• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - alejandro

#1
Quote from: 21st Century Man on February 23, 2016, 12:30:21 AM
I'll settle for some tequila.
Do you also swallow the worm?
#2
What the demonios did I just want to say? I forgot everything. I think my brains also rebooted.
#3
Quote from: 21st Century Man on February 23, 2016, 12:07:49 AM
Did bellgab go down for anybody else?
Métetelo por el culo
Now I have to write my comment again. I just wrote the greatest thing evar, and BANG servero mierda.
#4
Heather is still too focused on how her voice sounds on radio,
so her brain has no capacity left to ask critical questions.
#5
Quote from: Juan Cena on February 22, 2016, 11:46:51 PM
Is that Cruz or Rubio in your avatar?
that's Keith
#6
Cremo is a total hoaxer. He even quotes from this "Sanskrit" Text that some goofball bitch "channelled" in the 1920's or so, without saying that it's totally made up. It's the one that talks about UFOs and how they are powered.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaim%C4%81nika_Sh%C4%81stra
that one.

QuoteThe Vaimānika Śāstra (वैमानिक शास्त्र, lit. "shastra on the topic of Vimanas"; or "science of aeronautics", sometimes also rendered Vimanika, Vymanika, Vyamanika) is an early 20th-century Sanskrit text on aerospace technology. It makes the claim that the vimānas mentioned in ancient Sanskrit epics were advanced aerodynamic flying vehicles.

The existence of the text was revealed in 1952 by G. R. Josyer who asserted that it was written by Pandit Subbaraya Shastry (1866â€"1940), who dictated it during the years 1918â€"1923. A Hindi translation was published in 1959, while the Sanskrit text with an English translation was published in 1973. It contains 3000 shlokas in 8 chapters which Shastry claimed was psychically delivered to him by the ancient Hindu sage Bharadvaja.[1] The text has gained favor among proponents of ancient astronaut theories.

A study by aeronautical and mechanical engineering researchers at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, in 1974 concluded that the aircraft described in the text were "poor concoctions" and that the author showed a complete lack of understanding of aeronautics. Regarding the "Rukma Vimana", the study noted, "If the craft is taken to mean what the drawing and the text say, it can be stated that the craft is a decided impossibility".[2]
#7
Politics / Re: Who Will You Vote For in 2012?
June 09, 2012, 07:58:50 PM
Quote from: Usagi on June 07, 2012, 07:46:33 PM

We need more awesome undefeatable Czech heroes on this forum.  Bring 'round the wagons!
#8
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell
June 08, 2012, 05:03:02 PM
just heard Art's "reasoning" about global man made climate change (2010 show).

freely from memory he said something like:
Quote"Despite the recent Climategate emails, I still believe in man-made climate change, because you just can't change science".

I think that comment and such an opinion are typical for Art's arrogance and ignorance. The UN paid scientists pretty much doctored up their whole graphs about climate change, but Art claims that science is with his opinion still despite he doesn't know shit about how they doctored up the whole thing in the first place most likely.

Art Bell has been a moron and totally wrong in so many things, but always presents his opinions like a god who can't possibly be wrong with his nasal aristocrat like voice, like when he said Obama is the best thing since sliced bread, or when he supports all the wars the US Administration started.
#9
Quote from: MV on June 08, 2012, 10:26:06 AM
what you said above is just silly talk.  all available evidence?  really?  the problem with you and people LIKE you is,blablabla
actually I just copied and pasted the text from the youtube clip. I thought it was the whole movie actually and would be interesting to this thread here. Unfortunately it's just teasers as I saw later.

Anyway, I am not a Diana fan or care much about the case, but I believe they did murder her. You think people can't put evidence into place so that it looks like an accident with a drunk driver? If you think about it, the death of Diana was the best thing that could happen to the Royal house. If she had not died, there would have been years of scandal that the Princess fucks with a Muslim, Prince Charles getting horned and being a douche. People might even have realized that the Royals are not better than any other people, and just are in power because their ancestors were more criminal than normal people. The death of Di made the smallfolk not realize all of this and diverted their attention into  some kind of cult lifting Diana up to be some kind of Holy Mary struck by fate. A tragic story that they love to weep about when reading their boulevard press crap.
#10
As Britain remains busy celebrating the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee this year, many of her subjects remain ignorant and blissfully unaware of the brutal, staged incident in Paris which took the life of Princess Diana only a few short years ago. All available evidence now points overwhelmingly to a cold-blooded murder and cover-up which was then used as a giant psy-op against the world public.

