any special love or hate for Muslims, Christians, Jews, or most organized religions. Abrahamic religions have used/use their belief systems to commit heinous acts upon each other and the world for around 2 millennia. Orders bequeathed from upon high. Using God as a shield of righteousness, that protects their mortal souls & conscience from the abominations they've foisted upon Humankind during their brief existence in history. The same religions also unified large groups of people focusing there energies, which helped transform western civilization into what it is today.   

Does that mean all religions are bad, or good? Like most things in life it's not a simple yes or no answer. Most people realize some things in life can't be reduced down into simple narratives. Which one oscillates between as it comforts or offendeds personal expedience. Then using said narratives as a means to cubby hole ideas, facts, and beliefs into some over simplified bifurcated "logic" consisting of black/white, good/bad, right/wrong, us/them. There is much middle ground between these polarized conclusions. Which is where most things tend fall on the spectrum of life. Sometimes things in life don't have a single simple answer, or even have a correct answer. No matter how hard we try to force order into the chaos. Such a notion can be discomforting, or down right scary to some. Which is why they find comfort in answers, any answers. Even incorrect answers are more comforting than no answers at all. 

Life can be brutal and scary at times, and always has been. When our first world existence is slapped in the face with that brutality, it's shocking to our nerfed collective psyche. Which sends all of us reeling grasping for answers, any answers. Seeking comfort, attempting to create order from chaos.

Being attacked from outsiders or "others" is always more comforting than being attacked from within. We are wired to suspect the the former over the latter scenario. Biological imperatives forged eons ago demands we protect the tribe. However, it was much simpler to define who was us and who was them long ago, when tribal sizes were counted in the tens or hundreds.

Being attacked from within is always a far more repugnant notion to consider. Such a notion could lead to thoughts of rot from within the society in which we've forged our identity. Casting doubt not only on our society, but within ourselves. Expedients demands we make a monster out of these rouge elements living among us. Lines get rapidly drawn, defining us from them. Developing the outsiders or others narrative, which is more comforting to societies tribal consensus.

Those lines can be any combination of things gender, religion, politics, social status, financial status, race, mental health, to name a few. Once all these lines are drawn, what can we make of such a profile, and how accurate can our conclusions be about that persons real motives? People can create a deceptive narrative for investigations to follow. People lie and deceive each other about their true motives all the time, even in death. How often are these deceptions caught or missed? How often does a profiles conclusions align with someones real underlying motives, once they break from social norms in a blaze of glory? How often is a profile right or wrong? How do you determine if a profile is more or less right or wrong, with only part of the equation? None of these questions can be answered with any high degree of certitude. You have to determine just how much faith and belief you give these methods. Which team, ideology, religion, does any berserker truly belong? Something larger than themselves, a party of one, both, or none?

Demonization or monster narratives as a whole helps to dehumanize the rouge berserkers. Making it easier for society to segregate out those who would dare slaughter their own, after the fact. Which in turn absolves society as a whole. Leading to a collective sigh of relief, and very little introspection. Case closed.

We are all ultimately responsible for our own actions in life. However what roll does society play in creating these monsters as they gestate, if any? They aren't created in a vacuum.

This isn't even scratching the surface, but the bullet points will have to suffice. We all can't hit it out of the park in 140 charters or less with original copy & paste content like our resident Dr..

TL;DR

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2017, 05:27:15 PM »

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2017, 05:30:03 PM »
TL;DR

Why not? You've plenty of time to shit post here 24/7.

Sorry. They can't all be 30 minute videos of Alex Jones frothing at the mouth.
You've got that one covered though.

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #25 on: October 09, 2017, 05:33:45 PM »
Why not? You've plenty of time to shit post here 24/7.

Sorry. They can't all be 30 minute videos of Alex Jones frothing at the mouth.
You've got that one covered though.

It's a quality vs quantity thing that you're probably incapable of understanding. Now, don't you have to get to your weekly Antifa meeting?

