You are retarded! I posted *the answer* to *your request* in the form of the EXACT tweet-of-origin (of the news sourses chart in question) -- there was no "unsubstantiated opinion" about it, I expressed no opinion *whatsoever* in my reply to your question. FFS. If you are so fucking unorganized and disorderly and etiquette-less that you are going to decide to reply to something I may have said a couple of posts back and to someone else to boot that's your fucking problem and simply firther proof/manifestation of how deranged you are!
What you posted was someone's opinion that is based on nothing discernible. How hard is it to understand that the fact that something is tweeted doesn't make it factual. That chart is nothing more than the subjective opinion of one person. If it were based on something approaching imperical analysis it might carry some weight. I could in matter of minutes provide you with 10 URLs where you would find assertions that Hilliary is a witch and a pedophyle that are supported by nothing but conjecture and opinion just as the chart you posted is. If you were not so emotionally fragile you might comprehend the difference between supported argument and subjective opinion. When you post things that have no basis for conclusions reached you are inviting criticism.