Didn't watch this yet. maybe some are interested.


Part 1 - The Unlawful Killing Film of Princess Diana (Sneak Preview)

Part 2 - The Unlawful Killing Film of Princess Diana (Sneak Preview)
#11
I wrote 'most likely', you dumb ass.

Do you believe they mistook the ships identity, esp. after watching the documentary and hearing all the survivors accounts? If you refuse to inform yourself about the case, shut the fuck up moron and stay in your fantasy world.

Gee, I just stabbed my wife 30 times with a butchers knife, but hey I mistook her as a roastbeef. so sorry... ::)
#12
Quote from: MV on June 07, 2012, 10:00:33 PM
where did the above quote come from, by the way?  i see it says the committee offered theories.  good for them... but that doesn't really mean much.
the wikipedia article on this incident is really well written and sourced.  as you'll hopefully learn by reading it, the reasons and circumstances behind the attack weren't nearly as simple as you suggest. 
oh, wait... i forgot... wikipedia is never accurate.  alright.  you win.
actually the quote i posted was from Wikipedia. I think I chose it because guys like you only believe what's written in Dumbstream Media like CNN, MSNBC or Wikipedia.

Quotei'm not sure what your point was in posting it.  did israel deny culpability?  did they deny shooting up the vessel?  i'm not aware they did, so to "hold israel to be culpable" isn't exactly news.
Apparently they were caught in the act by a Russian ship, and denying is a bit hard then. Also they failed to sink the ship and kill all the US sailors.

Quote
oh... not to mention the fact that this was like... uhh, 45 years ago?  doesn't that render it slightly irrelevant to the discussion of israel's global role in 2012?
This is not a bullshit discussion about "Israels global role in 2012". This topic is about the USS Liberty. It's a good example to explain to morons like you how governments kill their own people in order to further an agenda. The chess term "pawn sacrifice" isn't only a tactic in a boardgame. About time you get this through your head.

Quotethe uss liberty attack is not something to base today's foreign policy on which is what i think you're suggesting should happen.
I'm not suggesting that at all.

What I want to know from you though is: Do you really believe it was "an accident" that the Israelis attacked a ship flying US colors for 2 hours, even strafing lifeboats with machine-guns?

#13
Quote from: BobGrau on June 08, 2012, 05:38:14 AM

Thing is, my friend, the sun does not rise in the morning. It stays in the same place and we turn towards it.
actually it does not stay in the same place. it rotates around our galaxy among other things.
#14
It's good to be on the fringe when you live in an Idiocracy
#15
Quote from: MV on June 07, 2012, 03:29:10 PM
who did israel blame for the incident?  i watched the news segment you posted, and they said israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity.  i heard nothing about israel blaming someone else for it.
well then.  case closed.
Man, sometimes I feel like explaining to kids why the sun rises in the morning.
QuoteAdmiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a critic of the official United States Government version of events, chaired a non-governmental investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty in 2003. The committee, which included former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia James E. Akins, held Israel to be culpable and suggested several theories for Israel's possible motives, including the desire to blame Egypt and bring the U.S. into the Six Day War.

So either the US Administration wanted the Israelis to attack the ship, or the US Administration simply is subservient to Israel. They only broke off the attack because a Russian ship got close and witnessed what was going on there. If they had succeeded in killing all the US sailors they would most likely have blamed Egypt or some other 3rd party.


Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty
here's another movie about it.
#16

Israel's deadly attack on USS Liberty emerges from the past


Israeli attack on USS Liberty (US Navy ship)

As we all can see with this example. The US and their so called ally Israel don't hesitate one moment to slaughter a bunch of their own military men if they intend to blame a 3rd party to get some justification for the stupid public for a war.