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #26 on: October 09, 2017, 05:34:00 PM »
Why not? You've plenty of time to shit post here 24/7.

Sorry. They can't all be 30 minute videos of Alex Jones frothing at the mouth.
You've got that one covered though.

Chicks; writing great walls of text about who the fuck cares, AGAIN! :)

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2017, 05:38:38 PM »
This guys on the run now... machete attack. Might not have been an accident.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4647357/hunt-for-knifeman-after-man-slashed-in-the-face-in-horror-attack-in-london/

Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2017, 05:42:36 PM »
The thread has gone quiet pretty fast.  Shouldn't we still be upset by this act of terrorism committed by another adherent to the religion of peace?

How can I ghoulishly get off as I protest loudly my faux indignation, if there is no there, there?


Re: London pedestrians struck 2017 Oct 7
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2017, 05:48:54 PM »
Hey, I'm once again: back. I don't suppose you fell for that little thing about the refresh button. After all, you're a responsible, intelligent person who apparently has a lot of time on your hands. Well, you can't possibly have more time than I do. I mean, after all, I made this site. You're only browsing it. into to word problem. To prevent this, I did nothing. So, it is now up to you, the imaginary reader, to decide whether I mean probley or problem...it's almost like a game! But without the bad sound track. And I promise not to force you to live when you would rather die. Moving on, I have nothing else to say, but don't feel like quitting just yet. I'm like the little engine that could. Or maybe the Energizer Bunny. I just keep going, and going and going. Or I could be like that annoying guy on T.V. who keeps asking if you can hear him. If my site manages to last a decade, my readers *snicker* will probley wonder what I'm talking about. My answer is simple. It doesn't matter. I'm just rambling. Which means that it doesn't matter if you understand anything I say. Doesn't that make you feel better? I bet it does. Wow. Look how long this has gotten. I even impress myself. Who would have thought I have this much free time? And I congratulate any reader who has gotten this far. Ooooooo! You must check out the fortunes section of the random stuff page! I've just gotten an idea for some more, original, fortunes...I gotta go!(may the moose be with you) And now I am back. I swear. If iI fill out the fake tab form I'm gonna have to put back as my favorite word...I already have filled it out, though. Would it be cheating to fill it out again? Only if I had multiple personalities.  A lot has happened. Like my EVIL school computer deleting my updates page. But it's all good. Especially since I just saw The Matrix: Reloaded. The following text may spoil the movie for you, so WARNING: do no read this unless you have already seen the movie. Okay. What I liked best was the philosophy on choices. (the mindless fight scenes were really cool, too). It's like this. In the beginning of the movie, Neo is having dreams about Trinity's death. Later, The Oracle tells him that he has already decided her fate. Towards the end of the movie, Neo chooses to tell Trinity to stay out of the Matrix, since he saw her die in it. She agrees, but only after seeing how important it is to him. After a horrific chain of events (is it coincidence, or fate) the people who will deactivate the secondary power source of the building Neo is infiltrating, die. So...the plan is going to fail. Unless someone does something, Neo, Morpheus and many others will die. Trinity, who is of course outside of the Matrix, knows this and chooses to enter the Matrix to save the day. The events of Neo's dream unfold. So...when the oracle said that the choice had already been made, she was completely correct. The moment Neo woke from dreams of Trinity's death, he made a choice. He would do everything in his power to keep his dream from becoming reality. So he kept her out of the Matrix, and she saw the problem, and entered the Matrix to fix it. If she had been in the Matrix, she would have likely been with Morpheus, never would have known about the plan's failure, would therefore not have been in the situation that resulted in her death. And the plan would have failed and Neo might have died, along with a large portion of the city (the building was set to blow if there was any intruders) So...Neo's choice to attempt to save Trinity triggered