Quote from: 21st Century Man on February 23, 2016, 12:30:21 AMDo you also swallow the worm?
I'll settle for some tequila.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: 21st Century Man on February 23, 2016, 12:30:21 AMDo you also swallow the worm?
I'll settle for some tequila.
Quote from: 21st Century Man on February 23, 2016, 12:07:49 AMMétetelo por el culo
Did bellgab go down for anybody else?
Quote from: Juan Cena on February 22, 2016, 11:46:51 PMthat's Keith
Is that Cruz or Rubio in your avatar?
QuoteThe Vaimānika Śāstra (वैमानिक शास्त्र, lit. "shastra on the topic of Vimanas"; or "science of aeronautics", sometimes also rendered Vimanika, Vymanika, Vyamanika) is an early 20th-century Sanskrit text on aerospace technology. It makes the claim that the vimānas mentioned in ancient Sanskrit epics were advanced aerodynamic flying vehicles.
The existence of the text was revealed in 1952 by G. R. Josyer who asserted that it was written by Pandit Subbaraya Shastry (1866â€"1940), who dictated it during the years 1918â€"1923. A Hindi translation was published in 1959, while the Sanskrit text with an English translation was published in 1973. It contains 3000 shlokas in 8 chapters which Shastry claimed was psychically delivered to him by the ancient Hindu sage Bharadvaja.[1] The text has gained favor among proponents of ancient astronaut theories.
A study by aeronautical and mechanical engineering researchers at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, in 1974 concluded that the aircraft described in the text were "poor concoctions" and that the author showed a complete lack of understanding of aeronautics. Regarding the "Rukma Vimana", the study noted, "If the craft is taken to mean what the drawing and the text say, it can be stated that the craft is a decided impossibility".[2]
Quote from: Usagi on June 07, 2012, 07:46:33 PM
We need more awesome undefeatable Czech heroes on this forum. Bring 'round the wagons!
Quote"Despite the recent Climategate emails, I still believe in man-made climate change, because you just can't change science".
Quote from: MV on June 08, 2012, 10:26:06 AMactually I just copied and pasted the text from the youtube clip. I thought it was the whole movie actually and would be interesting to this thread here. Unfortunately it's just teasers as I saw later.
what you said above is just silly talk. all available evidence? really? the problem with you and people LIKE you is,blablabla
Quote from: MV on June 07, 2012, 10:00:33 PMactually the quote i posted was from Wikipedia. I think I chose it because guys like you only believe what's written in Dumbstream Media like CNN, MSNBC or Wikipedia.
where did the above quote come from, by the way? i see it says the committee offered theories. good for them... but that doesn't really mean much.
the wikipedia article on this incident is really well written and sourced. as you'll hopefully learn by reading it, the reasons and circumstances behind the attack weren't nearly as simple as you suggest.
oh, wait... i forgot... wikipedia is never accurate. alright. you win.
Quotei'm not sure what your point was in posting it. did israel deny culpability? did they deny shooting up the vessel? i'm not aware they did, so to "hold israel to be culpable" isn't exactly news.Apparently they were caught in the act by a Russian ship, and denying is a bit hard then. Also they failed to sink the ship and kill all the US sailors.
QuoteThis is not a bullshit discussion about "Israels global role in 2012". This topic is about the USS Liberty. It's a good example to explain to morons like you how governments kill their own people in order to further an agenda. The chess term "pawn sacrifice" isn't only a tactic in a boardgame. About time you get this through your head.
oh... not to mention the fact that this was like... uhh, 45 years ago? doesn't that render it slightly irrelevant to the discussion of israel's global role in 2012?
Quotethe uss liberty attack is not something to base today's foreign policy on which is what i think you're suggesting should happen.I'm not suggesting that at all.
Quote from: BobGrau on June 08, 2012, 05:38:14 AMactually it does not stay in the same place. it rotates around our galaxy among other things.
Thing is, my friend, the sun does not rise in the morning. It stays in the same place and we turn towards it.
Quote from: MV on June 07, 2012, 03:29:10 PMMan, sometimes I feel like explaining to kids why the sun rises in the morning.
who did israel blame for the incident? i watched the news segment you posted, and they said israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity. i heard nothing about israel blaming someone else for it.
well then. case closed.
QuoteAdmiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a critic of the official United States Government version of events, chaired a non-governmental investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty in 2003. The committee, which included former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia James E. Akins, held Israel to be culpable and suggested several theories for Israel's possible motives, including the desire to blame Egypt and bring the U.S. into the Six Day War.
Quote from: Oversoul on June 07, 2012, 02:03:40 AMI kinda believe in a Universal god, but more in the way people like Nassim Haramein explain it (basically we're all a part of God because he's infinite). I know Nassim may be a bit of a charlatan in some ways, but he's a good storyteller.
The "Big Guy" does NOT work that way. The MEN who claim to speak in its behalf are the ones who cause and do it The "Big Guy" transcends all that human crap.
Quote from: Sardondi on June 06, 2012, 07:22:34 PMYou could have dropped a MOAB on the building where Bush sr. dined with the whole fucking Bin Laden Clan.
Regardless of the reasons for getting in, and there were several which made it virtually mandatory
Quote from: Sardondi on June 06, 2012, 07:22:34 PM
IMO Bush ultimately wanted to fundamentally change the nature of the Middle East, which I believe was hopelessly and shockingly naive. But there was the great unspoken reason which has resulted in an indisputable benefit.
Because there are millions of, yes, say it, Muslims who have committed their lives to the literal, physical destruction of the West. Everything you and I take for granted and love about about the liberties and glories of Western culture, they despise with an eternal, unchangeable enmity. And they're going to try to destroy the west for generations. But the good thing is about Iraq and Afghanistan, we killed a ton of them there, and not in London or New York.
"War for oil", my sweet fanny. Get some new slogans.
QuoteNo, the good thing is that you don't realize that you're a dumb ignorant POS, or you might shoot yourself.
But the good thing is about Iraq and Afghanistan, we killed a ton of them there, and not in London or New York.
Quote from: Zircon on June 06, 2012, 09:17:24 AMActually the war against Germany was declared for one major reason: Keeping the Money power in place. Hitler had begun to issue real German "money" instead of the fraudulent Federal Reserve like "issued debt" by the so called "Deutsche Reichsbank". So the USA basically shot themselves in the foot by declaring war on Germany instead of Great Britain and the Soviet Union.
We bailed your asses out of two world wars where the Germans were beating the shit out of you
Quote from: b_dubb on June 05, 2012, 10:48:41 AMCan't help it, I'm Miss South Carolina, you know, some Americans don't _have_ maps, so they can't find the Iraq on a map.
I'm glad you picked up on the sincerity in that post. cause I was totally being sincere. just like now
Quote from: b_dubb on June 04, 2012, 06:54:35 AMactually I just like to inject wording like that so I can have my own little fun when somebody again falls into my honeytrap and thinks I'm Jones or one of his minions. I'm really David Duke, can't you tell?
uhhh ... Alex?
of course it's him. how could an ego like that not go around the net ... visiting every little nook and cranny ... spreading his brand of crazy cream cheese? further feeding enormous ego?