Basically the same thing happened on 9/11. Deal with it.
#17
Quote from: Oversoul on June 07, 2012, 02:03:40 AM
The "Big Guy" does NOT work that way.  The MEN who claim to speak in its behalf are the ones who cause and do it  The "Big Guy" transcends all that human crap.
I kinda believe in a Universal god, but more in the way people like Nassim Haramein explain it (basically we're all a part of God because he's infinite). I know Nassim may be a bit of a charlatan in some ways, but he's a good storyteller.
The "Big guy" from the old testament, torah and Koran that people pray to and who demands sacrifice and likes killing so much may well be an ancient alien entity who genetically fucked with human DNA in our past. Definitely an infinite god who created the Universe doesn't have a human ego that requires sheep being slaughtered and people getting butchered who don't worship him.

#18
Quote from: Sardondi on June 06, 2012, 07:22:34 PM
Regardless of the reasons for getting in, and there were several which made it virtually mandatory
You could have dropped a MOAB on the building where Bush sr. dined with the whole fucking Bin Laden Clan.
You know Bush - Bin Laden they're old business partners from Carlyle Group.
"Al Qaeda" blows up stuff in Saudi Arabia - Saudi Bin-Ladin Group gets the contract to rebuild it.

Al Qaeda is nothing but the fucking Executioners for the CIA and the Mossad. You'd have less terror if you blew up the CIA and stopped all support for Israel.

So your good reason to attack Iraq and Afghanistan was that your own guys attacked you on 9/11.

Quote from: Sardondi on June 06, 2012, 07:22:34 PM
IMO Bush ultimately wanted to fundamentally change the nature of the Middle East, which I believe was hopelessly and shockingly naive. But there was the great unspoken reason which has resulted in an indisputable benefit.
Because there are millions of, yes, say it, Muslims who have committed their lives to the literal, physical destruction of the West. Everything you and I take for granted and love about about the liberties and glories of Western culture, they despise with an eternal, unchangeable enmity. And they're going to try to destroy the west for generations. But the good thing is about Iraq and Afghanistan, we killed a ton of them there, and not in London or New York.

"War for oil", my sweet fanny. Get some new slogans.

Bush jr. is a moronic no-good for anything son of his CIA daddy who was pretty much involved in the JFK assassination and the failed Anti-Cuba crap they pulled.
What "benefit" did you get out of anything? You pay MORE for oil, and when you travel to any muslim country the people there pretty much want to kill you when they realize you're American or British. Remember the old movies from the 40's and 50's where quotes like "I am an American" resulted in smiles and admiration? These "evil muslims" that you applaud being killed by the tons weren't always hating "the free west". There's a reason they hate America, and a good one. Your fucking CIA and military pretty much fucked them in the ass for the bigger part of the last century, even destroying a pro-western evolving Republic in Iran because the Iranians didn't think it was a good deal that British Petroleum and American Oil companies stole all their oil and they got peanuts in return.

Quote
But the good thing is about Iraq and Afghanistan, we killed a ton of them there, and not in London or New York.
No, the good thing is that you don't realize that you're a dumb ignorant POS, or you might shoot yourself.
#19
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Alex Jones
June 06, 2012, 09:29:00 AM
Alex Jones doesn't even have the decency to let a man eat his lunch, because he always thinks he's the most important thing everywhere he goes.
#20
Quote from: Zircon on June 06, 2012, 09:17:24 AM
We bailed your asses out of two world wars where the Germans were beating the shit out of you
Actually the war against Germany was declared for one major reason: Keeping the Money power in place. Hitler had begun to issue real German "money" instead of the fraudulent Federal Reserve like "issued debt" by the so called "Deutsche Reichsbank". So the USA basically shot themselves in the foot by declaring war on Germany instead of Great Britain and the Soviet Union.
#21
Does the Queen really think she's a true descendant of the Israelites?
Heard something about that stone under the throne has to do with it too.

example claims: http://destination-yisrael.biblesearchers.com/destination-yisrael/2011/05/memories-of-the-royal-israelite-wedding-british-prince-william-and-catherine-middleton-of-the-tribe-.html

Before 1900 private guests and 2 billion people around the world, the royal House of Windsor, represents the only reigning monarch of the ancient dynasty of Kings David and Solomon.  It set the stage for the Davidian Dynasty to continue now through Prince William and his Israelite bride, Catherine Middleton.

#22
1. So Lady Di was a noble already. Good, then they only killed her for divorce intentions and betrayal.
2. interesting. why do they need blondes?
3. you say the majority of Brits don't like the Royals? Possibly, then you really got total Propaganda news all over.
4. I don't know much about Diamonds.