the sequence of events that led to her death. As Neo realizes all of this, through a nearly omniscient Architect of the Matrix, he makes another choice. This choice is simply an extension of his original choice: he will save Trinity at all costs. Neo is told that he has two choices. He can save mankind, and doom Trinity. Or he can try to save Trinity and doom mankind. No guarantee that he'll succeed in saving Trinity. He goes for Trinity, makes it just in time to catch her body, and starts her heart back up. In return for not taking the easy route, he gains a power in the more or less real world. He can deactivate the machines, (squidies) but at great personal cost. The movie ends with him in a coma. Now, you must realize that I have described only one aspect of this movie of all movies. There are not enough words in the English language to describe the sheer coolness of the fight choreography, special effects and the plot. I highly recommend you see the movie yourself. I'm sorry that today's rant isn't random, insane or completely chaotic, but I must right my experience with The Matrix before I forget. I am so buying this movie when it comes out on DVD. I love it! You have to admit its sheer coolness. I mean, come on! It's the sequel to the movie that revolutionized the standard by which we judge special effects. I better stop typing before I have a heart attack...just remember...The Matrix has you...I'm back. And throughly pissed off at my school system in general. You see...they feel that the only way to reward academic achievement...yada-yada-yada...is to force the smart kids to be ushers for Senior Honor Nite, and Graduation. Where is the logic in this? I for one, didn't know about such dire consequences for not deliberatly failing classes. It was bad enough that I was forced to "volunteer" my precious time (i could have worked on this site)...no...I was forced to wear formal attire. My school system is stuck in the past...and formal attire means...a dress...a white dress...(for those you who never bothered to find out...I am indeed female). So...for the first time in about 5 years...I wore a dress...and something that was complelty white. What cruel fate is this? To compound the EVIL situation...I was forced to wear feminine shoes. In other words...they hurt. And they pushed my toes together. Since I have a rather weird phobia of touching my own skin...this made my evening my own personall torture session. I think that such gender-specific torture should be deemed inhumane and abolished from our great society...of flaming chickens. Henceforth...Code: 666 of the Flaming Chickens Handbook states that under no circumstance will the Patron Saint of Paper Clips (guess who) be forced to wear anything other than a t-shirt and preferably black jeans. Should you violate this right, you will become destroyed or possibly dizzy. I'm leaving now...I have some destruction to do. i'm back. from graduation. we had to get there one hour and fifteen minutes early because there was traffic. After standing around a lot...the ceremony started. Lots of people spoke. by the time I had to do my part (tell people where to stand before getting their diploma) it was dark. there were bugs. they liked landing on me. then...i got to go stand while people said a lot of stuff. i couldn't hear it because someone had put the speakers facing the audience. we clapped. the whole time, even during the name-calling, seniors were playing with silly string and beachballs. afterwards...they turned off the lights. there were lots of fireworks. i wandered around for 20 minutes looking for a cell phone. i called home, and waited another hour for my ride...traffic to the school was one way. i felt sorry for my dad. i am tired...but cannot go to sleep. i'll copy and paste this to my site. maybe the longest text ever. you will all suffer as i have suffered when and if you graduate. i cannot feel my feet. i hate dress shoes. I'm back. Today, I'm here to salute the Pointless Signs Of America! The PSOA have been whole-heartedly working for you, and what have you done for them? NOTHING! These so-called "pointless" signs are doing just what they were meant to do: entertain you! You cannot judge them simply because they have no apparant function. They expand your mind, making you think about all the things they could do. They could do anything they wanted to, if they just put their minds to it. If you judged everything by what it doesn't acomplish, then the entire world is populated by pointless beings. Noone can do everything, so how can you expect a SIGN, with the I.Q. of toilet paper, to do everything. You people sicken me. You expect far to much of the inanimate world. The inanimate world, on the otherhand, expects nothing of you. Which is exactly what it gets. If you expect nothing, and get nothing, you feel nothing. If you expect nothing and get something, you're happy. But, if you expect something and get something you feel nothing. And if you expect something and get nothing, you feel cheated. If you're following along, and not completly confused, you'll realize that it is better to be a pessimist than an optomist. Yep that's right. This entry went from saluting the PSOA to making a statement about my ideals. This has been a weird day. You can thank my associate "Meg" she came up with the PSOA acronym. Everyone, clap for "Meg".I gotta go...seeya later! I'm finnaly back! Today, I took a long look at this site, which is the acomplishment of almost a year of work. And I asked myself "How could I have better spent my time?" And so, in the interest of wasting even more time, I made a list. Here we go! Number One: I could have cured cancer. Not that I know anything about medicine...or cancer for that matter. But I'm sure that if I just would have put my mind to it, I could have done it. Number Two: I could helped the earth to find eternal and lasting peace. Which would be boring. So I at least have an excuse for not doing that. Number Three: I could have studied and stuff. Uh...don't think so...Number Four: I could have learned to drive. This would have resulted in the deaths of numerous pedistrians...and I would still probably be wondering around in search of a McDonalds. Number Five: I could have read more books, played more video games and watched more mindless television. Gee...I wish I'd thought of that sooner. Number Six: I could have implemented one of several plans for world domination. Or, as an alternative, I could have ruined several plans for world domination that other people made. Number Seven: I could drive people crazy. Wait...aren't I already doing that? Scratch number seven. And on to: Number Eight: I could have...uhhhh...ummmmm...actually thought up these things before hand. Number Nine: Now it's just getting redundant, isn't it? Number Ten: This is the list that never ends. Yes, it goes on and on my friend. One person, started typing it not knowing what it was, and they'll continue typing it forever just because this is the list that never ends, yes it goes on and on my friends, some person started typing it not...etc, etc. Okay...I admit it. I have officialy run out of ways I could have better spent my time. I don't think there actually are any. Except for maybe five and six. Now, those have possibilities. However, I am currently content to just sit here and type. For the benefit of you, the reader...who may or may not exist. Either way, I'm continuing to sort of entertain myself. I feel like I should be outraged about some topic or another. I just can't work up the energy to be outraged. Perhaps a nice, soothing mistrust. Yeah. I can work with mistrust. I definitly mistrust lots of stuff. Like organ grinders, and the evil conspiracies. Did you know, that Kodak was part of the conspiracy to assasinate John F. Kennedy. Now, some of you are probably thinking "Gee, Really?", or "Wow, I never knew that!" while others are thinking "Who's John F. Kennedy?" or possibly "Who or What is Kodak". I fervently hope that you're not thinking the last two...especially about Kodak. Kodak, as you may know, is a film developing company. And John F. Kennedy (JFK) was an alien bent on global domination. Or possibly a really good president who wanted to fly to the moon. Either way, he got assasinated. And ever loony in America decided that it was a conspiracy. Some even go so far as to claim that Kodak "changed" the pictures of the assasination to make an assasination in the bushes become a tree's shadow. I didn't know that they had such good technology back then. I have to wonder...why would Kodak do such a thing. Perhaps Kodak is actually a front organization for a shadowy governmental system that controls the entire world and didn't want mankind to obtain the freedom of the stars and so tried to sabotauge the space program even though it didn't work as well as they planned. Or perhaps not. Either way, Kodak is undeniably evil. How can any company that takes so many "wholesome" pictures not be? You can just bet that they look at every one that get's turned in to them, judging blackmail value, and whether or not you could get arrested. It's just sickening, you can't even take a simple photo nowadays. Unless you have a digital camera, which are a symbol of freedom from the old ways and willing enslavement to the new ways. We can only hope that the digital camera manufacturers are kinder masters than the evil Kodak Lords. I better go...I think Kodak is tracing my site....I'm back now! And, once again, I have proof that someone actually took the time (two hours) to read this entire Longest Text Ever! It's amazing, it's incredible, it's unbelievable. But true. Even more incredible, this time it's someone I don't even know! Wooooooo! I feel inspired and happy and other really good emotions and stuff. And so, I'll take a trip down memory lane, to the dark depths of the past, to when I decided to make this page. It was inspired, in part, by my sheer and utter boredom. In school, back before I even owned a computer, I'd type random words for long periods of time, 'cause I had nothing better to do. Once I got this computer, I decided to do something similar on my beloved site. But, it ended up making more sense than I anticipated (scary thought, huh). Oh, well...I tired of nostalgia. Back to the present. Right now, I'm just typing so that no one can say that I've been slacking off. I don't think I have any conspiracy theories...except pop-ups/pop-unders. Have you ever had the evil pop-up that says that if you click here, it'll get rid off all the annoying pop-ups? Isn't that sort of ironic? Could the pop-up blocker people have chosen a better means to advertise their product? It's like grand-theft auto 3's talk show, you know, the one where there are Citizens Raging Against Phones? Or CRAP, for short. And the lady representing them, calls the radio station...on a phone. It's stupid and ironic and just shouldn't exist in a better world. Pop-Up ad's help you get rid of pop-up ads? Insane, chaotic...hmmmmm...I wonder who thought of it? Was it on purpose, or was it just some mistake? It is now my civic duty to discover this ancient mystery, and reveal it to the uncaring world. Or maybe I'll go make a frozen pizza. Yeah. That sounds good, too. Since I'm not particualarly inspired at the moment, I should leave and let you gather what is left of your sanity. I just can't seem to stop, though. Okay...I can do it. I'm leaving. I'm back...and it's several hours later. I've decided to imortalize the stupidity of my dog, Moose. She is a heavy-set Yorkshire Terrior (12 lbs.) In otherwords, she's a small yappy dog who is big for her breed. Today, I met her arch-enemy. An enemy so terrifying that Moose cannot stop shaking. An enemy so hideous that Moose must destroy it at all costs. An enemy so dangerous that Moose fears it above all others. Now you may be wondering what horrible beast is Moose's arch-enemy. And you probably suspect that it is something pathetic. You would be correct in your suspiciousness...for Mooses arch-enemy is...*dramatic drumroll*...a small, white, feather. Now, Moose has seen many feathers, birds even. But none have struck terror in her little moose heart like this particular feather. So...naturally I put her arch-enemy in my pocket and brought it home with me. This action has made her very suspicious of where my loyalties lie. She tracks the feather smell all over the house, and goes crazy whenever I take it out of my pocket. She even got her sister and mother in the spirt of things. Now her sister sounds an alarm whenever she sees the evil feather. Now, you may be wondering what is so terrifying about a small, white, feather. So am I. It doesn't smell funny, (I asked my brother, since I don't have a sense of smell), it seems perfectly ordinary. So, I've decided that Moose works for some secret government organization, and that the feather is the key to the destruction of the world, and I am just blithely letting it enter our home, so that it may furthur its evil plans to destroy the universe. That is the only possible explanation as to why it upsets her so much. Or...maybe it's the feather off of the cartoon owl from the tootsie-roll pop comercials (one...two...three..*crunch*). Whatever the case, I decided that the whole world, (or three of four random people) deserve to know that if the world and or universe are destroyed, it's the evil, little, white, feather's fault. Now I'd better go and torture my Moose with it...:) I am officially back. And you, the potentially non-existant reader gets a once in a lifetime chance to hear me rant and rave about my Horrible, Horrible Family Vacation. I know. You feel very, very honored. It's like this. My mother is a control freak, and she decided on the spur of the moment that we were going north to visit relatives. Later that day, she decided we were NOT going north, we were going south to a beach resort. Still later that day, she got offended at some trivial thing and decided that we weren't going anywhere at all. The very next day, she decided that we were going north, after all. So, we packed everthing up. Before we knew it, we were on the road. The first part of the trip was fairly easy. As in, I was half-asleep, hoping that we'd arrive while I slept. Then, in an inspired move, my brother talked my mother into letting him sit up front. That meant that my mother would be in the back, with me and my younger, eviler sister. Immediatly, my mother started complaining. It was uncomfortable in the back, it was too hot, it was too cold. Then, she accidently woke our three yappy dogs up, and they relized that they were in a car. That meant only one corse of action for them. They started shaking and barked their little heads off. This annoyed my mother further, untill she asked, no, demanded that my father turn the car around so that we could go home. Unfortuantly, we had already driven 337 miles toward our destination. After much argument, my father was going to turn around, untill he realized that my mother was going to drop the dogs and me off, and then turn around and continue north. This seemed slightly unpracticle, so we ended up not taking that 337 mile detour. We eventually reached our destination after 16 hours of virtually non-stop driving. We got there, we ate. We slept. My mother visited relatives. And so the week went by. I got to go to a huge library, and see Terminator 3 at the local theater. That was the high point of the entire trip. The last day, we were deciding where to eat. My mom said that she didn't care. So my dad picked a steak place. My mother tried to order a mushroom-swiss burger...only to discover that the place had no swiss-cheese. So she decided on a salad, only to discover that they didn't have her favorite salad dressing. After much deliberation, she decided that she wouldn't eat. After complaining how hungry she was, and about the poor quality of the resteraunt, she walked out of the resteraunt, instructing the rest of us to "enjoy our meals". And I wonder where my little sister gets her annoyingness. Not that my mother is annoying...just set in her ways. The whole meal thing was about the only interesting thing to happen during the week. On the way home, we had gotten approximatly 4 hours into the trip when my mother predicatably decided that we had to go back and eat at the 50th aniversary of her favorite ice cream place. Needless to say, we ignored her. Oh, and when my sister had to go to the bathroom very badly during a traffic jam, my mother had the good taste to making hissing/water noises to make my sister's problem worse. She claimed that my little sister always did it to her, and she was getting pay-back. Between her bickering with my sister, and obsessivly playing neopets games, I don't know what to do with her. Anyway...that was my family vacation rant. It sucked. No suprise. At least it's over. Sorry if I complained a lot. If you don't like it, start your own longest text ever. Anyway, I promise to go back to my usual routine the next time I rant here. I thought of a topic on the way home, but forgot it. Seeya. I'm back! I know, I took you completly by suprise. You thought you'd gotten rid of me. *cheesy super-hero voice* Well, fear not, random citizen, for I, PSOPC am here! *normal voice* Today I have a very important to discuss with you in this: PERFECTLY NORMAL PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCMENT. Yes, that's right. It's time to warn you, the viewer...er...reader...about the evils of various stuff. Today's lesson is: subliminal messages . That's right, folks, mass hypnosis via commercials. Now, I'm sure you've at least heard of subliminal messages , right? No? Well...prepare to be enlightened. Subliminal messages are an advertising technique that puts hidden pictures and words into a main image. You don't see them, but your subconsious (dreaming) mind does. Your subconsious mind acts on whatever it is told. What does this mean to you? It means that WAL-MART TV IS EVIL! EVIIIIIIIIIIIIL!!!!!! Why else would they invest all that money to show commercials in their own store? Because they put subliminal messages in them, of course! Subliminal messanging also explains the successes of certain fast-food resteraunts, and brand name items. BEWARE YOUR TOASTER OVEN! Okay. That had nothing to do whatsoever with subliminal messages...it's just cool to say. Anyway, only watch wal-mart if you WANT to be subliminaly entertained into purchasing a new set of TUPERWARE, even though your old set is PERFECTLY fine. This has been a public service announcment. Pretty cool, huh? Uh...you don't have to take the subliminal stuff seriously. It's true, and all, but I have no proof about wal-mart, or certain fast food resteraunts. It makes sense, though. Wal-mart TV is evil. You cannot deny it. Seeya...hmmm..I wonder if there's subliminal stuff in my computer...I'm back. And I feel that it's time for a FAKE commercial break, for the highly informed, obviously brain-dead consumer. And now, a word from our non-existant sponsor. Ketchup: The only food that you'll want to eat after traveling to the 5th Dimension. It's been practically proven that Ketchup transforms into a highly intoxicating (non-addictive) delicious substance upon returning from the 5th Dimension. Stock up now with our Valu-Pak to recieve 3-metric tons of Ketchup, all for the low, low price of your brain, since you're obviously not using it anyway. Then, just wait for technology to "catch-up" (get it, catch-up, Ketchup?)so you can travel to the 5th Dimension like our scientists almost did. (Next Commercial) Get ready fo: Faux's new "reality" TV show, "How Low Can We Go?" It's about six contestants who compete to create the worst, least likely "reality" TV show. The winner not only gets the million-dollar prize, they get the chance to produce the show they created. Remember: if the show sucks, it's their fault, not ours!(Next exciting commercial!)And for all the idiots out there: Try new and improved Dum-B-Gon! Dum-B-Gon stimulates brain activity, making you up to 10 times smarter! Not only that, Dum-B-Gon: stimulates weight loss, cures "any" illness, does simple houshold chores, never leaves the toilet seat up and is the perfect gentle companion for your kids. How can you pass up this revolutionary new product? It's yours for only 3 bi-monthly payments of $3.95 ($3,95,000 on days ending in "y")Don't forget, Dum-B-Gon is practically guaranteed!* (*Not a guarantee) (Next commercial)Have you ever wondered why food sometimes goes bad in your fridge, even if you've only had it a few years? It's because of the "evil little faeries with sharp little teeth." These "faeries" sprinkle your food with highly toxic "age dust" and ruin a perfectly good four-year-old meatloaf. How do you stop them? With our patented "spray". Our "spray" kills over 99.9% of "faeries" (which are much to small to see) Our "spray" also kills most disease causing agents, like rats, or pigeons. WARNING: Leave food sit in an open, well-venilated spot for a week before eating. And now, back to our featured presentation. Wasn't that semi-entertaining? I bet you wanna go eat some Ketchup covered Dum-B Gon right now, while watching "reality" TV. Just make sure you "spray" your food first. Pathetic, wasn't it? Oh, well. I was bored, and a dilligent reader suggested I make fake commercials, so...therer they are. Happy? Good. I'm leavin', for now. I'm back. And I'm willing to enlighten you, the potentially you-know-what reader. Today, I was checking out some weird news. At one point, I read an article that stated that it had been proven, conclusivly, that Kansas was flatter than the standard pancake. The researches even used highly advanced technololgy to map the surface of a pancake and compare it to documented geology of Kansas. Some people disagree, the director of the Kansas Geological Survey said "I think this is part of a vast breakfast food conspiracy to denigrate Kansas. It's a cheap shot." So...doesn't that make you want to take Kansas' side (I sincerly appologize if you are from Kansas). It just seems extremly weird (and worthy of mentioning) that this semi-important guy from Kansas believes in a "vast breakfast food conspiracy". Makes you think that the long held belief that Kodak conspired with the JFK assasin(s) is normal. Another article claims that an anitseptic turned a polar bear purple, drawing large crowds of people. I sure hope other zoos won't copy them. Before you know it, we'll have orange alligators, pink tigers and blue lions. School children won't be able to correctly identify the color of a zebra. Random people will think they've gone crazy, after a seemingly innocent visit to the zoo. It's wrong, I tell you. A complete and total degregation of our societies values. What values, you say? The basic moral belief that Polar bears should be WHITE. Unless we spray-painted the snow purple, too. Then it would