BellGab.com Archive

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on June 09, 2017, 08:22:26 AM
Aw, c'mon Miser, you can only find two ''celebrities'' who attacked Trump so far today?

Just for you . . .

https://twitter.com/Rosie/status/873160341244583936

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on June 09, 2017, 07:55:40 AM
FIFY

That too. If he was pinned down (commanded) to a one word Yes or No (truthful) answer, I think his head might splode and our problem would be solved!

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on June 09, 2017, 07:42:54 AM
Jew on bellgab, posting a jew liar Nancy Pelosi.

No one believes your jew lies here.

(((The Queen of Kings))) would seem the more fitting nom de guerre given the gender-confused avitar you're most comforable self-identifying with. Any objections? You ok with that? Nice tits anyway.

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on June 09, 2017, 07:31:36 AM
It can all be settled by him giving evidence under oath and releasing the tapes he alluded to. Simple.

I honestly can't imagine what Trump would look or sound-like answering Q's _under oath_ e.g. Congression hearing of some kind rather than some common deposition. I mean I can't imagine "truth" exiting his mouth -- it just doesn't compute! Is he even capable of uttering a (one) completely truthful sentance?

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/873156117152620544

https://youtu.be/z1Enrod-ySQ


During his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, former FBI Director James Comey declined to say “in an open setting” whether President Donald Trump colluded with Russia in its interference in the 2016 presidential election.
“Do you believe Donald Trump colluded with Russia?” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked bluntly.
“That’s a question I don’t think I should answer in an open setting,” Comey replied. “When I left, we did not have an investigation focused on President Trump. But that’s a question that will be answered by the investigation, I think.”

Liar

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/873134052735365120

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/873120139222306817

√

Quote from: Meister_000 on June 09, 2017, 02:31:53 AM
Don't be shy Bobby . . .


https://youtu.be/55fJ0FgPSQk

So what you're sayin is that Trumptards like to kid themselves that their opponents are all "snowflakes", is that right Bob?

√

Don't be shy Bobby . . .


https://youtu.be/55fJ0FgPSQk

 

https://twitter.com/Rschooley/status/873042022944301056

Donny's buddy Nigel foiled!   

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/873009050182721540

Silver linings

https://twitter.com/SimonWDC/status/873010422454132736

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on June 08, 2017, 11:33:05 PM
The best is yet to come?  You mean when this Trump nothingburger bleeds over to Obama White House felony spying and leaking?

Lance. Pustules. Now.

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on June 08, 2017, 10:40:17 PM
Wishful thinking or Delusional Disorder?  Only her psychiatrist knows.

It's Mueller time!

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on June 08, 2017, 07:04:48 PM
Stay tuned to what?

The Best is yet to come.

Highlight of the day:

Comey and Angus King quoting Henry II

"Will no one rid me of this meddlesome preist"

Washington Post ~ June 8, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/06/08/why-did-comey-say-will-no-one-rid-me-of-this-meddlesome-priest/

"Trump fired Comey last month amid an FBI probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election. During Thursday’s testimony, Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) asked Comey questions about what he assumed when Trump said to “hold back” on Flynn:

“You said [Trump] said, ‘I hope you will hold back on that.’ But when a president of the United States in the Oval Office says something like ‘I hope’ or ‘I suggest’ or ‘would you,’ do you take that as a directive?”

Comey replied: “Yes. Yes, it rings in my ear as kind of, ‘Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?’ ”

King said: “I was just going to quote that in 1170 [of] Dec. 29 Henry II said, ‘Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?’ And then the next day he was killed. Thomas A Becket. That’s exactly the same situation. We’re thinking along the same lines.”

The reference between Comey and King goes back to an outburst from King Henry II about the Archbishop of Canterbury. The story passed down through history is that Henry II, who was frustrated by Becket, cried out, “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?”

Becket was then murdered by four knights.


Thomas Becket (the "preist" = Comey/FBI) was Archbishop of Canterbury (Lord Chancellor, Roman Catholic) from 1162 until his murder in 1170. He is venerated as a saint and martyr by both the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion. He engaged in conflict with Henry II, King of England, over the rights and privileges of the Church, and was assassination by followers of the king in Canterbury Cathedral.