Why can't you kick the Royals out, declare a Republic or something, and make them commoners too plus confiscate all their land holdings and turn them into public parks?
#23
I guess Dickhead Prince Charles is in disgrace because he dared to marry a commoner from the "smallfolk". Of course they murdered here later because Diana dared to make out with a Muslim and dishonor the Royal family.
The British Royals are a major pain in the ass, but the brainwashed Brits seem to love them - at least that's what we hear in the media, so it may also be a load of horsedung. But I guess the brainwashing just works there.

Also funny of course, that the Windsors are more German than English and just took the new name after "von Saxen-Koburg" seemed a bad idea during the war with Germany.

So in a nutshell the Brits are shelling out a bunch of taxpayer money to support parasites who consider their subjects as inferior dumb cockroaches, but hey they get a party and some big festivals to worship their leaders once a year.
This is what you want - this is what you get!


THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT THIS IS WHAT YOU GET.wmv
#24
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell Stream!
June 06, 2012, 06:39:29 AM
Thanks a lot for the stream, it's also nice to be surprised of course.
Saves me from trying to get a full Art Bell mp3 collection again. how many gigs would that be btw?
#25
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell Stream!
June 06, 2012, 12:22:52 AM
why not play them in chronological order?

Often a topic is covered in sequential shows, or Art says "we'll have guest xy on tomorrow". It's just such a tease to hear it and then I can't hear it. If you're shuffling every days you're also getting too many damn repeats.
#26
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Alex Jones
June 05, 2012, 01:28:54 PM
I am slightly irritated because Jim Tucker hast Tortillas with Salsa instead of eyeballs.
#27
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Alex Jones
June 05, 2012, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: b_dubb on June 05, 2012, 10:48:41 AM
I'm glad you picked up on the sincerity in that post. cause I was totally being sincere. just like now
Can't help it, I'm Miss South Carolina, you know, some Americans don't _have_ maps, so they can't find the Iraq on a map.
#28
Radio and Podcasts / JBWells hosts Alex Jones!
June 05, 2012, 10:40:58 AM
Noted radio and television host John B. Wells guest hosts the Alex Jones Show today, Tuesday, June 5. Alex hosts the second hour of today's show from the road via video Skype as he works his way back to Texas from the 2012 Bilderberg confab in Virginia. Wells is heard on radio and television stations throughout the United States, Europe, Asia, South Africa, Australia, and South America, and is one of the world's most recognized voice artists. He talks with Theresa Dale, Ph.D., about the effects of Fukushima radiation, and Craig B Hulet, an expert on government policy, international relations, and terrorism. Mr. Hulet will talk about the NDAA.

http://www.infowars.com/

NOW LIVE!

[playlist]
NumberOfEntries=9
File1=http://stream.infowars.com
Title1=www.infowars.com
Length1=-1
File2=http://stream1.infowars.com
Title2=www.infowars.com
Length2=-1
File3=http://stream2.infowars.com
Title3=www.infowars.com
Length3=-1
File4=http://stream.infowars.com
Title4=www.infowars.com
Length4=-1
File5=http://stream1.infowars.com
Title5=www.infowars.com
Length5=-1
File6=http://stream2.infowars.com
Title6=www.infowars.com
Length6=-1
File7=http://freespeech.ic.llnwd.net/stream/freespeech_thealexjonesshow32k
Title7=www.infowars.com
Length7=-1
File8=http://stream.infowars.com
Title8=www.infowars.com
Length8=-1
File9=http://freespeech.ic.llnwd.net/stream/freespeech_thealexjonesshow16k
Title9=www.infowars.com
Length9=-1
Version=2
#29
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Ron Paul Murder Plot
June 05, 2012, 09:34:26 AM
Quote from: b_dubb on June 04, 2012, 06:54:35 AM
uhhh ... Alex?
of course it's him.  how could an ego like that not go around the net ... visiting every little nook and cranny ... spreading his brand of crazy cream cheese?  further feeding enormous ego?
actually I just like to inject wording like that so I can have my own little fun when somebody again falls into my honeytrap and thinks I'm Jones or one of his minions. I'm really David Duke, can't you tell?
#30
hating on George Noory is antisemitic! he's a minority and shouldn't be discriminated like this. I bet you really just hit on him because of his Jewish nose.
Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod