Author Topic: The Michael Decon Program  (Read 164096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4560 on: January 13, 2019, 11:19:56 AM »
Yup, because this asshole Masters really pisses me off.  Did you know that he was a US Army "Public Affairs" officer before he went to CNN?

So whose uniform are you wearing Gunny?

Quote
The man has been a disinfo agent his entire life!

So what is this a photo of?



Quote
Great job confronting him about the Kolbrin Mike - He knew full well that article existed and the reason he was not sued was that the Culdian Trust is based in New Zealand https://culdiantrust.org/ and could not afford to pursue it! I did not expect him to "vapor-lock" and drop on you...but he is one slimy fucker!

Great job proving which side of WWG1WGA you're taking hothead.

Your disproportionate anger speaks volumes - literally. Your red herring - priceless, even in Kiwi dollars. 8)





Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4561 on: January 13, 2019, 11:21:45 AM »
Again, ya knocked it out of the park, tonight.  Best show yet, Myke! ;) ;D :-*

Outstanding call Starr - WWG1WGA. :)

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4562 on: January 13, 2019, 11:23:15 AM »

So what is this a photo of?


Oh cool, a lense flare.  God damn amazing.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4563 on: January 13, 2019, 11:24:00 AM »
This asshole is a total Anti-American commie fuck....

What precisely did he say that was:

1.) Anti-American?

2.) Communistic?

Be VERY specific in your answers, cuz your personal credibility is at stake here. :-X


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4564 on: January 13, 2019, 11:24:27 AM »
Oh cool, a lense flare.  God damn amazing.

Where's the "flare"?

http://www.allskycam.com/u.php?u=597

Be very specific cuntflap.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4565 on: January 13, 2019, 11:27:52 AM »
Where's the "flare"?

http://www.allskycam.com/u.php?u=597

Be very specific cuntflap.

As the camera moves, the flare moves in opposing direction.  The flare is the pink spot moving in opposing direction as the camera. 

Correction:  As the direction of light moves, so does the flare.  In this case, the camera is not moving but the direction of light is moving.  Earth's rotation causing the direction of light to move, then causes the flare to move in opposing direction.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4566 on: January 13, 2019, 11:34:30 AM »
As the camera moves, the flare moves in opposing direction.  The flare is the pink spot moving in opposing direction as the camera.

Funny how it doesn't look like a "lens flare" at all:



It looks like a very solid spherical object.

Doesn't it?





Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4567 on: January 13, 2019, 11:35:46 AM »
Where's the "flare"?

http://www.allskycam.com/u.php?u=597

Be very specific cuntflap.

If the Sun was dead center, the flare would also be just below the light source and as the light source moves to the right, the flare would continue to the left at the exact same speed as the light source movement.  Unfortunately this is a gif and does not show much time-wise, such as the flare moving at the exact same speed as the light source.  It would probably be more believable if the spot moved at a different speed as the light source.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4568 on: January 13, 2019, 11:37:02 AM »
Funny how it doesn't look like a "lens flare" at all:



It looks like a very solid spherical object.

Doesn't it?

Those are also types of lens flares.  Yes I am sure it depends on the lens.  Explain to me why this object moves at the exact same speed as the light source then.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4569 on: January 13, 2019, 11:38:17 AM »
Funny how it doesn't look like a "lens flare" at all:



It looks like a very solid spherical object.

Doesn't it?

Also the landscape picture is not a fair comparison since the original gif shows only Sun and sky.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4570 on: January 13, 2019, 11:38:41 AM »


For those who don't know, you can just click play and you'll hear the show, that just went down.


Thanks for listening goodnight.

Nice job - I had not expected a social discord angle to be the driver over actual astronomy. Masters is in some ways the cranky Grand Torino to Hoaxie's erudite kooky  uncle as planetary changes go.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4571 on: January 13, 2019, 11:40:32 AM »
If the Sun was dead center, the flare would also be just below the light source and as the light source moves to the right, the flare would continue to the left at the exact same speed as the light source movement.  Unfortunately this is a gif and does not show much time-wise, such as the flare moving at the exact same speed as the light source.  It would probably be more believable if the spot moved at a different speed as the light source.