be okay. As long as the bear blends in, you know? Speaking of animals, there's a cat in California who is a kleptomaniac (likes to steal stuff). He sneaks into neighboring homes, and takes clothing, wrapped christmas presents, and anything he can find. He then leaves them under his owners car. Okay, better leave. I'm back. And I don't really have a topic today. I'm just bored. Sometimes I just do this, you know? Start typing without any idea about what it is I intend to say. Maybe I subconsiously DO know what I'm doing here, but refuse to admit it to myself. Or maybe I am monumentally bored and don't have anything else to do at the moment. Either way, I'm here. You must be pretty bored, too. Otherwise, why on earth (beta, krpto, zkdjf, Planet X, whatever) would you be here? It would make no sense. If you have something better to do, why wouldn't you be doing it right now? I would be. But, maybe that's just the difference between you and me. Yeah. That must be it. Unless you're bored. Then I completly understand. I need to find a topic. Here, topic, topic, topic! Come on, I won't hurt you, I promise! *hides large ax behind back* Come here, topic! Why are you afraid of little ol' me? *sigh* There are no topics anywhere near me. Kinda like me and "Meg" webcomic we are trying to do. It's called Hit-Or-Miss, any topics, plot, etc. are completly accidental and are not the fault/responsibility of the creators. That was sort of a topic, even though it was sort of random. Which is what I do best. Okay, I'm done with that litte commercial. What now...hmmmmm...should I share with you more of my paranoid/delusional conspiracy theories? Or have I been doing that too much lately? Oooooo! I know, I'll start of list of why it's fun/good to be insane/weird! #1You can say or do anything and normal people will agree with you in the hopes that you'll be satisfied, shut up, and go away. Far away. I will show you an example with this completly true stuff that I experienced several years ago. ME: My vicious, psychotic, flesh-eating bunny-rabbit wants to rule the world. RANDOM PERSON: Uh-huh, that's nice. ME: Yeah, but I told her that she'd be a terible ruler. I mean, she traded Asia for a carrot! And she doesn't even LIKE carrots! RANDOM PERSON: You don't say? ME: Yep. She also is the goddess of red jello. RANDOM PERSON: *head explouding from sheer insanity* As you can see, I was a very weird child (this happened in elementary school...uh...except for that head-explouding part). Okay...on to: #2 You can get out of practically anything by saying: a)It's against my religion b)I'm allergic to that. c)I have an extremly irrational fear of that. d)I already did that in a past life and it sucked. e)My psychotic bunny predicted I'd die doing it. Unfortunalty, several of those reasons LEGITAMITLY apply to a certain activity I do every Tuesday, which WILL NOT BE NAMED HERE LEST I GIVE IT POWER OVER ME! I'm allergic to parts of it, have irrational fears about others and I'm pretty sure it's against my Jenny religion...along with eating mashed potatoes, or potatoes of any kind. I'll add that to the FLAMING CHICKENS HANDBOOK. Thou shalt not eat spuds. Hmmmm...time for #3You can obsessive over ANYTHING, and people will think nothing of it. I, personally, am obsessed with, kitties, bunnies, bats, this website, drawing, making intriate little patterns with strings, doing mildly repetitive activities, being weird, apparantly making lists and cheese...and chickens...and flame. Fire is good. Fire is free. Fire is my friend...until it burns me. Then it must die...painfully. And on to:#4You make your friends look normal in comparison. And #5: You can give each of your pets several weird names such as: Ringling-Raison-Bailey-Suzana-Midnight-Schultz, Squirell, Moose, Moose-Moose, Moosey-Moose, Linzey-Moose, Muffin, Squirell-Muffin, Yabby-Doodle, Abby Normal, Wiggle-Baby, Wiggle-Muffin, Witle-Baby, Cheese-Monkey, Muffin-With-Squirell-Juice, Squirell-With-Muffin Juice, Moosey-Juice, Squirell-Monkey, etc. Now, wasn't that a fun list!? Doesn't that just make you proud to be weird? I should make bumber stickers saying that. Proud to be weird. It'd be cool. Anyway, gotta go! *yawn* I'm back. Last night I was super-charged with lots of sugar and not a lot of sleep. I ended up writing things during the time of night when EVERYTHING is hilarious, including the word sheep. To compound things, I wasn't alone, and things just escalated. The following is everything I wrote during that sugar-coated time period. Some are answers to e-mails, the rest are just stuff I wrote. VAGINA!