Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
Politics / Re: Race & I.Q.
« Last post by Dr. MD MD on Today at 01:22:18 PM »
Yah, so scabbed over that you can't even elect a coffee-coloured guy as president without having a conniption and trying to claim he isn't really American.

That's not about race. It's about fraud. ::)
Radio and Podcasts / Re: The Synaptic Gap with Luca Parcelli
« Last post by LucaParcelli on Today at 01:21:58 PM »
Will there be a section on rabbit recipes? I have a pile in the freezer and don't know what to do with them.

Mr. Vashtar...

      There will be no discussion of rabbit recipes... Rabbits are friends, and not food...

      I also encourage you to thaw those poor souls and provide a proper burial in your yard...
      Can I count on your attendance tomorrow? We will further discuss your villainy, and I will provide a forum for your formal apology to the Lagomorph community...
Politics / Re: Race & I.Q.
« Last post by Robtheacidghost on Today at 01:13:31 PM »
I agree with you. I spent a couple of years in San Francisco, and I find that in the last decade or so, it has been crap-flooded by Glassholes or whatever they are - those middle class/bourgeois, self-entitled, snobbish tech workers from Google Inc, Twatter, and Facebook. (They are extremely good at writing computer programs, but beyond that, they are ignorant, uncultured, clueless robots all saying the same thing.) They have gentrified a once great city and driven rent so high that all of the interesting people, creative types, minorities, have been driven out of town. The only people there now are either very old or trust fund babies and YUPPIEs. Currently, the only good thing about the city is the scenery. Except for the odd nomad or hobo passing through, the people there now are not worth knowing or even speaking to for that matter. The only likable people and the only people who were genuine I met there were brown, but sadly, they had to commute from Richmond and other places to their jobs as security guard or garbageman or whatever in the city.. I've traveled across the USA, and I've read a lot of sociology literature.

FYI, there is a reason that the white bourgeois have higher IQs. From preschool to university, they have been in an educational system and a social environment that trains for taking IQ tests. Science has shown that IQ can be improved or harmed to a significant degree based on ones life background.

Id take a group of so-called “low IQ” black folk any day over some fake smart “high IQ” white progressives. Easily the most annoying people there are. These “smart” people are the same people who’ve turned San Francisco into a toilet. Plus they’re just annoying worthless people.

It’s a shame we don’t have a way to measure likability. White people from “progressive big cities” would come in last. Easily the most close minded judgmental group there are. Let’s regulate the environment around some mountain man’s home who lives in the woods 500 miles away while we turn our own city into a shithouse.
Politics / Re: Race & I.Q.
« Last post by SredniVashtar on Today at 01:09:58 PM »
That you're trying to hold open a centuries old wound that had basically already scabbed over for political purposes and are using "minorities" as pawns; and that this, in fact, makes you the racist.

Yah, so scabbed over that you can't even elect a coffee-coloured guy as president without having a conniption and trying to claim he isn't really American.
Politics / Re: Race & I.Q.
« Last post by SredniVashtar on Today at 01:07:36 PM »
But you are, still, subjects.

Is that what you're using against me because I haven't 'fled' yet? I don't mind being a subject. I'll leave it to you to fret over semantics.
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« Last post by Dr. MD MD on Today at 01:02:12 PM »
Rush Limbaugh had, maybe still has (haven't listened since the 1990s - the content of his program became unbearable when he started talking about Monica Lewinski every day. I never liked the Clintons, and I never cared who they were sleeping with.) an excellent voice. I remember that his pronunciation, tone, and vocabulary were top notch. Unlike the made-for-print voices of the NPR newscasters, he had none of the grating vocal tics, blood curdling lisps, ghastly lip-smacking, "creaky girl," and other heinous idiosyncrasies of the NPR crew that made my skin crawl whenever my American ex girlfriend listened to NPR. As for his personal life, I find it bizarre that a far right social conservative, who at one time called for the jailing of all potheads IIRC, is a junkie. And worse, he forced his maid to risk imprisonment by copping pills for him at various pharmacies with fake scripts.

I've only recently started listening to Heather Wade's program, but I understand that she has improved greatly since she started a few years ago. She's still new at it. Her vocabulary, skills, and her life experiences will increase with age. I'm used to listening to college radio, so her relative inexperience doesn't bother me. I don't have anything against sex workers or phone sex or whatever the rumor was. Just get checked for STDs and don't have unwanted pregnancies.
Yes, Heather would benefit from learning how to pronounce words.  No doubt about it.  But I think we've all learned that she just... how do you say this... doesn't have a big vocabulary or any life experience.  I honestly think she would be good at teaching pre-school or something, but she should not be near a microphone.  No fucking way. 

And you think RUSH LIMBAUGH sounds better than the nerds on NPR?  That pillhead sounds like doing squats the whole time he's on air.
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Alex Jones
« Last post by Dr. MD MD on Today at 12:40:28 PM »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10