There is more data there (25 minutes worth) than you choose to admit. But enjoy your disinformation campaign, it amuses me greatly.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4572 on: January 13, 2019, 11:42:17 AM »
Also the landscape picture is not a fair comparison since the original gif shows only Sun and sky.

Uh huh...keep denying, it's all you lot have.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4573 on: January 13, 2019, 11:44:22 AM »
Those are also types of lens flares.  Yes I am sure it depends on the lens.  Explain to me why this object moves at the exact same speed as the light source then.

It doesn't, obviously. In fact it 'moves' (in a relative sense to an earth observer) significantly faster and across the ecliptic. 8)

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4574 on: January 13, 2019, 11:46:54 AM »
Uh huh...keep denying, it's all you lot have.



I am not denying anything.  I am applying logic.  I would seriously consider it being an object if it moved at a different rate as the light source.  Also if that were a planet, it would be washed out by the Sun's light and you'd be able to see it better at night rather than during the day. 

See the cropped landscape photo below.  What we are seeing in a picture with only Sun and sky is the red colored lense flare.  The other lighter colored flares are washed out by the sunlit sky.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4575 on: January 13, 2019, 11:48:07 AM »
Uh huh...keep denying, it's all you lot have.



The Sun as pictured through a splattered window as thought someone sneezed on many times over several days.  I'm not seeing the point to this picture.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4576 on: January 13, 2019, 12:13:29 PM »
I am not denying anything.  I am applying logic.  I would seriously consider it being an object if it moved at a different rate as the light source.

Which it actually does - the "light source" being the very bright and white sun.

This is clearly an object that is solid, dimpled, reflecting in the red spectrum, etc.

Quote
Also if that were a planet, it would be washed out by the Sun's light and you'd be able to see it better at night rather than during the day.

Ever wonder why sightings are  tough to come by?

Anyway, at night you say, ok:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/726419/Nibiru-2018-red-planet-appears-beside-moon-Pennsylvania-USA-video

I guess we'd have to classify this one then as a "moon flare", yes?

Quote
See the cropped landscape photo below.  What we are seeing in a picture with only Sun and sky is the red colored lense flare.  The other lighter colored flares are washed out by the sunlit sky.

Which "other lighter colored flares"?

How many do you think there are, and where are they located.

Please note that this object appears at the top of the horizonal imagery located in the same southwestern transit at the very top of the strip.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4577 on: January 13, 2019, 12:14:47 PM »
The Sun as pictured through a splattered window as thought someone sneezed on many times over several days.  I'm not seeing the point to this picture.

Lens flare = the point.


Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4578 on: January 13, 2019, 12:19:27 PM »
Tucson, Az.

A hemisphere away and yet:

http://www.allskycam.com/u.php?u=463



Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4579 on: January 13, 2019, 12:28:29 PM »
Which it actually does - the "light source" being the very bright and white sun.

This is clearly an object that is solid, dimpled, reflecting in the red spectrum, etc.

Ever wonder why sightings are  tough to come by?

Anyway, at night you say, ok:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/726419/Nibiru-2018-red-planet-appears-beside-moon-Pennsylvania-USA-video

I guess we'd have to classify this one then as a "moon flare", yes?

Which "other lighter colored flares"?

How many do you think there are, and where are they located.

Please note that this object appears at the top of the horizonal imagery located in the same southwestern transit at the very top of the strip.


This lunar video is a bit more convincing.  As the camera moves, the object does not.  hence, not a lense flare.  Why don't more people see this?  Also, if this Planet X is so far away, it would move extremely slowly and you'd see it there for a very long time.  Is this lunar video Planet X, or the second Sun theory?



Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4580 on: January 13, 2019, 12:36:07 PM »

This lunar video is a bit more convincing.  As the camera moves, the object does not.  hence, not a lense flare.

So why does the "lens flare" have solid spherical dimensions.?

And why is it consistent with the Tucson capture?

Wouldn't it be more plausible to call it a full moon?

Quote
Why don't more people see this?

Ever hear of chem trails?

Quote
Also, if this Planet X is so far away, it would move extremely slowly and you'd see it there for a very long time.



elliptical transit path

Quote
Is this lunar video Planet X, or the second Sun theory?

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4581 on: January 13, 2019, 02:44:00 PM »
Peter ward will be live tonight same place... Same time.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4582 on: January 13, 2019, 03:04:28 PM »
Nice job - I had not expected a social discord angle to be the driver over actual astronomy. Masters is in some ways the cranky Grand Torino to Hoaxie's erudite kooky  uncle as planetary changes go.

Yeah that was unexpected, the goal was to keep it organic, & fresh. I think we successfully did that

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4583 on: January 13, 2019, 03:09:46 PM »


tonight 8 pm pst - 11 pm est

(born 1949) Peter Ward is Professor of Biology, a Professor of Earth and Space Sciences, and Adjunct Professor of Astronomy at the University of Washington in Seattle. He is Principal Investigator of the University of Washington node of the NASA Astrobiology Institute, which involves the leadership of over 25 scientists studying the probability of finding life beyond the Earth. He is also Senior Councilor of the Paleontological Society and was awarded an Affiliate Professorship at the California Institute of Technology.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4584 on: January 13, 2019, 03:42:27 PM »
Yeah that was unexpected, the goal was to keep it organic, & fresh. I think we successfully did that

Very much so, Masters was very energized and kept it anti-globalist real, so that was totally a bonus for me. I don't know if that call drop on the Kolbrin bible question was staged or the real deal, regardless the tempo was not lost. I find it fascinating that Masters own siting was so brief given the volume of others' reports and imagery he's sorted through.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4585 on: January 13, 2019, 04:06:24 PM »
Very much so, Masters was very energized and kept it anti-globalist real, so that was totally a bonus for me. I don't know if that call drop on the Kolbrin bible question was staged or the real deal, regardless the tempo was not lost. I find it fascinating that Masters own siting was so brief given the volume of others' reports and imagery he's sorted through.

Marshall is always a great guest he seems to come alive when he's on the program. you won't find him in the same manner when he's on other shows. I don't stage anything, I don't even take many notes. I just asked what Gunner, had sent me.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4586 on: January 13, 2019, 04:07:36 PM »
Also ... Hard to stage anything, when a guest was a last minute replacement, for Peter Ward.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4587 on: January 13, 2019, 04:46:06 PM »
You're right, he's less open and chatty on other shows. I could tell the interview was anything but scripted which is what made it such great radio. Gunny may no tlike the guy but I found him to be highly entertaining and real in his political and social observations. I mean seriously, he manages to work excessive college debt into a Planet X riff - heady stuff!

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4588 on: January 13, 2019, 05:17:55 PM »
You're right, he's less open and chatty on other shows. I could tell the interview was anything but scripted which is what made it such great radio. Gunny may no tlike the guy but I found him to be highly entertaining and real in his political and social observations. I mean seriously, he manages to work excessive college debt into a Planet X riff - heady stuff!

When he's on Coast or another show of that nature, they want you to bring questions and answers. I take limited notes, but even then most of the questions are generated organically. I've spent a couple hours a number of times, just writing notes. That was such a waste of time, I've learned that only about 4 of those questions are asked. Gunner only takes Douglas Dietrich, which is okay with me haha.  It also helps that Marshall, knows how I like doing the show, he knows my style already and he's comfortable with me. Yes.... the college debt talk... god damn.

Re: The Michael Decon Program
« Reply #4589 on: January 13, 2019, 08:26:27 PM »
You're right, he's less open and chatty on other shows. I could tell the interview was anything but scripted which is what made it such great radio. Gunny may no tlike the guy but I found him to be highly entertaining and real in his political and social observations. I mean seriously, he manages to work excessive college debt into a Planet X riff - heady stuff!

I would have liked to hear Marshall for the entire three hours.  He seemed to remained focused on what he wanted to talk about even with those around him inserting unrelated questions at him for no obvious reason.  Marshall came prepared, and I don't think he needed any assistance, or interruption.  I could be wrong.