. . . Becket continued to excommunicate his opponents in the church, the news of which also reached Henry II, Henry the Young King's father. Upon hearing reports of Becket's actions, Henry is said to have uttered words that were interpreted by his men as wishing Becket killed. The king's exact words are in doubt and several versions have been reported. The most commonly quoted, as handed down by oral tradition, is "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?", --  but according to historian Simon Schama this is incorrect: he accepts the account of the contemporary biographer Edward Grim, writing in Latin, who gives us "What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric?"  Many variations have found their way into popular culture. . .

Batter up!

Good Luck today (England & America!)

Bye Donny

 

https://twitter.com/superdeluxe/status/872460665033641986

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on June 08, 2017, 02:21:05 AM
Oh good because none of that indicated a crime. When is that coming? 

It's it's a good start at laying out the foundation for the Obstruction of Justice case/charges/impeachment. I just wanted you'all to set your focus properly for the coming events, the Obstruction of Justice (a Federal Crime) portion of the banquet of angles currently on the table. A "pattern" of obstruction will be established in due course. If you want more it's available, just go read Comey's full statement and watch what happens later today at the hearing -- 10 am EST, 7 am Pacific. C-span cable/web/twitter will carry it as usual. Enjoy

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on June 08, 2017, 01:15:24 AM
To YP, MEISTER, UHURA  ET AL:

How do you like them apples?

really, you should eat better. Here's a sample of the main course (there's more)

from Comey's written statement for later today, excerpt:

January 27 Dinner

. . ."The President began by asking me whether I wanted to stay on as FBI Director, which I found strange because he had already told me twice in earlier conversations that he hoped I would stay, and I had assured him that I intended to. He said that lots of people wanted my job and, given the abuse I had taken during the previous year, he would understand if I wanted to walk away.

My instincts told me that the one-on-one setting, and the pretense that this was our first discussion about my position, meant the dinner was, at least in part, an effort to have me ask for my job and create some sort of patronage relationship. That concerned me greatly, given the FBI's traditionally independent status in the executive branch.
I replied that I loved my work and intended to stay and serve out my ten-year term as Director. And then, because the set-up made me uneasy, I added that I was not "reliable" in the way politicians use that word, but he could always count on me to tell him the truth. I added that I was not on anybody's side politically and could not be counted on in the traditional political sense, a stance I said was in his best interest as the President.

A few moments later, the President said, "I need loyalty, I expect loyalty." I didn't move, speak, or change my facial expression in any way during the awkward silence that followed. We simply looked at each other in silence. . . "

there's more

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on June 08, 2017, 12:05:03 AM
. . . It's so rampant that when I hear another report of an incident, my first thought is . . .

It's only "rampant" if your diet consists of nothing but fake news.
Have you lanced your pustules today?

James Comey's
"Shit Just Got Real" Tour
June 8th, 2017

LA Times front page
Read-um n weap fellas!

"You wanna keep your job?"
no I mean "You wanna keep your job, don't you?"

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on June 07, 2017, 09:50:46 PM
Um, the premise of his post was the caller was a student at the college, and wasn't a Trump supporter.  In other words one of the POS America haters there.

It's true, we really can't fix 'stupid'.

All the more Brain-Dead -- to put it mildy (both of you). But thanks for more insight into how your team's demented minds function.

Quote from: GravitySucks on June 07, 2017, 09:32:10 PM
I gave the snowflake 4 hours to take me up on my challenge, but no balls from the liberal shitslinger. I'll just make my own donation and ignore the libtard for awhile.

Didn't even see this, but it doesn't matter. Last time I checked, virtually all College/University students in the United States are of voting age (18 minimum) so the premiss of your challenge is fundamentally brain-dead.

Next.

[The Twenty-sixth Amendment (Amendment XXVI) to the United States Constitution prohibits the states and the federal government from using age as a reason for denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen years old.]