Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Gunner65

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 264
1
Radio and Podcasts / "Vinny Barbarick" responds
« on: Today at 07:33:15 AM »
"Vinny Barbarick" responds"


Barbarick (AKA Peter Moon) is a "writer" and self-publisher of science-fiction.  Noted for his book "The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Montauk_Project%3A_Experiments_in_Time
https://web.archive.org/web/20060427061111/http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id95/pg1/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment

Dietrich has had "Moon" on his shit-show several times and claims he is working with him to publish a book.

https://rkcolejr.blogspot.com/2019/04/douglas-dietrch-guest-peter-moon.html

https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17237

2
My Response to Peter Moon (aka: Vince Barbarick):

Regarding his FB post which promoted the (private/gifted) "Sora Aoi" FB page without naming Douglas Dietrich as being the actual source!


3
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: Yesterday at 04:25:12 PM »
If Dietrich was getting state help for mental illness most likely he  was receiving state subsidized psychiatric therapy and possibly medication for his problem with mandatory periodic evaluations to determine if he is still mentally ill. It is highly unlikely that the State of California would be willing to pay him money to live in an apartment and pay for utilities, receive food stamps if he was so mentally ill that he could not even do any work. If he is physically able to do work the state will insist that he get to work otherwise he will receive nothing, not even psychiatric care. Dietrich has to prove that he is physically disabled but we know that he is not and any competent doctor will give him a physical exam to verify his claims. The state of California has adopted the concept of workfare which is anyone applying for benefits must be willing to work at any job or even the jobs the state finds for them. Refusal to work means no benefits period. Welfare scammers like Dietrich cannot succeed so he must be living off some other source of income.
SSDI is a Federal program administered by the Social Security Administration and requires the involvement of a Judge assigned by the Social Security Administration to the State of California in order to adjudicate claims of applicants for SSDI.   https://www.ssa.gov/

Dietrich is not receiving assistance from the State of California which pays his rent or utilities. Dietrich would qualify for medical insurance via Medicaid and MediCal as well as food assistance and the issue of a cell phone to be used in case of emergency.

Apparently, you are choosing to ignore or reject the information I have provided in the previous post today.

4
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: Yesterday at 11:39:29 AM »
DD might qualify for SSDI if he is around 55 years old and PHYSICALLY disabled and can do only limited amounts of menial work or perhaps even no work if the disability is severe. But mental illness is in very murky waters since even mentally ill people have been shown to be able to work in most cases. If DD refuses or shows resistance to work then he probably would  not get any form of assistance from the state. How willing the state is going to help someone depends on that person's ability to generate revenue in taxes to pay back for all that assistance. If DD is a useless lazy mental case then he won't get any help and it will be up to his family or some charity group to help him. The state is not obligated to help anyone survive. They are to provide services to run a city and nothing more. Social Security was set up mainly to help the elderly to be able to retire and receive medical care but even that may not be enough to live on either.
I think you are confusing SSDI and SSI with regard to age requirements.  Here are a few links which will help clarify any confusion regarding SSDI/SSI benefit requirements.

What Is the Difference Between Social Security Disability (SSDI) and SSI?
https://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page5-13.html

Age Requirements for Disability Benefits
https://www.disabilitybenefitshome.com/eligibility/age-requirements-for-disability

The following links relate to Dietrichs' claims of receiving SSDI benefits as a result of being medically diagnosed and treated for a condition(s) which had prevented him from working for at least one year, and would expect to continue for the foreseeable future.  Unlike the VA which uses a rating scale of disability by percentage (and may involve being rated as having more than one condition,) SSDI is essentially a rating of "permanent and total" (100%) disability due to at least one condition for which there is medical evidence.

In Dietrich'case, he claims Combat-Related PTSD and damage to his lungs from exposure to Sarin gas, resulting in surgery for multiple pneumothorax events.  I have found no surgical procedure which involves the stapling of lung tissue into the ribcage through the chest wall ("pleura"), as Dietrich has described.  I believe, based on Dietrichs' ability to enter the USMC and participate in recruit training, that he had no physical issues up to the age of 21.  I believe that if he is truly receiving SSDI benefits it is likely due to a diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.



"The lungs sit in the chest, inside the ribcage. They are covered with a thin membrane called the “pleura.” The windpipe (or trachea) branches into smaller airways. In this drawing, 1 lung is normal, and 1 has collapsed because air has leaked out of it. The air that has leaked out of the lung (shown in blue) has filled the space outside of the lung."

Treatment and surgical procedure for pneumothorax:
https://www.drericlim.com/pneumothorax-surgery/
https://www.sclhealth.org/locations/medical-group-general-trauma-surgery/services/respiratory/lung-and-chest-conditions/collapsed-lung/

SSDI and PTSD:
https://www.disabilitysecrets.com/win-can-you-get-disability-for-ptsd.html
https://ptsdlawyers.com/blog/ssdi-and-va-benefits/
https://www.truehelp.com/understanding-ssdi/guidelines-by-disability/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd-and-social-security-disability-insurance/

5
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 05:50:17 PM »
SSDI is hardly enough money to live on in an expensive city like San Francisco. It cannot be done.
One would assume so.  But we know from BarnYardFire that he pays about 800.00 per month rent. He admits to receiving Meals On Wheels food and last night stated he was rated at 250% for medical benefits/treatment. (Medicaid and MediCal)

"The estimated average Social Security disability benefit amount for a disabled worker receiving Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) in Jan. 2019 is $1,234 per month, but a beneficiary can receive either less than this or up to $2,861. These benefits are based on average lifetime earnings, not on household income or how severe the individual's disability is."
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/082015/what-are-maximum-social-security-disability-benefits.asp

We also know, (by his own admissions on-air) that Dietrich receives a minimum of 200.00 per month from donations from fans/followers and likely a similar or larger amount from his sponsor Ben Astenius. 

In my opinion, Dietrich was already familiar with "working the system" of State and Federal benefits well before 2008.  And applied for SSDI following either a diagnosis of a disabling condition (either physical or mental) sometime after his rejection from USMC basic training.
Dietrich would not have been accepted into the Marines if he had any disabling condition. So whatever the cause of his "disability" occurred after 1988 and was not "service-related". 

Dietrich claims 2 disabling conditions: Combat PTSD and damaged lungs, to be "service-related".  If that were so, he would be dealing with the VA.  It is my opinion that his disability is due to a mental illness. Likely schizophrenia.

I can produce a time-line of sorts, but it is obvious to me that Dietrich was not able to be gainfully employed from 1988 to 1998 and his record of debt and liens and financial judgment by the State of California and a chapter 7 bankruptcy filing are all evidence of this.





6
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 05:27:15 PM »
I have researched all of this. I believe Dietrich has been receiving SSDI for nearly 20 years.  The problem with Dietrich is that his entire personae is a lie.  The best way to approach this shit is by considering the problem-solving technique of Occam's razor: "The simplest solution is most likely the right one."

Dietrich is disintegrating. And this recent admission, albeit subtle and poorly arranged, that he has been lying about his sister shows it.

7
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 04:57:33 PM »
If the sister and DD's parents rejected him years ago then we still have the question of where he is getting the money that is supporting him.
I don't believe Dietrichs' parents willed him any assets whatsoever beyond personal property.  I believe he is being truthful in saying his source of income is SSDI because that would also coincide with a diagnosis of being mentally ill.

I do not believe he was a qualified caretaker for both his parents for over a decade.  His previous statements regarding his sister would suggest she was deceased in the late 1990's before he began "caring for" his elderly parents.  I believe this to be a lie. Dietrich's' initial appearance on C2C was in 2008 after calling into the show for about a year. His father died in 2007. I believe his claims that Japan and the Axis won WW2 was likely one of the reasons he may have had family problems which continued until the death of his mother in 2011.  Keep in mind, Dietrich lived in the same apartment with his parents the entire time. 

The fact that Dietrich would use his fathers' name and perfect service record to introduce himself and bolster his credibility while lying about his own is not something family members would appreciate.  And to do this following the death of his father, claiming the Japs won WW2 would also not have been appreciated.  But Dietrich has gone much further than that in the past year, eventually rejecting his father and mother by claiming he is the biological son of Adolf Hitler.  You can bet his sister wants nothing whatsoever to do with him.

8
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 04:15:45 PM »
I wonder if Dietrich's sister is aware of what he was up to all these years. All the lies and terrible things he has been saying about her and their parents on the internet. She would probably not be too amused by this revelation and she could decide to cut Dietrich off from all monetary support and never speak to him again.
Then DD will end up as a filthy homeless street bum having to beg for change just to survive.
I believe something occurred years ago between Dietrich and his sister which resulted in her rejection of him.  I think there was a problem with Dietrich and his family and likely connected to his apparent mental illness.  I don't know if she is aware of the things he has said about his own family, but if she is, it means Dietrich is aware of it and might be attempting to punish her in some sick way by saying she is dead.

This is why I did not mention anything Dietrich has claimed in my letter to her. The fact is, we may never know the truth unless she chooses to respond.

What I do know is that Dietrich is now aware of my investigation and is hinting that his sister is alive!  This is very important because he is not admitting he lied, he is twisting the lie by saying she is "officially or publicly" deceased, which is also not true but serves his intent to cover his ass!  Dietrich could have presented evidence:  He didn't.  Dietrich could have accused me of stalking a dead relative: He didn't. 

What Dietrich is implying now is that his sister is alive, but is somehow "publicly or officially" listed as being deceased.  This makes no sense at all.

9
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:56:33 AM »
Yesterday at 05:34:33 PM »

"Note:  There is also the fact that we have a consistent number of guests visiting this thread, some of whom may be communicating with Dietrich.
In either case, there has been no mention by Dietrich himself who could present evidence which proves I am wrong, or admit he has been lying about her being dead for some reason and then accuse me of stalking her."




(5:33:00 - 5:38:00) Dietrich mentions his sister at 5:36:00

10
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 10:16:57 AM »


Dietrich admits his sister is not dead!

During his bizarre birthday shit-show, Dietrich regurgitated and embellished upon the ridiculous claim that he has a "device" called the "VOX ARCHA" which gives him the power to destroy the entire world. 

But this time, Dietrich claims that his elder sister has an exact copy of the device!  He has never made this claim in any of his previous and rare mentions of his sister.  Dietrich is now claiming that she is "publicly or officially dead" (whatever the fuck that means).  Which is total bullshit because my recent investigation indicates the complete opposite!  I have found no public or official record showing she is deceased!

"And my' publicly decedent' sister, my sister known to be dead 'officially', holds the replicated redundancy mechanism."

11
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:24:01 AM »
This is an attack on Aquino and a threat to others

Dietirch claims he rescued hundred of these: mannequins from the Presidio

12
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:13:24 AM »
There is no "Vox Arca".  This is Dietrich vomiting his lies.  It is time for people to expose Dietrich.

HIS SISTER HOLDS THE MECHANISM?

13
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:09:03 AM »
Dietrich is a rat who is hiding from the rest of the world.  While he snivels and snorts and drewels his insane bull shit.

14
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:46:19 PM »
Dietrich is ranting about satanic ritual abuse and continues to lie.   He will eventually regret his claims regarding May Brussel.


15
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:35:20 PM »
The man pictured in a photo seated on the starboard bow of the Snark was called "Nature Man"


16
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:21:43 PM »
When I was in college I came across the writings of Jack London and his gaff-rigged yacht the "Snark". 



17
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:11:37 PM »
The main-top-mast hasn't been stepped.  The fore-top & mizzen-top masts have been stepped in that picture.

It is a bit odd, but maybe the photograph was taken in the middle of the top-mast stepping process...
I will look into this. I think she was a beautiful ship though. Sleek.

What is your best design?  Cutter? Schooner?

I prefer the two-masted schooner, but I just love wooden ships.

18
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 11:01:50 PM »

19
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:57:59 PM »
Even the terms used to refer to ships (nautical) has become "archchaic": Masts and rigging, types of sails, types of ships.  All of it is now lost to history.

20
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:52:33 PM »
Wooden ship modelling is a dying art.  And I am not claiming to be an expert.  It is just my love of ships etc.  I was offered over 1k for the1:48  model of Hokulea 1.  I turned it down.

21
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:46:45 PM »
I liked building models like most boys, but my older brother was a fanatic. Unfortunately for him I liked blowing up models. He used to get so pissed at me!
I built plastic models of WW2 Navy aircraft in the 1970's. I had a collection of about 25 (mostly 1:48) I came home on leave one year to find my younger brothers had gotten hold of them and "bastardized" or destroyed them.  I have never forgiven them.

22
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:26:36 PM »
YES!


23
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:22:44 PM »
We should create a new thread about the history of old wooden ships!  I would much rather discuss this than Douglas Dietrich!

I have "kit" models I can build this winter. It is a dying art. I have a "workshop" and tools. I am sure WAN would be interested. Just a thought.

24
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:21:36 PM »
The main-top-mast hasn't been stepped.  The fore-top & mizzen-top masts have been stepped in that picture.

It is a bit odd, but maybe the photograph was taken in the middle of the top-mast stepping process...
During the period that wooden ships were being "modified" for steam power and required a "stack" normally replacing the "mainmast"

26
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 10:06:14 PM »
GOOD EYE!  What I am trying to focus on here is why Dietrich would claim ANY relation to this ship. I am also a wooden ship modeler. Your perception of Masts and rigging is accurate. It was a  three-masted "square-rigger"1886.

https://www.nps.gov/safr/learn/historyculture/balclutha.htm


27
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 09:56:50 PM »

28
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 09:51:13 PM »
I think he was referring to this ship by that name anchored in the bay:           https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balclutha_(1886)
Yes! He did!   He claims he swam to it!  As a "test" prior to his going to "USMC boot camp"

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Location_map_San_Francisco_County.png

29
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 09:45:50 PM »
My research shows he enlisted in the "delayed entry program" (DEP) on October 20, 1986.  In Oakland, CA. And reported to MCRD San Diego, CA on October 20, 1987.  He was given an Entry Level Separation (ELS) in January 1988.

30
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Critical Omissions with Douglas Dietrich
« on: October 20, 2019, 09:42:58 PM »
You can "look this up" Pelayo: Where is Balclutha Island relative to San Francisco? And if he enlisted in Oakland this claim is also total bullshit!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 264